National Academies Press: OpenBook

Report of the Committee on Proposal Evaluation for Allocation of Supercomputing Time for the Study of Molecular Dynamics: Eleventh Round (2020)

Chapter: Appendix G: Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

« Previous: Appendix F: Board on Life Sciences and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Suggested Citation:"Appendix G: Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Report of the Committee on Proposal Evaluation for Allocation of Supercomputing Time for the Study of Molecular Dynamics: Eleventh Round. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25910.
×

APPENDIX G

BOARD ON CHEMICAL SCEINCES AND TECHNOLOGY AND THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES OF SCIENCES, ENGINEERING, AND MEDICINE

BOARD ON CHEMICAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY

Co-Chairs

SCOTT COLLICK, DuPont

JENNIFER SINCLAIR CURTIS, University of California, Davis

Members

JOANNA AIZENBERG (NAS, NAE), Harvard University

GERARD BAILLELY, Procter & Gamble

RUBEN G. CARBONELL (NAE), North Carolina State University

JOHN FORTNER, Yale School of Engineering & Applied Science

SAMUEL H. GELLMAN (NAS), University of Wisconsin–Madison

KAREN I. GOLDBERG (NAS), University of Pennsylvania

TIMOTHY HALL, McNeese State University

MIRIAM E. JOHN, Sandia National Laboratories (Retired)

JODIE L. LUTKENHAUS, Texas A&M University

JOSEPH B. POWELL, Shell Global

PETER ROSSKY (NAS), Rice University

REBECCA T. RUCK, Merck Process Research & Development

RICHMOND SARPONG, University of California, Berkeley

VIJAY SWARUP, ExxonMobil

SALY ROMERO-TORRES, Thermo Fisher Scientific

Staff

JEREMY T. MATHIS, Board Director

ELLEN MANTUS, Scholar

MARILEE SHELTON-DAVENPORT, Senior Program Officer

MAGGIE WALSER, Senior Program Officer

NICHOLAS ROGERS, Financial Associate

JESSICA WOLFMAN, Research Associate

SARAH HARPER, Program Assistant

KESIAH CLEMENT, Senior Program Assistant

BENJAMIN ULRICH, Program Assistant

OLIVIA TORBERT, Program Assistant

ELISE ZAIDI, Communications and Media Associate

Suggested Citation:"Appendix G: Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Report of the Committee on Proposal Evaluation for Allocation of Supercomputing Time for the Study of Molecular Dynamics: Eleventh Round. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25910.
×

Image

The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, nongovernmental institution to advise the nation on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Marcia McNutt is president.

The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineering to advising the nation. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. John L. Anderson is president.

The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on medical and health issues. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished contributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president.

The three Academies work together as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions. The National Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding contributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engineering, and medicine.

Learn more about the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at www.nationalacademies.org.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix G: Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Report of the Committee on Proposal Evaluation for Allocation of Supercomputing Time for the Study of Molecular Dynamics: Eleventh Round. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25910.
×

Image

Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.

Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.

For information about other products and activities of the National Academies, please visit www.nationalacademies.org/about/whatwedo.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix G: Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Report of the Committee on Proposal Evaluation for Allocation of Supercomputing Time for the Study of Molecular Dynamics: Eleventh Round. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25910.
×
Page 21
Suggested Citation:"Appendix G: Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Report of the Committee on Proposal Evaluation for Allocation of Supercomputing Time for the Study of Molecular Dynamics: Eleventh Round. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25910.
×
Page 22
Suggested Citation:"Appendix G: Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Report of the Committee on Proposal Evaluation for Allocation of Supercomputing Time for the Study of Molecular Dynamics: Eleventh Round. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25910.
×
Page 23
Next: Appendix H: Acknowledgment of Report Reviewer »
Report of the Committee on Proposal Evaluation for Allocation of Supercomputing Time for the Study of Molecular Dynamics: Eleventh Round Get This Book
×
 Report of the Committee on Proposal Evaluation for Allocation of Supercomputing Time for the Study of Molecular Dynamics: Eleventh Round
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Report of the Committee on Proposal Evaluation for Allocation of Supercomputing Time for the Study of Molecular Dynamics: Eleventh Round evaluates submissions received in response to a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Biomolecular Simulation Time on Anton 2, a supercomputer designed and built by D. E. Shaw Research (DESRES). Over the past 10 years, DESRES has made an Anton or Anton 2 system housed at the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center available to the non-commercial research community. The goal of the eleventh RFP for simulation time on Anton 2 is to continue to facilitate breakthrough research in the study of biomolecular systems by providing a massively parallel system specially designed for molecular dynamics simulations. The program seeks to continue to support research that addresses important and high impact questions demonstrating a clear need for Anton’s special capabilities.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!