ASSESSMENT OF THE
INFORMATION SCIENCES
DIRECTORATE AT THE
ARMY RESEARCH OFFICE
Panel on Review of Extramural Basic Research at the Army Research Laboratory
Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Board
Laboratory Assessments Board
Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences
A Consensus Study Report of
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
Washington, DC
www.nap.edu
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001
This activity was supported by Contract No. W911QX-14-C-0039 from the Army Research Laboratory. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization or agency that provided support for the project.
International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-49197-6
International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-49197-5
Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.17226/25426
Additional copies of this report are available for sale from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu.
Copyright 2019 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America
Suggested citation: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Assessment of the Information Sciences Directorate at the Army Research Office. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25426.
The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, nongovernmental institution to advise the nation on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Marcia McNutt is president.
The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineering to advising the nation. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., is president.
The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on medical and health issues. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished contributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president.
The three Academies work together as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions. The National Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding contributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engineering, and medicine.
Learn more about the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at www.nationalacademies.org.
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
For information about other products and activities of the National Academies, please visit www.nationalacademies.org/about/whatwedo.
PANEL ON REVIEW OF EXTRAMURAL BASIC RESEARCH AT THE ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY
FREDERICK R. CHANG, NAE,1 Southern Methodist University, Chair
PETER A. BELING, University of Virginia
JAMES O. BERGER, NAS,2 Duke University
JONATHAN N. BLAKELY, Army Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center
RANDAL E. BRYANT, NAE, Carnegie Mellon University
ALICIA L. CARRIQUIRY, NAM,3 Iowa State University
BHARAT DOSHI, Army Communications-Electronics Research, Development and Engineering Center
VIRGIL GLIGOR, Carnegie Mellon University
GERALD F. GOODWIN, Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
WILLIAM D. GROPP, NAE, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
BRUCE HAJEK, NAE, University of Illinois
MARY JANE IRWIN, NAE, Pennsylvania State University
PETER M. KOGGE, University of Notre Dame
DAVID A. LAMB, Army Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center
PATRICK MCDANIEL, Pennsylvania State University
SORIN MITRAN, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
RADIA PERLMAN, NAE, Dell EMC Corporation
STEPHEN M. ROBINSON, NAE, University of Wisconsin - Madison
JONATHAN M. SMITH, University of Pennsylvania
Staff
AZEB GETACHEW, Senior Program Assistant
EVA LABRE, Administrative Coordinator
JAMES P. MCGEE, Director
ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT BOARD
JENNIE S. HWANG, NAE, H-Technologies Group, Chair
FREDERICK R. CHANG, NAE, Southern Methodist University
MARK EBERHART, Colorado School of Mines
GEORGE (RUSTY) T. GRAY III, NAE, Los Alamos National Laboratory
PRABHAT HAJELA, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
WESLEY L. HARRIS, NAE, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
WILLIAM S. MARRAS, NAE, Ohio State University
ALAN NEEDLEMAN, NAE, Texas A&M University
DANIEL A. REED, University of Iowa
Staff
AZEB GETACHEW, Senior Program Assistant
EVA LABRE, Administrative Coordinator
JAMES P. MCGEE, Director
ARUL MOZHI, Senior Program Officer
___________________
1 Member, National Academy of Engineering.
2 Member, National Academy of Sciences.
3 Member, National Academy of Medicine.
LABORATORY ASSESSMENTS BOARD
ROSS B. COROTIS, NAE, University of Colorado, Boulder, Chair
WESLEY L. HARRIS, NAE, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
JENNIE S. HWANG, NAE, Case Western Reserve University; H-Technologies Group
W. CARL LINEBERGER, NAS, JILA, University of Colorado, Boulder
C. KUMAR N. PATEL, NAS/NAE, University of California, Los Angeles; Pranalytica, Inc.
ELSA REICHMANIS, NAE, Georgia Institute of Technology
LYLE H. SCHWARTZ, NAE, University of South Florida, Tampa
Staff
AZEB GETACHEW, Senior Program Assistant
EVA LABRE, Administrative Coordinator
JAMES P. MCGEE, Director
ARUL MOZHI, Senior Program Officer
Acknowledgment of Reviewers
This Consensus Study Report was reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in making each published report as sound as possible and to ensure that it meets the institutional standards for quality, objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process.
We thank the following individuals for their review of this report:
Steven M. Bellovin, NAE,1 Columbia University,
Philip A. Bernstein, NAE, Microsoft Corporation,
Katy Borner, Indiana University,
Ingrid Daubechies, NAS2/NAE, Duke University,
Vice Admiral Paul G. Gaffney II, NAE, Monmouth University (retired),
Leslie F. Greengard, NAS/NAE, New York University,
Jennifer Rexford, NAE, Princeton University, and
Jeffrey D. Ullman, NAE, Stanford University.
Although the reviewers listed above provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations of this report nor did they see the final draft before its release. The review of this report was overseen by Philip M. Neches, NAE, Teradata Corporation. He was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with the standards of the National Academies and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content rests entirely with the authoring committee and the National Academies.
___________________
1 Member, National Academy of Engineering.
2 Member, National Academy of Sciences.
This page intentionally left blank.
Contents
Programs Within the Information Sciences Directorate
Information Processing and Fusion Program
Computational Architecture and Visualization Program
Overall Assessment of the Computing Science Division
Multi-Agent Network Control Program
Social and Cognitive Networks Program
Communications and Hybrid Networks Program
Intelligent Information Networks Program
Overall Assessment of the Network Science Division
4 MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES DIVISION
Computational Mathematics Program
Modeling of Complex Systems Program
Probability and Statistics Program
Overall Assessment of the Mathematical Sciences Division
5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
APPENDIX: Possible Metrics for Assessment of Program and Project Accomplishments and Plans
This page intentionally left blank.