Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Output Categories and Coding Notes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Evaluation of the Minerva Research Initiative. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25482.
×
Appendix H
Output Categories and Coding Notes
| Output Type | Notes on Coding |
|---|---|
|
Journals in which the articles appeared were designated as peer-reviewed if they were considered to be peer-reviewed in any of three library databases that contain peer-reviewed journals: Scopus, Proquest, and Ulrich’s. Publications were included in this category if they were published, or were described by principal investigators (PIs) as “in press,” “forthcoming,” “to appear in,” “being copyedited,” “conditionally accepted,” or “under contract.” (If publications were described as in progress in various alternative ways, they were coded as such.) |
|
Included non-peer-reviewed journal articles, papers, paper series, working papers, reports, op-ed pieces, blogs, and newsletters. Also see above note on publication status. |
|
All books and book chapters, regardless of peer-review status. Also see above note on publication status. |
|
All conference proceedings, regardless of peer-review status. |
|
Included articles written for peer-reviewed or non-peer-reviewed journals, or books and book chapters that were described by the PIs as “revise and resubmit,” “under review or submitted to,” “typescript,” “manuscript,” “draft available,” “draft in progress,” or “being reviewed by PI.” |
|
Included conference presentations, briefings, or testimony. |
|
Included sharable resources, such as publicly available software, websites, databases, patents, licenses, or training materials. |
Suggested Citation:"Appendix H: Output Categories and Coding Notes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Evaluation of the Minerva Research Initiative. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25482.
×
This page intentionally left blank.
