Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
52 1. Mohammad, L.N., M. Elseifi, A. Bae, N. Patel, J. Button, and J. Scherocman. NCHRP Report 712: Optimization of Tack Coat for HMA Placement. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, D.C., 2012. 2. A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual, 4th ed. Manual Series 19. Asphalt Institute, Lexington, KY, 2009. 3. ASTM D8-02: Standard Terminology Relating to Materials for Roads and Pavements. Vol. 04.03: Annual Book of ASTM Standards. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004. 4. Asphalt Handbook, 1989 ed. Manual Series 4 (MS-4). Asphalt Institute, Lexington, KY, 1989. 5. Roberts, F. L., P. S. Kandhal, E. R. Brown, D. Lee, and T. W. Kennedy. Hot Mix Asphalt Materials, Mixture Design, Construction, 2nd ed. NAPA Education Foundation, Lanham, MD, 1996. 6. Mohammad, L. N., A. Bae, M. A. Elseifi, J. Button, and J. A. Scherocman. Evaluation of Bond Strength of Tack Coat Materials in Field: Development of Pull-Off Test Device and Methodology. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2126, 2009, pp. 1â11. 7. Bituminous Tack Coat. Unified Facilities Guide Specification 02744N. 8. Construction of Hot Mix Asphalt Pavements, 2nd ed. Manual Series 22. Asphalt Institute, Lexington, KY. 9. Tashman, L., K. Nam, and A. T. Papagiannakis. Evaluation of the Influence of Tack Coat Construction Factors on the Bond Strength Between Pavement Layers. WA-RD 645.1. Washington State Depart- ment of Transportation, Olympia, 2006. 10. Proper Tack Coat Application. Technical bulletin. Flexible Pave- ments of Ohio, Columbus, May 21, 2001. 11. Proper Use of Tack Coat. Technical Advisory 2001-1. Construction and Bridge Divisions, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, June 29, 2001. 12. Paint Binder (Tack Coat) Guidelines. Construction Procedure Bulletin 03-1 California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, 2003. 13. Chaignon, F., and J.-C. Roffe. Characterization Tests on Bond Coats: Worldwide Study, Impact, Tests, Recommendations. Canadian Technical Asphalt Association, Toronto, November 2001. 14. Roffe, J.-C., and F. Chaignon. Characterization Tests on Bond Coats: Worldwide Study, Impact, Tests, Recommendations. 3rd Inter- national Conference on Bituminous Mixtures and Pavements, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2002, p. 315. 15. Paul, H. R., and J. A. Scherocman. Friction Testing of Tack Coat Surfaces. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transporta- tion Research Board, No. 1616, 1998, pp. 6â12. 16. Cross, S. A., and P. P. Shrestha. Guidelines for Using Prime and Tack Coats. Report FHWA-CFL-04-001. Central Federal Lands Highway Division, Federal Highway Administration, Lakewood, CO, 2004. 17. Mohammad, L., et al. Worldwide State of Practice on the Use of Tack Coats: A Survey. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 77, 2008. 18. Aggregate Handbook. National Stone Association, Washington, D.C., 1991. 19. Hot-Mix Asphalt Paving Handbook 2000. AC 150/5370-14A, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, D.C., 2000. 20. ASTM D2995-99 Standard Practice for Estimating Application Rate of Bituminous Distributors. Annual Book of ASTM Stan- dards 2003, Section 4: Construction, Volume 04.03. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 2003. 21. COLNET and EMULCOL. Product flyer. COLAS, France. 22. Uzan, J., M. Livneh, and Y. Eshed. Investigation of Adhesion Properties Between Asphaltic Concrete Layers. Asphalt Paving Technology, Vol. 47, February 1978, pp. 495â521. 23. Tschegg, E. K., et al. Investigation of Bonding Between Asphalt Layers on Road Construction. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 121, No. 4, 1995, pp. 309â316. 24. Hachiya, Y. and K. Sato. Effect of Tack Coat on Bonding Char- acteristics at Interface Between Asphalt Concrete Layers. Proceed- ing of the 8th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, 1997, pp. 349â362. 25. Sangiorgi, C., A. C. Collop and N. H. Thom. Laboratory Assessment of Bond Condition Using the Leutner Shear Test. 3rd International Conference on Bituminous Mixtures and Pavements, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2002, pp. 315â324. 26. Sholar, G. A., G. C. Page, J. A. Musselman, P. B. Upshaw, and H. L. Moseley. Preliminary Investigation of a Test Method to Evaluate Bond Strength of Bituminous Tack Coats. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 73, 2004, pp. 771â806. 27. Mohammad, L. N., M. A. Raqib, and B. Huang. Influence of Asphalt Tack Coat Materials on Interface Shear Strength. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1789, 2002, pp. 56â65. 28. Akhtarhusein, A. T., M. S. Rahman, B. K. Moreshwar and Q. X. Xu. A Mechanistic Approach to Evaluate Contribution of Prime and Tack References
53 Coat in Composite Asphalt Pavements. Final report. FHWA/NC/ 2004-05, North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, June 25, 2004. 29. Buchanan, S., and M. Woods. Field Tack Coat Evaluator (ATACKerTM). Final report. FHWA/MS-DOT-RD-04-168. Mississippi State Uni- versity, Mississippi Department of Transportation, Federal High- way Administration, December 2004. 30. Canestrari, F., and E. Santagata. Temperature Effects on the Shear Behavior of Tack Coat Emulsions Used in Flexible Pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 6, No.1, March 2005, pp. 39â46. 31. West, R., J. Zhang, and J. Moore. Evaluation of Bond Strength Between Pavement Layers. NCAT Report.05â08. National Center for Asphalt Technology, August 2005. 32. Leng, Z., et al. Interface Bonding Between Hot-Mix Asphalt and Various Portland Cement Concrete Surfaces: Laboratory Assess- ment. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2057, 2008, pp. 46â53. 33. Leng, Z., et al. Interface Bonding Between Hot-Mix Asphalt and Various Portland Cement Concrete Surfaces: Assessment of Accelerated Pavement Testing and Measurement of Interface Strain. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2127, 2009, pp. 20â28. 34. McGhee, K. K., and T. M. Clark. Bond Expectations for Milled Surfaces and Typical Tack Coat Materials Used in Virginia. VTRC 09-R21. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, and Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, 2009. 35. Chen, J.-S., and C.-C. Huang. Effect of Surface Characteristics on Bonding Properties of Bituminous Tack Coat. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2180, 2010, pp. 142â149. 36. Collop, A. C., et al. Development of an Automatic Torque Test to Measure the Shear Bond Strength Between Asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2011, pp. 623â629. 37. Raab, C., A. O. Abd El Halim, and M. N. Partl. Developing a Frame- work for Standardization of Interlayer Bond of Asphalt Pavements. Presented at 91st Annual Meeting. Transportation Research Board, 2012. 38. Raab, C. and Partl, M. Interlayer Shear Performance: Experience with Different Pavement Structures. 3rd Eurasphalt and Eurobitume Congress, Vienna, Austria, 2004. 39. Mohammad, L., et al. Effects of Pavement Surface Type and Sample Preparation Method on Tack Coat Interface Shear Strength. Trans- portation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2180, 2010, pp. 93â101. 40. Salinas, A., I. Al-Qadi, K. Hasiba, H. Ozer, Z. Leng, and D. Parish. Interface Layer Tack Coat Optimization. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2372, 2013, pp. 53â60. 41. Johnson, E. N., M. K. Cole, and J. Pantelis. Tack Coat Testing- Measuring Field Bond Strength. MN/RC 2015-25. Minnesota Department of Transportation, 2015. 42. Hakim, B., L. W. Cheung, and R. J. Armitage. Use of FWD Data for the Prediction of Bonding Between Pavement Layers. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 1, 2000, pp. 49â59. 43. Mohammad, L., M. Hassan, and N. Patel. Effects of Shear Bond Characteristics of Tack Coats on Pavement Performance at the Interface. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transpor- tation Research Board, No. 2209, 2011, pp. 1â8. 44. DeJong, D. L. Computer Program, BISAR. Royal/Shell Laboratory, External Report AMSR0006.73, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1973. 45. Goodman, R. E., R. L. Taylor, and T. L. Brekke. A Model for the Mechanics of Jointed Rocks. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Founda- tions Division, 1968. 46. Crispino, M., B. Festa, P. Giannattasio, and V. Nicolosi. Evaluation of the Interaction Between the Asphalt Concrete Layers by a New Dynamic Test. 8th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, Volume 1, University of Washington, Seattle, 1997, pp. 741â754. 47. Romanoschi, S., and J. Metcalf. Characterization of Asphalt Concrete Layer Interfaces. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1778, 2001, pp. 132â139. 48. Estakhri, C. K., and J. W. Button. Evaluation of NovachipTMâ Construction Report. Research Report 553-1. Texas Transportation Institute, July 1994. 49. Estakhri, C. K., and J. W. Button. Performance Evaluation of NovachipTMâUltrathin Friction Course. Report 553-2F. Texas Transportation Institute, November 1995. 50. Miller, J. S., and W. Y. Bellinger. Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program. FHWA-HRT-13-092. Federal Highway Administration, 2014. 51. Heitzman, M., et al. SHRP 2 Report S2-R06D-RW-3: Nondestructive Testing to Identify Delaminations Between HMA Layers. Transpor- tation Research Board, 2013. 52. Marasteanu, M. O., and T. R. Clyne. âRheological Characterization of Asphalt Emulsions Residues.â Journal of Materials in Civil Engi- neering. Vol. 18, No. 3, 2006, pp. 398â407. 53. Recasens, M., J. Rodrigo, A. H. MartÃnez Reguero, and F. E. PÃ©rez JimÃ©nez. Assessing Heat-Adhesive Emulsions for Tack Coats. Trans- port, Vol 158, No. 11, 2005. 54. Rabiot, D., and M. F. Morizur. Polymer-Modified Bitumen Emul- sions an Advantage for the Various Road Applications. Vol 3. PAPER E&E. 6.161. 1996. Eurasphalt and Eurobitume Congress, Strasbourg, France. May 7â10, 1996. 55. Mohammad, L. N., W. Zhong, and A. Raqib. Investigation of the Behavior of Asphalt Tack Interface Layer. FHWA/LA. 04/394. Federal Highway Administration, 2005. 56. Mohammad, L. N., A. Bae, and M. A. Elseifi. Effect of Tack Coat Materials and Application Rate on the Interface Shear Strength. 6th International Conference on Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Pavements and Technological Control, 2009. 57. Kulkarni, M. B. Effect of Tack and Prime Coats, and Baghouse Fines on Composite Asphalt Pavements. PhD dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 2005. 58. Carr, A. G. The Behavior of Layered Pavement Structures: The Dynamic Shear Box. Project report. NCPE, Nottingham, England, 2001. 59. Santagata, E., and F. Canestrari. Tensile and Shear Tests of Interfaces in Asphalt Mixes: A New Retrospective on Their Failure Criteria. 1994. 60. Nikolova, S., and K. Grossey. Study of the Influence of Types of Emulsions on the Shear Stress. Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress on Emulsions. Bordeaux, France, 1997. 61. Mrawira, D., and D. J. Damude. Revisiting the Effectiveness of Tack Coats in HMA Overlays: The Shear Strength of Tack Coats in Young Overlays. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Canadian Technical Asphalt Association. Polyscience Publications, 1998, 1999. 62. Canestari, F., and M. Bocci. Influence of the Old Pavement Surface Conditions on the Effectiveness of Tack Coat Emulsions. 2nd World Congress on Emulsions, Bordeaux, France, 1997. 63. An Important Tool for Highway Management. Cornell Local Roads Program. Web 23, May 2017. 64. Miller, Irwin. John E. Freundâs Mathematical Statistics: With Applications. Pearson Education, India, 2004.
54 65. Freund, R. J., W. J. Wilson, and P. Sa. Regression Analysis. Academic Press, 2006. 66. Hair, Jr., J. F., et al. Multivariate Data Analysis: With Readings. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1995. 67. Johnson, M. L. Why, When, and How Biochemists Should Use Least Squares. Analytical Biochemistry, 206, 1992, pp. 215â225. 68. Brown, A. M. A Step-by-Step Guide to Non-Linear Regression Analysis of Experimental Data Using a Microsoft Excel Spread- sheet. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, Vol. 65, No. 3, 2001, pp. 191â200. 69. Lavin, P., Asphalt Pavements: A Practical Guide to Design, Pro- duction and Maintenance for Engineers and Architects. CRC Press, 2003. 70. Standard Test Method for Measuring Pavement Macrotexture Depth Using a Volumetric Technique. Vol. 04.03: Road and Paving Materials; Vehicle-Pavement Systems. ASTM Designation E965. American Society for Testing and Materials, 2004. 71. Roque, R., et al. Evaluation of Asphalt Pavement Interface Con- ditions for Enhanced Bond Performance. University of Florida, 2017. 72. Park H. M., R. Kim, and S. Park. Temperature Correction of Multi- load Level Falling Weight Deflectometer Deflections. Transporta- tion Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1806, 2002, pp. 3â8. 73. Hocking, R. R. The Analysis and Selection of Variables in Linear Regression. Biometrics, V. 32, No. 1, 1976, pp. 1â49.