National Academies Press: OpenBook

Seismic Design of Non-Conventional Bridges (2019)

Chapter: References

Get This Book
Unfortunately, this book can't be printed from the OpenBook. If you need to print pages from this book, we recommend downloading it as a PDF.

Visit NAP.edu/10766 to get more information about this book, to buy it in print, or to download it as a free PDF.
« Previous: Chapter 5 - Conclusions
Page 28
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Seismic Design of Non-Conventional Bridges. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25489.
×
Save
Cancel
Page 28

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

28 1. AASHTO Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Bridge Design Specifications, 8th Edition. Washington, D.C., 2017. 2. AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design, 2nd Edition. Washington, D.C., 2011. 3. ATC-32. Improved Seismic Design Criteria for California Bridges: Provisional Recommendations. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, 1996. 4. Chopra, A. Dynamics of Structures. Prentice Hall International, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2016. 5. Penzien, J., and Clough, R.W. Dynamics of Structures. McGraw Hill, New York, NY, 1975. 6. Lund, H., and Mitchell, R. Seismic Time-History Analysis and Strain-Based Design of Cable-Stayed Bridges. 39th IABSE Symposium Proceedings, Vancouver, BC, 2017. 7. Marwan, N., Manzanarez, R., and Maroney, B. Seismic Design Strategy of the New East Bay Bridge Suspen- sion Span. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, NZ, 2000. 8. Seible, F. Long Span Bridges in California—Seismic Design and Retrofit Issues. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, NZ, 2000. 9. ATC-49. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, and Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake and Engineering Research (MCEER), Buffalo, NY, 2003. 10. Jones, M., Treyger, S., and Pence, P. Seismic Analysis of New Tacoma Narrows Suspension Bridge. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Aug. 2004. 11. Goodyear, D., and Sun, J. New Development in Cable-Stayed Bridge Design. Structural Engineering Inter­ national, Feb. 2003. 12. Caltrans Memo to Designers 20-1. Seismic Design Methodology. Sacramento, CA, July 2010. 13. Caltrans Memo to Designers 20-16. Seismic Safety Peer Review. Sacramento, CA, June 2009. 14. Whittaker, A., Atkinson, G., Baker, J., Bray, J., Grant, D., Hamburger, R., Haselton, C., and Somerville, P. Selecting and Scaling Earthquake Ground Motions for Performing Response-History Analyses. National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST GCR 11-917-15, Gaithersburg, MD. References

Next: Glossary of Terms »
Seismic Design of Non-Conventional Bridges Get This Book
×
Seismic Design of Non-Conventional Bridges
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 532: Seismic Design of Non-Conventional Bridges documents seismic design approaches and criteria used for “non-conventional” bridges, such as long-span cable-supported bridges, bridges with truss tower substructures, and arch bridges.

Design of conventional bridges for seismic demands in the United States is based on one of two American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) documents: the AASHTO Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Bridge Design Specifications (AASHTO BDS) (1) or the AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design (Guide Spec) (2). The stated scope of these documents for seismic design is limited to conventional bridges.

Non-conventional bridges outside the scope of these two AASHTO documents, such as cable-supported bridges and long-span arch bridges, are typically high value investments designed with special project criteria. There is no current AASHTO standard seismic design criteria document specific to these non-conventional bridges. Seismic design criteria for these non-conventional bridges are typically part of a broader project-specific criteria document that addresses the special character of the bridge type.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!