National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Appendix E: Committee Roster
Suggested Citation:"Appendix F: Acknowledgment of Report Reviewers." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Evaluation of Applications to Carry Out Research to Determine the Taxonomy of Wild Canids in the Southeastern United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25661.
×
Page 12
Suggested Citation:"Appendix F: Acknowledgment of Report Reviewers." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Evaluation of Applications to Carry Out Research to Determine the Taxonomy of Wild Canids in the Southeastern United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25661.
×
Page 13
Suggested Citation:"Appendix F: Acknowledgment of Report Reviewers." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Evaluation of Applications to Carry Out Research to Determine the Taxonomy of Wild Canids in the Southeastern United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25661.
×
Page 14
Suggested Citation:"Appendix F: Acknowledgment of Report Reviewers." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Evaluation of Applications to Carry Out Research to Determine the Taxonomy of Wild Canids in the Southeastern United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25661.
×
Page 15
Suggested Citation:"Appendix F: Acknowledgment of Report Reviewers." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Evaluation of Applications to Carry Out Research to Determine the Taxonomy of Wild Canids in the Southeastern United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25661.
×
Page 16

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Appendix F Acknowledgment of Report Reviewers This Consensus Study Report was reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspective and technical expertise. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in making each published report as sound as possible and to ensure that it meets the institutional standards for quality, objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We thank the following individuals for their review of this report: Roland Kays, North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences and North Carolina State University Rasmus Nielson, University of California, Berkeley Mary Power (NAS), University of California, Berkeley Although the reviewers listed above provided many constructive comments and suggestions, there were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations of this report. The review of this report was overseen by Barbara Schaal, Washington University in St. Louis. She was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with the standards of the National Academies and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content rests entirely with the authoring committee and the National Academies. 12

BOARD ON LIFE SCIENCES Chair JAMES P. COLLINS, Arizona State University Members A. ALONSO AGUIRRE, George Mason University VALERIE H. BONHAM, Ropes & Gray LLP DOMINIQUE BROSSARD, University of Wisconsin–Madison NANCY D. CONNELL, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security SEAN M. DECATUR, Kenyon College JOSEPH R. ECKER (NAS), Howard Hughes Medical Institute SCOTT V. EDWARDS (NAS), Harvard University GERALD L. EPSTEIN, National Defense University ROBERT J. FULL, University of California, Berkeley MARY E. MAXON, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory ROBERT NEWMAN, The Aspen Institute STEPHEN J. O’BRIEN (NAS), Nova Southeastern University LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO, University of California, San Diego JILL P. MESIROV, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine and Moores Cancer Center CLAIRE POMEROY (NAM), Albert and Mary Lasker Foundation MARY E. POWER (NAS), University of California, Berkeley SUSAN RUNDELL SINGER, Rollins College LANA SKIRBOLL, Sanofi DAVID R. WALT (NAE, NAM), Harvard Medical School PHYLLIS M. WISE, University of Colorado Staff FRAN SHARPLES, Director JO HUSBANDS, Scholar and Senior Project Director KATHERINE BOWMAN, Senior Program Officer KEEGAN SAWYER, Senior Program Officer ANDREA HODGSON, Program Officer AUDREY THEVENON, Program Officer STEVEN MOSS, Associate Program Officer JESSICA DE MOUY, Senior Program Assistant KOSSANA YOUNG, Senior Program Assistant 13

BOARD ON AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES Chair CHARLES W. RICE, Kansas State University, Manhattan Members ARISTOS ARISTIDOU (NAE), Cargill, Inc. SHANE C. BURGESS, University of Arizona, Tucson SUSAN CAPALBO, Oregon State University GAIL CZARNECKI-MAULDEN, Nestlé Purina PetCare BERNADETTE DUNHAM, The George Washington University GEBISA EJETA, Purdue University JAMES S. FAMIGLIETTI, California Institute of Technology FRED GOULD (NAS), North Carolina State University JOHN HAMER, DCVC Bio DOUGLAS B. JACKSON-SMITH, The Ohio State University JAMES W. JONES (NAE), University of Florida ERMIAS KEBREAB, University of California, Davis STEPHEN S. KELLEY, North Carolina State University JAN E. LEACH, Colorado State University ROBIN LOUGEE, IBM Research JILL J. MCCLUSKEY, Washington State University KAREN I. PLAUT, Purdue University RICARDO SALVADOR, Union of Concerned Scientists V. ALARIC SAMPLE, George Mason University Staff ROBIN A. SCHOEN, Director CAMILLA YANDOC ABLES, Senior Program Officer KARA N. LANEY, Senior Program Officer JENNA BRISCOE, Research Assistant SARAH KWON, Program Assistant 14

The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, nongovernmental institution to advise the nation on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Marcia McNutt is president. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineering to advising the nation. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. John L. Anderson is president. The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on medical and health issues. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished contributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president. The three Academies work together as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions. The National Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding contributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engineering, and medicine. Learn more about the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at www.nationalacademies.org. 15

Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task. Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies. For information about other products and activities of the National Academies, please visit www.nationalacademies.org/about/whatwedo. 16

Evaluation of Applications to Carry Out Research to Determine the Taxonomy of Wild Canids in the Southeastern United States Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service commissioned the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to develop a request for applications, "Research to determine the taxonomy of wild canid populations in regions of the United States where recent evidence suggests the potential presence of red wolves (Canis rufus)," and to conduct an independent evaluation of the submitted applications. This letter report describes the work of the committee and transmits the final evaluation of applications to carry out research.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!