National Academies Press: OpenBook

Automated Pavement Condition Surveys (2019)

Chapter: References

« Previous: Chapter 6 - Conclusions
Page 87
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Automated Pavement Condition Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25513.
×
Page 87
Page 88
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Automated Pavement Condition Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25513.
×
Page 88
Page 89
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Automated Pavement Condition Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25513.
×
Page 89
Page 90
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Automated Pavement Condition Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25513.
×
Page 90
Page 91
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Automated Pavement Condition Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25513.
×
Page 91
Page 92
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Automated Pavement Condition Surveys. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25513.
×
Page 92

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

87 Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities. 2018. Highway Distress Data Collection Quality Management Plan. Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, Juneau, AK. Alberta Transportation. nd. Terms of Reference Integrated Data Collection Project. Alberta Transportation, Edmonton, Alberta. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard Practice for Determination of International Roughness Index (IRI) to Quantify Roughness of Pavements. AASHTO PP 37-04. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2005. Standard Practice for Determining Maximum Rut Depth in Asphalt Pavements. AASHTO PP 38-00. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2006. Standard Practice for Definition of Terms Related to Quality and Statistics as Used in Highway Construction. AASHTO R 10-06. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2010a. Standard Equipment Specification for Inertial Profiler. AASHTO M 328-10. American Association of State Highway and Transpor- tation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2010b. Standard Practice for Collecting the Transverse Pavement Profile. AASHTO PP 70-10. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2010c. Standard Practice for Determining Pavement Deformation Parameters and Cross Slope from Collected Transverse Profiles. AASHTO PP 69-10. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2010d. Standard Practice for Quantifying Cracks in Asphalt Pavement Surfaces from Collected Images Utilizing Automated Methods. AASHTO PP 67-10. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2010e. Standard Practice for Collecting Images of Pavement Surfaces for Distress Detection. AASHTO PP 68-10. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2012. Pavement Management Guide, Second Edition. Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2013a. Standard Practice for Determining Rut Depth in Pavements. AASHTO R 48-10. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2013b. Standard Practice for Quantifying Cracks in Asphalt Pavement Surface. AASHTO R 55-10. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2013c. Standard Practice for Evaluating Faulting of Concrete Pavements. AASHTO R 36-13. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2014. Standard Practice for Quantifying Cracks in Asphalt Pavement Surfaces from Collected Images Utilizing Automated Methods. AASHTO PP 67-14. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2015. Standard Practice for Measuring Pavement Profile Using a Dipstick. AASHTO R 41-05. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. References

88 Automated Pavement Condition Surveys American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2017a. Standard Practice for Collecting the Transverse Pavement Profile. AASHTO PP 70-14. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2017b. Standard Practice for Evaluating Faulting of Concrete Pavements. AASHTO R 36-17. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2017c. Standard Practice for Quantifying Roughness of Pavements. AASHTO R 43-13. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2017d. Standard Practice for Determining Pavement Deformation Parameters and Cross Slope from Collected Transverse Profiles. AASHTO PP 69-14. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2017e. Standard Practice for Collecting Images of Pavement Surfaces for Distress Detection. AASHTO PP 68-14. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2017f. Standard Practice for Quantifying Cracks in Asphalt Pavement Surfaces from Collected Images Utilizing Automated Methods. AASHTO PP 67-16. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2018a. Standard Equipment Specification for Inertial Profiler. AASHTO M 328-14. American Association of State Highway and Transpor- tation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2018b. Standard Practice for Operating Inertial Profiling Systems. AASHTO R 57-14. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2018c. Standard Practice for Certification of Inertial Profiling System. AASHTO R 56-14. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2018d. Standard Practice for Measuring Pavement Profile Using a Rod and Level. AASHTO R 40-10. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2018e. Standard Practice for Determining Pavement Deformation Parameters and Cross Slope from Collected Transverse Profiles. AASHTO R 87-18. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2018f. Standard Practice for Quantifying Cracks in Asphalt Pavement Surfaces from Collected Pavement Images Utilizing Automated Methods. AASHTO R 85-18. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2018g. Standard Practice for Collecting Images of Pavement Surfaces for Distress Detection. AASHTO R 86-18. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2018h. Standard Practice for Collecting the Transverse Pavement Profile. AASHTO R 88-18. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2012. Standard Terminology Relating to Vehicle-Pavement Systems. ASTM E867-06. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2013a. Standard Practice for Computing Ride Number of Roads from Longitudinal Profile Measurements Made by an Inertial Profile Measuring Device. ASTM E1489-08. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2013b. Standard Test Method for Using a Rolling Inclinometer to Measure Longitudinal and Transverse Profiles of a Traveled Surface. ASTM E2133-03. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2014a. Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Test Program to Determine the Precision of Test Methods for Construction Materials. ASTM C802-14. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2014b. Standard Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in ASTM Test Methods. ASTM E177-14. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2015a. Standard Practice for Computing International Roughness Index of Roads from Longitudinal Profile Measurements. ASTM E1926-08. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2015b. Standard Test Method for Measuring Rut-Depth of Pavement Surfaces Using a Straightedge. ASTM E1703-10. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

References 89 American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2015c. Standard Practice for Calculating Pavement Macro- texture Mean Profile Depth. ASTM E1845-15. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2015d. Standard Practice for Preparing Precision and Bias Statements for Test Methods for Construction Materials. ASTM C670-15. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2016. Standard Guide for Classification of Automated Pavement Condition Survey Equipment. ASTM E1656-11. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2018a. Standard Test Method for Measuring the Longitudinal Profile of Traveled Surfaces with an Accelerometer-Established Inertial Profiling Reference. ASTM E950-09. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2018b. Standard Practice for Conducting an Inter- laboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method. ASTM E691-18. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2018c. Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys. ASTM D6433-18. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. Arkansas Department of Transportation (ARDOT). 2018. Pavement Performance Data Quality Management Program. Arkansas Department of Transportation, Little Rock, AR. British Columbia Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure (BCMoTI). 2015. Request for Proposal 2016-2017 Pavement Surface Condition Surveys. British Columbia Ministry of Transportation, Victoria, British Columbia. British Columbia Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure (BCMoTI). 2016. Pavement Surface Condition Rating Manual. British Columbia Ministry of Transportation, Victoria, British Columbia. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2015. Automated Pavement Condition Survey Manual. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2017. Request for Proposal Automated Pavement Condition Survey (APCS). RFP No. 56A0505. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2018. Pavement Condition Survey Data Quality Management Plan. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA. Chatti, K., and I. Zaabar. 2012. NCHRP Report 720: Estimating the Effects of Pavement Condition on Vehicle Operating Costs. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). 2011. Public Road Mileage for Apportionment of Highway Safety Funds. Rule 23 CFR 460. Office of Federal Register, Washington, DC. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). 2016. National Performance Management Measures. Rule 23 CFR 490. Office of Federal Register, Washington, DC. Connecticut Department of Transportation (CTDOT). 2018. Network-Level Pavement Condition Data Collection Quality Management Plan. Connecticut Department of Transportation, Newington, CT. de León Izeppi, E., S. Katicha, G. W. Flintsch, and K. K. McGhee. 2016. “Pioneering the Use of Continuous Pavement Friction Measurements to Develop New Safety Performance Functions, Improve the Accuracy of Crash Count Predictions, and Evaluate Possible Treatments for the Roads in Virginia,” Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT). 2018. Pavement Distress Data Quality Management Plan. Delaware Department of Transportation, Dover, DE. Epps, J. A., and C. L. Monismith. 1986. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 126: Equipment for Obtaining Pavement Condition and Traffic Loading Data. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Faghih-Imani, A., and L. Amador-Jimenez. 2013. Toward Sustainable Pavement Management: Incorporating Environmental Impacts of Pavement Treatments into a Performance-Based Optimization. Transportation Re- search Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2366, pp. 13–21. https://dx.doi.org/10.3141/ 2366-02. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2010. Data Integration Primer. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2014. Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS). Office of Highway Policy Information website. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2016. Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) Field Manual. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Flintsch, G., and K. McGhee. 2009. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 401: Quality Management of Pavement Condition Data Collection. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). 1999. Basic Financial Statements—and Management’s Discussion and Analysis—For State and Local Governments. Statement No. 34. Governmental Accounting Standards Board, Washington, DC. Gramling, W. L. 1994. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 203: Current Practices in Determining Pavement Condition. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

90 Automated Pavement Condition Surveys Henning, T. F. P., and G. J. Morrow. 2017. Transition from Visual Condition Rating of Cracking, Shoving and Raveling to Automatic Data Collection. Research Report 617, New Zealand Transport Agency, Wellington, New Zealand. Hicks, R. G., and J. P. Mahoney. 1981. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 76: Collection and Use of Pavement Condition Data. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Illinois Department of Transportation (ILDOT). 2017. Request for Proposal Condition Rating Survey Data Collection Services. Illinois Department of Transportation, Springfield, IL. Illinois Department of Transportation (ILDOT). 2018. National Performance Management Measures Data Quality Management Program. Illinois Department of Transportation, Springfield, IL. Illinois Department of Transportation (ILDOT). nd. Pavement Data Collection Contract. Illinois Department of Transportation, Springfield, IL. Iowa Department of Transportation (IADOT). 2018. Distress Classification. Iowa Department of Transportation, Ames, IA. Islam, S., and W. G. Buttlar. 2012. Effect of Pavement Roughness on User Costs. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2285, pp. 47–55. https://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2285-06. Jing, G., Y. Huang, W. Yin, and Q. Want. 2014. Real-Time Distress Screening in Automatic Pavement Condition Data Collection. National Center of Measurement for Equipment of Roads and Bridges, Research Institute of Highway, Ministry of Transportation, China. Kim, R. Y., J. E. Hummer, M. Gabr, D. Johnston, B. S. Underwood, D. J. Findley, and C. M. Cunningham. 2009. Asset Management Inventory and Data Collection. Report No. FHWA/NC/2008-15. North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, NC. Laurent, J., J. F. Hebert, D. Lefebvre, and Y. Savard. 2012. “Using 3D laser profiling sensors for the automated measurement of road surface conditions.” Proceedings, 7th Rilem International Conference on Cracking in Pavements, Delft, Netherlands. Australian Road Research Board Group Limited, Melbourne, Victoria. Laurent, J., Y. Savard, and D. Lefebvre. 2014. “3D Laser Road Profiling for the Automated Survey of Road Surface Conditions and Geometry.” International Road Federation Examiner, Volume 2: Road Asset Management. International Road Federation, Alexandria, VA. Li, F. 2012. A Methodology for Characterizing Pavement Rutting Condition Using Emerging 3D Line Laser Imaging. PhD Dissertation. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta GA. Lytton, R. L., J. B. Rauhut, and M. I. Darter. 1985. Long Term Pavement Monitoring Data Collection Guide. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Maine Department of Transportation (MEDOT). 2018. Pavement Condition Data Collection Quality Management Plan—DRAFT. Maine Department of Transportation, Augusta, ME. Maryland Department of Transportation (MDDOT). 2018. Pavement Data Quality Management Program. Maryland Department of Transportation, Hanover, MD. McGhee, K. 2004. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 334: Automated Pavement Distress Collection Techniques. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington DC. Miller, J. S., and W. Y. Bellinger. 2014. Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Perfor- mance Program. Fifth Revised Edition. Report No. FHWA-HRT-13-092. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT). 2018. Pavement Data Quality Management Plan. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Maplewood, MN. Muench, S., and T. Van Dam. 2015. Climate Change Adaptation for Pavements. Report FHWA-HIF-15-015, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. New Hampshire Department of Transportation (NHDOT). 2018. Pavement Data Quality Management Program. New Hampshire Department of Transportation, Concord, NH. New Mexico Department of Transportation. 2017. Pavement Condition Data Collection. RFP No. 18-06. New Mexico Department of Transportation, Santa Fe, NM. New Mexico Department of Transportation. 2018. Pavement Distress Data Quality Management Plan. New Mexico Department of Transportation, Santa Fe, NM. New York State Department of Transportation (NYDOT). 2018. Quality Management Plan for Pavement Condition Data Collection. New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, NY. North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). 2015. High Speed Data Collection Request for Proposal. North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, NC. North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). 2018. Network-Level Pavement Condition Data Collection Quality Management Plan. North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, NC. North Dakota Department of Transportation (NDDOT). 2018. Network-Level Pavement Condition Data Collection Quality Management Plan. North Dakota Department of Transportation, Bismarck, ND. OPUS Consultants Limited (OPUS). 2017. 2017 RPMS Survey QA. Memorandum, dated December 21, 2017. OPUS Consultants Limited, Vancouver, British Columbia.

References 91 Oregon Department of Transportation (ORDOT). 2018. Data Quality Management Plan for Pavement Condition National Highway Performance Program. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, OR. PB Consult, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Cambridge Systematics, and NuStats (PBC). 2004. NCHRP Report 522: A Review of DOT Compliance with GASB 34 Requirements. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT). 2018a. Data Quality Management Program. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Harrisburg, PA. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT). 2018b. Automated Pavement Condition Survey Field Manual. Publication 336. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Harrisburg, PA. Pierce, L. M., G. McGovern, and K. Zimmerman. 2013. Practical Guide for Quality Management of Pavement Condition Data Collection. Federal Highway Administration, Washington DC. Quebec Ministry of Transportation (QMoT). 2017. Quality Assurance of Data Collected by the Pavement Survey Vehicle. Technical Information Bulletin. Quebec Ministry of Transportation, Montreal, Quebec. Robbins, M. M., and N. H. Tran. 2016. A Synthesis Report: Value of Pavement Smoothness and Ride Quality to Roadway Users and the Impact of Pavement Roughness on Vehicle Operating Costs. NCAT Report 16-03. National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn, AL. Saskatchewan Ministry of Highways and Infrastructure (SMH&I). 2017. AM4300.7 Road Condition Technical Manual. Saskatchewan Ministry of Highways and Infrastructure, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. Sayers, M. W., and S. M. Karamihas. 1998. The Little Book of Profiling. The Regent of the University of Michigan, Ann Harbor, MI. Serigos, P. A., M. Burton, A. Smit, J. A. Prozzi, and M. R. Murphy. 2014. Field Evaluation of Automated Distress Measuring Equipment. Report No. FHWA/TX-14/0-6663-2. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX. Serigos, P., K. Y. Chen, A. Smit, M. R. Murphy, and J. A. Prozzi. 2015. Automated Distress Surveys: Analysis of Network Level Data (Phase III). Report No. FHWA/TX-15/0-6663-3. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX. Shekharan, R., D. T. Frith, C. Chowdhury, C. Larson, and D. Morian. 2007. Effects of Comprehensive Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan on Pavement Management. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1990, pp. 65–71. https://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1990-08. Smith, R. E., M. I. Darter, and S. M. Hernn. 1979. Highway Pavement Distress Identification Manual for Highway Condition and Quality of Highway Construction Survey. Federal Highway Administration and Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP). 1993. SHRP Report SHRP-P-338: Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Project. Strategic Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Tennessee Department of Transportation (TNDOT). 2018. Guidelines on Quality Management of Pavement Condition Data. Tennessee Department of Transportation, Nashville, TN. Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT). 2017. Pavement Condition Data Collection Services. Specification No. TxDOT 968-62-65. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX. Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT). 2018a. Quality Management Plan for Pavement Data Collection. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX. Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT). 2018b. Pavement Management Systems Process Requirements Document. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX. Timm, D. H., and J. M. McQueen. 2004. A Study of Manual vs. Automated Pavement Condition Surveys. Report No. IR-04-01. Alabama Department of Transportation, Montgomery, AL. Tsai, Y., and Z. Wang. 2015. “Development of an Asphalt Pavement Raveling Detection Algorithm Using Emerging 3D Laser Technology and Macrotexture Analysis.” NCHRP IDEA-163 Final Report. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Tsai, Y. J., and F. Li. 2012. “Critical Assessment of Detecting Asphalt Pavement Cracks under Different Lighting and Low Intensity Contrast Conditions Using Emerging 3D Laser Technology.” Journal of Transportation Engineering. Volume 138, No. 5. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA. Tsai, Y. J., and Z. Wang. 2018. A Remote Sensing and GIS-Enabled Asset Management System (RS-GAMS) Phase 2. Report No. FHWA-GA-17-1210. Georgia Department of Transportation, Forest Park, GA. Tsai, Y., and A. Chaterjee. 2017. “Pothole Detection and Classification Using 3D Technology and Watershed Method.” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA. Tsai, Y., Y. Wu, C. Ai, and E. Pitts. 2012 “Feasibility Study of Measuring Concrete Joint Faulting Using 3D Con- tinuous Pavement Profile Data.” Journal of Transportation Engineering. Volume 138, No. 11. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA. Tsai, Y., Z. Wang, and C. Ai. 2017. Implementation of Automatic Sign Inventory and Pavement Condition Evaluation on Georgia’s Interstate Highways. Report No: FHWA-GA-16-15-11. Georgia Department of Transportation, Atlanta, GA.

92 Automated Pavement Condition Surveys Tsai, Y., Z. Wang, and F. Li. 2015. “Assessment of Rut Depth Measurement Accuracy of Point-based Rut Bar Systems Using Emerging 3D Line Laser Imaging Technology.” Journal of Marine Science and Technology. Volume 23, No. 3. Underwood, B. S., Y. R. Kim, and J. Corley-Lay. 2011. “Assessment of Use of Automated Distress Survey Methods for Network-Level Pavement Management.” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. Volume 25, Issue 3. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA. Utah Department of Transportation (UTDOT). 2018. Management Plan for Pavement Condition Data. Utah Department of Transportation, Salt Lake City, UT. Vavrik, W. R., L. D. Evans, J. A. Stefanski, and S. Sargand. 2013. PCR Evaluation—Considering Transition from Manual to Semi-Automated Pavement Distress Collection and Analysis. Final Report. Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, OH. Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans). 2017. Roadway Condition Assessment Parameter Collection Contract SOW. Vermont Agency of Transportation, Montpelier, VT. Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans). 2018. Pavement Condition Data Collection Quality Management Plan. Vermont Agency of Transportation, Montpelier, VT. Virginia Department of Transportation (VADOT). 2015. Pavement Data Collection & Evaluation Services Request for Proposal. Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, VA. Wang, K. C. P. 2011. “Elements of Automated Survey of Pavement and a 3D Methodology.” Journal of Modern Transportation. Volume 19, Number 1. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany. Wang, K., and O. Smadi. 2011. Transportation Research E-Circular E-C156: Automated Imaging Technologies for Pavement Distress Surveys. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. https://dx.doi.org/10.17226/22866. Wang, K., W. Gong, T. Tracy, and V. Nguyen. 2011. Automated Survey of Pavement Distress Based on 2D and 3D Laser Images. Report No. MBTC-3023, Mack-Blackwell Rural Transportation Center, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR. Wang, K. C. P., Q. Li, G. Yang, Y. Zhan, Y. Qiu. 2015. “Network Level Pavement Evaluation with 1 mm 3D Survey System.” Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. Vol. 2, Issue No. 6. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). 2018. Pavement Condition Data Collection Quality Management Plan. Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, WA. West Virginia Department of Transportation (WVDOT). 2018. Pavement Condition Data Quality Management Plan. West Virginia Department of Transportation, Charleston, WV. Wimsatt, A. 2017. Test Procedure for Validation of Automated Distress Data: Technical Report. Report No. FHWA/ TX-16/0-6835-1. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX. Wright, D., G. Crabb, and A. Gleeson. 2014. Use of Traffic Speed Lidar in Road Asset Assessment. Transport Research Laboratory, Workingham, Berks, UK. Wu, H., Z. Zhang, K. Long, and M. R. Murphy. 2014. Considering Safety Impacts of Skid Resistance in Decision- Making Processes for Pavement Management. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2455, pp. 19–27. https://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2455-03. Wyoming Department of Transportation. 2018. Data Quality Management. Wyoming Department of Transpor- tation, Cheyenne, WY. Zhao, M., M. D. Fontaine, and R. Venkatanarayana. 2018. Case Studies of Successful “Big Data” Programs at State Departments of Transportation. Presented at 97th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Zimmerman, K. A. 2017. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 501: Pavement Management Systems: Putting Data to Work. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

Next: Glossary »
Automated Pavement Condition Surveys Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 531 documents agency practices, challenges, and successes in conducting automated pavement condition surveys.

The report also includes three case examples that provide additional information on agency practices for conducting automated pavement surveys.

Pavement condition data is a critical component for pavement management systems in state departments of transportation (DOTs). The data is used to establish budget needs, support asset management, select projects for maintenance and preservation, and more.

Data collection technology has advanced rapidly over the last decade and many DOTs now use automated data collection systems.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!