National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 5 System Vulnerabilities
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the Department of Energy's Plans for Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25593.
×

References

ANL (Argonne National Laboratory). 1998. WIPP Transportation Assessment Update—Comparative Cost and Risk Assessments. DOE/WIPP 98-2282. September. Carlsbad, NM: Department of Energy’s Carlsbad Field Office.

Basabilvazo, G. T. 2019. WIPP Compliance. Presentation to the Committee on the Disposal of Surplus Plutonium at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Washington, DC, April 16. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/04-162019/disposal-of-surplus-plutonium-in-the-waste-isolation-pilot-plant (accessed April 14, 2020).

Bathke, C. G., B. B. Ebbinghaus, B. A. Collins, B. W. Sleaford, K. R. Hase, M. Robel, R. K. Wallace, K. S. Bradley, J. R. Ireland, G. D. Jarvinen, M. W. Johnson, A. W. Prichard, and B. W. Smith. 2012. The attractiveness of materials in advanced nuclear fuel cycles for various proliferation and theft scenarios. Nuclear Technology 179:1, 5-30. DOI: 10.13182/NT10-203.

BRC (Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future). 2012. Report to the Secretary of Energy. January. Washington, DC: Department of Energy. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/04/f0/brc_finalreport_jan2012.pdf (accessed November 19, 2019).

Brunnel, S. 2019. Analysis Package for Normalized Releases in the 2019 Compliance Recertification Application Performance Assessment (CRA-2019 PA). Revision 0. ERMS #571373. WIPP:4.2.1:PA:QA-L:571155. Sandia National Laboratories. August 26. https://wipp.energy.gov/library/CRA/CRA-2019/A%20-%20C/Brunell%20%202019%20%20ERMS%20571373.pdf (accessed April 22, 2020).

Cantey, T., and S. Robertson. 2019. Surplus Plutonium Disposition Program Container Utilization. SRNS‐MS‐201900071. Aiken, SC: Savannah River Nuclear Solutions.

Channell, J. K., and M. K. Silva. 2001. Independent Technical Oversight of an Operating Repository. Presentation at ICEM 8th International Conference on Radioactive Waste Management, Brugge, Belgium, September 30-October 4.

Costello, B., and A. Karickhoff. 2019. Truck Driver Shortage Analysis 2019. Arlington, VA: American Trucking Associations. July. https://www.trucking.org/ATA%20Docs/News%20and%20Information/Reports%20Trends%20and%20Statistics/ATAs%20Driver%20Shortage%20Report%202019%20with%20cover.pdf (accessed November 20, 2019).

Dillingham, C. 2012. Meeting nonproliferation agreements requires destroying thousands of surplus plutonium pits. National Security Science No. 2. https://www.lanl.gov/science/NSS/issue2_2012/story4full.shtml (accessed April 14, 2020).

DNFSB (Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board). 2018. Deficiencies in DOE Standard 5506-2007, Preparation of Safety Basis Documents for Transuranic (TRU) Waste Facilities. DNFSB/TECH-43. February. Washington, DC. https://www.dnfsb.gov/sites/default/files/document/14436/Deficiencies%20in%20DOE%20Standard%205506-2007%20%5B2018-100-011%5D.pdf (accessed November 18, 2019)

DOE (Department of Energy). 1981. Waste Isolation Pilot Plant; record of decision. Federal Register 46(18):9162-9164. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/12/f34/EIS-0026-ROD-1981.pdf (accessed February 22, 2020).

DOE. 1996a. Plutonium: The First 50 Years. DOE/DP-0137. Washington, DC. https://www.osti.gov/opennet/servlets/purl/219368/219368.pdf (accessed January 14, 2020).

DOE. 1996b. Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, Summary. EIS-0229. Washington, DC.

DOE. 1997. Record of decision for the storage and disposition of weapons-usable fissile materials final programmatic environmental impact statement. Federal Register 62(13):3014-3030. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/nepapub/nepa_documents/RedDont/EIS-0229-ROD-1997.pdf (accessed November 20, 2019).

DOE. 1999a. Surplus Plutonium Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement. EIS-0283. November. Washington, DC. https://www.energy.gov/nepa/downloads/eis-0283-final-environmental-impact-statement (accessed April 3, 2020).

DOE. 1999b. Surplus Plutonium Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement—Summary. EIS-0283. November. Washington, DC. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/EIS-0283-Summary-1999.pdf (accessed April 3, 2020).

DOE. 2000. Record of decision for the surplus plutonium disposition final environmental impact statement. Federal Register 65(7):1608-1620. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/nepapub/nepa_documents/RedDont/EIS0283-ROD-2000.pdf (accessed November 25, 2019).

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the Department of Energy's Plans for Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25593.
×

DOE. 2002. Surplus Plutonium Disposition Program—amending records of decision. Federal Register 67(76):19432-19435. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2002-04-19/pdf/02-9658.pdf (accessed March 30, 2020).

DOE. 2003. Amended record of decision—Surplus Plutonium Disposition Program. Federal Register 68(79):20134-20137. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2003-04-24/pdf/03-10151.pdf (accessed March 30, 2020).

DOE. 2007. Preparation of Safety Basis Documents for Transuranic (TRU) Waste Facilities. DOE-STD-5506-2007. Washington, DC. https://www.standards.doe.gov/standards-documents/5000/5506-astd-2007/@@images/file (accessed November 18, 2019).

DOE. 2010. Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets. DOE Order 413.3B. Washington, DC. https://www.directives.doe.gov/directives-documents/400-series/0413.3-BOrder-B-chg5minchg/@@images/file (accessed September 10, 2018).

DOE. 2011. Nuclear Material Control and Accountability. DOE O 474.2. Washington, DC. https://www.directives.doe.gov/directives-documents/400-series/0474.2-BOrder-chg4-pgchg/@@images/file (accessed September 10, 2018).

DOE. 2014. Report of the Plutonium Disposition Working Group: Analysis of Surplus Weapon‐Grade Plutonium Disposition Options. April. Washington, DC. http://fissilematerials.org/library/doe14a.pdf (accessed April 3, 2020).

DOE. 2015a. Final Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement—Summary. EIS-0283-S2. Washington, DC. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2015/04/f22/EIS-0283-S2_SPD_Summary.pdf (accessed September 6, 2018).

DOE. 2015b. Final Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, Volume 1: Chapters 1 through 10. DOE/EIS-0283-S2. April. Washington, DC. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2015/04/f22/EIS-0283-S2_SPD_Vol_1_EIS_Chapters.pdf (accessed January 14, 2020).

DOE. 2015c. Final Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, Volume 2: Appendices. DOE/EIS-0283-S2. April. Washington, DC. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2015/04/f22/EIS-0283-S2_SPD_Vol_2_Appendices.pdf (accessed November 25, 2019).

DOE. 2016a. Surplus plutonium disposition, record of decision. Federal Register 81(65):19588-19594. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/04/f30/EIS-0283-S2_ROD.pdf (accessed November 17, 2019).

DOE. 2016b. Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Disposal of Greater-Than-Class C (GTCC) Low-Level Radioactive Waste and GTCC-Like Waste. EIS-0375. Washington, DC. https://www.energy.gov/nepa/downloads/eis-0375-final-environmental-impact-statement (accessed September 10, 2018).

DOE. 2018a. Safety Evaluation Report Addendum for Annual Update of Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Document Safety Analysis DOE/WIPP 07-3732, Revision 6 and Technical Safety Requirements DOE/WIPP 07-3733, Revision 6. DOE/WIPP 16-3565, Revision 1. Carlsbad, NM. https://wipp.energy.gov/Library/ser/DOE-WIPP16-3565_Rev_1_Feb2018.pdf (accessed November 18, 2019).

DOE. 2018b. Surplus Plutonium Disposition Dilute and Dispose Option Independent Cost Estimate (ICE) Report. Washington, DC. https://s3.amazonaws.com/ucs-documents/global-security/dilute-and-dispose-independentcost-estimate-4-18.pdf (accessed September 10, 2018).

DOE. 2019. Final Supplement Analysis of the Complex Transformation Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement. EIS-0236-S4-SA-02. Washington, DC. December. https://www.energy.gov/nepa/downloads/doeeis-0236-s4-sa-02-final-supplement-analysis (accessed April 3, 2020).

DOE. 2020. Draft Supplement Analysis of the 2008 Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory for Plutonium Operations. DOE/EIS-0380-SA-06. March 2020. Washingotn, DC. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2020/03/f72/draft-supplement-analysis-eis-0380-sa06-lanl-pit-production-2020-03.pdf (accessed March 18, 2020).

DOE-CBFO (Department of Energy’s Carlsbad Field Office). 1988. C&C Agreement. Carlsbad, NM. http://www.wipp.energy.gov/library/Information_Repository_A/Supplemental_Information/Consultation%20and%20Cooperation%20Agreement.pdf (accessed September 10, 2018).

DOE-CBFO. 1996. Title 40 CFR Part 191 Compliance Certification Application for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. DOE/CAO 1996-2184. Carlsbad, NM. https://www.wipp.energy.gov/library/CRA/2009_CRA/references/CCA/CCA.htm (accessed November 20, 2019).

DOE-CBFO. 2000. The long road to the WIPP. In The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant: Pioneering Nuclear Waste Disposal. DOE/CAO-00-3124. Department of Energy’s Carlsbad Area Office. https://wipp.energy.gov/pdfs/Why_WIPP.pdf (accessed April 3, 2020).

DOE-CBFO. 2005. Empty WIPP truck overturns. DOENews. 010DR1205. https://www.wipp.energy.gov/pr/2005/Truck_accident.pdf (accessed November 19, 2019).

DOE-CBFO. 2014. Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C, Compliance Recertification Application 2014 for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Waste Characterization. DOE/WIPP-14-3503. Carlsbad, NM. http://www.wipp.energy.gov/library/cra/CRA-2014/CRA/Section_24/Section_24.htm (accessed May 7, 2020).

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the Department of Energy's Plans for Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25593.
×

DOE-CBFO. 2016a. Annual Transuranic Waste Inventory Report—2016. DOE/TRU-16-3425, Revision 0. Carlsbad, NM. https://www.wipp.energy.gov/library/TRUwaste/DOE-TRU-16-3425_Rev_0_ATWIR2016.pdf (accessed April 3, 2020).

DOE-CBFO. 2016b. TRU Waste Transportation Plan. DOE-CBFO-98-3103, Revision 4. http://wipp.energy.gov/library/TRUwaste/DOE-CBFO-98-3103_Rev_4.pdf (accessed April 3, 2020).

DOE-CBFO. 2017a. Letter from T. Shrader, DOE-CBFO, to J. D. Edwards, EPA. Compliance Recertification Application (CRA) 2019. October 5. Carlsbad, NM.

DOE-CBFO. 2017b. Recovery Guide for TRU Waste Packages, DOE, Revision 8, Effective Date: May 23. https://wipp.energy.gov/library/NTP/DOE-CBFO-94-1007_Rev_8_Eff_05-23-17.pdf (accessed April 3, 2020).

DOE-CBFO. 2018a. Annual Transuranic Waste Inventory Report–2018. DOE/TRU-18-3425, Revision 0. Carlsbad, NM. https://wipp.energy.gov/library/TRUwaste/DOE-TRU-18-3425_Rev_0.pdf (accessed November 19, 2019).

DOE-CBFO. 2018b. Class 2 Permit Modification Request Clarification of TRU Mixed Waste Disposal Volume Reporting. WIPP Permit Number NM4890139088-TSDF. Carlsbad, NM. http://www.wipp.energy.gov/rcradox/rfc/18-0308_Redacted_enclosure.pdf (accessed September 10, 2018).

DOE-CBFO. 2018c. Transuranic Waste Acceptance Criteria for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Revision 9. DOE/WIPP-02-3122. October. Carlsbad, NM. https://wipp.energy.gov/library/wac/DOE-WIPP-023122_Rev_9_FINAL.pdf (accessed November 18, 2019).

DOE-CBFO. 2019a. Carlsbad Field Office Strategic Plan 2019-2024. DOE/CBFO-19-3605, Revision 0, Final Draft for Stakeholder Input. https://wipp.energy.gov/pdfs/DOE-CBFO-19-3605_CBFO%20Strategic%20Plan%202019-2023-Rev%200-DRAFT%20A.pdf (accessed November 12, 2019).

DOE-CBFO. 2019b. Annual Transuranic Waste Inventory Report—2019. DOE/TRU-19-3425, Revision 0. December. Carlsbad, NM. https://wipp.energy.gov/library/TRUwaste/DOE-TRU-19-3425_R0_FINAL.pdf (accessed March 23, 2020).

DOE-CBFO. 2019c. Title 40 CFR Part 191 Subparts B and C Compliance Recertification Application 2019 for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Executive Summary. Carlsbad, NM. https://wipp.energy.gov/library/CRA/CRA%202019/CRA-2019%20Section%20Executive%20Summary%20Final.pdf (accessed January 16, 2020).

DOE-EM (Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management). 1994. Department of Energy Cesium Transportation Plan, Revision 5. Available through requests made to the National Academies’ Public Access Request Office (paro@nas.edu).

DOE-EM. 2015. Accident Investigation Report—Phase 2—Radiological Release Event at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, February 14. April. Washington, DC. https://wipp.energy.gov/Special/AIB_WIPP%20Rad_Event%20Report_Phase%20II.pdf (accessed February 22, 2020).

DOE-EM. 2017. WIPP Marks Milestone with 12,000 Safe Transuranic Waste Shipment. https://www.energy.gov/em/articles/wipp-marks-milestone-12000th-safe-transuranic-waste-shipment (accessed September 10, 2018).

DOE-EM. 2018. TRANSCOM Fact Sheet. https://tcc.transcom.energy.gov/forms/TRANSCOM_Fact_Sheet2019L.PDF (accessed April 14, 2020).

DOE-NNSA (Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Adminsitration). 2016. Surplus Plutonium Disposition Program Requirements Document for the Proposed Dilute and Dispose Approach. M3-SR-160009, Revision 0. August 30. http://www.srswatch.org/uploads/2/7/5/8/27584045/m3-sr-16-0009_spd_prdfinal_releaseable.pdf (accessed March 21, 2020).

DOE-NNSA. 2018. Surplus Plutonium Disposition Program Requirements Document for the Dilute and Dispose Approach. M3-SR-16-0009, Revision 1, May 15. Available through requests made to the National Academies’ Public Access Request Office (paro@nas.edu).

DOE-NNSA. 2019. PAF-260_NNSA_Input for Final NAS Report 7-2-2019 (publicly releasable). Received by the Committee on July 9, 2019. Available through requests made to the National Academies’ Public Access Request Office (paro@nas.edu).

Domenici, P. V. 2002. Letter to Secretary Spencer Abraham, February 5. Available through requests made to the National Academies’ Public Access Request Office (paro@nas.edu).

DOS (Department of State). 2000. Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Russian Federation Concerning the Management and Disposition of Plutonium Designated as No Longer Required for Defense Purposes and Related Cooperation. Washington, DC. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/11-713.1-Russian-Federation-Nuclear-Material.pdf (accessed November 17, 2019).

DOS. 2010. Protocol to the Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Russian Federation Concerning the Management and Disposition of Plutonium Designated as No Longer Required for Defense Purposes and Related Cooperation. 2011-0136. Washington, DC.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the Department of Energy's Plans for Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25593.
×

https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/11-713.2-Russian-Federation-Nuclear-Material-Amend.pdf (accessed November 17, 2019).

DOS. 2019. Adherence to and Compliance with Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments. Washington, DC. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Compliance-Report2019-August-19-Unclassified-Final.pdf (accessed November 12, 2019).

Dunagan, S. 2019. SR‐KAC‐SPD and SR‐KAC‐PuOx Waste Streams. Presentation to the Committee on the Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Washington, DC, April 17. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/04-16-2019/disposal-of-surplus-plutonium-in-the-waste-isolation-pilot-plant (accessed April 14, 2020).

Dunagan, S., B. Day, and T. Zeitler. 2019. WIPP Performance Assessment: Surplus Pu Disposition. SAND20194067PE. Presentation to the Committee on the Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, April 16. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/04-16-2019/disposal-of-surplus-plutonium-in-the-waste-isolation-pilot-plant (accessed April 14, 2020).

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 1994. Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes (40 CFR Part 191). January. Washington, DC. https://www.epa.gov/radiation/environmental-radiation-protection-standards-management-and-disposalspent-nuclear-fuel (accessed December 3, 2019).

EPA. 2000. National primary drinking water regulations; radionuclides; final rule. Federal Register 65(236):76707-76753. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2000/12/07/00-30421/national-primary-drinking-waterregulations-radionuclides-final-rule (accessed April 3, 2020).

EPA. 2014a. Criteria for the Certification and Recertification of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant's Compliance with the 40 CFR Part 191 Disposal Regulations 40 CFR Part 194. October. Washington, DC. https://www.epa.gov/radiation/criteria-certification-and-recertification-waste-isolation-pilot-plants-compliance-40-cfr (accessed December 3, 2019).

EPA. 2014b. CARD No. 46: Removal of waste. Compliance Application Review Documents for the Criteria for the Certification and Recertification of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant’s Compliance with the 40 CFR Part 191 Disposal Regulations, Part 46: Removal of Waste, 40 CFR § 191.46. October. Washington, DC. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-05/documents/card46.pdf (accessed November 26, 2019).

EPA. 2019. Certification and Recertification of WIPP. https://www.epa.gov/radiation/certification-and-recertification-wipp (accessed January 15, 2020).

Epstein, M. J., and A. Rejc Buhovac. 2005. Identifying, Measuring, and Managing Organizational Risk for Improved Performance: Risk Management Accounting Guideline. Toronto, Ontario: CMA Canada and AICPA.

GAO (Government Accountability Office). 2009. GAO Cost Estimation and Assessment Guide. GAO-09-3SP. March. Washington, DC. https://www.gao.gov/new.items/d093sp.pdf (accessed April 3, 2020).

GAO. 2017. Plutonium Disposition: Proposed Dilute and Dispose Approach Highlights Need for More Work at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. GAO-17-390. Washington, DC. https://www.gao.gov/assets/690/686928.pdf (accessed September 10, 2018).

Gaswirth, S. B., K. L. French, J. K. Pitman, K. R. Marra, T. J. Mercier, H. M. Leathers-Miller, C. J. Schenk, M. E. Tennyson, C. A. Woodall, M. E. Brownfield, T. M. Finn, and P. A. Le. 2018. Assessment of Undiscovered Continuous Oil and Gas Resources in the Wolfcamp Shale and Bone Spring Formation of the Delaware Basin, Permian Basin Province, New Mexico and Texas, 2018. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2018-3073. https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2018/3073/fs20183073.pdf (accessed April 3, 2020).

Goodson, J. T. 2018. An Alternative Method for Disposition of U.S. Excess Weapons-Grade Plutonium: Addressing the Challenges of the PMDA. LLNL-TR-749067. Livermore, CA: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/934245.pdf (accessed September 10, 2018).

Greenberg. M. 2018. Siting Noxious Facilities. New York: Earthscan/Routledge.

Greenberg, M., C. Haas, L. A. Cox, Jr., K. Lowrie, K. McComas, and W. North. 2012. Ten most important accomplishments in risk analysis, 1980-2010. Risk Analysis 32(5):771-781.

Haddal, R., R. J. Finch, G. T. Baldwin, and D. S. Blair. 2014. Geological Repository Safeguards: Options for the Future. SAND2014-17724C. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1315146 (accessed November 20, 2019).

Haddal, R., R. J. Finch, H. A. Smartt, and R. Suh. 2018. Maintaining Continuity of Knowledge on Nuclear Waste Destined for Geological Repositories. A Case Study of Plutonium Shipments to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). SAND-2018-12409. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1481535 (accessed November 20, 2019).

Haimes, Y. 2016. Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the Department of Energy's Plans for Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25593.
×

Hansen, F. 2009. Assessing Engineered Systems in Geologic Repositories: WIPP. Presentation at Performance Assessment Community of Practice Workshop, Salt Lake City, UT, July 13-14. http://www.cresp.org/PACOP/Presentations/Day%201%20July%2013%202009/08_Hansen_Franks%20Presentation_60909.pdf (accessed April 3, 2020).

Hart, M. J., N. F. Brown, M. J. Rokey, H. J. Huslage, J. D. Castro-Bran, N. Y. Lao, R. J. Duphily, V. M. Canales, J. P. Davis, W. L. Plumb-Starnes, and J.-S. W. Chien. 2015. Plutonium Disposition Study Options Independent Assessment Phase 2 Report. Aerospace Report No. TOR-2015-02671. Washington, DC: National Nuclear Security Administration. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2018/02/f49/Plutonium_Disposition_Phase2_TOR_082015_FINAL%5B1%5D.pdf (accessed April 3, 2020).

Hedden, A. 2019. Department of Energy: Half of nuclear waste shipments to WIPP come from Idaho National Lab. Carlsbad Current-Argus, November 18. https://www.currentargus.com/story/news/local/2019/11/18/doemore-than-half-wipp-shipments-come-idaho-national-lab/4205541002 (accessed April 3, 2020).

Helton, J. 1994. Treatment of uncertainty in performance assessments for complex systems. Risk Analysis 14(4):483-511.

Helton, J., D. Anderson, H.-N. Jow, M. Marietta, and G. Bashbivazo. 1999. Performance assessment in support of the 1996 compliance certification application for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Risk Analysis 19(5):959-986.

IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). 1972. The Structure and Content of Agreements Between the Agency and States Required in Connection with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. INFCIRC/153. Vienna, Austria. https://www.iaea.org/publications/documents/infcircs/structure-and-content-agreements-between-agency-and-states-required-connection-treaty-non-proliferation-nuclear-weapons (accessed November 20, 2019).

IAEA. 2011. Disposal of Radioactive Waste—Specific Safety Requirement, SSR-5. STI/PUB/1449. Vienna, Austria. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1449_web.pdf (accessed April 3, 2020).

IAEA. 2015. Security of Nuclear Material in Transport, Implementation Guide. IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 26-G. 2015. Vienna, Austria. https://www.iaea.org/publications/10792/security-of-nuclear-material-in-transport (accessed February 11, 2020).

IDA (Institute for Defense Analyses). 2019. Independent Assessment of the Two-Site Pit Production Decision: Executive Summary. IDA Document NS D-10711. Alexandria, VA. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2019/06/f63/NNSA-IDA-study-introduction.pdf (accessed November 20, 2019).

Idaho State Police. 2006. Presentation at the Western Governors’ Association, WIPP Transportation Technical Advisory Group, Security Subcommittee Meeting, Carlsbad, NM, May 30-June 1.

Institute for Science and International Security. 2015. Plutonium and Highly Enriched Uranium Inventories, 2015. November 16. http://isis-online.org/isis-reports/detail/plutonium-and-highly-enriched-uranium-inventories-2015 (accessed April 3, 2020).

IPFM (International Panel on Fissile Materials) 2016. Russia raises concerns about changes in U.S. plutonium disposition plan. IPFM Blog. April 7. http://fissilematerials.org/blog/2016/04/russia_raises_concerns_ab.html (accessed April 3, 2020).

Kerr, R. A. 1999. For radioactive waste from weapons, a home at last. Science 283(5408):1626-1628.

Kersting, A. B. 2013. Plutonium in the environment. Inorganic Chemistry 52(7):3533-3546. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic3018908 (accessed April 3, 2020).

Kersting, A. B., D. W. Efurd, D. L. Finnegan, D. J. Rokop, D. K. Smith, and J. L. Thompson. 1999. Migration of plutonium in ground water at the Nevada Test Site. Nature 397(6714):56-59.

Kunreuther, H., and M. Isseem. 2018. Mastering Catastrophic Risk. New York: Oxford University Press.

LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory). 2012. Performance Assessment Inventory Report—2012. INV-PA-12, Revision 0. Carlsbad, NM. https://www.wipp.energy.gov/library/cra/CRA-2014/References/Others/Van_Soest2012_PAIR_2012.pdf (accessed November 19, 2019).

LANL. 2017. NNSA Surplus Plutonium Disposition Performance Assessment Inventory Report—2017. INV-SDP-17, Revision 1. Carlsbad, NM.

Lowrance, W. 1972. Of Acceptable Risk: Science and Determination of Safety. Menlo Park, CA: William Kaufmann.

Mason, T. 2015. Final Report of the Plutonium Disposition Red Team. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2018/02/f49/Pu-Disposition-Red-Team-Report-081315vFinal-SM%5B1%5D.pdf (accessed September 10, 2018).

Maxted, M. 2019. Overview of the 6 Metric Tons of Surplus Plutonium Disposition Plan. Presentation to the Committee on the Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Washington, DC, April 16. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/04-16-2019/disposal-of-surplus-plutonium-in-the-wasteisolation-pilot-plant (accessed April 14, 2020).

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the Department of Energy's Plans for Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25593.
×

McAlhany, S. 2017. Surplus Plutonium Disposition - Dilute and Dispose Approach. M3-SR-18-0001. Presentation to the Committee on the Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, November 28, Washington, DC. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/11-28-2017/disposal-of-surplus-plutonium-in-the-waste-isolation-pilot-plant---meeting-1 (accessed April 14, 2020).

McAlhany, S., T. Shrader, and S. Callahan, 2018. Surplus Plutonium Disposition Program. M3-SR-180-0017, Revision 0. June. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/06-26-2018/disposal-of-surplus-plutonium-in-the-waste-isolation-pilot-plant (accessed April 14, 2020).

Meyer, S., S. Cotton, J. Lengacher, and J. Oh. 2019. CNS Global Incidents and Trafficking Database, James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies (CNS). July. https://media.nti.org/documents/global_incidents_trafficking_2018.pdf (accessed February 11, 2020).

Moody, D. C. 2011. Interim Action Decision, Disposition of Certain Plutonium Materials Stored at the Savannah River Site, 500 kg SPD IA. October. Aiken, SC: Savannah River Site. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/EIS-0283-S2-IntActDet-2011.pdf (accessed November 24, 2019).

NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2018. Disposal of Surplus Plutonium at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25272 (accessed April 13, 2020).

NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act). 1988. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1989. Pub. L. No. 100-456. https://www.congress.gov/bill/100th-congress/house-bill/4481 (accessed November 22, 2019).

Neill, R. H., and M. K. Silva. 2001. EEG’s independent technical oversight on WIPP, a TRU waste geologic repository. Proceedings: 9th International High Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference, Las Vegas, NV, April 29-May 3. American Nuclear Society.

NMED (New Mexico Environment Department). 2018. Secretary's Order Approving Draft Permit. No. WB 18-19 (P). https://www.env.nm.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2016/05/HWB-18-19-P-Secretarys-OrderApproving-Draft-Permit.pdf (accessed April 3, 2020).

Novikov, A. P., S. N. Kalmykov, S. Utsunomiya, R. C. Ewing, F. Horreard, A. Merkulov, S. B. Clark, V. V. Tkachev, and B. F. Myasoedov. 2006. Colloid transport of plutonium in the far-field of the Mayak Production Association, Russia. Science 314(5799):638-641.

NRC (National Research Council). 1994. Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/2345 (accessed November 20, 2019).

NRC. 1996. The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant: A Potential Solution for the Disposal of Transuranic Waste. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/5269 (accessed April 3, 2020).

NRC. 2000. The Spent-Fuel Standard for Disposition of Excess Weapon Plutonium: Application to Current DOE Options. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9999.

Nuclear Security & Deterrence Monitor, Staff Reports, August 30. “Extra Shifts Increase Plutonium Downblending at Savannah River,” Vol. 23 No. 3, August 30.

Nuclear Waste Partnership LLC. 2018a. Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Documented Safety Analysis. DOE/WIPP 07-3372, Revision 6a. Carlsbad, NM: U.S. Department of Energy, Carlsbad Field Office. https://wipp.energy.gov/Library/DSA/DOE-WIPP-07-3372_R6a_WIPP-DSA_Eff073118.pdf (accessed November 18, 2019).

Nuclear Waste Partnership LLC. 2018b. Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Technical Safety Requirements. DOE/WIPP 07-3373, Revision 6a, Carlsbad, NM: U.S. Department of Energy, Carlsbad Field Office. https://wipp.energy.gov/Library/DSA/DOE-WIPP-07-3373_R6a_WIPP-TSR_Eff073118.pdf (accessed November 18, 2019).

Omnibus Risk Review Committee. 2015. A Review of the Use of Risk‐Informed Management in the Cleanup Program for Former Defense Nuclear Sites. Nashville, TN: Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation. http://www.cresp.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Omnibus-Risk-Review-Report_FINAL.pdf (accessed November 20, 2019).

Oswald, M., 2019. Udall suggests new administration reconsider WIPP volume change. Albuquerque Journal, January 13. https://www.abqjournal.com/1267913/permit-changes-at-wipp-face-challenges-ex-new-governorurged-to-reconsider-predecessors-decision.html (accessed November 22, 2019).

Parsons, Enterprise Construction Management Services. 2017. Surplus Plutonium Disposition Project, Analysis of Alternatives, Final Report. BPA Number: DE-NA0000385, Order Number: DE-DT0011884. April. Washington, DC: Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration. Available through requests made to the National Academies’ Public Access Request Office (paro@nas.edu).

Peake, T. 2019. EPA Role at WIPP. Presentation to the Committee on the Disposal of Surplus Plutonium at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Plutonium Panel, Washington, DC, April 16. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/0416-2019/disposal-of-surplus-plutonium-in-the-waste-isolation-pilot-plant (accessed April 14, 2020).

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the Department of Energy's Plans for Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25593.
×

Perry, R. 2018. Letter to Deb Fischer, Committee on Armed Services, May 10. http://www.lasg.org/MPF2/PerryLtrMOX-D&D-MFFF_10May2018.pdf (accessed November 25, 2019).

RadioFreeEurope RadioLiberty. 2016. Putin Suspends Russia-U.S. Plutonium Disposition Agreement. https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-plutonium-deal--suspended/28028737.html (accessed September 10, 2018).

Rechard, R. P., L. C. Sanchez, C. T. Stockman, and H. R. Trellue. 2000. Consideration of Nuclear Criticality when Disposing of Transuranic Waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. SAND 99-2898. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/755094 (accessed April 16, 2020).

Richard, P. 2019. Surplus Plutonium Disposition Dilute and Dispose NEPA. Presentation to the Committee on the Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, April 17, Washington, DC. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/04-16-2019/disposal-of-surplus-plutonium-in-the-waste-isolationpilot-plant (accessed April 14, 2020).

Sahd, G. H. 2019. Videos: Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Meeting 9, Washington, DC, April 16. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/04-16-2019/disposal-of-surplus-plutonium-in-the-waste-isolation-pilot-plant (accessed April 22, 2020).

Santschi, P. H., K. A. Roberts, and L. D. Guo. 2002. Organic nature of colloidal actinides transported in surface water environments. Environmental Science & Technology 36(17):3711-3719.

Saylor, E. M., and J. M. Scaglione. 2018. Nuclear Criticality Safety Assessment of Potential Plutonium Disposition at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. ORNL/TM-2017/751/R1. November. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Scaglione, J. M., and Saylor, E. M. 2018. Summary of US Surplus Weapons-Usable Plutonium WIPP Postclosure Criticality Analysis. PB1800791. Provided to the Committee on the Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in April 2019 by the Department of Energy. Available through requests made to the National Academies’ Public Access Request Office (paro@nas.edu).

Seaborg, G. T., E. M. McMillan, J. W. Kennedy, and A. C. Wahl. 1946. Radioactive element 94 from deuterons on uranium. Physical Review 69:366-367.

Seaborg, G. T., and I. Perlman. 1948. Table of isotopes. Reviews of Modern Physics 20(4):585.

Sewards, T., R. Glenn, and K. Keil. 1991. Mineralogy of the Rustler Formation in the WIPP-19 core. SAND877036. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories. Figure III-1—Map Showing Location of Borehole WIPP-19 (TRI-6342-474-0).

Shrader, T. 2018. WIPP Capacity [and 3D Underground map of WIPP]. Presentations to the Committee on the Disposal of Surplus Plutonium at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, June 26, Irvine, CA. https://vimeo.com/405888931 (accessed April 13, 2020).

Society for Risk Analysis. 1999. Special collection: Performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal. Risk Analysis 19(5):759-1017.

SRNS (Savannah River Nuclear Solutions). 2016. Surplus Plutonium Disposition—System Plan for the Proposed Dilute and Dispose Approach. SRNS-TR-2016-00136, Revision 0. October. Aiken, SC. Available through requests made to the National Academies’ Public Access Request Office (paro@nas.edu).

SRNS. 2018a. Surplus Plutonium Disposition Program Dilute and Dispose Approach Life Cycle Cost Estimate, Summary Report. SRNS-RP-2018-00570, Revision 0. May. Aiken, SC. Available through requests made to the National Academies’ Public Access Request Office (paro@nas.edu).

SRNS. 2018b. Surplus Plutonium Disposition—Technical Baseline Description for the Proposed Dilute and Dispose Approach. SRNS-TR-2016-00285, Revision 1. June. Aiken, SC. Available through requests made to the National Academies’ Public Access Request Office (paro@nas.edu).

SRNS. 2018c. System Plan for the Proposed Dilute and Dispose Approach. SRNS-TR-2016-00136, Revision 1. May. Aiken, SC. Available through requests made to the National Academies’ Public Access Request Office (paro@nas.edu).

SRNS. 2018d. Risk and Opportunity Management Plan for the National Nuclear Security Administration Surplus Plutonium Disposition Program Dilute and Dispose Approach. Y-RMP-G-00023, Revision 1. February. Aiken, SC. Available through requests made to the National Academies’ Public Access Request Office (paro@nas.edu).

SRNS. 2018e. Surplus Plutonium Disposition Program Dilute and Dispose Approach Risk and Opportunity Analysis Report (ROAR). Y-RAR-G-00064, Revision 1. May. Aiken, SC. Available through requests made to the National Academies’ Public Access Request Office (paro@nas.edu).

SRNS. 2018f. Surplus Plutonium Disposition Program Technology Readiness Assessment. SRNS-T8000-201600295, Revision 1. June. Aiken, SC. Available through requests made to the National Academies’ Public Access Request Office (paro@nas.edu).

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the Department of Energy's Plans for Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25593.
×

SRS (Savannah River Site). 2018. Savannah River Site continues shipment of transuranic waste out of state. NEWS from the Savannah River Site, August 16. https://www.srs.gov/general/news/releases/nr18_srs-transuranicwaste-out-of-state.pdf (accessed April 14, 2020).

SSEB (Southern States Energy Board). 2018. Memorandum of Agreement Between the Southern States and Department of Energy, Regional Protocol for the Safe Transport of Transuranic Waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.

Stebbins-Wheelock, E., and A. Turgeon. 2018. Guide to Risk Assessment & Response. University of Vermont.

Tracy, C. L. 2019. Feasibility and Risks of Human Intrusion in WIPP. Presentation to the Committee on the Disposal of Surplus Plutonium at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Washington, DC, April 16. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/04-16-2019/disposal-of-surplus-plutonium-in-the-waste-isolation-pilot-plant (accessed April 22, 2020).

Trimble, D. 2014. Nuclear Nonproliferation—Additional Actions Needed to Increase the Security of U.S. Industrial Radiological Sources. Testimony Before the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, U.S. Senate. GAO-14-681T. June. https://www.gao.gov/assets/670/664074.pdf (accessed February 11, 2020).

U.S. Congress, House. 2016. Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill, 2017. H. Rep. 114-532 together with Additional Views to accompany H.R. 5055. Explanatory Statement. https://www.congress.gov/congressional-report/114th-congress/house-report/532/1 (accessed November 25, 2019).

USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 2018. Independent Life Cycle Cost Estimate (LCCE) for Surplus Plutonium Disposition (SPD) Program—Dilute and Dispose Approach. November.

USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). 2018. USGS Announces Largest Continuous Oil Assessment in Texas and New Mexico. November 28. https://www.usgs.gov/news/usgs-announces-largest-continuous-oil-assessment-texas-and-new-mexico (accessed March 30, 2020).

Veal, K. 2019. Engagement with IAEA for 6 MT. Presentation to the Committee on the Disposal of Surplus Plutonium at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, April 17, Washington, DC. https://vimeo.com/showcase/6028445/video/338030316 (accessed April 13, 2020).

Walker, B. A. and Silva, M. K. 2002. EEG’s Views on the Proposed Modifications to the WIPP Hazardous Waste Facility Permit. Waste Management Conference, February 24-28, Tuscon, AZ. Washington TRU Solutions. 2008. Nuclear Criticality Safety Evaluation for Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. WIPP-016, Revision 0. Washington, DC. https://19january2017snapshot.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-05/documents/2_nuccriticalityassessment_shieldedcontainers.pdf (accessed January 15, 2020).

WGA (Western Governors’ Association). 1989. Report to Congress: Transport of Transuranic Wastes to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, State Concerns and Proposed Solutions. Developed Cooperatively Through the Western Governors’ Association Task Force on Nuclear Waste, Representing the States of: Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming, In Cooperation with the Department of Transportation, June.

WGA. 1991. Report to the Western Governors and Secretary of Energy, Safe Transport of Transuranic Wastes to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant: Report of the Technical Advisory Group for WIPP Transport, Developed Cooperatively through the Western Governors’ Association and the Technical Advisory Group States, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wyoming, Funded Through a Grant from the Department of Energy. June.

WGA. 2019. Memorandum Between the Western Governors and the Department of Energy Regional Protocol for the Safe and Uneventful Transportation of Transuranic (TRU) Waste. https://rampac.energy.gov/docs/defaultsource/DOEInfo/Attachment-2.pdf (accessed April 3, 2020).

White House, Office of the Press Secretary. 1993. Fact Sheet on Nonproliferation and Export Control Policy, September 27. https://www.rertr.anl.gov/REFDOCS/PRES93NP.html (accessed April 3, 2020).

WIPP (Waste Isolation Pilot Plant). 2018. WIPP Hazardous Waste Permit, Attachment J: Hazardous Waste Management Unit Tables. December. https://hwbdocuments.env.nm.gov/Waste%20Isolation%20Pilot%20Plant/181200/181200%20WIPP%20Permit%20PDF/Attachment%20J%2012-2018.pdf (accessed March 30, 2020).

WIPP. n.d. Waste Transportation. http://wipp.energy.gov/waste-transportation.asp (accessed September 10, 2018).

World Bank. 2013. World Development Report 2014: Risk and Opportunity—Managing Risk for Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Zeitler, T., B. Day, J. Bethune, D. Kicker, and R. Sarathi. 2018. Summary Report for Surplus Plutonium Disposition Analysis. WIPP: 2.3.06:PA:NQ:569298, SAND2019-2307 O. December. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories. Available through requests made to the National Academies’ Public Access Request Office (paro@nas.edu).

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the Department of Energy's Plans for Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25593.
×
Page 106
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the Department of Energy's Plans for Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25593.
×
Page 107
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the Department of Energy's Plans for Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25593.
×
Page 108
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the Department of Energy's Plans for Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25593.
×
Page 109
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the Department of Energy's Plans for Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25593.
×
Page 110
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the Department of Energy's Plans for Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25593.
×
Page 111
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the Department of Energy's Plans for Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25593.
×
Page 112
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Review of the Department of Energy's Plans for Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25593.
×
Page 113
Next: Appendix A: Committee and Staff Biographies »
Review of the Department of Energy's Plans for Disposal of Surplus Plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $75.00 Buy Ebook | $59.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

In 2018, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine issued an Interim Report evaluating the general viability of the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration’s (DOE-NNSA’s) conceptual plans for disposing of 34 metric tons (MT) of surplus plutonium in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), a deep geologic repository near Carlsbad, New Mexico. It provided a preliminary assessment of the general viability of DOE-NNSA’s conceptual plans, focused on some of the barriers to their implementation. This final report addresses the remaining issues and echoes the recommendations from the interim study.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!