National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 5 Conclusion
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Final Review of the Study on Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #4. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25710.
×

References

Cary, A. 2019. Hanford’s $17 billion vit plant is at serious risk of not being finished on time. Tri-City Herald. September 4, 2019.

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). 2011a. Radioactive Waste Management Manual, DOE M 435.1-1, Change 2.

DOE. 2011b. Technology Readiness Assessment Guide. DOE G 413.3-4A.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2002. Radionuclides in Drinking Water: A Small Entity Compliance Guide. February 2002.

EPA. 2006. WIPP Magnesium Oxide (MgO)—Planned Change Request. https://www.epa.gov/radiation/wipp-magnesium-oxide-mgo-planned-change-request (accessed December 6, 2019).

EPA. 2015. Hazardous and Solid Waste Management System; Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals From Electric Utilities. Federal Register Notice Vol. 80, No. 74, April 17, 2015.

GAO (U.S. Government Accountability Office). 2007. Nuclear Waste: DOE Should Reassess Whether the Bulk Vitrification Demonstration Project at Its Hanford Site is Still Needed to Treat Radioactive Waste. GAO-07-762, June 2007.

GAO. 2017. Nuclear Waste: Opportunities Exist to Reduce Risks and Costs by Evaluating Different Waste Treatment Approaches at Hanford. Report to Congressional Addressees, GAO-17-306, May 2017.

GAO. 2019, Environmental Liabilities: DOE Would Benefit from Incorporating Risk-Informed Decision-Making into Its Cleanup Policy. Report to Congressional Requesters, GAO-19-339, September 2019.

Independent and External Team of Experts. 2006. A Comprehensive Technical Review of the Demonstration Bulk Vitrification System. Technical Assessment Conducted by an Independent and External Team of Experts. Volume 1. RPP-31314, September 28, 2006.

NBS (National Bureau of Standards). 1959. Maximum Permissible Body Burdens and Maximum Permissible Concentrations of Radionuclides in Air and in Water for Occupational Exposure, Handbook 69 (June 5, 1959).

Peterson, R.A., E.C. Buck, J. Chun, R.C. Daniel, D.L. Herting, E.S. Ilton, G.J. Lumetta, and S.B. Clark. 2018. Review of the scientific understanding of radioactive waste at the U.S. DOE Hanford Site. Environmental Science & Technology 52(2):381-396.

WRPS (Washington River Protection Solutions). 2018. The Tanks. https://wrpstoc.com/tank-operations/the-tanks (accessed December 5, 2019).

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Final Review of the Study on Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #4. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25710.
×
Page 33
Next: Appendix A: Major Parts of Review of the Final Draft Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #3 »
Final Review of the Study on Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #4 Get This Book
×
 Final Review of the Study on Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #4
Buy Paperback | $65.00 Buy Ebook | $54.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management is responsible for managing and cleaning up the waste and contamination at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, the nation's biggest and most complex nuclear cleanup challenge. At the site, 177 underground tanks collectively contain about 211 million liters of waste that includes high-activity and low-activity materials.

At the request of Congress, Final Review of the Study on Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #4 focuses on approaches for treatment and disposal of the supplemental portion of the low-activity waste from the tanks. This review report discusses developments since the publication of Review #3 and provides a summary of public comments on the third committee review report. The authoring committee then shares their views on these comments and whether they change any of the findings or recommendations in the third review report.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!