Manipulating
Quantum Systems
AN ASSESSMENT OF ATOMIC, MOLECULAR, AND
OPTICAL PHYSICS IN THE UNITED STATES
Committee on Decadal Assessment and Outlook Report on Atomic,
Molecular, and Optical Science
Board on Physics and Astronomy
Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences
A Consensus Study Report of
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
Washington, DC
www.nap.edu
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001
This study is based on work supported by Contracts DE-SC0018414 with the Department of Energy, 1642381 with the National Science Foundation, and FA9550-19-1-0045 with the Air Force Office of Scientific Research. This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the U.S. government. Neither the U.S. government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. government or any agency thereof. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any agency or organization that provided support for the project.
The U.S. Government retains a paid-up, nonexclusive, irrevocable, world-wide license to reproduce, prepare derivative works, distribute copies to the public, and display publicly, by or on behalf of the Government, this work in whole or in part, or otherwise use the work for Federal purposes
International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-49951-4
International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-49951-8
Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.17226/25613
Library of Congress Control Number: 2020938871
Copies of this report are available free of charge from:
Board on Physics and Astronomy
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001
Additional copies of this publication are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu.
Copyright 2020 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America
Suggested citation: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Manipulating Quantum Systems: An Assessment of Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25613.
The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, nongovernmental institution to advise the nation on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Marcia McNutt is president.
The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineering to advising the nation. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. John L. Anderson is president.
The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on medical and health issues. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished contributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president.
The three Academies work together as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions. The National Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding contributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engineering, and medicine.
Learn more about the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at www.nationalacademies.org.
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
For information about other products and activities of the National Academies, please visit www.nationalacademies.org/about/whatwedo.
COMMITTEE ON DECADAL ASSESSMENT AND OUTLOOK REPORT ON ATOMIC, MOLECULAR, AND OPTICAL SCIENCE
JUN YE, NAS,1 JILA, National Institute of Standards and Technology, and University of Colorado, Co-Chair
NERGIS MAVALVALA, NAS, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Co-Chair
RAYMOND G. BEAUSOLEIL, Hewlett Packard Labs
PATRICIA M. DEHMER, Department of Energy (retired)
LOUIS DIMAURO, The Ohio State University
METTE GAARDE, Louisiana State University
STEVEN GIRVIN, NAS, Yale Quantum Institute
CHRIS H. GREENE, NAS, Purdue University
TAEKJIP HA, NAS, Johns Hopkins University
MARK KASEVICH, Stanford University
MICHAL LIPSON, Columbia University
MIKHAIL LUKIN, NAS, Harvard University
A. MARJATTA LYYRA, Temple University
PETER J. REYNOLDS, Army Research Office
MARIANNA SAFRONOVA, University of Delaware
PETER ZOLLER, NAS, University of Innsbruck
Staff
CHRISTOPHER J. JONES, Program Officer, Study Director
JAMES C. LANCASTER, Director, Board on Physics and Astronomy
NEERAJ P. GORKHALY, Associate Program Officer
NATHAN BOLL, Associate Program Officer (until April 2019)
LINDA WALKER, Program Coordinator
AMISHA JINANDRA, Research Associate
BETH DOLAN, Financial Associate
HENRY KO, Research Associate (until January 2019)
___________________
1 Member of the National Academy of Sciences.
BOARD ON PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY
ABRAHAM LOEB, Harvard University, Chair
ANDREW LANKFORD, University of California, Irvine, Vice Chair
WILLIAM BIALEK, NAS,1 Princeton University
JILL DAHLBURG, Naval Research Laboratory
FRANCIS DESALVO, Cornell University
LOUIS DIMAURO, The Ohio State University
WENDY FREEDMAN, NAS, University of Chicago
TIM HECKMAN, NAS, Johns Hopkins University
WENDELL HILL III, University of Maryland
ALAN HURD, Los Alamos National Laboratory
NERGIS MAVALVALA, NAS, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
LYMAN PAGE, JR., NAS, Princeton University
STEVEN RITZ, University of California, Santa Cruz
SUNIL SINHA, University of California, San Diego
WILLIAM ZAJC, Columbia University
Staff
JAMES C. LANCASTER, Director
GREGORY MACK, Senior Program Officer
CHRISTOPHER J. JONES, Program Officer
NEERAJ P. GORKHALY, Associate Program Officer
BETH DOLAN, Financial Associate
AMISHA JINANDRA, Research Associate
LINDA WALKER, Program Coordinator
___________________
1 Member of the National Academy of Sciences.
Preface
This report is an accounting of the “AMO 2020” decadal study undertaken by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to assess opportunities in AMO (atomic, molecular, and optical) science and technology over the coming decade. The charge for this study was devised by a Board on Physics and Astronomy standing committee, the Committee on Decadal Assessment and Outlook Report on Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Science, in consultation with the study’s sponsors, the Department of Energy (DOE), the National Science Foundation (NSF), and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR). The main task for the committee is to provide insights for both scientists and agencies in finding opportunities to advance established and emerging areas of AMO, through funding, education, and industrial partnerships.
The Committee on AMO 2020, which carried out the study, was asked to assess the state of the field of AMO science, emphasizing recent accomplishments and identifying new and compelling scientific questions and opportunities. The committee that carried out this study and wrote this report comprised leaders from many different subfields within the AMO physics community, as well as prominent scientists from outside the field. By highlighting a summary review of the field of AMO science as a whole, the committee describes opportunities for scientific discoveries and new technological development. The report is structured around scientific grand challenges, with science goals, tool development, and research impact interleaved throughout the main science chapters. These summaries are intended as a guideline to identify the impacts of AMO science, now and in the coming decade, on emerging technologies and in meeting national needs.
The committee held five in-person meetings and numerous teleconferences among members to provide input, receive feedback, deliberate findings, and collaborate on writing. In addition, the committee received valuable input in the form of presentations from the following colleagues during some of the in-person meetings: Phil Bucksbaum, Paul Corkum, Dave DeMille, Emily Domenech, Markus Greiner, Anna Krylov, Steve Leone, Chris Monroe, Oskar Painter, Adam Rosenberg, Daniel Savin, and Jelena Vuckovic. The following individuals also provided perspective from the federal agencies: John Gillaspy (NSF/Mathematical and Physical Sciences [MPS]), Grace Metcalf (AFOSR), and Tom Settersten (DOE/Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences [CSGB]).
Significant effort was made to solicit community input for this study. This was done via town hall meetings held at the Annual Meeting of the Division of AMO Physics of the American Physical Society (APS) in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, in May 2018 and the Frontiers in Optics Conference hosted by the Optical Society of America and co-sponsored by APS, Division of Laser Science in September 2018 in Washington, D.C. The committee also solicited input from the community through a public website and received many white papers. The comments supplied by the AMO community through this site and at the town hall meetings were extremely valuable primary input to the committee. The committee also consulted a number of reports concerning the connection of AMO science to photonics, quantum information, and space-related activities. The committee acknowledges valuable input from the following colleagues: Alain Aspect, Paul Baker, Louis Barbier, Lisa Barsotti, Klaus Bartschat, Scott Bergeson, Klaus Blaum, Brad Blakestad, Immanuel Bloch, Doerte Blume, Stephen Boppart, Steven Boxer, Igor Bray, Paul Brumer, Dmitry Budker, Jaime Cardenas, Jenna Chan, Ignacio Cirac, Eric Cornell, Steve Cundiff, Tatjana Curcic, Brian DeMarco, John Doyle, Francesca Ferlaino, Debra Fischer, Graham Fleming, Nathan Goldman, Barbara Goldstein, Rudolf Grimm, Christian Gross, Richard Hammond, Ulrich Höfer, Matt Hourihan, Liang Jiang, Sabre Kais, Henry Kapteyn, Wolfgang Ketterle, Thomas Killian, Derek Jackson Kimball, H. Jeff Kimble, Tobias Kippenberg, David Kleinfeld, Svetlana Kotochigova, Ferenc Krausz, Anne L’Huillier, Todd Martinez, C. William McCurdy, William Moerner, Sarah Monk, Margaret Murnane, Frank Narducci, David Newell, Kang-Kuen Ni, Tilman Pfau, Nathalie Picque, Johannes Reimann, David Reis, Ana Maria Rey, Tara Ruttley, Dan Stamper-Kurn, Marc Ulrich, Pieter van Dokkum, Vladan Vuletic, Ronald Walsworth, Andrew Weiner, Jonathan Wheeler, Tommy Willis, Norm Yao, and Linda Young.
The national organizations and federal agencies that support AMO research in the United States were also solicited for input, through their direct testimony at open meetings and their written responses to requests for information on funding patterns, demographic information, and other statistical data. These data are summarized in Chapter 8 and in the appendixes to the report. The committee is
also grateful to the staff from the committees in Congress concerned with funding legislation, who provided important background on connections between AMO science and national science policy.
The AMO field continues to progress at an exciting pace for both scientific discoveries and technological innovations. The increasingly stronger and pervasive connections to many disciplines of physical and biological sciences have made AMO a cornerstone for modern science and emerging technologies, and we note particularly the fundamental role AMO plays in shaping the ongoing revolution in the field of quantum information science and technology. AMO has become a vital engine for current and future economic development. It is the collective enthusiasm and optimism of the AMO scientific community that helped make writing this report a pleasant and rewarding task. The committee gratefully acknowledges the infinite talent, expertise, and tireless efforts of our committee members, who contributed enormously to the success of this report, as well as valuable contributions from many colleagues from our community. The committee is grateful to Tom O’Brian and the National Institute of Standards and Technology for strong support for the committee activities. Last, the committee expresses its sincere gratitude to Chris Jones for his dedication, expertise, and organizational skills, to Jim Lancaster for his insights and guidance, and to the National Academy of Sciences staff for their many important contributions to data analysis during the writing of this report. The committee is also deeply grateful for the partnership between the co-chairs that made this study a fulfilling and enjoyable process.
Acknowledgment of Reviewers
This Consensus Study Report was reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in making each published report as sound as possible and to ensure that it meets the institutional standards for quality, objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process.
We thank the following individuals for their review of this report:
___________________
1 Member, National Academy of Sciences.
2 Member, National Academy of Engineering.
Although the reviewers listed above provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations of this report nor did they see the final draft before its release. The review of this report was overseen by Julia M. Phillips, NAE, Sandia National Laboratories, and David J. Wineland, NAS, University of Oregon. They were responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with the standards of the National Academies and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content rests entirely with the authoring committee and the National Academies.
Contents
1 MANIPULATING QUANTUM SYSTEMS: AMO SCIENCE IN THE COMING DECADE
Chapter 2: Tools Made of Light
Chapter 3: Emerging Phenomena from Few- to Many-Body Systems
Chapter 4: Foundations of Quantum Information Science and Technology
Chapter 5: Harnessing Quantum Dynamics in the Time and Frequency Domains
Chapter 6: Precision Frontier and Fundamental Nature of the Universe
Chapter 7: Broader Impact of AMO Science
Chapter 8: AMO Science: Part of the U.S. Economic and Societal Ecosystem
AMO Science and National Policies: Conclusions and Recommendations
Main Findings and Recommendations
Chapter-Level Findings and Recommendations
Generating Light with Extreme Properties
The Future for New Tools Made of Light
3 EMERGING PHENOMENA FROM FEW- TO MANY-BODY SYSTEMS
From Few Bodies to Many Bodies: How Complexity Builds
Ultracold Physical Processes Involving Ions
Developments with Atomic Degenerate Quantum Gases
Many-Body Systems with Ultracold Molecules
Analog Quantum Simulation of Strongly Correlated Quantum Many-Body Systems
Summary of Opportunities and Recommendations
4 FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Understanding, Probing, and Using Entanglement
Controlling Quantum Many-Body Systems
Controlled Many-Body Systems for Quantum Simulations
Bell Inequalities, Quantum Communication, and Quantum Networks
Quantum Information Science for Sensing and Metrology
Grand Challenges and Opportunities
5 HARNESSING QUANTUM DYNAMICS IN THE TIME AND FREQUENCY DOMAINS
Attosecond Science: The Time Scale of the Electron
The Molecular Time Scale: Femto- to Picoseconds
Frequency-Domain Approaches to Dynamics: Collisions and Correlations
Novel Physics with Extreme Light
6 PRECISION FRONTIER AND FUNDAMENTAL NATURE OF THE UNIVERSE
Crisis of Modern Fundamental Physics
Searches for New Physics Beyond the Standard Model
Fundamental Constants and Measurement Standards
Summary, Discovery Potential, and Grand Challenges
7 BROADER IMPACT OF AMO SCIENCE
Astronomy, Astrophysics, Gravitation, Cosmology, and AMO
Statistical Physics, Quantum Thermalization, Emergence of the Classical World, and AMO
AMO and Economic Opportunities
Jointly Sponsored Interdisciplinary Research Laboratories
8 ATOMIC, MOLECULAR, AND OPTICAL SCIENCE: PART OF THE U.S. ECONOMIC AND SOCIETAL ECOSYSTEM
Investments in AMO Research: Funding, Collaboration, and Coordination
Workforce, Educational, and Societal Needs
Findings and Recommendations: Realizing the Full Potential of AMO Science
C Reprise of Past National Academies Reports on AMO Science
D Committee Biographical Information