National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 5 - Conclusions
Page 68
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Highway Hydraulic Engineering State of Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25848.
×
Page 68
Page 69
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Highway Hydraulic Engineering State of Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25848.
×
Page 69
Page 70
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Highway Hydraulic Engineering State of Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25848.
×
Page 70
Page 71
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Highway Hydraulic Engineering State of Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25848.
×
Page 71
Page 72
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Highway Hydraulic Engineering State of Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25848.
×
Page 72
Page 73
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Highway Hydraulic Engineering State of Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25848.
×
Page 73
Page 74
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Highway Hydraulic Engineering State of Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25848.
×
Page 74

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

68 Bibliography AASHTO (2008). Guide Specifications for Bridges Vulnerable to Coastal Storms. Alaska DOT (2011). Alaska Storm Water Guide. Chapter 1 Overview of Storm Water Regulations. https:// dec.alaska.gov/water/wastewater/stormwater/guidance/. Caltrans (2016). Hydraulic Design Manual, Chapter 880 – Shore Protection. http://www.dot.ca.gov/design/hsd/ index.html. Caltrans (2017). Caltrans Stormwater Quality Handbooks Project Planning and Design Guide. Section One Intro- duction. http://www.dot.ca.gov/design/hsd/ppdg/PPDG-Final_2017-07.pdf. Carlson, E. (2019). Case example inquiry via email. Michigan DOT. Center for Environmental Excellence (2018). What Is a Programmatic Agreement? Accessed May 2019 at https://environment.transportation.org/documents/programmatic_agreement_toolkit/. Colorado DOT (2004). Colorado DOT Drainage Design Manual: Chapter 3 Policy. https://www.codot.gov/ programs/environmental/water-quality/documents/drainage-design-manual-1. Colorado DOT (2009). Colorado DOT Drainage Design Manual: Chapter 10 Bridges. https://www.codot.gov/ programs/environmental/water-quality/documents/drainage-design-manual-1. Colorado DOT (2013). Colorado DOT Drainage Design Manual: Chapter 13 Storm Drains. https://www.codot. gov/programs/environmental/water-quality/documents/drainage-design-manual-1. Colorado DOT (2017). Hydraulics SOP No-rise Certification for Floodways. Colorado DOT Region 4 procedures. Davis, A., P. (2005). Green Engineering Principles Promote Low-Impact Development. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 16, 338A-344A. https://doi.org/10.1021/es053327e. Delaware DOT (2017a). Delaware Floodplain: Impacts of Sever Storms or Infrastructure in a Low-Lying State, University of Delaware Sharp Campus. ppt. Delaware DOT (2017b). Strategic Implementation Plan for Climate Change, Sustainability and Resilience for Transportation. https://deldot.gov/Publications/reports/SIP/pdfs/SIP_FINAL_2017-07-28.pdf. Delaware DOT (2008). Delaware DOT Road Design Manual. Chapter 6 Drainage and Stormwater Management. https://deldot.gov/Publications/manuals/road_design/pdfs/06_drainage_stormwater_mgmt.pdf. Dietz, M., E. (2007). Low Impact Development Practices: A Review of Current Research and Recommendations for Future Directions. Water Air Soil Pollut 186:351–363. DOI 10.1007/s11230-007-9484-z. EPA (2018). EPA Standard Federal Regions. https://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/visiting-regional-office. FEMA (2011). Glenville Buy-Outs: Back to Nature Full Mitigation Best Practice Story, New Castle County, Delaware. https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=10899. FEMA (2019). Hydraulic Numerical Models Meeting the Minimum Requirement of National Flood Insurance Program: Hydrologic Models Meeting The Minimum. https://www.fema.gov/hydraulic-numerical-models- meeting-minimum-requirement-national-flood-insurance-program. FHWA (2001). Revision of Coding Guide, Item 113 - Scour Critical Bridges. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/ hydraulics/policymemo/revguide.cfm. FHWA (2005). Hydraulic Engineering Circular No 9: Debris Control Structures Evaluation and Counter measures, Third Edition. Publication Na. FHWA-IF-04-016. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/ 04016/hec09.pdf. FHWA (2012a). FHWA Highway Hydraulics State of Practice Report, 50 US States and Puerto Rico. FHWA Resource Center Hydraulics Technical Service Team. FHWA (2012b). Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 18: Evaluating Scour at Bridges, Fifth Edition. Publication No. FHWA-HIF-12-003. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/library_arc.cfm?pub_number= 17&id=151. FHWA (2014). Fish Passage in Large Culverts with Low Flows: PUBLICATION NO. FHWA-HRT-14-064.

Bibliography 69 FHWA (2016a). Barrier Island Roadway Overwashing from Sea Level Rise and Storm Surge: US 98 on Okaloosa Island, Florida, FHWA-HEP-17-015. FHWA (2016b). FHWA Pooled Fund Study: Fish Passage in Large Culverts with Low Flows. https://www.pooledfund. org/Details/Study/388. FHWA (2018a). FHWA-HEP-18-062: Coastal Green Infrastructure to Enhance Resilience of State Route 1, Delaware. FHWA (2018b). Nature-based Resilience for Coastal Highways. Office of Planning, Environment, and Realty (HEP), Environment. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/sustainability/resilience/ongoing_and_ current_research/green_infrastructure/nature_based_solutions/fhwahep18037.pdf. FHWA (2018c). Researchers Develop Field Device for Bridge Scour Testing. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/ research/articles/bridge_scour_test.cfm https://www.pooledfund.org/Details/Study/438. FHWA (2019). Collaborative Hydraulics: Advancing to the Next Generation of Engineering (CHANGE). https:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/innovation/everydaycounts/edc_5/change2.cfm. FHWA/WVDOT (2010–2012). Criteria for Predicting Scour of Erodible Rock in West Virginia, FHWA/West Virginia Department of Transportation-Division of Highways and Federal Highway Administration, 2010–2012. https://trid.trb.org/view/1300194. FishXing Version 3.0 Beta, 2006. http://www.fsl.orst.edu/geowater/FX3/help/FX3_Help.html. Georgia DOT (2018a). State of Georgia DOT: Drainage Design for Highways Revision 3.4. Georgia DOT (2018b). Hydraulic and Hydrological Study: PI No. 0013737 Calhoun County: SR 37 Over Pachitla Creek and Overflows. Georgia DOT. Georgetown Climate Center (2013). Adaption Clearinghouse: DE EO 41: Preparing Delaware for Emerging Climate Impacts and Seizing Economic Opportunities from Reducing Emissions. https://www.adaptationclearinghouse.org/ resources/de-eo-41-preparing-delaware-for-emerging-climate-impacts-and-seizing-economic-opportunities- from-reducing-emissions.html. Gosseli, M., Sheppard, M., McLemore, S. (2006). NCHRP Web-Only Document 106: Criteria for Selecting Hydraulic Models. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Hawaii DOT (2015). Storm Water Permanent Best Management Practices Manual. Chapter 3 Exemptions and Variances. https://hidot.hawaii.gov/harbors/files/2013/01/Final-SWMP-150325.pdf. Illinois Center for Transportation, Straub, T.D., Over, T.M., U.S. Geological Survey (2010). Research Report ICT-10-074: Pier and Contraction Prediction in Cohesive Soils at Selected Bridge in Illinois. A report of the findings of ICT-R27-19 Pier and Contraction Scour Prediction in Cohesive Soils. https://apps.ict.illinois.edu/ projects/getfile.asp?id=3033. Illinois DOT (2012a). Bridge Manual. Bureau of Bridges and Structures Division of Highways. Springfield, IL. http://www.idot.illinois.gov/Assets/uploads/files/Doing-Business/Manuals-Guides-&-Handbooks/Highways/ Bridges/Bridge%20Manual%202012.pdf. Illinois DOT (2012b). Memorandum: Revised Riprap Treatment Standard and Guidelines. http://www.idot. illinois.gov/doing-business/procurements/engineering-architectural-professional-services/Consultants- Resources/all-bridge-designers-memorandums http://www.idot.illinois.gov/Assets/uploads/files/Doing- Business/Memorandums-&-Letters/Highways/Bridges/ABD-Memos/abd125.pdf. Indiana DOT (2013). Indiana Design Manual: Chapter 203. Indiana DOT. https://www.in.gov/indot/design_ manual/files/Ch203_2013.pdf. Kahlig, E. (2019). Email Correspondence with Specific Design-Build Questions. Ohio DOT. Keaton, J. R., Mishra, S. K., and Clopper, P. E. (2012). NCHRP Report 717: Scour at Bridge Foundations on Rock. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. http://www.trb.org/Main/ Blurbs/167222.aspx. Kirk, D. (2019). Responses on Scour, West Virginia Division of Highways. Email 05072019. Kilgore (2018). Emerging Issues Associated with Sea Level Rise. Federal Highway Administration Contract: DTFH61-16-D-00033, Subcontract: 469-HDL16-1-15. https://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/newcastle29614/ . . . /29614_green_08082018_final.pdf Knott, J. F., Elshaer, M., Daniel, J. S., Jacobs, J. M., and Kirshen, P. (2017). Assessing the effects of rising groundwater from sea level rise on the service life of pavements in coastal road infrastructure. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.2639, pp. 1–10. Kosicki, A. (2019). Responses on Scour, Maryland State Highway Administration. Email 05072019. Leitao, J. P., Simoes, N. E., Pina, R. D., Ochoa-Rodriguez, S., and Marques, A. S. (2015). Stochastic Evaluation of Sewer Inlet Capacity on Urban Pluvial Flooding. 10th International Urban Drainage Modelling Conference, Mont-Sainte-Anne, Quebec, Canada. Maine DOT (2014). Keeping Our Bridges Safe 2014 Report. https://www.adaptationclearinghouse.org/resources/ maine-department-of-transportation-eo-bridge-scour-management.html. Maine DOT (2019a). Hampden Bridge Bundle - Design-Build: Design and construction of eight replacement bridges located on Interstate 95 in Hampden between Exit 174 and Exit 180. https://www.maine.gov/mdot/design- build/hampden/.

70 Highway Hydraulic Engineering State of Practice Maine DOT (2019b). Hampden Bridge Bundle - Design-Build: Request for Statement of Interest. https:// www.maine.gov/mdot/design-build/docs/hampden/HampdenBundleRFSOI_2019-02-22.pdf. Maine DOT (2019c). Hampden Bridge Bundle - Design-Build: Draft Hydrology, Hydraulics and Scour Report. http://gishydro.eng.umd.edu/hydraulics_panel.htm. Markell, J. (2013). State of Delaware Executive Order 41: Preparing Delaware for Emerging Climate Impacts and Seizing Economic Opportunities from Reducing Emissions. https://news.delaware.gov/2013/09/12/ governor-markell-executive-order-preparing-delaware-for-emerging-climate-impacts-and-seizing- economic-opportunities-from-reducing-emissions/. Maryland SHA (2011, 2015, 2016). Manual for Hydrologic and Hydraulic Design, Chapter 7: Scour Program for Existing Bridges, Chapter 11: Appendix B, TIDEROUT2, Chapter 11: Evaluating Scour at Bridges. http:// gishydro.eng.umd.edu/sha_soft.htm. Maryland SHA and the Maryland MDE Joint Hydraulics Panel: E. Rios Vidal, K. Sandoval, and A. Kosicki (2017). Maryland Hydraulics Panel. http://gishydro.eng.umd.edu/hydraulics_panel.htm http://gishydro.eng.umd. edu/HydraulicsPanel/2017-06-22_Presentation_rev_2017-07-20.pdf. Maryland SHA (2017). Office of Structures Manual on Hydrologic and Hydraulic Design, Chapter 5, Project Devel- opment. Table 1: Office of Structures Milestones. http://gishydro.eng.umd.edu/sha_soft.htm http://gishydro. eng.umd.edu/HydraulicsPanel/2017-07-20_Panel_revised_Table1_OOS_Milestones.pdf. Maryland Hydraulics Panel (2018). Progress Report of the Maryland Hydraulics Panel: Culverts, Channel Stability, and Aquatic Organism Passage in Maryland. http://gishydro.eng.umd.edu/hydraulics_panel.htm. Maryland, State of; FEMA (2019). DFIRM Outreach Program. https://mdfloodmaps.net/. Maryland DOT (2009). Maryland Transportation Plan. http://www.mdot.maryland.gov/Office%20of%20 Environmental%20Programs/Documents/2009MTPEnvironmental%20stewardship1.pdf. Matthews, J. (2019). Responses on Scour. Virginia DOT. Email 05072019. Michigan DOT (2006). Michigan DOT Drainage Manual. Michigan DOT, Lansing, MI. https://www.michigan. gov/mdot/0,4616,7-151-9621_11041_91575_91583-93193--,00.html. Minnesota DNR (2017). MnDNR Ecological and Water Resources, Water Management, Floodplain Letters of Map Revisions: MnDNR LOMC Guide. https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/watermgmt_section/floodplain/ tech_resources.html. Minnesota DOT (2000). Minnesota DOT Drainage Manual. https://www.dot.state.mn.us/bridge/hydraulics/ drainagemanual.html. Minnesota DOT (2011a). Statewide Flood Mitigation Program. http://www.dot.state.mn.us/floodmitigation/ http://www.dot.state.mn.us/floodmitigation/list.html. Minnesota DOT (2011b). Minnesota River Flood Mitigation Study Final Report, Minnesota DOT, SEH No. MNTMD 115709. http://www.dot.state.mn.us/floodmitigation/list.html. Minnesota DOT (2012). (2511) GEOTEXTILE CONTAINER. http://www.dot.state.mn.us/bridge/hydraulics/ resources.html. Minnesota DOT (2013). Culvert Designs for Aquatic Organism Passage: Culvert Design Practices Incorporating Sediment Transport. Minnesota DOT TRS1302, accessed May 2019 at http://dotapp7.dot.state.mn.us/ projectPages/pages/projectDetails.jsf;jsessionid=t3PoW79ooteIQ8QF9YwBytyc.9773acc1-da1d-30bb- b6a7-70c38c81c330?id=38577&type=DOCUMENT. Minnesota DOT (2015a). Hydraulics, Matrix Riprap Installation Guidance. http://www.dot.state.mn.us/bridge/ hydraulics/resources.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9X9Y6wWI2c. Minnesota DOT (2015b). Final Report 2015-15: Matrix (Partially Grouted) Riprap Lab Flume Study. https:// conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/172740. Minnesota DOT (2016). Geobags – Summary Sheet. http://www.dot.state.mn.us/bridge/hydraulics/resources.html. Minnesota DOT (2017a). Design-Build Manual. http://www.dot.state.mn.us/designbuild/resources.html. Minnesota DOT (2017b). Minnesota DOT Design-Build RFP Template: Book 2 Section 12. http://www.dot.state. mn.us/designbuild/rfp.html. Minnesota DOT (2017c). Research Project Final Report 2017-40: Multi-Beam Sonar Infrastructure Mapping Research. http://www.dot.state.mn.us/bridge/hydraulics/scour.html. Minnesota DOT (2019). Minnesota Guide for Stream Connectivity and Aquatic Organism Passage Through Culverts Research Report 2019-02. Morgenstern, S. (2019). Responses on Scour, New Mexico DOT. Email 05072019. Myers, R. (2019). Responses on Scour, Maine DOT. Email 05072019. NDOR (2013). Drainage and Erosion Control Manual, Chapter 3: Stormwater Treatment. https://dot.nebraska.gov/ media/9970/f-chapter-3-stormwater-treatment.pdf. NHDES, New Hampshire Geological Survey, New Hampshire DOT, New Hampshire Fish and Game Depart- ment, New Hampshire Department of Safety – Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Association of New Hampshire Regional Planning Commissions UNH Technology Transfer Center (2019). New Hampshire Stream Crossing Initiative Field Manual: SADES Stream Crossing Assessment 8.0.

Bibliography 71 New Hampshire DOT Bureau of the Environment (2015). NHDOT Monthly Natural Resource Agency Coordina- tion Meeting. New York State DOT (2019). New York State Bridge Manual. https://www.dot.ny.gov/divisions/engineering/ structures/manuals/bridge-manual-usc. New York State DOT (2018). Highway Design Manual. Chapter 8 Highway Drainage. https://www.dot.ny.gov/ divisions/engineering/design/dqab/hdm. Nguyen, T. (2019). Georgia DOT Email. North Carolina DOT (2009). North Carolina DOT Design-Build Submittal Guidelines. https://connect.ncdot.gov/ letting/Pages/Design-Build-Resources.aspx. North Carolina DOT (2016). Guidelines for Drainage Studies and Hydraulic Design: Chapter 10 Storm Drain System. North Carolina DOT. https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/hydro/Pages/Guidelines-Drainage- Studies.aspx. Nuccitelli, S. (2019). Responses on Scour, Texas DOT. Email 05032019. Ocean Engineering International, PLLC (2013). North Carolina DOT Bridge Superstructure Level III Wave Vulnerability Study. Prepared for the North Carolina DOT, Raleigh, NC. https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/ hydro/Hydraulics%20Memos%20Guidelines/NCDOT%20Wave%20Loading%20Final%20Report%20 10-27-2013.pdf. Ohio DOT (2009a). ODOT Design-Build Manual and Instructions for Completing the Scope of Services Form. http://www.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/ConstructionMgt/design-build/Pages/Design_Build.aspx. Ohio DOT (2009b). Ohio DOT Construction and Material Specification Book. http://www.dot.state.oh.us/ Divisions/ConstructionMgt/design-build/Least Cost Design Build Examples/093005.pdf. Ohio DOT (2011). FRA-71-17.76, FRA-670-4.19, PID 77369, Project Scope: I-70/I-71 South Innerbelt - Project 1, I-71/I-670 Interchange, Design-Build. http://www.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/ConstructionMgt/design-build/ Pages/Design_Build.aspx. Ohio DOT (2018). Location and Design Manual Volume Two Drainage Design. http://www.dot.state.oh.us/ Divisions/Engineering/Hydraulics/Location%20and%20Design%20Volume%202/LD%20Volume%20 2%20Archive%2012013/ODOT-Location%20and%20Design%20Manual%20Volume%20II.pdf. Oregon DOT (2014). Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Options Study, report for FHWA. https://www.oregon.gov/odot/programs/pages/climate-change.aspx. Oregon DOT (2016). Green Infrastructure Techniques for Resilience of the Oregon Coast Highway. https:// www.oregon.gov/ODOT/Programs/TDD%20Documents/Green-Infrastructure-Study.pdf. Pennsylvania DOT (2015). Design Manual, Part 2, Highway Design. Publication 13M (DM-2) 2015 Edition - Change #3. https://www.dot.state.pa.us/public/pubsforms/Publications/PUB%2013M/Pub%2013M%20 Title%20Page.pdf. Pennsylvania DOT (2017). Phase I Pennsylvania DOT Extreme Weather Vulnerability Studies—Study Report. http://s3.amazonaws.com/tmp-map/climate/doc/StudyReport-PaVulnerabilityStudy-ver040317.pdf. Pierce, G. (2018). Every Day Counts for Georgia, PPT. Rhode Island Statewide Planning Program Division of Planning (2015). Vulnerability of Transportation Assets to Sea Level Rise. Department of Administration, http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/sea_level/2015/ TP164.pdf. Rossell, Ryan P., and Francis C. K. Ting. Hydraulic and Contraction Scour Analysis of a Meandering Channel: James River Bridges near Mitchell, South Dakota. J. Hydraul. Eng., 2013, 139(12): 1286–1296. Sheppard, D. M., Dompe, P. E., Gosselin, M. S., and Demir, H. (2016). Development of wave and surge atlas for the design and protection of coastal bridges in South Louisiana-phase 2 (No. FHWA/LA. 16/568). Louisiana Transportation Research Center. http://www.ltrc.lsu.edu/pdf/2015/FR_528.pdf. Shilling, F. (2019). Tracking Shoreline Conditions to Protect Infrastructure. University of California, Davis, CA. Sisson, S. (2019). Phone conversation and email. Delaware DOT. Snead, J. (2018). North Carolina DOT’s Partnership with NC Floodplain Mapping Program: Streamlining NFIP Compliance. Presentation. South Dakota DOT (2011). South Dakota Drainage Manual: Chapter 12 Storm Drainage Systems. South Dakota DOT. https://dot.sd.gov/media/documents/Chapter%2012-Storm%20Drainage%20Systems.pdf. SurveyGizmo (2017). Tips for Building Efficient Survey Logic. https://help.surveygizmo.com/help/logic-tips. Tang, H., Qu, K., and Dong, W. (2018). Potential Hydrodynamic Loads on Coastal Bridges in the Greater New York Area due to Extreme Storm Surge and Wave. City University of New York, NY. Tennessee DOT (2012). Tennessee DOT Design Division Drainage Manual. Chapter 2 General Drainage Poli- cies and Practices. https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/tdot/roadway-design/documents/drainage_manual/ DM-Chapter_02.pdf. Tennessee DOT (2019a). Construction Manager/General Contractor Explained. Video. https://www.tn.gov/content/ tn/tdot/tdot-construction-division/transportation-construction-alternative-contracting/construction-cm- gc-services.html.

72 Highway Hydraulic Engineering State of Practice Tennessee DOT (2019b). Design-Build RFP Contract Book 1, Instructions to Design-Builders (ITDB), TDOT. US-64 (SR-40) over Ocoee River Bridge Polk County- TENNESSEE CONTRACT NUMBER: DB1802. https:// www.tn.gov/tdot/tdot-construction-division/transportation-construction-alternative-contracting/design- build.html. Tennessee DOT (2019c). PROPOSAL CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF Contract No. CMGC02 SHELBY COUNTY Project No. NH-I-240-1(294), 79006-3194-44 (PIN 118737.00) Interstate I-240 Over- head Bridges at Norfolk Southern R/R, SR 57 (Poplar Ave. EB and WB), and Park Ave. Shelby County, TENNESSEE. https://www.tdot.tn.gov/Applications/Documents?pathName=%5CConstruction%5CCMGC %5CCMGC02_Proposal. Texas DOT (1993). TSEAS Manual. https://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/brg/geotechnical/tseas.pdf. Texas DOT (July 2016). Hydraulic Design Manual. Texas DOT (2017). Allowable Limit Contraction Scour and Abutment Scour at Bridges (Deliverable Based). Research Project Statement 17-133: FY 2017 Annual Program. https://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/rti/ statements/ps-17-133.pdf. Texas DOT (2018a). Geotechnical Manual. onlinemanuals.txdot.gov/txdotmanuals/geo/geo.pdf. Texas DOT (2018b). Project 0-6935: Allowable Limit Contraction Scour and Abutment Scour at Bridges. Technical Report, FHWA/TX-18/0-6935-R1. https://library.ctr.utexas.edu/Presto/content/Detail.aspx?ctID=UmVzZ WFyY2gtaW4tUHJvZ3Jlc3NfMTExMjY=&rID=NTU2&ssid=c2NyZWVuSURfMTgxMTY=. University of Texas, San Antonio (2012). Synthesis of Hydrologic and Hydraulic Impacts: Technical Report. Report No. FHWA/TX-12/0-6671-1. http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-6671-1.pdf. Urban Drainage Flood Control District (2016). Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Volume 1: Chapter 7: Street, Inlets, and Storm Drains. Accessed May 2019. https://udfcd.org/wp-content/uploads/uploads/vol1%20 criteria%20manual/07_Streets%20Inlets%20Storm%20Drains.pdf. U.S. Department of Agriculture (2008). Stream Simulation: An Ecological Approach to Providing Passage for Aquatic Organisms at Road-Stream Crossings. Forest Service Stream-Simulation Working Group in partnership with U.S. DOT, Federal Highway Administration Coordinated Federal Lands Highway Technology Implementa- tion Program. https://www.fs.fed.us/t-d/pubs/pdf/StreamSimulation/hi_res/%20FullDoc.pdf. U.S. DOT FHWA (2008). Publication No. FHWA-NHI-07-096: Highways in the Coastal Environment, Second Edition, Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 25. USGS, Holnbeck, S.R., Parrett, C. (1997). Method for Rapid Scour Method at Highway Bridges Based on Limited Site Data. USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4310. https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/FS-244-96/. USGS. (2018). USGS - Virginia DOT: Bridge Scour Pilot Study. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/fs20183006. Utah DOT (2017). Best Value Design-Build Selection Manual of Instruction. https://www.udot.utah.gov/main/ f?p=100:pg:0:::1:T,V:4552,72396. Utah DOT (2018a). Utah DOT Drainage Manual of Instruction. https://www.udot.utah.gov/main/ f?p=100:pg::::1:T,V:285. Utah DOT (2018b). Drainage Manual of Instruction: Chapter 8 Storm Drainage Systems. Utah DOT. https:// www.udot.utah.gov/main/uconowner.gf?n=6796917172274537. Utah DOT (2019). Utah DOT Design Build Templates. https://sites.google.com/a/utah.gov/udot-db-rfp/. VanBebber, N. (2019). Responses on Scour, Illinois DOT. Email 04272019. Vermont DOT (2017). Vermont DOT Drainage Manual: Chapter 12 - Bridges, structure and Riverine Hydraulics. Virginia DOT (2019a). Virginia DOT Governance Document Drainage Manual, Location and Design Divi- sion Issued April 2002 - Revised March 2019. Chapter 8 Stormwater Management. Virginia DOT. http:// www.virginiadot.org/business/locdes/hydra-drainage-manual.asp. Virginia DOT (2019b). Virginia DOT Materials Manual of Instructions Chapter III: Geotechnical Engineering. http://www.virginiadot.org/business/materials-download-docs.asp. Virginia DOT (2019c). Virginia DOT Governance Document, Location and Design Division. Chapter 1 Intro- duction. http://www.virginiadot.org/business/locdes/hydra-drainage-manual.asp. Wagner, C. R. (2007). Simulation of Water-Surface Elevations and Velocity Distributions at the U.S. Highway 13 Bridge over the Tar River at Greenville, North Carolina, Using One- and Two-Dimensional Steady-State Hydraulic Models. Prepared in cooperation with the North Carolina Department of Transportation Scien- tific Investigations Report 2007-5263, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007. Wagner, C. R., Mueller, D. S., Parola, A. C., Hagerty, D. J., and Benedict, S. T. (2006). NCHRP Web-Only Document 83: Scour at Contracted Bridges. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. WDFW (2019). Fish Passage Inventory, Assessment, and Prioritization Manual. https://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/ 02061. WDFW (2013). Water Crossing Design Guidelines. https://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/01501. Washington State DOT (2017a). Guidance for Considering Impacts of Climate Change in Washington State DOT Plans. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2017/07/24/GuidanceDoc-ConsideringClimate ChangeInWSDOTPlans.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2019.

Bibliography 73 Washington State DOT (2017b). Hydraulics Manual: M 23-03.05. www.wsdot.wa.gov/publications/manuals/ fulltext/M23-03/HydraulicsManual.pdf. Washington State DOT (2018). Design-Build Manual M 3126.02. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/publications/manuals/ m3126. Webb, B. (2017). A Primer on Modeling in the Coastal Environment (No. FHWA-HIF-18-002). Webb, B., Douglass, S., Dix, B., and Asam, S. (2018). White Paper: Nature-Based Solutions for Coastal Highway Resilience. (No. FHWA-HEP-18-037). West Virginia DOT (2015). West Virginia DOT Division of Highways Engineering Division Drainage Manual. 3rd Edition, 2007, Addendum 2, June 2015. West Virginia DOT (2019). Rock Scour Guidance. https://transportation.wv.gov/highways/engineering/geotech/ Pages/Geotechnical-Design/Rock-Scour.aspx. Photo Credits Figure 2. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) (2018). West Area Biologist Rachel Maggi, Thunder Road fish barrier project La Push, Washington, 2018. https://www.flickr. com/photos/usdagov/44150170104/in/photolist-2agpapo-gH3gcs-gH3jjv-MB7BRV-28AWyeh-2bhBn7G- PeaoBj-29YxDvR-Pea2Qj-2agoWM9-28AWo47-2bhBmgo-gH43iZ-2agpfpy-gH3nQD-28AWERW- gH36DE-2bn489z-29Yxs3R-2agpejs-2agp2Dd-hKSJeh-eEKpwU-29YxAhB-29Yxrbv-2agpdk3-2bhBm6J- 2agphSu-gH3kqi-28AWA7A-29YxrEg-2agphto-2agp5iw-2bhBn83-2bhBRLW-28AWxLJ-gH3mJa- 2agpn7w-gH39yY-2agpnQq-gH38dm-2agp1M3-MB7B3a-2agoWAC-29YxEoT-28AWz2Q-2bhBKfE- 28AWofQ-2agoXdQ-Peak5E Figure 3. Courtesy of the Georgia Department of Transportation. Figure 4. Wikimedia Commons (2010). Bioswale. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bioswale.jpg Figure 5. Wikimedia Commons (2009). Leucaena leucocephala-habitat and water retention basin-Waikapu-Maui. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Starr-090608-9053-Leucaena_leucocephala-habitat_and_ water_retention_basin-Waikapu-Maui_(24332198194).jpg Figure 6. Tetra Tech (2016). Tracking schematic 1. Created by Tetra Tech for US EPA and the Kentucky Division of Water. Reprinted with permission from Minnesota Department of Transportation. Figure 7. Maryland SHA (2017). Recommendations of the Joint SHA/MDE Panel of Hydraulics Experts. http://www.gishydro.eng.umd.edu/HydraulicsPanel/2017-06-22_Presentation_rev_2017-07-20.pdf Figure 8. Wikimedia Commons (2018). Oyster Reef, Delaware Bay. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/ File:Building_oyster_reef_breakwater_structures_or_castles_at_Gandy%27s_Beach_(26188321153).jpg Figure 9. Hampden Bundle Design Build Process Flow Chart. https://www.maine.gov/mdot/design-build/docs/ hampden/HampdenBundleRFSOI_2019-02-22.pdf. Reprinted from George Macdougall, PE, Contracts and Specifications Engineer, Maine DOT. Feb. 26, 2019. Figure 10. EPA Standard Federal Regions. https://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/visiting-regional-office (2018). Figure 18. Carp River Aerial: Low vegetation thus minimal discrepancies in LIDAR data recognition in the project area. Courtesy of MDOT. 2019. Figure 19. Carp River model mesh produced with reliable LIDAR data. Courtesy of MDOT. 2019. (Aquaveo Riverine Pro 2D model of M-35 over the Carp River in Marquette County, MI. Courtesy Erik Carlson, Hydraulics Unit Supervisor, Michigan Department of Transportation.) Figure 20. Velocity distributions depicted in a 2D model of 3 structures spanning the 1500-ft wide floodplain. Courtesy of Georgia Department of Transportation (2019). (Every Day Counts for Georgia, PowerPoint courtesy of/by Gary Pierce, P.E., Bridge Hydraulics Engineer, 2D model for SR 37 over Pachitla Creek & Overflows, Calhoun County, GA.) Figure 21. NCDOT Current 2017-2027 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Map. Courtesy of NCDOT. 2018. Figure 22. Flood Inundation Mapping Flood Risk Information System or FRIS. Courtesy of NCDOT. 2019. (NCDOT’s Partnership with NC Floodplain Mapping Program Streamlining NFIP Compliance, PowerPoint courtesy of/by Jerry Snead, P.E., CFM, Engineering Supervisor, Hydraulics Unit – Highway Floodplain Program, North Carolina Department of Transportation, NCAFPM Webinar Series.) Figure 23. SR 1 South Bound Indian River Inlet Bridge Approach Protected by Combination of Beach Nourish- ment and Sheet Piles. Photo Courtesy of Delaware DOT South District. 2019. (Photo Provided by DelDOT South District. Stephen M. Sisson, P.E., Design Resource Engineer, North Project Development, Delaware Dept. of Transportation.) Figure 24. Living Shoreline. Reprinted from Wikimedia Commons. 2014. [Wikimedia Commons (2014). File:Aerial-fog-point-living-shoreline-martin-Keith Shannon-20140820 (27930947456).jpg https:// commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aerial-fog-point-living-shoreline-martin-Keith_Shannon-20140820_ (27930947456).jpg.]

Next: Appendix A - Survey Questionnaire »
Highway Hydraulic Engineering State of Practice Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The TRB National Cooperative Highway Research Program's NCHRP Synthesis 551: Highway Hydraulic Engineering State of Practice documents significant changes in highway hydraulic engineering practices implemented by state departments of transportation (DOTs) over the past decade.

The synthesis focuses on eight subtopics of highway hydraulic engineering: roadway drainage; culvert aquatic organism passage; bridge scour computations and countermeasures; advanced hydraulic modeling; regulatory requirements; floodplain impacts and mitigation; coastal hydraulics; and alternative project delivery methods.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!