National Academies Press: OpenBook

Strategic Long-Term Participation by DoD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes (2019)

Chapter: Appendix B: Institutes' Offerings Value Proposition Rankings by Stakeholder

« Previous: Appendix A: Statement of Task
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Institutes' Offerings Value Proposition Rankings by Stakeholder." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Strategic Long-Term Participation by DoD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25417.
×

B

Institutes’ Offerings Value Proposition Rankings by Stakeholder

The following figures and tables are provided in this appendix:

  • Table B.1 Department of Defense (DoD) Manufacturing USA Institutes’ Offerings
  • Figure B.1 All stakeholders offerings’ ranking by total value.
  • Figure B.2 All stakeholders offerings’ total value and relative cost improvement, sorted by relative cost improvement.
  • Figure B.3 Institute stakeholders’ manufacturing institute offering assessment: % total value, % tech development, % tech diffusion, % education and workforce development, % relative cost improvement.
  • Figure B.4 Department of Defense stakeholders’ manufacturing institute offering assessment: % total value, % tech development, % tech diffusion, % education and workforce development, % relative cost improvement.
  • Figure B.5 Industry stakeholders’ manufacturing institute offering assessment: % total value, % tech development, % tech diffusion, % education and workforce development, % relative cost improvement.
  • Figure B.6 Academic stakeholders’ manufacturing institute offering assessment: % total value, % tech development, % tech diffusion, % education and workforce development, % relative cost improvement.
  • Figure B.7 Other groups and organizations’ manufacturing institute offering assessment: % total value, % tech development, % tech diffusion, % education and workforce development, % relative cost improvement.
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Institutes' Offerings Value Proposition Rankings by Stakeholder." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Strategic Long-Term Participation by DoD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25417.
×

TABLE B.1 Department of Defense (DoD) Manufacturing USA Institutes’ Offerings

Offering Generic Offering Description Funding Type
1 Technology R&D Roadmaps Member and customer workshops to create and maintain R&D roadmaps Core
2 MemberDriven R&D Projects Shared Cost, Risk, and Results (IP) Projects defined and executed by participating institute members Project
3 Contracted DoD Customer R&D Projects with Cost Share Projects defined by DoD and executed by selected institute members Project
4 Contracted Customer R&D Projects with No Cost Share Projects defined by DoD and executed by selected institute members Project
5 Technology Standards Roadmaps and Coordination Member and customer workshops to create and maintain technology standards development roadmaps Core
6 Technology Consulting Services Technology consulting provided by the institute to members and nonmembers Core or Project
7 Rapid Prototyping/Preproduction Services Contracted rapid prototyping/preproduction services executed by the institute Project
8 Use of Institute Equipment Contracted use of institute equipment by members and nonmembers Project
9 Updates on SOA Technology Technology SOA updates via member meetings, webinars, and website Core
10 Technical Papers and Publications Project technical reports, professional journal publications, trade magazine articles Core or Project
11 Data Coordination and Dissemination Coordinate creation and collection of R&D findings using a data management and repository system accessible online by members Core
12 Networking and Collaboration Opportunities Amongst Industry, Academia, and Government Members and Other DOD Institutes Includes member meetings, conferences, workshops and member visits, and coordination/collaboration meetings with other DoD institutes Core
13 Creation of Regional Institutes/Hubs and Technology Ecosystems Create and oversee regional institutes/institute hubs to develop technology ecosystems in multiple regions Core
14 Use of NIST MEP Program to Reach SMEs Partner with MEP Program network of centers to transition institute technology to SMEs Core
15 Education and Workforce Development Roadmaps Member and customer workshops to create and maintain technology education and workforce standards development roadmaps Core
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Institutes' Offerings Value Proposition Rankings by Stakeholder." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Strategic Long-Term Participation by DoD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25417.
×
Offering Generic Offering Description Funding Type
16 Institute Internships and Apprenticeships Coordinate and execute technology internship and apprenticeship programs with members and within the institute Core
17 Technology Handson Training and OnSite Courses (K12, Veterans, DOD, Industry) Develop and execute technology handson training and education courses at the institute or customer site (No charge for K12 tours) Core and Project
18 Technology Education Online Courses Develop and manage online technology education courses Core and Project
19 Technology Overview Courses for Government and Industry Executives and Leaders Develop and execute contracted technology overview courses for government and industry executives and leaders Project
20 Job Postings Online technology job postings and references Core

OTHER INSTITUTE OPERATING COSTS (OVERHEAD and G&A) THAT REQUIRE FUNDING:

  • Facility rent/depreciation (building, furnishings, computer network, etc.)
  • Equipment and software (office and technical) maintenance and depreciation
  • Secure website and data storage
  • Utilities
  • Office indirect support staff
  • Accounting
  • Employee benefits (health insurance, vacations, etc.)
  • Nonproject travel

NOTE: IP, intellectual property; MEP, Manufacturing Extension Partnership; NIST, National Institute of Standards and Technology; R&D, research and development; SME, small and mediumsize enterprises; SOA, state of the art.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Institutes' Offerings Value Proposition Rankings by Stakeholder." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Strategic Long-Term Participation by DoD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25417.
×
Image
FIGURE B.1 All stakeholders offerings’ ranking by total value.
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Institutes' Offerings Value Proposition Rankings by Stakeholder." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Strategic Long-Term Participation by DoD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25417.
×
Image
FIGURE B.2 All stakeholders offerings’ total value and relative cost improvement, sorted by relative cost improvement.
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Institutes' Offerings Value Proposition Rankings by Stakeholder." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Strategic Long-Term Participation by DoD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25417.
×
Image
FIGURE B.3 Institute stakeholders’ manufacturing institute offering assessment: % total value, % tech development, % tech diffusion, % education and workforce development, % relative cost improvement.
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Institutes' Offerings Value Proposition Rankings by Stakeholder." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Strategic Long-Term Participation by DoD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25417.
×
Image
FIGURE B.4 Department of Defense stakeholders’ manufacturing institute offering assessment: % total value, % tech development, % tech diffusion, % education and workforce development, % relative cost improvement.
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Institutes' Offerings Value Proposition Rankings by Stakeholder." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Strategic Long-Term Participation by DoD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25417.
×
Image
FIGURE B.5 Industry stakeholders’ manufacturing institute offering assessment: % total value, % tech development, % tech diffusion, % education and workforce development, % relative cost improvement.
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Institutes' Offerings Value Proposition Rankings by Stakeholder." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Strategic Long-Term Participation by DoD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25417.
×
Image
FIGURE B.6 Academic stakeholders’ manufacturing institute offering assessment: % total value, % tech development, % tech diffusion, % education and workforce development, % relative cost improvement.
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Institutes' Offerings Value Proposition Rankings by Stakeholder." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Strategic Long-Term Participation by DoD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25417.
×
Image
FIGURE B.7 Other groups and organizations’ manufacturing institute offering assessment: % total value, % tech development, % tech diffusion, % education and workforce development, % relative cost improvement.
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Institutes' Offerings Value Proposition Rankings by Stakeholder." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Strategic Long-Term Participation by DoD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25417.
×
Page 86
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Institutes' Offerings Value Proposition Rankings by Stakeholder." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Strategic Long-Term Participation by DoD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25417.
×
Page 87
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Institutes' Offerings Value Proposition Rankings by Stakeholder." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Strategic Long-Term Participation by DoD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25417.
×
Page 88
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Institutes' Offerings Value Proposition Rankings by Stakeholder." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Strategic Long-Term Participation by DoD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25417.
×
Page 89
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Institutes' Offerings Value Proposition Rankings by Stakeholder." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Strategic Long-Term Participation by DoD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25417.
×
Page 90
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Institutes' Offerings Value Proposition Rankings by Stakeholder." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Strategic Long-Term Participation by DoD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25417.
×
Page 91
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Institutes' Offerings Value Proposition Rankings by Stakeholder." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Strategic Long-Term Participation by DoD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25417.
×
Page 92
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Institutes' Offerings Value Proposition Rankings by Stakeholder." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Strategic Long-Term Participation by DoD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25417.
×
Page 93
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Institutes' Offerings Value Proposition Rankings by Stakeholder." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Strategic Long-Term Participation by DoD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25417.
×
Page 94
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Institutes' Offerings Value Proposition Rankings by Stakeholder." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Strategic Long-Term Participation by DoD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25417.
×
Page 95
Next: Appendix C: Summary of Potential Improvements to the DoD Institutes' Offerings »
Strategic Long-Term Participation by DoD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $65.00 Buy Ebook | $54.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

To effectively mature and transition DoD manufacturing science and technology advances into production, DoD must have access to a robust and responsive U.S. industrial base which is often driven by advanced manufacturing technologies. The Manufacturing USA institutes are considered crucial and game-changing catalysts that are bringing together innovative ecosystems in various technology and market sectors critical to DoD and the nation.

Since 2012, DoD has invested $600 million directly in its Manufacturing USA institutes with the understanding that the initial federal investment included (1) core funding and (2) one-time, start-up funding to establish the institutes within a period of 5 to 7 years. As the institutes now begin to reach year five, DoD is evaluating the effectiveness of the institutes in fulfilling their goals and the best on-going roles for the federal government, including on-going funding options, to ensure optimal benefit to U.S. competitiveness. This report reviews the role of DoD’s investment to date in establishing its eight institutes as public–private partnerships and its engagement with each institute after it has matured beyond the start-up period.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!