National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Initialisms
Page 72
Suggested Citation:"References and Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Asset Management Approaches to Identifying and Evaluating Assets Damaged Due to Emergency Events. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25825.
×
Page 72
Page 73
Suggested Citation:"References and Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Asset Management Approaches to Identifying and Evaluating Assets Damaged Due to Emergency Events. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25825.
×
Page 73

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

72 References and Bibliography 23 CFR § 515. Asset Management Plans. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2017-title23-vol1/xml/ CFR-2017-title23-vol1-part515.xml. 23 CFR § 667. Periodic Evaluation of Facilities Repeatedly Requiring Repair and Reconstruction Due to Emergency Events. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/10/24/2016-25117/asset-management-plans-and- periodic-evaluations-of-facilities-repeatedly-requiring-repair-and. 23 CFR § 668. Emergency Relief Program. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CFR-2011-title23-vol1/ CFR-2011-title23-vol1-part668. 23 CFR § 771. Environmental Impact and Related Procedures. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CFR-2019- title23-vol1/CFR-2019-title23-vol1-sec771-101. 23 USC § 101. Definitions and Declaration of Policy. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2017-title23/ USCODE-2017-title23-chap1-sec101. 23 USC § 119. National Highway Performance Program. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2017- title23/USCODE-2017-title23-chap1-sec119. 23 USC § 120. Federal Share Payable. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2011-title23/USCODE- 2011-title23-chap1-sec120. 23 USC § 125. Emergency Relief. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2011-title23/USCODE-2011- title23-chap1-sec125. 23 USC § 134. Metropolitan Transportation Planning. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/search/%7B%22query %22%3A%2223%20usc%20134%22%2C%22offset%22%3A0%7D. 40 CFR § 1508. Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of The National Environmental Policy Act—Terminology. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CFR-2018-title40-vol37/CFR-2018-title40-vol37- sec1508-1/summary. 42 USC § 5121. Congressional Findings and Declarations. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE- 2017-title42/USCODE-2017-title42-chap68-subchapI-sec5121. 49 USC § 5324. Public Transportation Emergency Relief Program. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE- 2017-title49/USCODE-2017-title49-subtitleIII-chap53-sec5324. Alipour, A. 2016. NCHRP Synthesis 497: Post-Extreme Event Damage Assessment and Response for Highway Bridges. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. ASTHO. 2012. Emergency Authority and Immunity Toolkit: Emergency Declarations and Authorities Fact Sheet. ASTHO, Arlington, Virginia. http://www.astho.org/Programs/Preparedness/Public-Health-Emergency-Law/ Emergency-Authority-and-Immunity-Toolkit/Emergency-Declarations-and-Authorities-Fact-Sheet/. Brabhaharan, P. 2011. Towards Transportation Networks Resilient to Natural Hazards, and Lessons from Recent Events. Austroads Bridge Conference, 8th, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. California DOT. 2009. Deputy Directive DD-26-R2. California DOT, Sacramento, Calif. www.dot.ca.gov/ser/ downloads/general/DD_26_R2_Signed.pdf. California DOT. 2018. Vulnerability Assessment. http://www.dot.ca.gov/transplanning/ocp/vulnerability- assessment.html (accessed June 18, 2019). California DOT. 2019. 2019 State Highway System Management Plan. Draft. http://www.dot.ca.gov/assetmgmt/ documents/SHSMP_05-16-2019_ADARemediated.pdf (accessed June 18, 2019). Colorado DOT. 2018. Repeatedly Damaged Assets: Evaluation and Process Report. Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, Colorado. FEMA. 2019. Disasters. https://www.fema.gov/disasters?field_dv2_state_territory_tribal_value_selective= NY&field_dv2_incident_type_tid=49112&field_dv2_declaration_type_value=All&field_dv2_incident_begin_ value%5Bvalue%5D%5Bmonth%5D=6&field_dv2_incident_begin_value%5Bvalue%5D%5Byear%5D=

References and Bibliography 73 2006&field_dv2_incident_end_value%5Bvalue%5D%5Bmonth%5D=&field_dv2_incident_end_value%5 Bvalue%5D%5Byear%5D= (accessed August 23, 2019). FHWA. 2013. Emergency Relief Manual (Federal-Aid Highways). FHWA, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2016a. Asset Management Plans and Periodic Evaluations of Facilities Repeatedly Requiring Repair and Reconstruction Due to Emergency Events. Federal Register 81 (205) (October 24, 2016). https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2016-10-24/pdf/2016-25117.pdf. FHWA. 2016b. TEACR Engineering Assessment. Adaptation Decision-Making Assessment Process (ADAP). FHWA-HEP-17-004. FHWA, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2016c. TEACR Engineering Assessment. Temperature and Precipitation Impacts on Cold Region Pavement: State Route 6/State Route 15 State Route 16 in Maine. FHWA-HEP-17-019. FHWA, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2016d. 23 CFR §§ 515 and 667, Asset Management Plans and Periodic Evaluations of Facilities Repeatedly Requiring Repair and Reconstruction Due to Emergency Events. Federal Register 81 (205) (October 24, 2016): Rules and Regulations. FHWA, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2018a. Mobile Solution for Assessment and Reporting (MSAR). https://collaboration.fhwa.dot.gov/dot/ fhwa/msar/default.aspx (accessed June 18, 2019). FHWA. 2018b. Questions and Answers Regarding Implementation of 23 CFR Part 667: Periodic Evaluation of Facilities Repeatedly Requiring Repair and Reconstruction Due to Emergency Events. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ programadmin/23cfr667_qa.cfm. FHWA. 2019. Asset Management Contacts. About Us. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/infrastructure/asstmgmt/ amcontacts.cfm (accessed June 18, 2019). Hofer, B. 2018. Iowa DOT Project Scoping and Prioritization Process/Tool. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/Conferences/2018/AssetManagement/HoferIowa DOTProjectScoping.pdf (accessed August 20, 2019). Iowa DOT. 2019. Emergency Relief (ER) and Detailed Damage Inspection Report (DDIR) Process and Workflow. Iowa Department of Transportation, Ames, Iowa. Kirk, R. S., and W. J. Mallett. 2018. Emergency Relief for Disaster-Damaged Roads and Public Transportation Systems. Congressional Research Service, Washington, D.C. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/R45298.pdf. Nakanishi, Y. J., and P. M. Auza. 2015. NCHRP Synthesis 472: FEMA and FHWA Emergency Relief Funds Reimbursements to State Departments of Transportation. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. NOAA. 2019. Fast Facts: Hurricane Costs. https://coast.noaa.gov/states/fast-facts/weather-disasters.html. New Jersey DOT. 2018. New Jersey Evaluation Report for 23 CFR Part 667: Periodic Evaluation of Facilities Repeatedly Requiring Repair and Reconstruction Due to Emergency Events. New Jersey Department of Transportation, Trenton, New Jersey. New York State. 2012. Governor Cuomo Announces Commissions to Improve New York State’s Emergency Preparedness and Response Capabilities and Strengthen the State’s Infrastructure to Withstand Natural Disasters. https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/governor-cuomo-announces-commissions-improve-new- york-states-emergency-preparedness-and (accessed June 18, 2019). New York State. 2014. Governor Cuomo Signs Community Risk and Resiliency Act. https://www.governor. ny.gov/news/governor-cuomo-signs-community-risk-and-resiliency-act (accessed June 18, 2019). New York State DOT. 2019. Transportation Asset Management Plan—Draft (excerpt provided). New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, New York. Onishi, M. 2018. Infrastructure Prioritization Incorporating Resilience. International Seminar on Disaster and Risk Management for Roads (November 7–8), Hanoi Daewoo Hotel, Hanoi, Vietnam. Oregon DOT. 2017. “Statewide Landslide Information Database.” https://www.oregongeology.org/slido/index.htm (accessed June 18, 2019). State of California. 2015. Governor Brown Establishes Most Ambitious Greenhouse Gas Reduction Target in North America. https://www.ca.gov/archive/gov39/2015/04/29/news18938/ (accessed June 18, 2019). U.S. DOT. 2018. FHWA Lacks Detailed Guidance on Infrastructure Resilience for Emergency Relief Projects and a Process to Track Related Improvements. Report No. ST2018014. U.S. DOT, Office of Inspector General, Washington, D.C. https://www.oig.dot.gov/sites/default/files/FHWA%20ER%20Resilience%20Final%20 Report%5E1-10-18.pdf. U.S. GAO. 2011. Highway Emergency Relief: Strengthened Oversight of Project Eligibility Decisions Needed. GAO-12-45. U.S. GAO, Washington, D.C. https://www.gao.gov/new.items/d1245.pdf.

Next: Appendix A - State Questionnaire »
Asset Management Approaches to Identifying and Evaluating Assets Damaged Due to Emergency Events Get This Book
×
 Asset Management Approaches to Identifying and Evaluating Assets Damaged Due to Emergency Events
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Current legislation and subsequent asset management rules require state departments of transportation (DOTs) to conduct statewide evaluations of roads, highways, and bridges that have required repair and reconstruction activities two or more times since 1997 due to emergency events as declared by the president of the United States or by a state’s governor.

The TRB National Cooperative Highway Research Program's NCHRP Synthesis 556: Asset Management Approaches to Identifying and Evaluating Assets Damaged Due to Emergency Events furnishes documentary evidence of the approaches that state DOTs have taken to identify and evaluate locations where highway assets have been repeatedly damaged and to identify considerations that have been made for mitigating the risk of recurring damage to assets in those areas.

The report is intended to help transportation agencies with building data sets and tools that support the evaluation of damage to assets associated with emergency events and to illustrate methodologies that are being used to integrate these risks into asset investment decisions.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!