National Academies Press: OpenBook

Building and Measuring Community Resilience: Actions for Communities and the Gulf Research Program (2019)

Chapter: Appendix E: Other Communities Considered by the Committee

« Previous: Appendix D: Communities the Committee Visited
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Other Communities Considered by the Committee." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Building and Measuring Community Resilience: Actions for Communities and the Gulf Research Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25383.
×

Appendix E

Other Communities Considered by the Committee

As part of its ground truthing of community resilience efforts in communities, the committee considered community work being undertaking by the National Academy of Sciences’ Resilient America Program and the National Institute of Standards and Technology. The Resilient America Roundtable launched a community pilot program in 2014 that partnered with local stakeholders in four communities—Cedar Rapids, Iowa; Central Puget Sound region, Washington; Charleston, South Carolina; and Tulsa, Oklahoma—to enhance and build their resilience. In 2015, the National Institute of Standards and Technology worked with the Boulder County Collaborative to develop a Resilient Design Performance Standard.

BOULDER, COLORADO

Colorado experiences a variety of disasters including blizzards, tornadoes, wildfires, floods and earthquakes. After the September 2013 floods, the state turned its attention to resilience building and developed the Colorado Resiliency Framework,1 which became the marching orders for reconstruction after the floods. Boulder became a member of the Rockefeller 100 Resilient Cities initiative in 2014 and released its resilience strategy in 2016. Two of its resilience challenges are: (1) the exacerbation of natural hazards (e.g., flooding, wildfires) from climate change, and (2) the link between ecological and social stresses with hazards and their negative impact on each other. Box 2-4 (Chapter 2) discusses

___________________

1 See https://sites.google.com/a/state.co.us/coloradounited/resiliency-framework?mobile=true.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Other Communities Considered by the Committee." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Building and Measuring Community Resilience: Actions for Communities and the Gulf Research Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25383.
×

the implementation of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Community Resilience Planning Guide in Boulder County.

CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA

Cedar Rapids’ devastating flood of 2008, a Presidentially Declared Disaster, was the defining disaster for the city. The Cedar River crested just above 31 feet, 12 feet higher than the previous record, resulting in overtopped levees and major damage to homes and businesses. The floodwaters devastated more than 10 square miles of the city and displaced about 10,000 residents.2 More than $5.4 billion in flood losses were reported, and city buildings outside of the 500-year floodplain (e.g., Linn County Sheriff’s Office and Mercy Medical Center) were seriously damaged. Since the 2008 floods, Cedar Rapids has made significant progress toward flood mitigation and recovery (e.g., by installing a comprehensive flood control system),3 and continues its efforts to become more prepared and build resilience to future floods and other hazards. In 2016, the Cedar River crested at 21.97 feet, the second-highest river crest in the city’s history. The city was well prepared and weathered that flood relatively unscathed.

CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGION, WASHINGTON

The Central Puget Sound Region includes King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish counties. Communities in the region face a variety of hazards including earthquakes, snow, ice, landslides, sea level rise, flooding, windstorms, and wild fires. The 2014 Oso landslide4 destroyed 40 homes, dammed the North Fork Stillaguamish River, and flooded numerous other homes and buildings; 43 residents lost their lives (USGS, 2015). The Hanukkah Eve windstorm in 2006 resulted in 14 deaths, millions of people without electricity for days, and hundreds of millions of dollars in damage (Wilma, 2006). And, the 6.8 magnitude Nisqually Earthquake in 2001 left about 400 people injured, damaged and destroyed buildings and roads, and resulted in billions of dollars in damage. Efforts are under way in the region to create a fully operational Earthquake Early Warning System (a.k.a., ShakeAlert™).5 To reduce flood risk, Pierce County has partnered with a number of agencies and organizations to complete floodplain remediation projects as part of its Floodplains for the Future Program.6 And the Snohomish County’s Sustainable Lands Strategy is a multistakeholder effort of municipal,

___________________

2 See http://www.cedar-rapids.org/discover_cedar_rapids/flood_of_2008/2008_flood_facts.php.

3 See http://www.cedar-rapids.org/local_government/departments_g_-_v/public_works/cedar_river_flood_control_system.php.

4 See http://old.seattletimes.com/flatpages/local/oso-mudslide-coverage.html.

5 For information about ShakeAlert™: https://www.shakealert.org.

6 See http://www.co.pierce.wa.us/4684/Floodplains-for-the-Future.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Other Communities Considered by the Committee." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Building and Measuring Community Resilience: Actions for Communities and the Gulf Research Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25383.
×

state, federal, and tribal partners working to identify solutions that are beneficial for fishing, farming, and flooding.7

CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA

Since the landmark disaster of Hurricane Hugo in 1989, Charleston has experienced several notable flood events: historic rainfall in October 2015, Hurricane Matthew in 2016, and Hurricane Irma in 2017. In recent years, the city has demonstrated a commitment to flood resilience. For example, in December 2015, the city identified sea level rise as a top priority in its first Sea Level Rise Strategy. Additionally, a volunteer group of individuals representing public, private, and nonprofit organizations created the Charleston Resilience Network.8 The network is working to enhance resilience in the community by sharing information, educating stakeholders, and fostering a unified strategy. The Charleston Resilience Network is also working on resilience projects including Building Community Resilience to Water-Related Hazards in the Charleston, SC Region and Development of Multi-hazard Coastal Resiliency Assessment and Adaptation Indices and Tools for the Charleston, SC Region. The city hired its first chief resilience officer in early 2017.

TULSA, OKLAHOMA

Tulsa experienced a devastating flood in 1984 that resulted in 14 deaths and $180 million in damage. As a result, the city implemented a major flood control program that included buyouts, comprehensive stormwater management, and a flood control system.9 In 2014, the city became a member of the Rockefeller Foundation’s 100 Resilient Cities initiative. The success of the flood control program has allowed the city to now focus on other challenges and priorities. In a state where city budgets are largely based on yearly sales-tax revenues, these revenues can be a primary determinant for how and whether a community is able to take action to build resilience to hazards. In recent years, Tulsa has experienced budget fluctuations in its yearly sales tax revenues, which can jeopardize the city’s ability to provide critical services. Thus, economic resilience is one of the city’s key priorities.

___________________

7 For information about the Sustainable Lands Strategy, see https://snohomishcountywa.gov/2194/37813/Sustainable-Lands-Strategy.

8 For more information about the Charleston Resilience Network, see http://www.charlestonresilience.net.

9 See https://www.cityoftulsa.org/government/departments/engineering-services/flood-control/flooding-history.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Other Communities Considered by the Committee." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Building and Measuring Community Resilience: Actions for Communities and the Gulf Research Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25383.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Other Communities Considered by the Committee." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Building and Measuring Community Resilience: Actions for Communities and the Gulf Research Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25383.
×
Page 131
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Other Communities Considered by the Committee." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Building and Measuring Community Resilience: Actions for Communities and the Gulf Research Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25383.
×
Page 132
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Other Communities Considered by the Committee." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Building and Measuring Community Resilience: Actions for Communities and the Gulf Research Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25383.
×
Page 133
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Other Communities Considered by the Committee." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Building and Measuring Community Resilience: Actions for Communities and the Gulf Research Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25383.
×
Page 134
Building and Measuring Community Resilience: Actions for Communities and the Gulf Research Program Get This Book
×
 Building and Measuring Community Resilience: Actions for Communities and the Gulf Research Program
Buy Paperback | $60.00 Buy Ebook | $48.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The frequency and severity of disasters over the last few decades have presented unprecedented challenges for communities across the United States. In 2005, Hurricane Katrina exposed the complexity and breadth of a deadly combination of existing community stressors, aging infrastructure, and a powerful natural hazard. In many ways, the devastation of Hurricane Katrina was a turning point for understanding and managing disasters, as well as related plan making and policy formulation. It brought the phrase "community resilience" into the lexicon of disaster management.

Building and Measuring Community Resilience: Actions for Communities and the Gulf Research Program summarizes the existing portfolio of relevant or related resilience measurement efforts and notes gaps and challenges associated with them. It describes how some communities build and measure resilience and offers four key actions that communities could take to build and measure their resilience in order to address gaps identified in current community resilience measurement efforts. This report also provides recommendations to the Gulf Research Program to build and measure resilience in the Gulf of Mexico region.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!