Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
45 Ramani, T., M. Kader, J. Johnson, T. Jacobs, C. Spiegelman, and J. Zietsman. (2015). âIncorporating Onboard Diagnostics into Fleet Preventive Maintenance Practices.â Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2482, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, p. 1â7. Ribecca, S. âThe Data Visualisation Catalogue.â https://datavizcatalogue.com/index.html Shaumik, P., P. S. Sriraj, L. Ogard, and S. McNeil. (2003). âEvaluation of Private-Sector Asset Management Practices.â Transportation Research Record 1848, Paper No. 03-3374, p. 29â36. The Kercher Group (formerly Asset Management Associates, PLLC). (2017). âDeveloping and Using Equipment Utilization Standards.â Western States Highway Equipment Managers Association. The Kercher Group (formerly Asset Management Associates, PLLC). (2015). âUtah Department of Transportation: Lifecycle Cost Analysis for Class 8 Snowplow Trucks, Business Case â Final Report.â https://www.udot.utah.gov/main/uconowner.gf?n=32953211573621153 Transportation Research Board, Committee on Maintenance Equipment. (2002). âFinancial Aspects of Equipment Acquisition.â Transportation Research Circular, Number E-C047. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). (2019). âAlternative Fuel Data Center.â https://afdc.energy.gov/ Warne, T. R. (2003). âNCHRP Synthesis 313: State DOT Outsourcing and Private-Sector Utilization.â National Academy of Sciences, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. White, J. (2016). âImproving Management Presentations.â http://pavementvideo.s3.amazonaws.com/2016_EMTSP_National/PDF/11_TAMP%20Targets% 20Com%20Presentation_White.pdf Wiegmann, K., A. Sundararajan, and Z. Tao. (2011). âNCHRP Report 692: Decision Making for Outsourcing and Privatization of Vehicle and Equipment Fleet Maintenance.â National Academy of Sciences, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
46 8. APPENDIX A. FLEET MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM IN DOTS Table 12 gives the FMIS used in each DOT and categorizes it as a mainframe/homegrown, COTS, ERP, or EAM system. Table 12. Summary of FMISs by state DOT State Description of Fleet Management System Used System Type Alabama In-house Mainframe/homegrown Alaska Homegrown Mainframe/homegrown Arizona Asset Works M4 COTS Arkansas AHTD Equipment Management System Mainframe/homegrown California AssetWorks FA COTS Colorado SAP ERP Connecticut AssetWorks FA COTS Delaware AssetWorks M5 COTS Florida Homegrown Mainframe/homegrown Georgia AssetWorks FA COTS Hawaii Sprint Geotab G06 Pro Plan COTS Idaho Agile Assets EAM Illinois MMIS Mainframe/homegrown Indiana Asset Works M5 COTS Iowa Homemade mainframe based Mainframe/homegrown Kansas Homegrown Mainframe/homegrown Kentucky Agile Assets 6.8 EAM Louisiana SAP ERP Maine AssetWorks M5 COTS Maryland Maximo 4.1.1 EAM Massachusetts Maximo 4.1.1 EAM Michigan AssetWorks M5 COTS Minnesota AssetWorks M5 COTS Mississippi Financial Management System and Wennsoft- Based Equipment Management System COTS Missouri CCG FASTER COTS Montana Agile Assets 7.0 EAM Nebraska Enterprise Asset Mgt System Mainframe/homegrown Nevada AssetWorks M4 (changing to M5) COTS New Hampshire AssetWorks M5 COTS New Jersey AssetWorks M4 COTS New Mexico AssetWorks 6.3 COTS