National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Front Matter
Page 1
Suggested Citation:"Summary." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Procedures and Guidelines for Validating Contractor Test Data. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25823.
×
Page 1
Page 2
Suggested Citation:"Summary." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Procedures and Guidelines for Validating Contractor Test Data. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25823.
×
Page 2

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

1 In the development of a quality assurance (QA) program, a state highway agency (SHA) incorporates policies and procedures for assessing how well the materials and construc- tion used by a contractor on a construction project satisfy the SHA’s specifications. Such procedures, commonly referred to as acceptance procedures, include detailed requirements for sampling and testing methods, selection of acceptance quality characteristics (AQCs), limits for those AQCs, and often procedures for calculating pay factors. One of the key considerations in the QA program is whether the SHA (or SHA’s designee) will conduct the acceptance sampling and testing or use contractor data for acceptance. According to a December 2015 FHWA Quality Assurance Assessment Report, 31 SHAs were using contractor test results in one or more of their acceptance decision processes. Title 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 637 Subpart B (23 CFR 637B) permits the use of results from contractor testing in determining the degree of compliance of materials and construction with project specifications, provided that the SHA’s QA program meets certain requirements. One of those requirements is that the SHA must use an appropriate process to validate the contractor’s results. This project addresses the need to identify procedures currently available for validating contractor test data for construction materials and to develop statistically sound and practi- cal procedures for validating contractor construction materials test data. The project was then to recommend procedures for validating contractor test data for construction mate- rials and to prepare guidelines for their application. This report documents the research performed and presents a proposed practice for validating contractor test data. When a SHA conducts all sampling and testing used in acceptance decisions, validation testing is not required. However, agencies may find value in the procedures and guidelines provided for identifying outlier data and dispute resolution. A literature review revealed a handful of statistical methods with F- and t-tests appear- ing significantly more often than any other method. The literature review was summa- rized into seven categories: (a) Validation Techniques and Diversity in Procurement Methods; (b) Modification of Existing or New Statistical Tests; (c) Concern with Bias; (d) Nonparametric Tests; (e) Potential Risks Associated with F- and t-tests; (f) State of the Practice; and (g) Policy, Standards, and Guidelines. A web-based survey of SHAs was conducted to obtain information in addition to that obtained from the search and review of literature. Twenty-nine SHAs completed the survey, with 22 SHAs responding that they do use contractor test results as part of the acceptance procedure. A breakdown of the SHA responses based on material type was presented. The survey also identified challenges that SHAs face with QA programs that needed to be considered in developing recommendations and conclusions. S U M M A R Y Procedures and Guidelines for Validating Contractor Test Data

2 Procedures and Guidelines for Validating Contractor Test Data The research approach builds upon the findings from the literature review and the survey of SHAs, with three major stages: gathering information, numerical analysis, and analysis of SHA data. A proposed AASHTO practice was prepared to describe appropriate processes for vali- dating contractor test results and recommending subsequent actions when the results are validated or not validated. The proposed practice identifies the purpose, the target audi- ence, background resources, and applicability of the recommended procedures. It also cites applicable standards and other relevant documents, and defines key concepts, such as acceptance plan, dispute resolution, and validation. The main part of the proposed practice incorporates the procedures and guidelines for validating contractor test data and includes an overview of the validation process and description of validation steps. Two recom- mended sampling and testing plans are presented as an appendix of the proposed practice.

Next: Part I - Research Overview »
Procedures and Guidelines for Validating Contractor Test Data Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

In the development of a quality assurance program, a state highway agency (SHA) incorporates policies and procedures for assessing how well the materials and construction used by a contractor on a construction project satisfy the agency's specifications.

The TRB National Cooperative Highway Research Program's NCHRP Research Report 946: Procedures and Guidelines for Validating Contractor Test Data reviews and evaluates the procedures and practices used in the acceptance of construction materials. The report also proposes a related practice for incorporation into AASHTO Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing.

Supplemental files to the report include Appendices A through E, available as a single PDF file, a State Highway Agency Survey (Appendix A), Survey Responses (Appendix B), Numerical Simulations (Appendix C), State Highway Agency Date Analysis (Appendix D), and Statistical Tables (Appendix E).

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!