National Academies Press: OpenBook

The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity (2021)

Chapter: 10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses

« Previous: 9 Nurses Leading Change
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 301
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 302
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 303
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 304
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 305
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 306
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 307
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 308
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 309
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 310
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 311
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 312
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 313
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 314
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 315
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 316
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 317
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 318
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 319
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 320
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 321
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 322
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 323
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 324
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 325
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 326
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 327
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 328
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 329
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 330
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 331
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 332
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 333
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 334
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 335
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 336
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 337
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 338
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 339
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 340
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 341
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 342
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 343
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 344
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 345
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 346
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 347
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 348
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 349
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 350
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 351
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 352
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 353
Suggested Citation:"10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25982.
×
Page 354

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

10 Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses I believe that everything affecting our society affects nurses and that eventually will hemorrhage over to the nursing profession. —Denetra Hampton, RN, documentary filmmaker of Racism: The African American Nursing Experience Short Film Nurses’ health and well-being are affected by the demands of their work- place, and in turn, their well-being affects their work and the people they care for. As it has in so many other areas, COVID-19 has imposed new challenges for the well-being of nurses. But it also has offered opportunities to give nurses’ well-being the attention it deserves and to address the systems, structures, and policies that create workplace hazards and stresses that lead to burnout, fatigue, and poor physical and mental health. This issue will take on even greater urgency over the coming years as nurses are asked to assume a more prominent role in advancing health equity. For nurses to address the many social determinants that influence health—from housing, to violence, to poor air quality—they must first feel healthy, well, and supported themselves. Policy makers, employers of nurses, nursing schools, nurse leaders, pro- fessional associations, and nurses themselves all have a role in ensuring the well-being of the nursing workforce. Nurses are committed to meeting the diverse and often complex needs of people with competence and compassion. While nursing is viewed as a “call- ing” by many nurses, it is a demanding profession. During the course of their work, nurses encounter physical, mental, emotional, and ethical challenges. De- pending on the role and setting of the nurse’s work, these may include incurring 301 PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

302 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 the risk of infection and physical or verbal assault, meeting physical demands, managing and supporting the needs of multiple patients with complex needs, having emotional conversations with patients and families, and confronting challenging social and ethical issues. Nurses, particularly those who work in communities and public health settings, may also face the stress of encounter- ing health inequities laid bare, such as hazardous housing and food insecurity. Nurses’ health and well-being are affected by these stresses and demands of their work, and in turn, their well-being affects their work, including increasing the risk of medical errors and compromising patient safety and care (Melnyk et al., 2018). As shown in the framework introduced in Chapter 1 (see Figure 1-1), well-being is one of five key areas with the potential to enhance nurses’ ability to address social determinants of health (SDOH) and advance health and heath care equity. With the emergence of COVID-19, the day-to-day demands of nursing have been illuminated and exacerbated. Nurses are coping with unrealistic workloads; insufficient resources and protective equipment; risk of infection; stigma directed at health care workers; and the mental, emotional, and moral burdens of caring for patients with a new and unpredictable disease (Shechter et al., 2020; Squires et al., 2020). Nurses are accustomed to setting aside their own needs and fears to care for people and take on the burdens and stresses of families and communities (Epstein and Delgado, 2010). However, if nurses are not supported in maintaining their physical, emotional, and mental well-being and integrity, their ability to serve and support patients, families, and communities will be compromised (e.g., McClelland et al., 2018). In this chapter, the committee briefly describes the impact of nurse well- being, then presents a framework for well-being in the context of the health care professions. The chapter examines aspects of nurses’ physical, mental, social, and moral1 well-being and health, and concludes with a review of approaches for addressing nurses’ health and well-being in various areas. THE FAR-REACHING IMPACT OF NURSE WELL-BEING Nurse well-being—or the lack thereof—has impacts on nurses, patients, health care organizations, and society (NASEM, 2019a). Well-being affects individual nurses in terms of physical and mental health, joy and meaning in their work, professional satisfaction, and engagement with their job. Nurses’ well-being affects patients and their perceptions of the quality of care they 1  Moral well-being is defined by Thompson (2018) as “the highest attainable development of innate capacities that enable humans to flourish as embodied, individuated but necessarily interdependent social organisms by managing the adaptive challenges of vulnerability, constraint, connection, and cooperation in an uncertain, risky environment.” PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 303 receive (e.g., McClelland et al., 2018; Melnyk et al., 2018; Ross et al., 2017; Salyers et al., 2017), and it also affects the health care system, impacting turn- over rates and the costs of hiring and training new nurses (Jones and Gates, 2007; Lewin Group, 2009; Li and Jones, 2013). With more than 1 million nurses projected to retire between 2020 and 2030 (Buerhaus et al., 2017), retaining established nurses and supporting new nurses is vital to the growth and sustainability of the workforce. The costs associated with nurse turnover are high. According to the most recent annual National Health Care Retention and RN Staffing Report, the average cost of turnover for a hospital-based reg- istered nurse (RN) is $44,400. Consequently, nurse turnover costs the average hospital $3.6–$6.1 million per year (NSI Nursing Solutions, 2020). Ensuring nurse well-being is not just good for nurses, then; it is essential for the health and safety of patients, the functioning of health systems, and the financial health of health care organizations. A FRAMEWORK FOR WELL-BEING Well-being is an inherently complex concept, encompassing an individual’s appraisal of physical, social, and psychological resources needed to meet a psy- chological, physical, or social challenge (Dodge at al., 2012). The 2019 National Academies report Taking Action Against Clinician Burnout (NASEM, 2019a) adopts an existing definition of well-being: an integrative concept that characterizes quality of life with respect to an in- dividual’s health and work-related environmental, organizational, and psycho- social factors. Well-being is the experience of positive perceptions and the presence of constructive conditions at work and beyond that enables workers to thrive and achieve their full potential. (Chari et al., 2018, p. 590) Professional well-being is associated with individuals’ job satisfaction, including being able to find meaning and fulfillment in work, feeling engaged, and having a high-quality work experience (Danna and Griffin, 1999; Doble and Santha, 2008; NASEM, 2019a). Well-being is often classified into objective well-being, or the satisfaction of physical needs, such as food, clothing, and shelter, and subjective well-being, or the emotional and psychological support needed to flourish (NASEM, 2019b; Prilleltensky, 2012). For the purposes of this report, the committee has chosen to examine well-being using a broad lens, encompassing many aspects of a nurse’s physical, mental, social, and moral well-being. Taking Action Against Clinician Burnout (NASEM, 2019a) uses a visual framework to describe clinician burnout and professional well-being (see Fig- ure 10-1). While focused primarily on addressing burnout, this framework demonstrates how the physical, social, and legal environments at different PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

304 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 FIGURE 10-1 Systems model of burnout and well-being. SOURCE: NASEM, 2019a. levels work together to impact clinician well-being. The first level, “external environment,” represents the health care industry, laws, regulations, standards, and societal values. The second level, “health care organization,” encompasses the leadership and management, governance, and policies and structures of the organization. The third level, “frontline care delivery,” represents the actions of and interactions among team members, local organizational conditions, technologies in the workplace, the physical environment, and work activities. Together, these three levels shape and constrain the day-to-day work environ- ment of clinicians, called “work system factors.” These work system factors include both job demands, such as workload and administrative burden, and job resources, such as organizational culture, teamwork, and professional rela- tionships. These factors are mediated by individual factors, such as personality, coping strategies, resilience, and social support, and ultimately impact the health and well-being of clinicians. While this framework was designed with the clinical environment in mind, it can be applied to nurses working in other environments, including communities, schools, and non–health care organizations. The specific work factors will vary from setting to setting—for example, some nurses will contend with electronic health records (see Box 10-1), while others will not—but the general schema holds true for most nurses in most settings. PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 305 BOX 10-1 Technological Factors Impacting Nurses’ Well-Being There is increasing evidence that the growing use of electronic health records (EHRs) and other technologies in the workplace is burdening health care workers and adding to their stressful and demanding work environment. Research has indicated that nurses spend a great deal of time charting in and reviewing EHRs, and that this can deplete their time, negatively impact their morale (Berwick et al., 2017), and take time away from their ethical and professional commitments to spend more time with patients and families (ANA, 2015). Many reports have considered the burden imposed by clinical documentation and other clerical tasks (Arndt et al., 2017; Baumann et al., 2018; Shanafelt et al., 2016; Sinsky et al., 2016; Tai-Seale et al., 2017). Accordingly, there have been many demands for a significant redesign of clinical documentation (Haas et al., 2019; Ommaya et al., 2018; Sinsky and Linzer, 2020). Another technological source of workplace stress is clinical alarms, which notify nurses that a patient is in distress. One study conducted over a period of 12 days found an average of 350 clinical alarms per patient per day in an intensive care unit (Yue et al., 2016). In a review of the research, Yue and colleagues (2016) found that alarm-related adverse events, including patient deaths due to failures to monitor alarm devices, are common in clinical practice. Factors associated with alarm-related adverse events include alarm fatigue, missed alarms, and inappro- priate parameter settings. THE STATE OF NURSES’ HEALTH AND WELL-BEING This section provides a brief overview of nurses’ health and well-being in the following areas: physical, occupational, mental and behavioral, moral, and social. It should be noted that both within and across these categories, some issues are interrelated and may exacerbate or reinforce others. For example, it has been demonstrated that chronic stress can create biological conditions that lead to obesity (Yau and Potenza, 2013). In addition, obesity has been associated with high-demand, low-control work environments and with working long hours (Schulte et al., 2007). These conditions—stress, high-demand and low-control work environments, and long hours—are common in nursing work environments, which may place nurses at risk of obesity. Obesity, in turn, has been associated with higher risk of occupational injury (Jordan et al., 2015; Nowrouzi et al., 2016; Schulte et al., 2007), for which nurses are already at high risk. It should be noted as well that most of the evidence cited in this chapter relates to nurses in clinical settings. While there is some limited research on other settings, including home visiting (Mathiews and Salmond, 2013), rural communities (Terry et al., PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

306 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 2015), prisons (Walsh and Freshwater, 2009), and schools (Jameson and Bowen, 2018), the vast majority of research on nurses’ well-being focuses on their work in clinical care, pointing to a need for more research on nurse well-being in all settings, including public and community health. Physical Health The physical health of American nurses is often worse than that of the gen- eral population, especially with regard to nutrition, sleep, and physical activity (Gould et al., 2019). Box 10-2 shows a snapshot of the physical health of nurses. Occupational Safety and Health There is a high prevalence of occupational injuries to health care workers, especially among nurses (OSHA, n.d.). Nurses may be exposed to a number of hazards in the workplace, including infectious agents; needle sticks; slips and falls; and injuries due to standing, bending, and lifting patients (Dressner and Kissinger, 2018). While nursing involves inherent risks due to proximity to infec- tious agents and other hazards and the physical demands of the work, these risks may be exacerbated by workplaces that are understaffed and underresourced. Nurse staffing levels have been associated with occupational injuries (Hughes, 2008), including musculoskeletal injuries and disorders. In addition, as described in Chapter 8, the COVID-19 pandemic has revealed the extent to which nurses’ jobs put them at risk of physical harm due to lack of adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) and severe staffing shortages. Nurses of color may be particu- larly at risk of COVID-19-related harms. As of September 2020, nurses of color made up half of the estimated 213 total RN deaths from COVID-19; nurses of Fil- ipino descent accounted for 31.5 percent of those total deaths (Akhtar, 2020). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2020) reviewed data from March to May 2020 in 13 states (n = 438) and found that more than 50 percent of the health care workers hospitalized because of COVID-19 were Black; 36.3 per- cent of the hospitalized health care workers were working in nurse functions that included nurse and certified nursing assistant (CNA) (Kambhampati et al., 2020). Patient safety is a frequent topic in discussion of improving care and is also a measure of nurses’ quality of care (AHRQ, 2019; Vaismoradi et al., 2020). Patient safety, staff safety, and equity have become a highlighted area of need, declining as health care workers face the challenge of the short- and long-term effects of structural racism, inequities, and bias. These challenges include caring for pa- tients who are often the most underrepresented in the community, who lack ade- quate access to health care, and who tend to work in low-wage jobs and to have increased exposure to illness among the general public. Chin (2020) discusses the necessity of aligning health care organizations’ approaches and intentionality toward patient safety and equity. One of the ways health care organizations and leadership can be more intentional is by stratifying data with patient and clinician PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 307 BOX 10-2 A Snapshot of the Physical Health of American Nurses Obesity/Overweighta,b •  The average body mass index (BMI) for nurses is 27.94, which falls into the overweight category. •  Roughly half (52 percent) of nurses say that they have adequate access to healthy food choices while at work. •  Only 11 percent of nurses report a daily intake of at least two servings of fruits and two and a half servings of vegetables. •  Fewer than half (47 percent) of nurses report not engaging in regular muscle-strengthening exercise, 46 percent in vigorous cardio exercise, and 20 percent in light or moderate exercise. •  Just over one-third (37 percent) of nurses say they have adequate access to employer-based exercise facilities and programs. •  Only 44 percent of nurses rate their health as good, 25 percent as very good, and 5 percent as excellent. Sleepa •  Just 60 percent of nurses report getting 7 or more hours of sleep. The Na- tional Sleep Foundation recommends 7 to 9 hours of sleep for individuals aged 18–64. Consequences of Shift Work and Long Hoursc,d • Long-term insomnia is reported by 32 percent of night workers and 26 percent of rotating shift workers. • Compared with the morning/day shift, there is an 18 percent increase in injury risk during the afternoon/evening shift and a 34 percent increase during the night shift. • There is a 40 percent increase in the risk for cardiovascular disease among shift workers. • The majority (79 percent) of newly licensed nurses work 12-hour shifts, a near majority work the night shift (44 percent), and more than half (61 percent) work overtime (mandatory or voluntary) weekly. • Nurses working weekly overtime are associated with a 32 percent increase in the risk of a needle stick, while those working night shift are associated with a 16 percent increase in the risk of a sprain or strain injury. Smokinge,f • Around 7 percent of registered nurses (RNs) smoke tobacco, while almost 25 percent of licensed practical nurses (LPNs) do so. • From 2003 to 2010–2011, the prevalence of smoking among RNs declined by 36 percent. • Smoke-free policies among 689 schools of nursing increased from 36 percent in 2015 to 91 percent in 2017. a ANA Enterprise, 2020. b Carpenter et al., 2020. c Trinkoff et al., 2008. d Stimpfel et al., 2015. e Sarna et al., 2014. f Sarna et al., 2019. PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

308 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 input, and nurses are a critical component of this process. As mentioned in Chap- ter 8, leaders and organizations will have to support an actual culture of equity throughout, and will require intentional change. Mental and Behavioral Health Mental health is defined as “a state of well-being in which every individual realizes his or her own potential, can cope with the normal stresses of life, can work productively and fruitfully, and is able to make a contribution to his or her community” (WHO, 2004). Mental health issues, including stress, burnout, and depression, are common among nurses (Adriaenssens et al., 2015; Da Silva et al., 2016; Gómez-Urquiza et al., 2016, 2017; Mark and Smith, 2012; McVicar, 2003). Whereas the exact prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)2 among nurses is unclear (see Schuster and Dwyer, 2020), intensive care unit (ICU) nurses are particularly exposed to repeated trauma and stress and often experience PTSD, anxiety, depression, and burnout (Mealer et al., 2017). These mental health issues have effects on multiple levels. They adversely impact individual nurses’ quality of life and enjoyment of work (Tarcan et al., 2017); they increase absenteeism and staff turnover (Burlison et al., 2016; Davey et al., 2009; Lavoie-Tremblay et al., 2008; Oyama et al., 2015); and they impact nurses’ ability to provide quality and safe care, resulting in such consequences as general and medication administration errors, poor relationships with patients and coworkers, and lower patient satisfaction (Gärtner et al., 2010). In addition, nurses with mental health concerns may be stigmatized and discriminated against by RN licensing boards. A recent study by Halter and colleagues (2019) found that of 30 boards that asked questions about mental illness, 22 asked questions not compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Studies have found that caring for patients on the front lines of the COVID-19 pandemic can increase stress, depression, anxiety, and PTSD for nurses (Kang et al., 2020; Lai et al., 2020). Early research results suggest that the pandemic has placed nurses at high risk of mental health sequelae, particularly anxiety, depression, and peritraumatic dissociation (Azoulay et al., 2020). Box 10-3 describes how address- ing the COVID-19 crisis has impacted nurses’ health and well-being. Burnout Burnout is an increasingly prevalent problem among clinicians, including nurses, and it has significant consequences for patients, organizations, teams, 2  The American Psychiatric Association defines PTSD as “a psychiatric disorder that may occur in people who have experienced or witnessed a traumatic event such as a natural disaster, a serious accident, a terrorist act, war/combat, or rape or who have been threatened with death, sexual violence or serious injury” (see https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/ptsd/what-is-ptsd [accessed April 13, 2021]). PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 309 BOX 10-3 COVID-19 and Nurses’ Health and Well-Being Nurses can struggle with determining how to uphold their professional ethical values in the context of competing obligations to patients, their own families, and their health. Many clinicians already faced anxiety, burnout, depression, stress, and risk of suicide prior to the pandemic, but the COVID-19 crisis has presented an even greater hardship that can exacerbate existing levels of burnout and men- tal health stressors (Squires et al., 2020; Ulrich et al., 2020). Sources of stress identified in a recent qualitative study of nurses caring for COVID-19 patients between May and July 2020 included personal experiences of social isolation, witnessing large numbers of deaths, increased patient acuity, caring for families, the uncertainty of how to care for patients, and severe staffing shortages and organizational issues (Squires et al., 2020). Nurses may experience varying de- grees of moral suffering that result in moral residue and fatigue as they respond to complex and often unsolvable ethical trade-offs in caring for patients with COVID-19 (Rosa et al., 2020). Adding to these stressors, nurses are acting as de facto social intermediaries for patients who are isolated from their families. For example, nurses are using technology to help patients stay connected with their families when visitors are not permitted (Shapiro, 2020). COVID-19 is also highlighting the challenges that nurses and nurse leaders have in reporting staff safety issues and equity issues (Rangchari and Woods, 2020). The disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on people of color (see Chapter 2) has highlighted the need for nurses to focus on caring for the underserved and addressing social and structural barriers to health. Nurses at the front lines see firsthand the consequences of social and economic injustice when the people most negatively affected by the disease are people of color, immigrants, and other vulnerable groups who are providing essential services often without needed pro- tections, who lack basic access to health services, and who live in overcrowded communities. Absent interventions, as COVID-19 rates ebb and peak around the United States, the impact on nurses is likely to be long-lasting (Nelson and Lee- Winn, 2020). and nurses themselves. Burnout syndrome is characterized by three compo- nents: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization (e.g., cynicism, apathy), and a low sense of personal accomplishment at work (Maslach and Jackson, 1981). Estimated rates of burnout among U.S. nurses have ranged between 35 and 45 percent (Aiken et al., 2002; Moss et al., 2016), although many studies focus only on the emotional exhaustion component of burnout, painting an incomplete picture (NASEM, 2019a). The consequences of burnout can include poor patient outcomes, high turnover rates, increased costs, and clinician illness and suicide (NASEM, 2019a). Factors including high workloads, staff shortages, extended shifts (Stimpfel et al., 2012), and the burden of documentation (see Box 10-1) can all contribute to nurse burnout. Another known contributor to burnout is a PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

310 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 mismatch between the skills and preparation of workers and the jobs that they are expected to perform (Maslach, 2017). Nurses in all roles and settings can experience burnout. Nursing students may experience academic and emotional burnout before they even enter the workforce (Ríos-Risquez et al., 2018). A shift toward preventive care and care management based in primary care or patient-centered medical homes means there is a grow- ing demand on nurses to take on more complex patients and associated tasks, increasing burnout among nurses in primary care (Duhoux et al., 2017). Nurses in other settings that entail prolonged contact with patients such as critical care, oncology, and psychiatric nursing, experience burnout as well (Cañadas-De la Fuente et al., 2017; Jackson et al., 2018). While data are lacking on burnout among nurse practitioners, some evidence shows they can experience burnout comparable to that experienced by nurses and physicians (Hoff et al., 2019). Nurses who work in long-term care settings face particular occupational stressors, such as physical or verbal abuse from residents with dementia, frequent physical transfers of residents, exposure to death and declining health among residents, and caring for individuals with very different care needs (Woodward et al., 2016). Compassion Fatigue Compassion fatigue, considered distinct from burnout, is defined as “a health care practitioner’s diminished capacity to care as a consequence of repeated exposure to the suffering of patients, and from the knowledge of their patients’ traumatic experiences” (Cavanagh et al., 2020, p. 640). Compassion fatigue occurs when a nurse’s ability to empathize with people is reduced as a result of repeated exposure to others’ suffering (Peters, 2018). Research suggests a number of factors that can lead to compassion fatigue, some of which are organizational and some of which are individual. Organizational factors include chronic and intense patient contact, prolonged stress, a lack of support, high workload, hours per shift, and time constraints that hinder quality care (Peters, 2018). Individual factors include a personal history of trauma, a lack of awareness about compas- sion fatigue, an inability to maintain professional boundaries (e.g., taking on extra shifts), and a lack of self-care (Peters, 2018). Suicide Nurses, like physicians, are at higher risk than the general population for suicide (Davidson et al., 2020a; NASEM, 2019a). Longitudinal data from 2005 through 2016 showed that nurses committed suicide at a higher rate relative to the general population. Both female and male nurses were at greater risk of suicide (female incident rate ratio [IRR] = 1.395, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.323– 1.470, p <.001; male IRR= 1.205, 95% CI 1.083, 1.338, p <.001) (Davidson et PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 311 al., 2020a). Despite this increased risk, relatively little attention has been paid to understanding and preventing nurse suicide (Davidson et al., 2018a). Behavioral Health Estimates indicate that nurses have the same rate of substance use disorders (SUDs) as the general population (Strobbe and Crowley, 2017; Worley, 2017), with approximately 10 percent of the nursing population having an SUD (Worley, 2017). In addition to the general risk factors that are associated with SUD, includ- ing genetic predisposition, history of trauma or abuse, early age at first use of a substance, and comorbid mental health disorders, nurses may also have unique risk factors that include access to controlled substances, workplace stress, and lack of education about SUDs (Worley, 2017). Nursing students are also at risk of SUDs (ANA, 2015; Strobbe and Crowley, 2017). Moral Well-Being Nurses in all roles and settings are confronted with ethical challenges that have the potential to cause moral suffering (ANA, 2015), including moral distress or moral injury (Rushton, 2018). When nurses are unable to convert their moral choices into action because of internal or external constraints, moral distress ensues and threatens their integrity (Ulrich and Grady, 2018). Moral distress also arises to varying degrees in response to moral uncertainty, moral conflicts or dilemmas involving competing ethical values or commitments, or tensions resulting from not being able to share moral concerns with others (Morley et al., 2019). Moral distress, the most well-researched form of moral suffering, occurs in response to moral adversity that threatens or violates an individual’s professional values and integrity, and is associated with myriad negative consequences (Bur- ston and Tuckett, 2013; Epstein and Delgado, 2010; Morley et al., 2019; Rushton et al., 2016). Nurses can experience moral distress when they feel inadequately supported, when health care resources are inappropriately used, and when there is disagreement between the patient’s care plan and the patient’s family wishes (Burston and Tuckett, 2013; Epstein et al., 2019). For example, nurses may expe- rience moral distress when asked to provide life support care that is not in the best interest of the patient (Kasman, 2004). Moral injury, a more extreme form of moral suffering, occurs when there is “a betrayal of what’s right, by someone who holds legitimate authority … in a high stakes situation” (Shay, 2014, p. 182). It involves a violation of one’s moral code by witnessing, participating in, or precipitating a variety of moral harms. While the roots of the concept began in the military, nurses and other clinicians increasingly are exploring its application in health care. Nurses can suffer from moral distress when they lack the resources or capac- ity to help their patients (Kelly and Porr, 2018) or are unable to take the ethically PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

312 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 appropriate action because of constraints or moral adversities (Ulrich et al., 2020). Nurses working in communities or with people with complex health needs and social risks, such as SUDs and psychological and behavioral disorders, and those working in high-intensity settings or palliative care can experience moral distress due to the complex moral and ethical issues they confront (Englander et al., 2018; SAMHSA, 2000; Welker-Hood, 2014; Wolf et al., 2019). Nurses who work in clinical care often lose contact with patients when they leave the clinical setting (Wolf et al., 2016), which makes it difficult to help these patients with their nonclinical needs, such as food, safe housing, and a support network. This can leave nurses feeling that their efforts are futile without societal commitment to systemic reforms. Addressing issues of health equity can involve confronting sexism, racism, ableism, xenophobia, and trauma, which can be uncomfortable and challenging for all involved (Munnangi et al., 2018). In addition, the historical roots of trauma are often “invisible” (Comas-Díaz et al., 2019; Helms et al., 2012), with individuals of color suffering from race-based stress (Comas-Díaz et al., 2019). Moreover, nurses may not feel empowered to raise their concerns about these inequities because of fear of retaliation or compromised relationships (Ulrich et al., 2019). When the claims or voices of nurses and other clinicians are discounted, their stress is heightened (Hurst, 2008). In the context of COVID-19 (see Box 10-3), evidence is emerging that nurses have experienced moral distress as they have addressed the stark ethical tensions (Morley et al., 2019; Ulrich et al., 2020) created by the pandemic, facing a gap between “what they can do and what they believe they should do” (Pearce, 2020; Rosa et al., 2020). This situation led the American Nurses Association (ANA) to develop guidance to help nurses understand their ethical obligations during a pandemic, particularly with respect to preserving their integrity and well-being (ANA, 2020a,b). Upholding the ethical mandate of nurses to provide respectful, equitable care for all persons and the responsibility to address issues of social justice can be especially challenging during a pan- demic (ANA, 2015; ANA and AAN, 2020). Moral injury has become a focus of inquiry both prior to and during the pandemic (Dean et al., 2020; Kopacz et al., 2019; Maguen and Price, 2020; Rushton et al., 2021), and early data suggest that it is emerging as a factor associated with the difficult ethical trade-offs experienced by clinicians in the context of the pandemic (Hines et al., 2020; Williams et al., 2020) and in response to the deaths of Black individuals at the hands of police (Barbot, 2020). The practice setting and ethical climate of the health care organization are postulated as factors that influence the prevalence of moral distress (Rathert et al., 2016; Sauerland et al., 2014). More research is needed to understand the relevance of moral injury among health care pro- fessionals and to study its relationship to various measures of well-being and moral resilience (Rushton, 2018). PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 313 Social Health and Well-Being The nature of nursing work means that nurses are constantly interacting with other people, including individuals, families, communities, physicians and other providers, administrators, staff, and other nurses. While these social interactions are essential to the work of caring for individuals and communities, they can also be a source of stress and adversely impact nurse well-being. This section explores three types of negative social interactions: bullying and incivility, workplace violence, and racism and discrimination. Bullying and Incivility Bullying and incivility among nurses is a major problem in nursing practice and can result in mental health issues, burnout, and nurses leaving positions or the profession entirely (Spence Laschinger et al., 2012; Weaver, 2013). There is an expected culture within nursing in which young or new nurses will encoun- ter bullying, gossip and belittling, intimidation, hostility, exclusion, and hazing from other staff nurses, supervisors, and managers (Caristo and Clements, 2019; Echevarria, 2013; Meissner; 1986). A survey of more than 10,000 RNs and nursing students found that half of respondents had experienced bullying in the workplace (ANA, n.d.). While the terms “bullying” and “incivility” are often used interchangeably,3 bullying is distinguished by its repetitive nature and is perpetrated by a person in a position of power (Rutherford et al., 2018). The ANA defines bullying as “repeated, unwanted, harmful actions intended to humiliate, offend, and cause distress in the recipient,” and incivility as “one or more rude, discourteous, or disrespectful actions that may or may not have a negative intent behind them” (ANA, n.d.). Psychological safety, the perception that it is safe to take risks within the team, is one important factor in creating healthy, civil, integrity-preserving workplaces (Edmonson, 1999, 2018; Edmondson and Lei, 2014). Low levels of psychological safety in the culture of some health care organizations can under- mine nurses’ ability to contribute fully and to thrive in the workplace (Edmon- son, 2002; Moore and McAuliffe, 2010, 2012; Newman et al., 2017; Ünal and Seren, 2016). Nurses—particularly those who work in clinical settings—work in teams where hierarchy, power imbalances, and interpersonal aggression can occur (Nembhard and Edmonson, 2006). Maslach and Leitner (2017) suggest that improving civility among the interprofessional team may be a leverage point for reducing burnout. However, there is limited research on the relationship between workplace hierarchies and bullying behaviors among nurses and between nurses and other health care providers (Wech et al., 2020). 3 The term “lateral violence” is also used interchangeably with “bullying” and “incivility” (Pfeifer and Vessey, 2017). PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

314 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 Workplace Violence In the United States, health care workers experience the highest level of assault of all occupations, and among health care workers, nurses and patient care assistants experience the highest rates of violence (Groenewold et al., 2018; OSHA, 2015). Aggression and assault can result in long-term effects on nurses that include posttraumatic stress and lower levels of productivity (Gates et al., 2011). Nurses endure both emotional and physical abuse from patients (Ga- brovec, 2017; Gates et al., 2011). An ANA health risk assessment of nurses during 2013–2016 indicated that 25 percent of nurses had experienced violence at the hands of patients or their family members (ANA, 2017). However, incidents of assault are substantially underreported by as much as 50 percent because of a lack of workplace reporting policies, a lack of confidence in the reporting system, and fear of retaliation (OSHA, 2015). A 2018 survey of more than 8,000 critical care nurses found that 80 percent of respondents had experienced verbal abuse at least once during the past year, nearly half physical abuse and discrimination, and 40 percent reported sexual harassment (Ulrich et al., 2019). Patients and family members were reported as the most frequent source of abuse (73 percent and 64 percent, respectively), fol- lowed by physicians (41 percent) and other nurses (34 percent). Fewer than half of nurses reported that their organization had zero tolerance policies for verbal abuse, while 62 percent reported such policies for physical abuse. These data paint a picture of work environments that are hostile to the psychological safety and well-being of nurses (Ulrich et al., 2019). While much of the research on workplace violence focuses on hospital set- tings, nurses working in other settings are also at risk of violence and aggression. Home visiting nurses, who often work alone in dynamic environments character- ized by potentially high-risk situations, are at risk of verbal and physical assault while in the community or people’s homes (Mathiews and Salmond, 2013). The incidence of workplace violence in home nursing is likely underreported because of factors including the perception that violence is part of the job and the moral conflict nurses face between duty to their patients and duty to report an incident of violence (Mathiews and Salmond, 2013). While many organizations are attempt- ing to respond to these challenges, education and training alone are likely insuf- ficient to address the root factors that contribute to them (Geoffrion et al., 2020). Racism and Discrimination As discussed in Chapter 2, racism can significantly impact the physical and mental health of individuals. Health can be affected by structural racism (poli- cies and systems), cultural racism (stereotypes, beliefs, and implicit biases), and discrimination (being treated differently based on race) (Williams et al., 2019). Microaggressions, which are brief and commonplace daily indignities, are also PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 315 correlated with poor health (Cruz et al., 2019; Nadal et al., 2016; Ong and Bur- row, 2017; Sue et al., 2007). Nurses may encounter racism, discrimination, and microaggressions from a number of sources, including employers, educators, managers, colleagues, and patients. Nurses and other clinicians of color can experience hardship, burnout, and the increased emotional labor and burden of an already emotionally demanding job while dealing with the personal negative consequences of racism from patients (Cottingham et al., 2018; Paul-Emile et al., 2016). Accommodating patients’ preferences regarding the race, gender, or religion of their providers has been common practice in the United States, often in a context of little guidance on how to approach these situations (Paul-Emile, 2012). This practice can have adverse effects on clinicians, especially when they are rejected by patients or subject to abuse because of their race. However, nurses’ experiences of racism are not limited to these types of discrete events but are part of the larger system of structural racism in the United States (Waite and Nardi, 2019). Black nurses in particular have long reported encountering racism in the workplace (Bennett et al., 2019; Wojciechowski, 2020). Internationally educated nurses (IENs)—those who completed a nursing education program in a country outside that of their employer and who have migrated to the United States (see also Chapter 3)—also contend with racism and discrimination (Ghazal et al., 2020). As described in Chapter 8, in the wake of COVID-19, which was first discovered in China, Asian nurses have reported verbal and physical attacks, and some patients have refused their care (AHA, 2020a). Discrimination against Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) nurses is not a new phenomenon, having existed since at least the mid-19th century. However, Stop AAPI Hate, a national coalition focused on tracking and addressing anti-Asian discrimination during the COVID-19 pandemic, reported 3,795 hate incidents between March 2020 and February 2021.4 These experiences may lead to increased anxiety, fear for personal safety, and poor physical health (AHA, 2020a). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ) nurses have also reported discrimination and harassment based on sexual orientation or gender identity and expression (Eliason et al., 2011, 2017). In a recent qualita- tive study of 277 LGBTQ+5 health care professionals, Eliason and colleagues (2017) found that these health care workers faced both work-related stress and hostility from coworkers and patients. Reported consequences included lack of promotions, tenure denials, and negative comments and gossip (Eliason et al., 2017). Avery-Desmarais and colleagues (2020) examined problematic substance use (PSU) and its relationship with stress among a convenience sample of 394 4  See https://secureservercdn.net/104.238.69.231/a1w.90d.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/ 2021/03/210312-Stop-AAPI-Hate-National-Report-.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3jLV0DTBnIy_NK3322T4f WDjZhJaY9A6w05elGLG83bJZ47SVckBrPwKQ (accessed April 13, 2021). 5 Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual/gender minorities. PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

316 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 lesbian, gay, and bisexual nurses. They found that the incidence of PSU was higher among this group than among either the general population of nurses or the general lesbian, gay, and bisexual population. Nurses with disabilities6 can experience discrimination in the workplace (Neal-Boylan et al., 2015), nursing school (Neal-Boylan and Smith, 2016), and by nursing boards, as mentioned previously (Halter et al., 2019), and encoun- ter negative stereotypes about their ability to do their job or provide effective care (Neal-Boylan et al., 2012). Nursing students with learning disabilities can encounter difficulties in nursing programs (Northway et al., 2015), including negative perceptions that conflate the need for accommodations for disabilities with a student’s capability as a nurse and professional (Marks and McCulloh, 2016). Nurses in the workforce may be reluctant to disclose a disability or mental illness (Hernandez et al., 2016; Peterson, 2017; Rauch, 2019) or to request a need for accommodations, which could increase the risk of injury to the health care team and potentially patients (Davidson et al., 2016). There has been a call for both health care organizations and nursing schools to see beyond disability as a disqualifier for nursing practice, and instead value professionals with disabilities who can offer unique and different perspectives (Marks and Ailey, 2014; Marks and McCulloh, 2016). New research on disabilities in the general population can increase awareness and depth of understanding, and more research on the health and experience of nurses themselves will build effective strategies for nurses with disabilities to achieve success (Davidson et al., 2016). APPROACHES TO IMPROVING WELL-BEING As shown in Figure 10-1, nurse well-being is impacted by the external envi- ronment, organizational structure and policies, and the conditions of day-to-day work. These three factors are mediated by individual factors, including person- ality, resilience, and social support. Together, these structural and individual factors can either strengthen or diminish nurse well-being. The responsibility for addressing nurse well-being lies with both nurses themselves and the systems, organizations, and structures that support them. Some barriers to well-being can be addressed only at the organizational and external environmental levels. For example, the burden of technology on nurses must be lifted by federal regulators, insurance companies, technology companies, and the like. However, individual nurses also have an important role to play in promoting their own well-being. 6 The definition of disabilities is based on the 1990 ADA and the 2008 ADA Amendments Act, in which a disability is defined as a physical or mental impairment or limitation that significantly affects a person in major life activities that include but are not limited to “caring for oneself, performing manual tasks, seeing, hearing, eating, sleeping, walking, standing, lifting, bending, speaking, breath- ing, learning, reading, concentrating, thinking, communicating, and working” (American Disabilities Act, Title 42, Chapter 126, § 12111; https://www.ada.gov/pubs/adastatute08.htm#12102 [accessed April 13, 2021]). PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 317 There is emerging evidence that despite the constraints imposed by the system, some nurses are able to remain healthy and whole and grow in response to adver- sity (Cui et al., 2021; Itzhaki et al., 2015; Okoli et al., 2021; Traudt et al., 2016). Nurses need the skills and tools that enable them to exercise their autonomy, agency, and competence within these systems. Further investigation is needed to understand the individual and system characteristics that create the conditions for nurses to thrive in the midst of complexity, uncertainty, and unpredictability. This section first examines individual-level approaches to well-being and then turns to a review of approaches at the systems level. The committee notes that although there exists no menu of ready-to-implement, evidence-based inter- ventions for improving nurse well-being (NASEM, 2019a), a great number of efforts currently being pursued can offer inspiration and opportunities for evalu- ation, replication, and scalability. However, as noted by Melnyk and colleagues (2020) in a recent systematic review of interventions focused on improving phy- sicians’ and nurses’ physical and mental well-being, more randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to examine the efficacy of such interventions as many of the available studies have weaknesses in their methodologies. Individual-Level Interventions While health care organizations must create the workplace conditions for well-being and integrity to thrive, nurses are also responsible for identifying their own needs and investing in their well-being (Ross et al., 2017). This respon- sibility arises from their inherent human dignity and their professional ethical mandate to invest in their own integrity and well-being so they can execute the responsibilities of their nursing role (ANA, 2015). Provision 5 of the ANA Code of Ethics states that nurses should “eat a healthy diet, exercise, get sufficient rest, maintain family and personal relationships, engage in adequate leisure and recre- ational activities, and attend to spiritual or religious needs” (ANA, 2015, p. 35). Although nurses are often knowledgeable about the importance of these issues, that knowledge does not always translate into action (Ross et al., 2017). Ross and colleagues (2017) identify a number of intrinsic and extrinsic factors that affect nurses’ participation in health-promoting behaviors. Intrinsic fac- tors include personal characteristics and beliefs, perceived benefits and barriers, self-efficacy, gender and age, fatigue, depression, and anxiety. Extrinsic factors include norms, social support, role modeling, financial and time constraints, and institutional support. Shift work and work schedules, as well as competing demands outside of work, such as caring for adult or child dependents, are addi- tional barriers to participation (Ross et al., 2017). Below, the committee examines interventions and initiatives directed at improving individual nurses’ health and well-being in a number of areas. Many such initiatives address multiple areas of well-being and use multiple approaches. For example, the Healthy Nurse, Healthy Nation (HNHN) Grand Challenge, an PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

318 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 effort of the ANA and its partners, seeks to transform the health of 4 million RNs through a focus on physical activity, nutrition, rest, quality of life, and safety (ANA, 2018). Organizations that participate in HNHN have developed a number of individual-focused initiatives, such as offering onsite fitness opportunities, walking programs, increased access to healthy food, mindfulness resources, and dedicated rooms for nurses to reset and relax (HNHN, 2019; Jarrín et al., 2017). Other well-being initiatives are focused on a specific behavior or health charac- teristic, but one that may have consequences for multiple areas of well-being. For example, poor sleep patterns are associated with poor physical and mental health, an increased risk of obesity, and an increased risk of accidents both in and outside of the workplace (IOM, 2006). The initiatives and ideas described below are designed to improve the health of nurses by addressing a wide variety of targets: • physical activity, diet, and sleep; • substance use; • resilience; • mental health; • ethical competence; • incivility, bullying, and workplace violence; and • racism, prejudice, and discrimination. Physical Activity, Diet, and Sleep A recent systematic review of workplace interventions to address obesity in nurses found limited evidence of successful interventions. The authors rec- ommend that interventions be tailored to the unique aspects of nurses’ working lives (Kelly and Wills, 2018) and that interventions not be universal but targeted toward those who are obese. In their systematic review, Melnyk and colleagues (2020) found that visual triggers, pedometers, and health coaching can increase participation in physical activity. The Nurses Living Fit program was effective in reducing nurses’ body mass index (BMI) over a 12-week intervention period; however, the effects of the program on BMI were not sustained (Speroni et al., 2014). A recent scoping review of studies looked at interventions targeted at nurses who work shifts and aimed at improving sleep patterns or managing fatigue (Querstret et al., 2020). In these studies, most of which were conducted in Italy, Taiwan, and the United States interventions fell into three primary categories: napping, working different shift patterns, and exposure to light or light atten- uation. With regard to napping interventions, the authors found mixed results. For studies that measured performance at work as an outcome, there was im- provement on some measures (e.g., information processing improving after a 30-minute nap). Studies that examined shift patterns (e.g., rotating shift patterns, PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 319 fixed night versus day shifts, 8-hour versus 12-hour rotating shifts) found that shift patterns including night shifts were associated with poorer sleep quality and increased fatigue. Results of light exposure studies were similarly mixed. Four studies found that self-reported energy levels increased with exposure to bright light. Another study, however, found no effect of an intervention involving light visors on fatigue or sleep. The scoping review found no studies conducted on samples involving nurse midwives. Querstret and colleagues (2020) conclude that the literature is inconsistent regarding how to intervene to improve sleep and reduce fatigue for nurses who work shifts, and that the interventions and measures used in these studies were disparate in nature. Substance Use A recent position statement from the Emergency Nurses Association and the International Nurses Society on Addictions called for four primary actions to address nurses with SUDs (Strobbe and Crowley, 2017): providing education to nurses and other employees, adopting alternative-to-discipline (ATD) approaches, considering drug diversion in the context of personal use as a symptom and not a criminal offense, and ensuring that nurses and nursing students are aware of the risks associated with SUDs and have a way to report concerns safely. The two pri- mary approaches to treating nurses with SUDs have been either a disciplinary ap- proach or an ATD program (Monroe et al., 2013; NCSBN, 2011; Russell, 2020). Monroe and colleagues (2013) conclude that ATD programs have a greater impact than disciplinary programs on protecting the health and safety of the public, as they identify and enroll more nurses and in turn remove more nurses with SUDs from direct patient care. These programs have been adopted by many state boards of nursing (Russell, 2020). In an analysis of 27 state board of nursing programs, Russell (2020) found a lack of consistency among them and suggests that more research is needed to identify the essential components of such programs. Com- mon components identified in at least half of the programs included an alcohol/ drug abstinence requirement, use of mood-altering medications for psychiatric/ medical conditions, an Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous program, and restricted hours or shifts (Russell, 2020). In a retrospective study of 7,737 nurses participating in SUD programs be- tween 2007 and 2015, Smiley and Reneau (2020) found that bimonthly random drug tests, a minimum of 3 years in a program, and daily check-ins were associ- ated with successful program completion. They also found that structured group meetings were helpful. The best results were for those nurses who stayed in a program at least 5 years and were tested twice per month. The authors recom- mend that an expert panel review these results and develop formal guidelines for such programs, and that boards of nursing test these guidelines in their ATD pro- grams. In addition, health care organizations and employers have a responsibility PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

320 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 to detect early patterns of drug diversion7 proactively before they become severe. To this end, organizations are using such technologies as automated dispensing cabinets, advanced analytics, and machine learning.8 Resilience Training focused on building individual resilience is often offered to prepare nurses for the fatigue, stress, workload, and burnout they may face (Taylor, 2019). Resilience refers to “the capacity of dynamic systems to withstand or recover from significant disturbances” (Masten, 2007, p. 923). Humans are thought to have an innate resilience potential that evolves over time and fluctuates depend- ing on the context; the interplay of individual factors; social, community, envi- ronmental, and societal conditions; and moral/ethical values and commitments (Rushton, 2018; Szanton et al., 2010). Resilience includes “the ability to face adverse situations, remain focused, and continue to be optimistic for the future,” and it is described as a “vital characteristic” for nurses in the complex health care system. Resilience is associated with reduced symptoms of burnout, improved mental health, and reduced turnover (Rushton et al., 2015). Taylor (2019) suggests offering resilience interventions at the primary, sec- ondary, and tertiary levels. At the primary level, such interventions would focus on building self-awareness, coping skills, and communications skills. At the secondary level, they might include screening for burnout and providing the associated resources and supports nurses will need. Finally, at the tertiary level, interventions would target nurses whose resilience threshold had been breached and support their healing and return to work. Understanding and addressing resilience among nurses holds promise for attenuating the effects of workplace demands that exceed personal resources (Yu et al., 2019). A nurse suicide task force led by ANA9 has been refocused on resilience and is making resources available that can address mental health, particularly during the response to the COVID-19 pandemic (Davidson et al., 2020a). However, focusing only on individual resilience is insufficient to create workplaces designed to preserve integrity and well-being (Taylor, 2019). Every system, including the human system, has limits beyond which it cannot recover and can become permanently degraded. The challenge is to better understand how to recognize the symptoms of those thresholds and to develop strategies that 7  Drug diversion is “the deflection of prescription drugs from medical sources into the illegal market” (see https://www.cms.gov/Medicare-Medicaid-Coordination/Fraud-Prevention/Medicaid- Integrity-Education/Downloads/infograph-Do-You-Know-About-Drug-Diversion-%5BApril- 2016%5D.pdf [accessed April 13, 2021]). 8  See https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/hospitals/industry-voices-as-covid-19-flare-ups-continue- healthcare-organizations-must-double-down (accessed April 13, 2021). 9  See https://www.nursingworld.org/get-involved/share-your-expertise/pro-issues-panel/moral- resilience-panel (accessed April 16, 2021). PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 321 support human systems, teams, and organizations in adapting healthfully to the adversities they inevitably encounter by modifying those characteristics that are amenable to intervention (Moss et al., 2016). In addition to improving the resil- ience of individuals, organizations can seek to identify and ameliorate the nega- tive conditions that systematically undermine health and well-being (Gregory et al., 2018). Barratt (2018) suggests that efforts to improve individual resilience focus on building the resilience of teams and organizations to give individuals the support and resources they need. Resilience is discussed further in the section on system-level approaches later in this chapter. Mental Health Promising approaches for fostering nurses’ mental health and well-being in- clude the development of skills in mindfulness and cognitive-behavioral therapy/ skills-building interventions. Mindfulness skills are aimed at building awareness of one’s reactions and being able to choose how to respond in the moment. The development of new neuropathways to calm a reactive nervous system is not aimed at tolerating intolerable situations, but at restoring stability so individ- uals can choose the responses that best reflect their values and commitments. Mindfulness interventions, including mindfulness-based stress reduction and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, are increasingly being used to treat anxiety and depression (Hofmann and Gomez, 2017), and may be particularly effective in fostering self-compassion (Wasson et al., 2020). Recent reviews of RCTs have found that mindfulness-based interventions are effective in treating a range of clinical symptoms and disorders, including anxiety, depression, psychological and emotional distress, and general “quality of life” concerns (Hofmann and Gomez, 2017). One evidence-based skills-building intervention based on cognitive-behavioral therapy that integrates mindfulness—MINDBODYSTRONG—(adapted from the COPE cognitive-behavioral skills-building intervention) is delivered by a nurse to new nurse residents. MINDBODYSTRONG comprises eight weekly sessions focused on caring for the mind, caring for the body, and building skills (Sampson et al., 2020). Evidence from an RCT supports MINDBODYSTRONG’s efficacy in improving mental health, healthy lifestyle beliefs, healthy lifestyle behaviors, and job satisfaction (Sampson et al., 2019), sustaining its positive impacts over time (Sampson et al., 2020). In a recent systematic review, Melnyk and colleagues (2020) found that interventions involving mindfulness and those using cognitive-behavioral ther- apy were effective in addressing stress, anxiety, and depression in clinicians (Melnyk et al., 2020). Deep breathing and gratitude interventions also showed promise. These findings are consistent with those of other reviews (e.g., Lomas et al., 2018). The programs reviewed by Melnyk and colleagues (2020) typically included eight weekly 1- to 2.5-hour sessions plus about 9 hours of mindfulness PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

322 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 practice at home; however, the authors conclude that these programs were po- tentially too time-intensive for clinicians to accommodate within their schedules. They also note that many hospitals do not have mindfulness trainers available to implement these programs. Given the challenges of implementing time-intensive interventions high- lighted by Melnyk and colleagues (2020), there is also promising evidence that brief mindfulness interventions may have positive impacts on compassion, although Hofmann and Gomez (2017) observe that it is unclear whether brief interventions can have the same kind of impact on anxiety and depression as that of the longer interventions. Box 10-4 describes promising interventions that use mobile technologies to support mindfulness and other well-being skills. Another promising approach to early screening and treatment is the Healer Evaluation Assessment and Referral (HEAR) program, first piloted with nurses in 2016 (Davidson et al., 2018b, 2020b). This program, a collaboration between the University of California, San Diego and the American Foundation for Sui- cide Prevention, includes a set of educational presentations focused on burnout, depression, and suicide, as well as an encrypted and confidential web-based assessment tool designed to identify and refer individuals at risk for depression and suicide. The pilot assessment showed it to be an effective screening tool (Da- vidson et al., 2018b). Three years after the pilot, 527 nurses have been screened, with 9 percent of those screened expressing thoughts of taking their own life; 176 nurses have received treatment, and 98 have accepted referrals for treatment. Ethical Competence Organizations are investing in programs aimed at building mindfulness, ethical competence, and resilience through experiential and discovery learning, simulation, and communities of practice (Brown and Ryan, 2003; Grossman et al., 2004; Rushton et al., 2021; Shapiro et al., 2005; Singleton et al., 2014). These programs, coupled with programs aimed at cultivating nurses’ competencies to address ethical concerns through systematic processes that engage the voice of the front line and provide nurses with skills for constructively and confidently raising their concerns, are important leverage points for creating workplaces where moral resilience is fostered and ethical practice is routine (Grace et al., 2014; Hamric and Epstein, 2017; Robinson et al., 2014; Rushton et al., 2021; Trotochaud et al., 2018; Wocial et al., 2010). These resources also need to be aligned with system changes that remove the impediments to nurses’ well-being and integrity and build moral community (Hamric and Wocial, 2016; Liaschenko and Peter, 2016; Traudt et al., 2016). Adopting systematic methods for building a culture that fosters ethical practice and integrity by investing in structural elements and processes in health care organizations will be essential to amplify interventions aimed at building individual capacities (Nelson et al., 2014; Pavlish PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 323 BOX 10-4 Mobile Technology and Mental Health Interventions Mobile technology and mHealth has become a growing field of innovation, study, and research (Park, 2016), and has the potential to help nurses and other clinicians maintain their well-being. mHealth is a combination of eHealth or tele- health service delivery, health care tracking, mobile computing, medical sensor, and communication technologies (Istepanian et al., 2004). mHealth has many advantages, it allows users to access services in most places, at any time, and bypasses traditional barriers created by infrastructure, such as roads and trans- portation (WHO, 2011). There has been a steady increase in the use of smartphones and the emer- gence of several mental health–focused apps (Donker et al., 2013). Systematic reviews have shown that these apps, including those focused on mindfulness and meditation (Huberty et al., 2019) and on behavior change (Han and Lee, 2018; Lyzwinski et al., 2019), hold promise for reducing symptoms of mental ill- ness and managing symptoms of other chronic illness. However, research in this area is growing, and studies have found that many apps lack clinical evidence or meaningful input from users (Subhi et al., 2015), or have been studied with small sample sizes (Goodwin et al., 2016; Rathbone and Prescott, 2017; Wang et al., 2018; Wood et al., 2017). Other challenges include limited adoption of new app- based health interventions because of age or access to traditional health care services (Alsswey and Al-Samarraie, 2020; Subhi et al., 2015). The near ubiquity and adoption of information technology and data systems in health care and the steady growth of younger nurses entering the workforce means that nurses, espe- cially during periods of public health emergencies and crises, provide an optimal pool of potential users for evidence-based mental health apps. In the coming years and with higher mobile usage in place (Alexopoulos et al., 2020), additional research will support the determination of best practices for helping nurses maintain their mental health or access mental health resources through the use of mobile technology. In the meantime, several resources have been launched with a focus on health care workers. A mental health partner initia- tive between the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Cooper University Health Care created an app called “Heroes Health,” launched in July 2020 that is aimed at first responders and health care workers. The app allows them to answer weekly questions that assess their mental health, and users are connected to resources based on their answers (Heroes Health, 2020). An additional feature to which a health care organization can subscribe allows its employees to give feedback through an aggregate dashboard. Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston released an app for emergency providers called “Rose” that collects data from users through a journal feature and questionnaires. The app’s built in AI platform then uses these data to identify trends in stress and burnout, allowing the organization to find warning patterns or triggers that mark adverse mental health symptoms in staff (Drees, 2020; Landi, 2020). Artificial intelligence technology in the app is equipped to read key words and phrases and detect signs of mental health problems, including trauma (Miliard, 2020). PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

324 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 et al., 2020). These efforts are synergistic with those aimed at building psycholog- ical safety (Nelson et al., 2014) and models of just culture for safe, quality care. Incivility, Bullying, and Workplace Violence In its 2015 position statement (ANA, 2015), ANA articulated the responsi- bilities of both individual nurses and employers in ending workplace bullying, incivility, and workplace violence. With regard to bullying, Rutherford and col- leagues (2019) conducted an integrative review of studies of interventions ad- dressing the bullying of prelicensure nursing students and nursing professionals, finding that those interventions fell into three main categories: education, nurses as leaders, and policy changes. The authors conclude that educational interven- tions are important to reducing or eliminating bullying behavior and may be of the most benefit to students. These types of interventions range from journaling to teaching nurses how to address being a target of bullying or incivility. One intervention, described by Aebersold and Schoville (2020), used role play simulations with debriefing sessions and an educational component with senior-level undergraduate nursing students. Preliminary qualitative evidence from this intervention indicated that simulation can be an effective strategy for addressing incivility and bullying in the workplace, although this was a small pilot study with a convenience sample of nursing students. Pfeiffer and Vessey (2017) conducted an integrative review of bullying and lateral violence (BLV) among nurses in Magnet® accredited health care organizations.10 The authors found that a variety of terms were used to describe BLV, making it difficult to synthesize and compare findings across studies. Although Magnet accreditation standards promote a model of collegiality and teamwork, BLV remains prevalent and exists in both Magnet and non-Magnet organizations. Pfeiffer and Vessey (2017) call for more studies examining the prevalence of BLV in these accredited organizations and also more research aimed at better understanding factors within organizations and interventions that can effectively reduce the occurrence of BLV. In sum, the level of evidence for the effectiveness of bullying interventions among nurses is limited and there is a need for rigorous, well-designed RCTs to build this evidence base; multiple, stratified interventions may be needed (Rutherford et al., 2019). As mentioned previously, workplace violence is also a concern for nurses, particularly those who work in emergency department settings (Gillespie et al., 2014a,b). Interventions that have been developed to address workplace violence include a hybrid educational intervention with online and classroom components (Gillespie et al., 2014a) and a multicomponent intervention that includes envi- ronmental changes, education, training, and changes in policies and procedures 10 These are health care organizations that are accredited through the American Nurses Credential- ing Center. This model is considered to be the gold standard for nursing (Pfeiffer and Vessey, 2017). PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 325 (Gillespie et al., 2014b), although these are not strictly focused on nurses. The hybrid educational intervention showed promise with a small sample of employ- ees from a pediatric emergency department, with the research team concluding that to achieve significant learning and retention, the hybrid model is preferred. The multicomponent intervention was promising, but only two of six sites re- ported significant decreases in violent events. The authors also note that emer- gency department workers did not report most of the violent events that occurred because of such factors as time constraints and fear of being blamed (Gillespie et al., 2014b). There is a need for more research to examine how to ameliorate workplace violence among health care workers, and for replication and rigorous RCTs of promising interventions. Racism, Prejudice, and Discrimination As discussed in Chapter 4, there has been a shift in patient care settings away from cultural competency toward cultural humility, and toward a focus on a lifelong approach to learning about diversity and the role of individual bias and systemic power in health care interactions. Specific approaches to weaving cultural humility concepts into nursing and interprofessional education are discussed in Chapter 7. In addition, as noted in Chapter 7, research on the efficacy of interventions designed to reduce implicit bias has found that many of these interventions are ineffective, and some may even increase implicit biases (FitzGerald et al., 2019). Chapter 7 describes an evidence-based intervention, the prejudice habit-breaking intervention (Cox and Devine, 2019; Devine et al., 2012), that has been tested in RCTs and is aimed at overcoming bias through conscious self-regulation or breaking the bias “habit.” Reducing prejudice and discrimination may also be possible through simple and brief interventions, such as 10-minute nonconfrontational conversations, although more research is needed to test such interventions with racial outgroups (Williams and Cooper, 2019). Another concept that can be considered in relationship to well-being is that of “wellness as fairness” (Prilleltensky, 2012). As described in earlier chapters of this report, nurses are being called on to dismantle racism and to advance the social mission of making health better and fairer. Similarly, in the public health field, it is acknowledged that a focus on both individual personal transforma- tion and structural change is needed to detect, confront, and prevent racism (Margaret and Came, 2019). Margaret and Came (2019, p. 317) note that White public health practitioners can become allies in antiracism work by addressing the following three interdependent and overlapping areas: “(1) understanding and addressing power; (2) skills for working across difference; and (3) building and sustaining relationships.” Rigorous, well-designed studies are needed to test these and other promising approaches with nurse educators, nursing students, and practicing nurses. PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

326 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 Systems-Level Approaches The responsibility for nurse well-being is shared between individual nurses and those who shape the environment in which they practice. Individual nurses’ dedication to their own well-being is enhanced by the support of the system, its leaders, and a culture in which well-being is prioritized. The 2019 National Academies report on clinician burnout makes clear that while interventions focused on individuals have their place, these strategies alone are insufficient to address the systemic contributions to the factors that erode clinician well-be- ing (NASEM, 2019a). The evidence demonstrates that integrated, systematic, organization-focused interventions are more effective at reducing burnout and improving well-being. A systems approach focuses on the structure, organization, and culture of workplaces (Dzau et al., 2018; Shanafelt and Noseworthy, 2017; Shanafelt et al., 2017), and considers the complex interplay of factors that impact well-being and other outcomes (NASEM, 2019a; Plsek and Greenhalgh, 2001; Rouse, 2008). An integrated and systematic approach requires the involvement of a broad range of stakeholders, including nurse leaders, educational institutions, health care organizations and other employers of nurses, policy makers, and professional associations. Some stakeholders will have the capacity to make sweeping changes to policies and work environments, while others will focus more on facilitating individual and team well-being. Because the factors that contribute to burnout and poor well-being are multiple, varied, complex, and context-dependent, efforts on all levels and in all areas are welcome and necessary. The National Academy of Medicine’s (NAM’s) Clinician Well-Being Knowledge Hub has detailed, illus- trative case studies from the Virginia Mason Kirkland Medical Center, and The Ohio State University’s Colleges of Medicine and Nursing, Emergency Medicine Residency Program and Wexner Medical Center.11 Stakeholder actions could include restructuring systems and implementing initiatives to prevent burnout, reduce administrative burden, enable technological solutions to support the provision of care, reduce the stigma and barriers that pre- vent health professionals from seeking support, and increase investment in research on clinician well-being (NASEM, 2019a). All stakeholders can consider the role technology can play in improving well-being (see Box 10-4). Well-being initiatives will vary considerably based on the setting and role of nurses; for example, nurses who are working directly with patients during a pandemic disease outbreak will have different needs and wants from those of nurses who are leading community efforts to change housing policies. This section describes how different stakehold- ers—nurse leaders, educational institutions, employers, policy makers, and nursing associations and organizations—can continue working toward improving nurse well-being, and provides several examples of action in these areas. 11 See https://nam.edu/clinicianwellbeing/case-studies (accessed April 13, 2021). PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 327 Nurse Leaders Nurse leaders have the potential to dramatically impact nurse well-being by shaping the day-to-day work life of nurses, setting the culture and tone of the workplace, developing and enforcing policies, and serving as exemplars of well-being (Ross et al., 2017). The leadership style and effectiveness of nurse leaders have been associated with outcomes including the health of the work environment, patient outcomes and mortality, job satisfaction, work engagement, burnout, and retention (Bamford et al., 2013; Boamah et al., 2018; Cummings et al., 2010a,b; Rushton and Pappas, 2020; Spence Laschinger and Fida, 2014; Spence Laschinger et al., 2012; Wei et al., 2018). Nurse leaders have a responsi- bility to create a safe work environment with a culture of inclusivity and respect, and to implement and enforce strong policies to protect nurses. In particular, nurse leaders must be skilled in recognizing signals of toxicity and strategically responding to them (Rutherford et al., 2019). This responsibility is not limited to acute care or hospital settings; nurses on all fronts and at every point in the workforce pipeline deserve support from their leaders. The specific ways in which leaders can impact nurse well-being depend on their role and scope of authority and responsibility. Nurse executives with influ- ence over organizational policies can advocate for adequate pay and benefits, and address staffing and scheduling issues to prevent nurses from being over- worked. Nurse leaders who manage teams can support well-being by addressing workplace safety and incivility and bullying, and by creating a culture in which all nurses feel supported and respected (Spence Laschinger et al., 2009). For example, leaders could implement a “see something, say something” program in which nurses are encouraged to report any unsafe workplace conditions, includ- ing violence and bullying. Nurse leaders can also use their position to serve as educators and role mod- els for their staff (NASEM, 2019a; Ross et al., 2017). They might do so by, for example, investing in programs aimed at developing resilience skills, teaching skills based on cognitive-behavioral therapy, creating norms of self-care within the work day, and setting firm work–life boundaries for self and staff. The effects of stress and trauma related to the COVID-19 pandemic will impact the work- force at both the individual and staffing levels for years to come, and leaders will need vigilance and a long-term strategy to build the health of the teams providing care. For example, Menschner and Maul (2016) report that some community-based health care organizations and health care networks are fostering a healthy life– work balance by encouraging employees to leave work mobile phones in the office after their shifts and ensuring that they do not work beyond their designated 40 hours. Nurse leaders can also serve as role models by examining their own health promotion behaviors and maintaining their own health and well-being (Ross et al., 2017). And they can be advocates for making environmental changes PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

328 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 in the workplace, such as by holding standing or walking meetings, advocating for healthy work schedules, or implementing programs to help nurses cope with the stresses of work. Leadership can be particularly important during times of transition and challenge. For example, during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic,12 health centers with level-headed, disciplined, and unified leadership were able to quickly implement plans, limit confusion, and prepare staff for the changes ahead (Canton and Company, 2020). Rosa and colleagues (2020) outline steps for nurse leaders to take to promote health system resilience during the COVID-19 pan- demic. These include specific local and organizational recommendations aimed at mitigating burnout and moral suffering and building a culture of well-being. The transition associated with integrating SDOH and health equity further into nursing practice will not be as swift or as bleak as the transition to COVID-19 care, but it will similarly require strong leadership and steady hands to guide the way and advocate for nurse well-being amid the changes (Rosa et al., 2020). Nurse leaders will be essential in helping to shift the priorities and workflow of nurses and to supporting nurses through this transition (AHA, 2020b). Educational Institutions The foundation for nurse well-being starts long before nurses enter the workplace. While more data are available on the poor well-being of medical students, research suggests that nursing students are similarly stressed out, exhausted, and disengaged (Michalec et al., 2013; Rudman and Gustavsson, 2012). While evidence on burnout and poor well-being among nursing students is quite limited (NASEM, 2019a), there is an emerging body of evidence on the important role of resilience (see also the earlier discussion of resilience in the section on individual-level interventions). Resilience of prelicensure nursing students has a significant inverse relationship with academic intention to leave (Van Hoek et al., 2019) and moral distress (Krautscheid et al., 2020). Strategies to support resilience include positive reframing (Amsrud et al., 2019; Mathad et al., 2017; Stacey et al., 2020; Thomas and Revell, 2016), reflection (He et al., 2018), and mindfulness (Stacey et al., 2020). Integration points for resilience within the clinical and didactic components of curricula are needed for sustainable impact on nursing student behavior (Cleary et al., 2018). In a recent systematic review of resilience among health care professions, Huey and Palaganas (2020) outline individual, organizational, and environmental factors that impact student resilience and promising interventions. Further work is needed to understand the relationship among factors that support well-being 12 The American Hospital Association developed a workforce checklist for use by leaders to con- sider how they can support their workforce during the pandemic. See https://www.aha.org/system/ files/media/file/2020/07/aha-covid19-pathways-workforce.pdf (accessed April 13, 2021). PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 329 and resilience among nursing students in all programs of study (Stephens, 2013; Thomas and Revell, 2016). Nursing educational institutions have a responsibility to ensure students’ well-being, and to impart to them the skills and resources necessary for well-be- ing throughout their nursing career. Consistent with the recommendations of the National Academies report focused on addressing burnout (NASEM, 2019a), educational institutions, like health care organizations, can invest in interventions that build individual resilience and well-being while dismantling the impediments within the system itself. This process begins with executive leadership and fac- ulty commitment to a learning culture in which systems, processes, incentives, rewards, and resources are aligned to amplify rather than degrade well-being. One way to accelerate change is through investment in a leadership position assigned the role of championing individual and system alignment of well-being activities. Routine assessment of well-being and factors known to undermine it is then conducted annually, with leadership accountable for remediating modifiable factors and expanding efforts to deepen culture change. These strategies, recom- mended in the National Academies report (NASEM, 2019a), require attention to supporting faculty, staff, and students in contributing to a culture of well-being as a strategic priority. As part of the effort to make well-being an institutional priority, conscious attention is needed to creating a culture in which well-being and integrity are not an afterthought but are integrated throughout the curriculum in visible and mean- ingful ways. Specific inclusion of content that links nursing students’ well-being to the profession’s Code of Ethics reinforces that self-stewardship is an ethical imperative rather than an optional activity (ANA, 2015). Including program out- comes focused on well-being and ethical competence is a tangible way to elevate the importance of developing and sustaining well-being as a foundational skill for the nursing profession, as explicitly reflected in the American Association of Colleges of Nursing’s Essentials13 for nursing education. Faculty, like students, require expanded resources that enable them to embody their commitment to well-being and serve as role models and coaches for students (Feeg et al., 2021; Robichaux, 2012). Statewide, regional, and national initiatives to build capacity among faculty and students in these foundational areas are vital. There are a variety of concrete ways in which nursing schools can facilitate student well-being (see Box 10-5)—for example, by ensuring that the workload is reasonable, providing easy-to-access support and mentoring for students, setting a culture and an example of well-being, and teaching self-care and mindfulness skills, such as reflective practice, journaling, or various forms of artistic expres- sion (Song and Lindquist, 2015). These skills can be integrated throughout the curriculum with reinforcement at regular intervals. For these interventions to be 13  See https://www.aacnnursing.org/Education-Resources/AACN-Essentials (accessed April 13, 2021). PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

330 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 BOX 10-5 Examples of Nursing Schools’ Well-Being Initiatives The Compassionate Care Initiative (CCI) (Bauer-Wu and Fontaine, 2015) is an integrated, multifaceted program within the University of Virginia School of Nurs- ing. CCI serves students, faculty, and staff and promotes well-being through such initiatives as coursework, resiliency activities, workshops, retreats, and meditation and yoga classes. CCI incorporates four central concepts: resilience, mindfulness, interprofessional collaboration, and a healthy work environment. The initiative conducts research on compassion, resilience, and self-care, and also has an Am- bassador program in which student-clinicians, faculty, and community members implement changes in their workplaces and meet monthly to share successes and challenges. The Ohio State University College of Nursing has a 5-year strategic plan focused on student, trainee, and faculty well-being, with outcomes monitored on an annual basis (Cappelucci et al., 2019). LIVE WELL is a core tenet of this plan aimed at producing nurses, leaders, researchers, and health professionals who Lead, Innovate, Vision, and Execute, and are Wellness-focused, Evidence-based, Lifelong Learners, and Lights for the World. The College has a LIVE WELL cur- riculum that promotes healthy lifestyles for students, faculty, and staff through seminars, events, and wellness activities. effective, it will be necessary for nursing education organizations to carefully assess the impact of recruitment narratives and organizational norms that conflate perfectionism with excellence, establish patterns of unhealthy competition, or reinforce systemic racism or social injustice. Such an assessment requires scru- tinizing grading and pedagogical practices, encouraging a diversity of learning styles, and eliminating norms of chronic overwork as the standard to be achieved. Attention is needed to how faculty norms and behaviors impact the adoption of those norms by students. For example, students who witness exhausted and overworked faculty who do not demonstrate investment in their own health and well-being experience dissonance when those same faculty urge them to adopt healthy habits and well-being practices. Nursing students’ well-being can also be enhanced by advancing opportu- nities for interdisciplinary education and interventions aimed at fostering pro- fessionalism and interprofessional practice to support well-being (IOM, 2014). Currently, core competencies for both interprofessional14 and single-discipline15 education lack robust requirements for developing capacities that enable well-be- 14 See https://www.aacom.org/docs/default-source/insideome/ccrpt05-10-11.pdf?sfvrsn=77937f97_ 2 (accessed April 13, 2021). 15  See https://www.aacnnursing.org/Education-Resources/AACN-Essentials (accessed April 13, 2021). PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 331 ing and integrity. Often when included, such content is elective or optional. However, there are signs of progress, animated by concerns about the detrimental effects of the learning environment and recommendations to redress them (Larsen et al., 2018). Interprofessional initiatives, such as the NAM’s Action Collabora- tive on Clinician Well-Being and Resilience,16 represent a coordinated method for learning with and from colleagues (IOM, 2014). Employers Organizations that employ nurses—including hospitals, nursing homes, schools, prisons, community organizations, and others—play a major role in shaping the conditions that promote nurse well-being or the lack thereof. In the framework for burnout and well-being shown earlier in Figure 10-1, there are a number of areas in which employers can make an impact. First, an organization’s leadership, governance, and management can make monitoring and improving nurse well-being a priority and be accountable for making the organizational changes necessary to dismantle the impediments to achieving that priority. This includes alignment of budgeting with desired outcomes of improved well-being in the nursing workforce. Nurses are also well equipped to take on roles as chief wellness officers in health care systems (Kishore et al., 2018). Second, an organization can shape the environment, culture, and policies that affect nurses. An organization can redesign the work system so that nurses have adequate resources (e.g., staffing, scheduling, workload, job control, physical environment), and design systems that encourage and facilitate interprofessional collaboration, communication, and professionalism (NASEM, 2019c). For ex- ample, a health care organization can ensure that nurses not only have sufficient PPE, but also “psychological PPE” (see Box 10-6). Third, employers can help support individual nurses in bolstering personal capabilities that may modify the effects of work systems on well-being; for ex- ample, employers can offer education, resources, and training in mindfulness, resilience, and healthy habits. As discussed previously, for individual approaches to be effective, they must be coupled with redesign of organizational processes, structures, and polices to animate sustainable culture shifts that make interventions feasible and normative (Rushton and Sharma, 2018; Stanulewicz et al., 2020). For example, if an organi- zation encourages nurses to use meditation to decompress during shifts but orga- nizational culture frowns on nurses taking breaks, the initiative is likely to have limited impact. End users of these initiatives (front-line nurses) can be engaged proactively in designing a diversity of resources that they perceive to be valuable in fostering their well-being rather than having such resources imposed on them 16  See https://nam.edu/initiatives/clinician-resilience-and-well-being (accessed April 13, 2021). PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

332 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 (Richards, 2020). The Wikiwisdom™ Forum: Wisdom from Nurses (Richards, 2020) is one such effort, sponsored by New Voice Strategies, the Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, and the American Journal of Nursing to facilitate online conversations with front-line nurses who are battling the COVID-19 pandemic. For organizations employing nurses who are dispersed in a community (e.g., public health nurses, school nurses) rather than concentrated in a clinical setting, monitoring and communicating with them about well-being may be even more critical. Nurses in community settings and in clinical settings face different risks; nurses working in the community may deal with, for example, isolation or violence in a patient’s home or neighborhood, and have less opportunity for breaks (Mathiews and Salmond, 2013; Terry et al., 2015). The dispersed nature BOX 10-6 Psychological Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Just as health care organizations provide PPE, schedule adequate staff, and ensure safety in the workplace, they are also responsible for providing “psycho- logical PPE” to their employees (IHI, 2020). The Institute for Healthcare Improve- ment (IHI) describes psychological PPE as “individual and system-level actions owned by unit and team leaders that provide protection and support for staff’s mental health that can be deployed both before providing care and after a shift has ended.” These guidelines (see the figure below) were created specifically for health care staff working during the COVID-19 pandemic, but they may be adapt- able for use in other contexts and settings as well (IHI, 2020). SOURCE: IHI, 2020. PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 333 of community nurses means that employers have less opportunity to observe their well-being and less control over the work environment. More research is needed on improving the well-being of nonclinical nurses; in the interim, given the lack of evidence, employers need to think creatively and communicate with nurses about their needs. There are a variety of existing organizational initiatives to improve nurse well-being through changes to the work environment, as described below. The previously discussed Magnet Recognition program of the American Nurses Cre- dentialing Center (ANCC) is an organizational model designed to improve the work environment for nurses in a hospital setting. The model is focused on impro- ving those components of a nurse’s work environment that can be adjusted, such as sufficient staffing, leadership, clinical autonomy, interdisciplinary collabora- tion, and shared governance. The committee notes that these components match many of the work system factors that contribute to burnout (NASEM, 2019a). As of 2019, about 10 percent of U.S. hospitals had achieved Magnet designation (ANCC, 2019). Another ANCC initiative, the Pathway to Excellence program, recognizes health care organizations that demonstrate a culture in which a work environment that engages and empowers its workers is fostered. Meeting the 12 standards focused on workplace excellence is associated with promising data suggesting improved patient care, decreased emotional exhaustion, and higher job satisfaction (Jarrín et al., 2017). Programs such as Schwartz Center Rounds offer interprofessional opportu- nities to explore the psychological, spiritual, and moral aspects of clinical work in a facilitated format. The creation of well-being and a feeling of psychological safety among teams is enabled by a culture of safety, norms of professional re- sponsibility to speak up, leadership, support from peers and leaders, familiarity with team members, and inclusiveness (O’Donovan and McAuliffe, 2020). Evi- dence suggests that such programs foster communication, teamwork and support (Lown and Manning, 2010), and psychological well-being (Maben et al., 2018). Further research is needed to support the design, implementation, and evaluation of interventions aimed at building psychological safety within health care teams (O’Donovan and McAuliffe, 2020). The American Association of Critical Care Nurses (AACN) has developed a set of standards for establishing and sustaining healthy work environment (HWE) standards. Initially released in 2005 and revised in 2016, the HWE standards have been widely adopted nationally and in several other countries. The six essen- tial standards are “skilled communication, true collaboration, effective decision making, appropriate staffing, meaningful recognition, and authentic leadership” (AACN, 2016, p. 10). Outcomes for organizations improve when they actively implement these standards (AACN, 2016). A survey of more than 8,000 acute and critical care nurses (Ulrich et al., 2019) demonstrated that units that intentionally address work environment issues scored better on every indicator of HWE stan- dards, including collaboration, leadership, staffing, intent to leave, and decision PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

334 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 making. Notably, these elements were consistently more highly rated at the unit level than at the health care organization level, suggesting that there may be opportunities to intervene at the unit/team level to leverage changes in practice and culture. AACN has also developed the AACN Healthy Work Environment Assessment tool, designed to assist organizations in monitoring their progress in implementing the standards (Connor et al., 2018). Meaningful recognition of the value each person brings to the organization is one key element of AACN’s HWE standards. Such recognition ought to be sys- tematic, consistent, and meaningful to those it intends to acknowledge. Programs such as the Daisy Award17 give patients, families, and colleagues opportunities to publicly recognize the contributions of individual nurses (Barnes et al., 2016). Recognition by the people served reinforces the meaning of nurses’ work by ac- knowledging their behaviors and their impact on others (Lefton, 2012). It can also help mitigate the unintended negative consequences of the “hero” narrative by connecting the contribution nurses make to patient outcomes explicitly, visibly, and meaningfully (Stokes-Parish et al., 2020). Health care organizations can also learn from other sectors in using such well-being frameworks as PERMA (Positive Emotion, Engagement, Relation- ships, Meaning, Achievement). PERMA has been proposed as a model for insti- tutional leadership and culture change to overcome the tendency in many health care organizations to look to quick fixes and partial solutions to stem the tide of burnout and degraded well-being among clinicians (Slavin et al., 2012). The committee points out that all of these existing programs focus on the acute care setting. In the future, programs that recognize and incentivize health care orga- nizations to distinguish their cultures as enabling the well-being of nurses have the potential to be expanded beyond acute care organizations to other settings where nurses work. Adopting standards and programs such as those described above offers organizations a roadmap for aligning efforts to produce meaningful and sustainable change. Policy Makers There have been sweeping changes in the structure and regulatory envi- ronment of U.S. health care in recent years, and some of these changes have impacted the well-being of clinicians (NASEM, 2019a). One frequently cited example is the growing administrative burden placed on clinicians, such as the documentation requirements associated with electronic health records (see Box 10-1). Efforts to reduce this burden at the federal level include the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid’s (CMS’s) Patients over Paperwork initiative, an attempt to simplify Medicare documentation requirements, and a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) draft Strategy on Reducing Regulatory and 17  See https://www.daisyfoundation.org/daisy-award (accessed April 13, 2021). PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 335 Administrative Burden Relating to the Use of Health IT and EHR (ONC, 2020). Policy makers can work together with nurses, other clinicians, workplaces, and patients to develop policies that meet the needs of health care while promoting the well-being of nurses. During the COVID-19 pandemic, CMS and other regulators and payers have made changes to policies to lift or lessen administrative and technological burdens on clinicians, including nurses. There have been calls to make many of these changes permanent to transform health care, with the goal of achieving the Quadruple Aim outcomes of better care for individuals, better health for the popu- lation, lower costs, and better experience for clinicians (Bodenheimer and Sinsky, 2014; Sinsky and Linzer, 2020). For instance, in a recent commentary, Sinsky and Linzer (2020) call for a reconsideration of the pre-COVID-19 status quo and recommend that certain policy and practice changes related to COVID-19 remain in place (e.g., permitting verbal orders, allowing clinicians to provide telehealth services from their homes). As noted in Chapter 4, the Triple Aim is focused primarily on optimizing the health system’s performance (see Bodenheimer and Sinsky, 2014). The “fourth aim,” addressing clinicians’ well-being and improving their work life, also targets improving the quality of patient-centered care, and these two need to be in balance so one or the other is not compromised (Boden- heimer and Sinsky, 2014). Nursing Associations and Organizations Nursing associations and organizations, individually and collectively, have a pivotal role in supporting nurse well-being. Professional organizations such as ANA, AACN, and others have leveraged their organizational infrastructure to curate resources; offer programs; and interpret and disseminate reports, re- search, and best practices. In May 2020, the American Nurses Foundation, the philanthropic arm of ANA, launched a national well-being initiative18 for nurses to address the increased stress on nurses due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This initiative is a collaboration among ANA, AACN, the Emergency Nurses Associ- ation (the ENA), and the American Psychiatric Nurses Association (APNA), and includes peer-to-peer conversations; hotlines; cognitive processing techniques; and other preventive approaches, such as apps for stress reduction. The National Black Nurses Association (NBNA) has an NBNA Affirmations webpage in which nurses can submit their favorite quotes or positive affirmations,19 and also has a Twitter campaign called #NBNAResilient. The National Association of Hispanic 18 See https://www.nursingworld.org/news/news-releases/2020/american-nurses-foundation- launches-national-well-being-initiative-for-nurses/ for more information (accessed April 13, 2021). 19  See https://www.nbna.org/affirmations (accessed April 13, 2021). PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

336 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 Nurses (NAHN) conducts educational programming that includes webinars fo- cused on stress and compassion fatigue.20 Nursing organizations are poised to be the collective voice of their members on critically important issues including nurse well-being by naming the problem and advocating for solutions. They have a vital role in shaping the narrative about the challenges nurses face to avoid reinforcing a victim perspective by offering an evidence-informed array of solutions that can be customized for the unique needs of members within their organizations. They have represented various nursing specialties in such interprofessional initiatives as the NAM’s Action Collaborative to bring the voice of nurses to the table. Professional organizations also provide systems of support, build community and connection among their members, and inspire engagement in addressing the systemic impediments to nurse well-being. Professional organizations have a pivotal role in educating their communities about the factors that degrade their well-being, such as burnout, and in disseminating resources to address them (Cochran et al., 2020). CONCLUSIONS To care responsibly for people—especially as they practice in more settings with more diverse people with complex needs—nurses need to feel healthy, well, and supported. The systems that educate and employ nurses have a duty to fully support them as they take on new roles to advance health equity. While nurses have experienced roadblocks to well-being before—from burnout, to compassion fatigue, to injuries and infection—COVID-19 has intensified their stress and left them feeling unprotected and unsupported. Conclusion 10-1: All environments in which nurses work affect the health and well-being of the nursing workforce. Ultimately, the health and well-being of nurses influence the quality, safety, and cost of the care they provide, as well as organizations and systems of care. The COVID-19 crisis has highlighted the shortcomings of historical efforts to address nurses’ health and well-being. Nurse well-being is impacted by physical, mental, moral, and social factors originating in a range of sources from the individual to the system level. Improv- ing the well-being of nurses will therefore require multilevel and multifaceted approaches that address their physical, mental, moral, and social health and cre- ate safe, supportive, and ethically grounded environments. Occupational health hazards, workplace violence, stress and mental health issues, moral suffering, compassion fatigue, burnout, and bullying and incivility all need to be addressed 20  See http://www.nahnnet.org/NAHN/Events/Webinars/NAHN/Content/Webinars.aspx?hkey= 5c3658d1-a2e6-4ea2-8b4f-da0f622bf2dc (accessed April 13, 2021). PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 337 through reform aimed at changing workplace policies and culture to support the well-being of nurses and ensure their capacity and ability to provide quality care for people, families, and communities. Conclusion 10-2: The lack of sufficient data and evidence about the negative impacts of burnout, fatigue, and stressful work environments on nurses’ health and well-being hinders understanding of the severity of these issues and limits the ability to address them appropriately. Many programs and initiatives seek to improve nurses’ health and well-being; however, the translation of effective evidence-based in- terventions into practice, further research, and rigorous studies are needed to understand the impact of these programs and initiatives and their relationship to system factors. Conclusion 10-3: Structural racism, cultural racism, and discrimi- nation exist within nursing as in other professions. Nurses of color experience discrimination and bias within the workplace and educa- tional systems, compounded by the lack of diversity among the nursing workforce and faculty. Nurses, educators, and health care leaders have a responsibility to address structural racism, cultural racism, and discrimination within the nursing profession across educational and practice settings, and to build structures and systems that promote in- clusivity and health equity. As the future of nursing demands that nurses increasingly address social needs and SDOH, attention to nurse well-being will be critical. Addressing so- cial needs and SDOH requires in turn cognitive, emotional, and moral work that is not currently supported; that is, time and payment for this work are largely not available. If nurses and other clinicians are expected to fulfill their profes- sional mandates for social justice, including addressing complex social needs and SDOH, and to spend the time and cognitive effort to address both health and social issues, system-wide changes will be needed to provide space and support for that shift. More well-designed, methodologically sound research studies are needed to develop additional knowledge in this area. Conclusion 10-4: Coordinated and collaborative action at the individ- ual and systems levels, encompassing individual nurses, educators, employers, health systems, professional organizations, and govern- ment agencies, is needed to promote nurses’ health and well-being. Ensuring nurse well-being necessitates an investment in individual strategies within a systems approach that addresses the structures and policies responsible for the workplace hazards and stresses that lead to poor health. This investment PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

338 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 is analogous to that needed to address SDOH in the society at large. It is not suf- ficient to ask people or nurses simply to make better choices when the structures and systems that surround them are designed to promote poor health and ineq- uity. Approaches to supporting nurse well-being must not be simply short-term, discrete initiatives; they must be embedded systematically into every aspect of nursing, from education to retirement, and in every practice setting. COVID-19 has served as an inflection point for giving nurses’ well-being the attention it deserves and for restructuring systems, organizations, and policies to promote their physical, mental, moral, and social health. REFERENCES AACN (American Association of Critical-Care Nurses). 2016. AACN standards for establishing and sustaining healthy work environments. https://www.aacn.org/WD/HWE/Docs/HWEStandards. pdf (accessed December 15, 2020). Adriaenssens, J., V. De Gucht, and S. Maes. 2015. Determinants and prevalence of burnout in emer- gency nurses: A systematic review of 25 years of research. International Journal of Nursing Studies 52(2):649–661. Aebersold, M., and R. Schoville. 2020. How to prevent the next generation of nurses from “eating their young.” Clinical Simulation in Nursing 38:27–34. AHA (American Hospital Association). 2020a. COVID-19: Acknowledging and addressing racism and xenophobia. https://www.aha.org/system/files/media/file/2020/05/COVID-19_Xenophobia_ Resource.pdf (accessed April 9, 2021). AHA. 2020b. Workforce. COVID-19 pathways to recovery: Considerations and resources to guide hospitals and health systems. https://www.aha.org/system/files/media/file/2020/07/aha-covid19- pathways-workforce.pdf (accessed October 6, 2020). AHRQ (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality). 2019. Nursing and patient safety. Patient Safety Network. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primer/nursing-and-patient-safety (accessed April 9, 2021). Aiken, L. H., S. P. Clarke, D. M. Sloane, J. Sochalski, and J. H. Silber. 2002. Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. Journal of the American Medical Association 288(16):1987–1993. Akhtar, A. 2020, September 29. Filipinos make up 4% of nurses in the US, but 31.5% of nurse deaths from COVID-19. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/filipinos-make-up- disproportionate-covid-19-nurse-deaths-2020-9 (accessed October 9, 2020). Alexopoulos, A. R., Hudson, J.G., and O. Otenigbagbe. 2020. The use of digital applications and COVID-19. Community Mental Health Journal 56(7):1202–1203. Alsswey, A., and H. Al-Samarraie. 2020. Elderly users’ acceptance of mHealth user interface (UI) design-based culture: The moderator role of age. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 14(1):49–59. doi: 10.1007/s12193-019-00307-w. Amsrud, K. E., A. Lyberg, and E. Severinsson. 2019. Development of resilience in nursing students: A systematic qualitative review and thematic synthesis. Nurse Education Practice 41:102621. ANA (American Nurses Association). 2015. Code of ethics. Silver Spring, MD: American Nurses Association. ANA. 2017. Executive summary: American Nurses Association health risk appraisal. https://www. nursingworld.org/~4aeeeb/globalassets/practiceandpolicy/work-environment/health--safety/ ana-healthriskappraisalsummary_2013-2016.pdf (accessed May 14, 2020). ANA. 2020a. Crisis standard of care: COVID-19 pandemic. https://www.nursingworld.org/~496044/ globalassets/practiceandpolicy/work-environment/health--safety/coronavirus/crisis-standards- of-care.pdf (accessed October 15, 2020). PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 339 ANA. 2020b. Provision 5: Self-care and COVID-19. https://www.nursingworld.org/~4a1fea/global assets/covid19/provision-5_-self-care--covid19-final.pdf (accessed October 15, 2020). ANA. n.d. Violence, incivility, & bullying. https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/work- environment/violence-incivility-bullying (accessed April 9, 2021). ANA and AAN (American Academy of Nursing). 2020. The American Academy of Nursing and the American Nurses Association call for social justice to address racism and health equity in communities of color (News Release). https://www.nursingworld.org/news/news-releases/2020/ the-american-academy-of-nursing-and-the-american-nurses-association-call-for-social- justice-to-address-racism-and-health-equity-in-communities-of-color (accessed October 15, 2020). ANA Enterprise. 2018. Healthy nurse, health nation: Year one highlights 2017–2018. American Nurse Today 13(11):1–12. https://www.nursingworld.org/~4ab632/globalassets/docs/ana/ practice/hnhn17-18highlights.pdf (accessed April 9, 2021). ANA Enterprise. 2019. Healthy nurse healthy nation: Year two highlights 2018-2019. American Nurse Today 14(9):1-12. https://www.healthynursehealthynation.org/globalassets/all-images- view-with-media/about/2019-hnhn_highlights.pdf (accessed April 9, 2021). ANA Enterprise. 2020. Year Three Highlights 2019–2020. https://www.healthynursehealthynation. org/globalassets/all-images-view-with-media/about/2020-hnhn_sup-8.pdf (accessed January 8, 2021). ANCC (American Nurses Credentialing Center). 2019. Find a Magnet organization. https://www. nursingworld.org/organizational-programs/magnet/find-a-magnet-organization (accessed April 19, 2021). Arndt, B. G., J. W. Beasley, M. D. Watkinson, J. L. Temte, W. J. Tuan, C. A. Sinsky, and V. J. Gilchrist. 2017. Tethered to the EHR: Primary care physician workload assessment using EHR event log data and time-motion observations. Annals of Family Medicine 15(5):419–426. Avery-Desmarais-S., Sethares, K.A., Stover, C., Batchelder, A., and M.K. McCurry. 2020. Substance use and minority stress in a population of lesbian, gay and bisexual nurses. Substance Use & Misuse 55(12):1958–1967. Azoulay. E., A. Cariou, F. Bruneel, A. Demoule, A. Kouatchet, D. Reuter, V. Souppart, A. Combes, K. Klouche, L. Argaud, F. Barbier, M. Jourdain, J. Reignier, L. Papazian, B. Guidet, G. Geri, M. Resche-Rigon, O. Guisset, V. Labbe, B. Megarbane, G. Van Der Meersch, C. Guitton, D. Friedman, F. Pochard, M. Darmon, and N. Kentish-Barnes. 2020. Symptoms of anxiety, depression, and peritraumatic dissociation in critical care clinicians managing patients with COVID-19. A cross-sectional study. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Med- icine 202:1388–1398. Bamford, M., C. A. Wong, and H. Spence Laschinger. 2013. The influence of authentic leadership and areas of work life on work engagement of registered nurses. Journal of Nursing Management 21(3):529–540. Barbot, O. 2020. George Floyd and our collective moral injury. American Journal of Public Health 110(9):1253–1253. Barnes, B., M. Barnes, and C. D. Sweeney. 2016. Supporting recognition of clinical nurses with the Daisy award. Journal of Nursing Administration 46(4):164–166. Barratt, C. 2018. Developing resilience: The role of nurses, healthcare teams and organisations. Nursing Standard 33(7):43–49. Baumann, L. A., J. Baker, and A. G. Elshaug. 2018. The impact of electronic health record systems on clinical documentation times: A systematic review. Health Policy 122(8):827–836. Bennett, C., E. K. Hamilton, and H. Rochani. 2019. Exploring race in nursing: Teaching nursing stu- dents about racial inequality using the historical lens. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing 24(2). Berwick, D. M., S. Loehrer, and C. Gunther-Murphy. 2017. Breaking the rules for better care. Journal of the American Medical Association 317(21):2161–2162. Boamah, S. A., H. K. Spence Laschinger, C. Wong, and S. Clarke. 2018. Effect of transformational leadership on job satisfaction and patient safety outcomes. Nursing Outlook 66(2):180–189. PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

340 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 Bodenheimer, T., and C. Sinsky 2014. From triple to quadruple aim: Care of the patient requires care of the provider. Annals of Family Medicine 12(6):573–576. Brown, K. W., and R. M. Ryan. 2003. The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psy- chological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84(4):822–848. Buerhaus, P., D. Auerbach, L. Skinner, and D. Staigner. 2017. State of the registered nurse workforce as a new era of health reform emerges. Nursing Economic$ 35(5):229–237. Burlison, J. D., R. R. Quillivan, S. D. Scott, S. Johnson, and J. M. Hoffman. 2016. The effects of the second victim phenomenon on work-related outcomes: Connecting self-reported caregiver distress to turnover intentions and absenteeism. Journal of Patient Safety 17(3):195–199. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000301. Burston, A. S., and A. G. Tuckett. 2013. Moral distress in nursing: Contributing factors, outcomes and interventions. Nursing Ethics 20(3):312–324. Cañadas-De la Fuente, G. A., J. Gómez-Urquiza, E. Ortega-Campos, G. Cañadas, L. Albendín-García, and E. De la Fuente-Solana. 2017. Prevalence of burnout syndrome in oncology nursing: A meta-analytic study. Psychooncology 27(5):1426–1433. Canton and Company. 2020. Finding the “next normal”: FQHC resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic. https://cantoncompany.com/2020/04/22/finding-the-next-normal-fqhc-resilience- during-the-covid-19-pandemic (accessed April 19, 2021). Cappelucci, K., M. Zindel, H. C. Knight, N. Busis, and C. Alexander. 2019. Clinician well-being at The Ohio State University: A case study. NAM Perspectives. Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine. doi: 10.31478/201908b. Caristo, J. M., and P. T. Clements. 2019. Let’s stop “eating our young”: Zero-tolerance policies for bullying in nursing. Nursing2020 Critical Care 14(4):45–48. Carpenter, H., T. Mulvey, and L. Gould. 2020. Examining and improving nurse wellness: Healthy nurse, healthy nation. Norwood, MA: Infusion Nurses Society. https://indd.adobe.com/ view/8b585881-bb8c-42a3-ad05-7b0dc1773874. Cavanagh, N., G. Cockett, C. Heinrich, L. Doig, K. Fiest, J. R. Guichon, S. Page, I. Mitchell, and C. J. Doig. 2020. Compassion fatigue in healthcare providers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nursing Ethics 27(3):639–665. Chari, R, C-C. Chang, S. Sauter, E. Petrun Sayers, J. Cerully, P. Schulte, A. Schill, and L. Uscher-Pines. 2018. Expanding the paradigm of occupational safety and health: A new frame- work for worker well-being. Journal of Occupational Environmental Medicine 60(7):589–593. Chin, M. 2020. Advancing health equity in patient safety: A reckoning, challenge, and opportunity. BMJ Quality and Safety. Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012599. Cleary, M., D. Visentin, S. West, V. Lopez, and R. Kornhaber. 2018. Promoting emotional intelligence and resilience in undergraduate nursing students: An integrative review. Nurse Education Today 68:112–120. Cochran, K. L., K. Doo, A. Squires, T. Shah, S. Rinne, and M. Mealer. 2020. Addressing burnout syndrome from a critical care specialty organization perspective. AACN Advanced Critical Care 31(2):158–166. Comas-Díaz, L., G. M. Hall, and H. A. Neville. 2019. Racial trauma: Theory, research, and healing: Introduction to the special issue. American Psychologist 74(1):1–5. Connor, J. A., S. I. Ziniel, C. Porter, D. Doherty, M. Moonan, P. Dwyer, L. Wood, and P. A. Hickey. 2018. Interprofessional use and validation of the AACN healthy work environment assessment tool. American Journal of Critical Care 27(5):363–371. Cottingham, M. D., A. H. Johnson, and R. J. Erickson. 2018. I can never be too comfortable: Race, gender, and emotion at the hospital bedside. Qualitative Health Research 28(1):145–158. Cox, W. T. L., and P. G. Devine. 2019. The prejudice habit-breaking intervention: An empower- ment-based confrontation approach. In Confronting prejudice and discrimination, edited by R. K. Mallett and M. J. Monteith. New York: Elsevier. Pp. 249–274. PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 341 Cruz, D., C. Mastropaolo, and Y. Rodriguez. 2019. Perceived microaggressions in health care: A measurement study. PLoS One 14:e0211620. Cui, P. P., P. P. Wang, K. Wang, Z. Ping, P. Wang, and C. Chen. 2021. Post-traumatic growth and influencing factors among frontline nurses fighting against COVID-19. Occupational and En- vironmental Medicine 78(2):129–135 Cummings, G. G., T. MacGregor, M. Davey, H. Lee, C. Wong, E. Lo, M. Muise, and E. Stafford. 2010a. Leadership styles and outcome patterns for the nursing workforce and work environ- ment: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies 47(3):363–385. Cummings, G. G., W. Midodzi, C. Wong, and C. Estabrooks. 2010b. The contribution of hospital nursing leadership styles to 30-day patient mortality. Nursing Research 59(5):331–339. da Silva, A. T., C. de Souza Lopes, E. Susser, and P. Rossie Menezes. 2016. Work-related depression in primary care teams in Brazil. American Journal of Public Health 106(11):1990–1997. Danna, K., and R. Griffin. 1999. Health and well-being in the workplace: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Management 25(3):357–384. Davey, M. M., G. Cummings, C. V. Newburn-Cook, and E. A. Lo. 2009. Predictors of nurse ab- senteeism in hospitals: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Management 17(3):312–330. Davidson, P. M., C. H. Rushton, J. Dotzenrod, C. A. Godack, D. Baker, and M. N. Nolan. 2016. Just and realistic expectations for persons with disabilities practicing nursing. AMA Journal of Ethics 18(10):1034–1040. Davidson, J. E., J. Mendis, A. R. Stuck, G. DeMichele, and S. Zisook. 2018a. Nurse suicide: Break- ing the silence. NAM Perspectives. Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine. doi: 10.31478/201801a. Davidson, J., Zisook, S., Kirby, B., DeMichele, G., and W. Norcross. 2018b. Suicide prevention: A Healer education and referral program for nurses. Journal of Nursing Administration 48(2):85–892. Davidson, J. E., J. Proudfoot, K. Lee, G. Terterian, and S. Zisook. 2020a. A longitudinal analysis of nurse suicide in the United States (2005-2016) with recommendations for action. Worldviews on Evidence Based Nursing 17(1):6–15. Davidson, J. E., R. Accardi, C. Sanchez, S. Zisook, and L. A. Hoffman. 2020b. Sustainability and outcomes of a suicide prevention program for nurses. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing 17(24):24–31. Dean, W., B. Jacobs, and R. A. Manfredi. 2020. Moral injury: The invisible epidemic in COVID health care workers. Annals of Emergency Medicine 76(4):385–386. Devine, P. G., Forscher, P. S., Austin, A. J., and W. T. L. Cox. 2012. Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48(6):1267–1278. doi: 10.1016/j. jesp.2012.06.003. Doble, S. E., and J. C. Santha. 2008. Occupational well-being: Rethinking occupational therapy outcomes. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 75(3):184–190. Dodge, R., A. Daly, J. Huyton, and L. Sanders. 2012. The challenge of defining wellbeing. Interna- tional Journal of Wellbeing 2(3):222–235. doi: 10.5502/ijw.v2i3.4. Donker, T., K. Petrie, J. Proudfoot, J. Clarke, M-R. Birch, and H. Christensen. 2013. Smartphones for smarter delivery of mental health programs: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 15(11):e247. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2791. Drees, J. 2020. Johns Hopkins digital health startup selected for pilot to help clinicians prevent COVID-19 burnout. Beckers Hospital Review. https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/ digital-transformation/johns-hopkins-digital-health-startup-selected-for-pilot-to-help-clinicians- prevent-covid-19-burnout.html (accessed April 9, 2021). Dressner, M. A., and S. P. Kissinger. 2018. Occupational injuries and illnesses among registered nurses. Monthly Labor Review. Bureau of Labor Statistics. doi: 10.21916/mlr.2018.27. Duhoux, A., M. Menear, M. Charron, M. Lavoie-Tremblay, and M. Alderson. 2017. Interventions to promote or improve the mental health of primary care nurses: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Management 25(8):597–607. PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

342 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 Dzau, V. J., D. G. Kirch, and T. J. Nasca. 2018. To care is human—Collectively confronting the clinician-burnout crisis. New England Journal of Medicine 378(4):312–314. Echevarria, I. M. 2013. Change your appetite: Stop “eating the young” and start mentoring. Nurs- ing2020 Critical Care 8(3):20–24. Edmondson, A. 1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 44(2):350–383. Edmondson, A. 2002. The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organization Science 13(2):128–146. Edmondson, A. C. 2018. The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Edmondson, A. C., and Z. Lei. 2014. Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 1(1):23–43. Eliason, M. J., DeJoseph, J., Dibble, S., Deevey, S., and P. Chin. 2011. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans- gender, and queer/questioning nurses’ experiences in the workplace. Journal of Professional Nursing 27(4):237–244. Eliason, M. J., C. Streed, and M. Henne. 2017. Coping with stress as an LGBTQ+ health care pro- fessional. Journal of Homosexuality 65(5):561–578. Englander, H., Collins, D., Perry, S. P., Rabinowitz, M., Phoutrides, E., and Nicolaidis, C. 2018. We’ve learned it’s a medical illness, not a moral choice: Qualitative study of the effects of a multicomponent addiction intervention on hospital providers’ attitudes and experiences. Journal of Hospital Medicine 13(11):752–758. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2993. Epstein, E. G., and S. Delgado. 2010. Understanding and addressing moral distress. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing 15(3):1. Epstein, E. G., P. B. Whitehead, C. Prompahakul, L. R. Thacker, and A. B. Hamric. 2019. Enhancing understanding of moral distress: The measure of moral distress for health care professionals. The American Journal of Bioethics 10(2):113–124. Feeg, V. D., D. J. Mancino, C. H. Rushton, K. J. Waligora Mendez, and J. Baierlein. 2021. Ethical dilemmas for nursing students and faculty: In their own voices. Nursing Education Perspective 42(1):29–35. FitzGerald, C., A. Martin, D. Berner, and S. Hurst. 2019. Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real world contexts: A systematic review. BMC Psychol- ogy 7(1):29. Gabrovec, B. 2017. Prevalence of violence toward community nurses: A questionnaire survey. Work- place Health & Safety 65(11):527–532. Gärtner, F. R., K. Nieuwenhuijsen, F. J. van Dijk, and J. K. Sluiter. 2010. The impact of common mental disorders on the work functioning of nurses and allied health professionals: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies 47(8):1047–1061. Gates, D. M., G. Gillespie, and P. Succop. 2011. Violence against nurses and its impact on stress and productivity. Nursing Economics 29(2):59–66, quiz 67. Geoffrion, S., C. Morselli, and S. Guay. 2016. Rethinking compassion fatigue through the lens of professional identity: The case of child protection workers. Trauma Violence & Abuse 17(3):270–283. Geoffrion S., D. J. Hills, H. M. Ross, J. Pich, A. T. Hill, T. K. Dalsbo, S. Riahi, B. Martinez-Jarreta, and S. Guay. 2020. Education and training for preventing and minimizing workplace aggres- sion directed toward healthcare workers. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011860.pub2. Ghazal, L. V., C. Ma, M. Djukic, and A. Squires. 2020. Transition-to-U.S. practice experiences of internationally educated nurses: An integrative review. Western Journal of Nursing Research 42(5):373–392. Gillespie, G. L., S. L. Farra, and D. M. Gates. 2014a. A workplace violence educational program: A repeated measures study. Nurse Education in Practice 14(5):468–472. PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 343 Gillespie, G. L., D. M. Gates, T. Kowalenko, S. Bresler, and P. Succop. 2014b. Implementation of a comprehensive intervention to reduce physical assaults and threats in the emergency department. Journal of Emergency Nursing 40(6):586–591. Gómez-Urquiza, J. L., A. B. Aneas-López, E. I. Fuente-Solana, L. Albendín-García, L. Díaz-Rodrí- guez, and G. A. Fuente. 2016. Prevalence, risk factors, and levels of burnout among oncology nurses: A systematic review. Oncology Nursing Forum 43(3):e104–e120. Gómez-Urquiza, J. L., E. I. De la Fuente-Solana, L. Albendín-García, C. Vargas-Pecino, E. M. Ortega-Campos, and G. A. Cañadas-De la Fuente. 2017. Prevalence of burnout syndrome in emergency nurses: A meta-analysis. Critical Care Nurse 37 (5): e1–e9. Goodwin, J., J. Cummins, L. Behan, and S. M. O’Brien. 2016. Development of a mental health smart- phone app: Perspectives of mental health service users. Journal of Mental Health 25(5):434–440. Gould, L., H. Carpenter, D. R. Farmer, D. Holland, and Dawson, J. M. 2019. Healthy nurse, healthy nation™ (HNHN): Background and first year results. Applied Nursing Research 49:64–69. Grace, S. M., J. Rich, W. Chin, and H. P. Rodriguez. 2014. Flexible implementation and integration of new team members to support patient-centered care. Healthcare 2(2):145–151. Gregory, S. T., T. Menser, and B. T. Gregory. 2018. An organizational intervention to reduce physician burnout. Journal of Healthcare Management 63(5):338–352. Groenewold, M. R., R. Sarmiento, K. Vanoli, W. Raudabaugh, S. Nowlin, and A. Gomaa. 2018. Workplace violence injury in 106 US hospitals participating in the Occupational Health Safety Network (OHSN), 2012–2015. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 61(2):157–166. Grossman, P., L. Niemann, S. Schmidt, and H. Walach. 2004. Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 57(1):35-43. Haas, D. A., J. D. Halmaka, and M. Suk. 2019, January 10. 3 ways to make electronic health records less time-consuming for physicians. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2019/01/3-ways- to-make-electronic-health-records-less-time-consuming-for-physicians (accessed April 9, 2021). Halter, M. J., D. G. Rolin, M. Adamaszek, M. C. Ladenheim, and B. Frese Hutchens. 2019. State nursing licensure questions about mental illness and compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services 57(8):17–22. Hamric, A. B., and E. G. Epstein. 2017. A health system-wide moral distress consultation service: Development and evaluation. Hospital Ethics Committee Forum 29(2):127–143. Hamric, A. B., and L. D. Wocial. 2016. Institutional ethics resources: Creating moral spaces. Hastings Center Report 46(S1):S22–S27. Han, M., and E. Lee. 2018. Effectiveness of Mobile health application use to improve health behavior changes: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Healthcare Informatics Research 24(3):207–226. doi: 10.4258/hir.2018.24.3.207. He, W., A. J. Holton, and G. Farkas. 2018. Impact of partially flipped instruction on immediate and subsequent course performance in a large undergraduate chemistry course. Computers & Ed- ucation 125:120–131. Helms, J. E., G. Nicolas, and C. E. Green. 2012. Racism and ethnoviolence as trauma: Enhancing professional and research training. Traumatology 18(1):65–74. Hernandez, S. H. A., B. J. Morgan, and M. B. Parshall. 2016. Resilience, stress, stigma, and barriers to mental healthcare in U.S. Air Force nursing personnel. Nursing Research 65(6):481–486. Heroes Health. 2020. A collaboration between UNC Chapel Hill and many others. https://heroes health.unc.edu (accessed April 9, 2021). Hines, S. E., K. H. Chin, A. R. Levine, and E. M. Wickwire. 2020. Initiation of a survey of healthcare worker distress and moral injury at the onset of the COVID-19 surge. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 63(9):830–833. Hoff, T., S. Carabetta, and G. E. Collinson. 2019. Satisfaction, Burnout, and turnover among nurse practitioners and physician assistants: A review of the empirical literature. Medical Care Re- search and Review 76(1):3–31. doi: 10.1177/1077558717730157. Hofmann, S. G., and A. F. Gómez. 2017. Mindfulness-based interventions for anxiety and depression. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 40(4):739–749. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2017.08.008. PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

344 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 Huberty, J., J. Green, C. Glissmann, L. Larkey, M. Puzia, and C. Lee. 2019. Efficacy of the mind- fulness meditation mobile app “Calm” to reduce stress among college students: Randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 7(6):e14273. doi: 10.2196/14273. Huey, C. W. T., and J. C. Palaganas. 2020. What are the factors affecting resilience in health profes- sionals? A synthesis of systematic reviews. The Medical Teacher 42(5):550–560. Hughes, R. (ed.). 2008. Patient safety and quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses (Vol. 3). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Hurst, S.A. 2008. Vulnerability in research and health care: Describing the elephant in the room? Bioethics 22(4):191–202. IHI (Institute for Healthcare Improvement). 2020. Psychological PPE: Promote health care workforce mental health and well-being. http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Tools/psychological-PPE- promote-health-care-workforce-mental-health-and-well-being.aspx (accessed April 9, 2021). IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2006. Sleep disorders and sleep deprivation: An unmet public health problem. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. IOM. 2014. Establishing transdisciplinary professionalism for improving health outcomes: Workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Istepanian, R. S. H., E. Jovanov, and Y. T. Zhang. 2004. Guest editorial introduction to the special section on M-Health: Beyond seamless mobility and global wireless health-care connectivity. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 8(4):405–414. doi: 10.1109/ TITB.2004.840019. Itzhaki, M., A. Peles-Bortz, H. Kostistky, D. Barnoy, V. Filshtinsky, and I. Bluvstein. 2015. Exposure of mental health nurses to violence associated with job stress, life satisfaction, staff resilience, and post-traumatic growth. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 24(5):403–412. Jackson, J., V. Vandall-Walker, B. Vanderspank-Wright, P. Wishart, and S. Moore. 2018. Burnout and resilience in critical care nurses: A grounded theory of managing exposure. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing 48:28–35. Jameson, B. E., and F. Bowen. 2018. Use of the Worklife and levels of burnout surveys to as- sess the school nurse work environment. Journal of School Nursing 36(4):272–282. doi: 1059840518813697. Jarrín, O. F., Y. Kang, and L. H. Aiken. 2017. Pathway to better patient care and nurse workforce outcomes in home care. Nursing Outlook 65(6):671–678. Jones, C., and M. Gates. 2007. The costs and benefits of nurse turnover: A business case for nurse retention. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing 12(3). Jordan, G., B. Nowrouzi-Kia, B. Gohar, and B. Nowrouzi. 2015. Obesity as a possible risk factor for lost-time injury in registered nurses: A literature review. Safety and Health at Work 6(1):1–8. Kambhampati, A. K., A. C. O’Halloran, M. Whitaker, S. Magill, N. Chea, S. Chai, P. Kirley, R. Herlihy, B. Kawasaki, J. Meek, K. Yousey-Hindes, E. Anderson, K. Openo, M. Monroe, P. Ryan, S. Kim, L. Reeg, K. Como-Sabetti, R. Danila, S. Shrum Davis, S. Tores, G. Barney, N. Spina, N. Bennett, C. Felsen, L. Billing, J. Shiltz, M. Sutton, N. West, W. Schaffner, H. Keipp Talbot, R. Chatelain, M. Hill, L. Brammer, A. Fry, A. Hall, J. Wortham, S. Garg, L. Kim, and COVID-NET Surveillance Team. 2020. COVID-19-associated hospitalizations among health care personnel—COVID-NET, 13 states, March 1–May 31, 2020. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 69(43):1576–1583. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6943e3. Kang, L., S. Ma, M. Chen, J. Yang, Y. Wang, R. Li, L. Yao, H. Bai, Z. Cai, B. Xiang Yang, S. Hu, K. Zhang, G. Wang, C. Ma, and Z. Liu. 2020. Impact on mental health and perceptions of psy- chological care among medical and nursing staff in Wuhan during the 2019 novel coronavirus disease outbreak: A cross-sectional study. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity 87:11–17. Kasman, D. L. 2004. When is medical treatment futile? A guide for students, residents, and physi- cians. Journal of General Internal Medicine 19(10):1053–1056. Kelly, P., and C. Porr. 2018. Ethical nursing care versus cost containment: Considerations to enhance RN practice. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing 23(1). PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 345 Kelly, M., and J. Wills. Systematic review: What works to address obesity in nurses? Occupational Medicine 68(4):228–238. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqy038. PMID: 29579241. Kishore, S., J. Ripp, T. Shanafelt, B. Melnyk, D. Rodgers, T. Brigham, N. Busis, D. Charney, P. Cipriano, L. Minor, P. Rothman, J. Spisso, D. G. Kirch, T. Nasca, and V. Dzau. 2018, October 26. Making the case for the chief wellness officer in America’s health systems: A call to action. Health Affairs Blog. doi: 10.1377/hblog20181025.308059. Kopacz, M., D. Ames, and H. Koenig. 2019. It’s time to talk about physician burnout and moral injury. Lancet Psychiatry 6(11):e28. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30385-2. Krautscheid, L., L. Mood, S. M. McLennon, T. C. Mossman, M. Wagner, and J. Wode. 2020. Ex- amining relationships between resilience protective factors and moral distress among nursing students. Nursing Education Perspectives 41(1):43–45. Lai, J., S. Ma, Y. Wang, Z. Cai, J. Hu, N. Wei, J. Wu, H. Du, T. Chen, R. Li, H. Tan, L. Kang, L. Yao, M. Huang, H. Wang, G. Wang, Z. Liu, and S. Hu. (2020). Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019.  JAMA Network Open 3(3):e203976. Landi, H. 2020. Brigham and Women’s taps mental health startup to use AI to track providers’ stress. Fierce Healthcare. https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/tech/brigham-and-women-s- teams-up-mental-health-startup-to-track-providers-stress-during-covid-19 (accessed April 19, 2021). Larsen, R., J. Ashley, T. Ellens, R. Frauendienst, K. Jorgensen-Royce, and M. Zelenak. 2018. Devel- opment of a new graduate public health nurse residency program using the core competencies of public health nursing. Public Health Nursing 35(6):606–612. Lavoie-Tremblay, M., D. Wright, N. Desforges, C. Gélinas, C. Marchionni, and U. Drevniok. 2008. Creating a healthy workplace for new-generation nurses. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 40(3):290–297. Lefton, C. 2012. Strengthening the workforce through meaningful recognition. Nursing Economics 30(6):331–338, 355. Lewin Group. 2009. Wisdom at work: Retaining experienced RNs and their knowledge—Case studies of top performing organizations. https://www.rwjf.org/en/library/research/2009/03/wisdom-at- work.html (accessed April 9, 2021). Li, Y., and C. B. Jones 2013. A literature review of nursing turnover costs. Journal of Nursing Man- agement 21(3):405–418. Liaschenko, J., and E. Peter. 2016. Fostering nurses’ moral agency and moral identity: The importance of moral community. Hastings Center Report 46(1):S18–S21. Lomas, T., J. Medina, I. Ivtzan, S. Rupprecht, and F. J. Eiroa Orosa. 2018. Mindfulness-based inter- ventions in the workplace: An inclusive systematic review and meta-analysis of their impact upon wellbeing. Journal of Positive Psychology 14:1–16. Lown, B. A., and C. F. Manning. 2010. The Schwartz Center rounds: Evaluation of an interdisciplin- ary approach to enhancing patient-centered communication, teamwork, and provider support. Academic Medicine 85(6):1073–1081. Lyzwinski, L. N., L. Caffery, M. Bambling, and S. Edirippulige. 2019. The mindfulness app trial for weight, weight-related behaviors, and stress in university students: Randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth 7(4):e12210. doi: 10.2196/12210. Maben, J., C. Taylor, J. Dawson, M. Leamy, I. McCarthy, E. Reynolds, S. Ross, C. Shuldham, L. Bennett, and C. Foot. 2018. Health services and delivery research. In A realist informed mixed-methods evaluation of Schwartz Center Rounds® in England. Southampton, UK: NIHR Journals Library. Maguen, S., and M. A. Price. 2020. Moral injury in the wake of coronavirus: Attending to the psy- chological impact of the pandemic. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy 12(S1):S131–S132. PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

346 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 Margaret, J., and H. Came. 2019. Organizing—What do white people need to know to be effective antiracism allies within public health? In Racism: Science and tools for the public health pro- fessional, edited by C. L. Ford, D. M. Griffith, M. A. Bruce, and K. L. Gilbert. Washington, DC: APHA Press. Pp. 315–326. Mark, G., and A. P. Smith 2012. Occupational stress, job characteristics, coping, and the mental health of nurses. British Journal of Health Psychology 17(3):505–521. Marks, B., and S. Ailey. 2014. White paper on inclusion of students with disabilities in nursing ed- ucational programs for the California Committee on Employment of People with Disabilities (CCEPD). California Committee on the Employment of People with Disabilities. doi: 10.13140/ RG.2.1.4741.9606. Marks, B., and K. McCulloh. 2016. Success for students and nurses with disabilities: A call to action for nurse educators. Nurse Educator 41(1):9–12. Maslach, C. 2017. Finding solutions to the problem of burnout. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research 69(2):143–152. Maslach, C., and M. P. Leiter. 2017. Understanding burnout: New models. In C. L. Cooper and J. C. Quick (eds.), The handbook of stress and health: A guide to research and practice (pp. 36–56). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell. Maslach, C., and S. E. Jackson. 1981. The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Organi- zational Behavior 2(2):99–113. Masten, A. 2007. Resilience in developing systems: Progress and promise as the fourth wave rises. Development and Psychopathology 19(3):921–930. Mathad, M. D., B. Pradhan, and S. K. Rajesh. 2017. Correlates and predictors of resilience among baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 11(2):jc05–jc08. Mathiews, A., and S. Salmond. 2013. Opening the door to improve visiting nurse safety: An initiative to collect and analyze protection practices and policies. Home Healthcare Now 31(6):319–321. McClelland, L. E., A. S. Gabriel, and M. J. DePuccio. 2018. Compassion practices, nurse well-be- ing, and ambulatory patient experience rating. Medical Care 56(1):4–10. doi: 10.1097/ MLR.0000000000000834. McVicar, A. 2003. Workplace stress in nursing: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 44(6):633–642. Mealer, M., J. Jones, and P. Meek. 2017. Factors affecting resilience and development of posttrau- matic stress disorder in critical care nurses. American Journal of Critical Care 26(3):184–192. Meissner, J. E. 1986. Nurses: Are we eating our young? Nursing 16(3):51–53. Melnyk, B. M., L. Orsolini, A. Tan, C. Arslanian-Engoren, G. D’Eramo Melkus, J. Dunbar-Jacob, V. Hill Rice, A. Millan, S. Dunbar, L. Braun, J. Wilbur, D. Chyun, K. Gawlik, and L. Lewis. 2018. A national study links nurses’ physical and mental health to medical errors and perceived worksite wellness. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 60(2):126–131. Melnyk, B. M., S. A. Kelly, J. Stephens, K. Dhakal, C. McGovern, S. Tucker, J. Hoying, K. McRae, S. Ault, E. Spurlock, and S. B. Bird. 2020. Interventions to improve mental health, well-being, physical health, and lifestyle behaviors in physicians and nurses: A systematic review. American Journal of Health Promotion 34(8):929–941. Menschner, C., and A. Maul 2016. Strategies for encouraging staff wellness in trauma-informed organizations. Center for Health Care Strategies. https://www.chcs.org/media/ATC-Staff- Wellness-121316_FINAL.pdf (accessed April 9, 2021). Michalec, B., C. Diefenbeck, and M. Mahoney. 2013. The calm before the storm? Burnout and com- passion fatigue among undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today 33(4):314–320. Miliard, M. 2020, August 17. Brigham and Women’s pilots new program to support provider mental health. Healthcare IT News. https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/brigham-and-womens- pilots-new-program-support-provider-mental-health (accessed April 9, 2021). Monroe, T. B., H. Kenaga, M. S. Dietrich, M. A. Carter, and R. L. Cowan. 2013. The prevalence of employed nurses identified or enrolled in substance use monitoring programs. Nursing Research 62(1):10–15. PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 347 Moore, L., and E. McAuliffe. 2010. Is inadequate response to whistleblowing perpetuating a culture of silence in hospitals? Clinical Governance 15(3). Moore, L., and E. McAuliffe. 2012. To report or not to report? Why some nurses are reluctant to whistle blow. Clinical Governance 17(4). Morley, G., J. Ives, C. Bradbury-Jones, and F. Irvine. 2019. What is “moral distress”? A narrative synthesis of the literature. Nursing Ethics 26(3):646–662. doi: 10.1177/0969733017724354. Moss, M., V. Good, D. Gozal, R. Kleinpell, and C. Sessler. 2016. A Critical Care Societies Collabo- rative statement: Burnout syndrome in critical care health-care professionals. A call for action. American Journal of Respirator and Critical Care Medicine 194(1):106–113. Munnangi, S., L. Dupiton, A. Boutin, and G. Angus. 2018. Burnout, perceived stress, and job satis- faction among trauma nurses at a Level I safety-net trauma center. Journal of Trauma Nursing 25(1):4–13. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000335. Nadal, K. L., C. N. Whitman, L. S. Davis, T. Erazo, and K. C. Davidoff. 2016. Microaggressions toward lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and genderqueer people: A review of the literature. Journal of Sex Research 53(4–5):488–508. NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2019a. Taking action against clinician burnout: A systems approach to professional well-being. Washington, DC: The Na- tional Academies Press. NASEM. 2019b. Strengthening the military family readiness system for a changing American society. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. NASEM. 2019c. A design thinking, systems approach to well-being within education and practice: Proceedings of a workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. NCSBN (National Council of State Boards of Nursing). 2011. Substance use disorder in nursing: A resource manual and guidelines for alternative and disciplinary monitoring programs. https:// www.ncsbn.org/SUDN_11.pdf (accessed April 9, 2021). Neal-Boylan, L., and D. Smith. 2016. Nursing students with physical disabilities: Dispelling myths and correcting misconceptions. Nurse Educator 41(1):13–18. Neal-Boylan, L., A. Hopkins, R. Skeete, S. B. Hartmann, L. I. Iezzoni, and M. Nunez-Smith. 2012. The career trajectories of health care professionals practicing with permanent disabilities. Aca- demic Medicine 87(2):172–178. Neal-Boylan, L., B. Marks, and K. J. McCulloh. 2015. Supporting nurses and nursing students with disabilities. American Journal of Nursing 115(10):11. Nelson, S. M., and A. E. Lee-Winn. 2020. The mental turmoil of hospital nurses in the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy 12(S1):S126–S127. Nelson, W. A., E. Taylor, and T. Walsh. 2014. Building an ethical organizational culture. Health Care Management (Frederick) 33(2):158–164. Nembhard, I. M., and A. C. Edmondson. 2006. Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior 27(7):941–966. Newman, A., R. Donohue, and N. Eva. 2017. Psychological safety: A systematic review of the liter- ature. Human Resource Management Review 27. Northway, R., M. Parker, N. James, L. Davies, K. Johnson, and S. Wilson. 2015. Research teaching in learning disability nursing: Exploring the views of student and registered learning disability nurses. Nurse Education Today 35(12):1155–1160. https://nsinursingsolutions.com/Documents/ Library/NSI_National_Health_Care_Retention_Report.pdf (accessed October 9, 2020). Nowrouzi, B., E. Giddens, B. Gohar, S. Schoenenberger, M. Bautista, and J. Casole. 2016. The quality of work life of registered nurses in Canada and the United States: A comprehensive literature review. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 22(4):1–18. NSI Nursing Solutions. 2020. 2020 NSI national health care retention & RN staffing report. https:// www.nsinursingsolutions.com/Documents/Library/NSI_National_Health_Care_Retention_ Report.pdf (accessed April 9, 2021). PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

348 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 O’Donovan, R., and E. McAuliffe. 2020. Exploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: Combining observational, survey and interview data. BMC Health Services Research 20(1):810. OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration). 2015. Workplace violence in healthcare. https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/OSHA3826.pdf (accessed April 9, 2021). OHSA. n.d. Healthcare overview. https://www.osha.gov/healthcare (accessed April 9, 2021). Okoli, C. T. C., S. Seng, A. Lykins, and J. T. Higgins. 2021. Correlates of post-traumatic growth among nursing professionals: A cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Nursing Management 29(2):307–316. Ommaya, A. K., P. F. Cipriano, D. B. Hoyt, K. A. Horvath, P. Tang, H. L. Paz, M. S. DeFrancesco, S. T. Hingle, S. Butler and C. A. Sinsky. 2018. Care-centered clinical documentation in the digital environment: Solutions to alleviate burnout. NAM Perspectives. Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine. doi: 10.31478/201801c. ONC (Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology). 2020. Strategy on reducing regulatory and administrative burden relating to the use of health it and EHRs: Final Report. https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/page/2020-02/BurdenReport_0.pdf (accessed April 9, 2021). Ong, A. D., and A. L. Burrow. 2017. Microaggressions and daily experience: Depicting life as it is lived. Perspectives on Psychological Science 12(1):173–175. Oyama, Y., Y. Yonekura, and H. Fukahori. 2015. Nurse health-related quality of life: Associations with patient and ward characteristics in Japanese general acute care wards. Journal of Nursing Management 23(6):775–783. Pappas, S., and C. Rushton. 2020. Leading the way to professional well-being. American Nurse Journal 15(2):28–31. https://www.myamericannurse.com/leading-the-way-to-professional-well- being (accessed April 9, 2021). Park, Y-T. 2016. Emerging new era of mobile health technologies. Healthcare Informatics Research 22(4):253–254. doi: 10.4258/hir.2016.22.4.253. Paul-Emile, K. 2012. Patient racial preferences and the medical culture of accommodation. UCLA Law Review 60:462. Paul-Emile, K., A. K. Smith, B. Lo, and A. Fernández. 2016. Dealing with racist patients. New En- gland Journal of Medicine 374(8):708–711. Pavlish, C. L., J. Henriksen, K. Brown-Saltzman, E. M. Robinson, U. S. Warda, C. Farra, B. Chen, and P. Jakel. 2020. A team-based early action protocol to address ethical concerns in the intensive care unit. American Journal of Critical Care 29(1):49–61. Pearce, K. 2020. In fight against COVID-19, nurses face high-stakes decisions, moral distress. Johns Hopkins University HUB. https://hub.jhu.edu/2020/04/06/COVID-nursing-cynda-rushton-qa (accessed April 9, 2021). Peters, E. 2018. Compassion fatigue in nursing: A concept analysis. Nursing Forum 53(4):466–480. Peterson, A. L. 2017. Experiencing stigma as a nurse with mental illness. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 24(5):314–321. Pfeifer, L. E., and J. A. Vessey. 2017. An integrative review of bullying and lateral violence among nurses in Magnet® organizations. Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice 18(3):113–124. Plsek, P. E., and T. Greenhalgh. 2001. The challenge of complexity in health care. British Medical Journal 323(7313):625–628. Prilleltensky, I. 2012. Wellness as fairness. American Journal of Community Psychology 49(1–2):1–21. Querstret, D., M. Cropley, P. Kruger, and R. Heron. 2016. Assessing the effect of a cognitive be- haviour therapy (CBT)-based workshop on work-related rumination, fatigue, and sleep. Euro- pean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 25(1):50–67. Querstret, D., K. O’Brien, D. J. Skene, and J. Maben. 2020. Improving fatigue risk management in health care: A scoping review of sleep-related/fatigue management interventions for nurses and midwives. International Journal of Nursing Studies 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijnurstu.2020.103745. PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 349 Rangachari, P., and J. L. Woods. 2020. Preserving organizational resilience, patient safety, and staff retention during COVID-19 requires a holistic consideration of the psychological safety of healthcare workers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(12):4267. Rathbone, A. L., and J. Prescott. 2017. The use of mobile apps and SMS messaging as physical and mental health interventions: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19(8):e295. Rathert, C., J. Mittler, and L. McClelland. 2016. Caring health care work environments and pa- tient-centered care. In The evolving healthcare landscape: How employees, organizations, and institutions are adapting and innovating, edited by A. Avgar and T. Vogus. Champaign, IL: Labor and Employment Relations Association. Rauch, S. 2019. Medicalizing the disclosure of mental health: Transnational perspectives of ethical workplace policy among healthcare workers. World Medical and Health Policy 11(4):424–439. Richards, C. 2020. Wisdom from nurses. Wikiwisdom Forum. New Voice Strategies, John Hopkins School of Nursing, and American Journal of Nursing. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c 237f83f2e6b174633d77df/t/5f5bddf47d362d682dfeb547/1599856128213/WikiWisdom-Nurses. pdf (accessed April 9, 2021). Ríos-Risquez, M. I., M. García-Izquierdo, E. de Los Ángeles Sabuco-Tebar, C. Carrillo-Garcia, and C. Solano-Ruiz. 2018. Connections between academic burnout, resilience, and psycho- logical well-being in nursing students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Advanced Nursing 74(12):2777–2784. Robichaux, C. 2012. Developing ethical skills: From sensitivity to action. Critical Care Nurse 32(2):65–72. Robinson, E. M., S. M. Lee, A. Zollfrank, M. Jurchak, D. Frost, and P. Grace. 2014. Enhancing moral agency: Clinical ethics residency for nurses. Hastings Center Report 44(5):12–20. Rosa, W. E, A. E. Schlak, and C. Rushton. 2020. A blueprint for leadership during COVID-19: Minimizing burnout and moral distress among the nursing workforce. Nursing Management 51(8):28–34. doi: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000688940.29231.6f. Ross, A., M. Bevans, A. T. Brooks, S. Gibbons, and G. R. Wallen. 2017. Nurses and health-promoting behaviors: Knowledge may not translate into self-care. Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses 105(3):267–275. Rouse, W. 2008. Health care as a complex adaptive system: Implications for design and management. Bridge: Linking Engineering and Society 38(1):17–25. Washington, DC: National Academy of Engineering. Rudman, A., and J. P. Gustavsson. 2012. Burnout during nursing education predicts lower occupa- tional preparedness and future clinical performance: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Nursing Studies 49(8):988–1001. Rushton, C. H. 2006. Defining and addressing moral distress: Tools for critical care nursing leaders. AACN Advanced Critical Care 17(2):161–168. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16767017 (ac- cessed April 9, 2021). Rushton, C. H. 2018. Moral resilience: Transforming moral suffering in healthcare. New York: Oxford University Press. Rushton, C. and S. Pappas. 2020. System recommendations to address burnout and support clinician well-being: Implications for critical care nurses. AACN Advanced Critical Care 31(2):141–145. Rushton C. H., and M. Sharma. 2018. Designing sustainable systems for ethical practice. In C. H. Rushton (ed.) Moral resilience: Transforming moral suffering in healthcare. New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 206–242. Rushton, C. H., J. Batcheller, K. Schroeder, and P. Donohue. 2015. Burnout and resilience among nurses practicing in high-intensity settings. American Journal of Critical Care 24(5):412–420. Rushton, C. H., M. Caldwell, and M. Kurtz. 2016. Moral distress: A catalyst in building moral resil- ience. American Journal of Nursing 116(7):40–49. PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

350 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 Rushton, C., S. Swoboda, N. Reller, K. Skrupski, M. Prizzi, P. Young, and G. Hanson. 2021. Mindful ethical practice and resilience academy: Equipping nurses to address ethical challenges. Amer- ican Journal of Critical Care 30(1):e1–e11. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2021359. Russell, K. 2020. Components of nurse substance use disorder monitoring programs. Journal of Nursing Regulation 11(2):20–27. Rutherford, D. E., G. L. Gillespie, and C. R. Smith. 2019. Interventions against bullying of prelicen- sure students and nursing professionals: An integrative review. Nursing Forum 54(1):84–90. Salyers, M. P., K. A. Bonfils, L. Luther, R. Firmin, D. White, E. Adams, and A. Rollins. 2017. The relationship between professional burnout and quality and safety in healthcare: A meta- analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine 32(4):475–482. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3886-9. SAMHSA (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration). 2000. Ethical issues. In Substance abuse treatment for persons with HIV/AIDS. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series, No. 37. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK64933 (accessed April 9, 2021). Sampson, M., B. M. Melnyk, and J. Hoying. 2019. Intervention effects of the MINDBODYSTRONG cognitive behavioral skills-building program on newly licensed registered nurses’ mental health, healthy lifestyle behaviors and job satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Administration 49(10):487–495. Sampson, M., B. M. Melnyk, and J. Hoying. 2020. The MINDBODYSTRONG intervention for new nurse residents: 6-month effects on mental health outcomes, healthy lifestyle behaviors, and job satisfaction. Worldviews on Evidence Based Nursing 17(1):16–23. Sarna, L., S. A. Bialous, K. Nandy, A. L. M. Antonio, and Q. Yang. 2014. Changes in smoking prev- alences among health care professionals from 2003 to 2010–2011. Journal of the American Medical Association 311(2):197–199. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.284871. Sarna, L., P. J. Hollen, J. Heath, and S. A. Bialous. 2019. Increased adoption of smoke-free policies on campuses with schools of nursing. Nursing Outlook 67(6):760–764. Sauerland, J., K. Marotta, M. A. Peinemann, A. Berndt, and C. Robichaux. 2014. Assessing and addressing moral distress and ethical climate, part 1. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing 33(4):234–245. Schulte, P. A., G. R. Wagner, A. Ostry, L. A. Blanciforti, R. G. Cutlip, K. M. Krajnak, M. Luster, A. E. Munson, J. P. O’Callaghan, C. G. Parks, P. P. Simeonova, and D. B. Miller. 2007. Work, obesity, and occupational safety and health. American Journal of Public Health 97(3):428–436. Schuster, M.,  and P. A. Dwyer.  2020. Post-traumatic stress disorder in nurses: An integrative re- view. Journal of Clinical Nursing 29:2769–2787. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15288. Shanafelt, T. D., and J. H. Noseworthy. 2017. Executive leadership and physician well-being: Nine organizational strategies to promote engagement and reduce burnout. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 92(1):129–146. Shanafelt, T. D., L. N. Dyrbye, C. Sinsky, O. Hasan, D. Satele, J. Sloan, and C. P. West. 2016. Rela- tionship between clerical burden and characteristics of the electronic environment with physi- cian burnout and professional satisfaction. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 91(7):836–848. Shanafelt, T. D., D. J. Lightner, C. R. Conley, S. P. Petrou, J. W. Richardson, P. J. Schroeder, and W. A. Brown. 2017. An organization model to assist individual physicians, scientists, and senior health care administrators with personal and professional needs. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 92(11):1688–1696. Shapiro, M. 2020. Johns Hopkins helps patients and families stay connected when COVID-19 prohib- its visits. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/coronavirus/articles/stay-connected.html (accessed December 13, 2020). Shapiro, S., J. Astin, S. Bishop, and M. Cordova. 2005. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for health care professionals: Results from a randomized trial. International Journal of Stress Management 12:164–176. Shay, J. 2014. Moral injury. Psychoanalytic Psychology 31(2):182–191. PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 351 Shechter, A., F. Diaz, N, Moise, D. E. Anstey, S. Ye, S. Agarwal, J. Birk, D. Brodie, D. Cannone, B. Chang, J. Claassen, T. Cornelius, L. Derby, M. Dong, R. Givens, B. Hochman, S. Homma, I. Kronish, S. Lee, W. Manzano, L. Mayer, C. McMurry, V. Moitra, P. Pham, L. Rabbani, R. Rivera, A. Schwartz, P. Shapiro, K. Shaw, A. Sullivan, C. Vose, L. Wasson, D. Edmondson, and M. Abdalla. 2020. Psychological distress, coping behaviors, and preferences for support among New York healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. General Hospital Psychiatry 66:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.06.007. Singleton, O., B. K. Hölzel, M. Vangel, N. Brach, J. Carmody, and S. W. Lazar. 2014. Change in brainstem gray matter concentration following a mindfulness-based intervention is correlated with improvement in psychological well-being. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8:33. Sinsky, C. L., and M. Linzer. 2020. Practice and policy reset post COVID-19: Reversion, transition, or transformation? Health Affairs 8:1405–1411. Sinsky, C., L. Colligan, L. Li, M. Prgomet, S. Reynolds, L. Goeders, J. Westbrook, M. Tutty, and G. Blike. 2016. Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: A time and motion study in 4 specialties. Annals of Internal Medicine 165(11):753–760. Slavin, S. J., Schindler, D., Chibnall, J.T., Fendell, G., and M. Shoss. 2012. PERMA: A model for institutional leadership and culture change. Academic Medicine 87(11):1481. Smiley, R., and K. Reneau. 2020. Outcomes of substance use disorder monitoring programs for nurses. Journal of Nursing Regulation 11(2):28–35. Song, Y., and R. Lindquist. 2015. Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on depression, anx- iety, stress and mindfulness in Korean nursing students. Nurse Education Today 35(1):86–90. Spence Laschinger, H. K., and R. Fida. 2014. New nurses burnout and workplace well-being: The influence of authentic leadership and psychological capital. Burnout Research 1(1):19–28. Spence Laschinger, H. K., M. Leiter, A. Day, and D. Gilin. 2009. Workplace empowerment, incivil- ity, and burnout: Impact on staff nurse recruitment and retention outcomes. Journal of Nursing Management 17(3):302–311. Spence Laschinger, H. K., C. Wong, and A. Grau. 2012. The influence of authentic leadership on newly graduated nurses’ experiences of workplace bullying, burnout and retention outcomes: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Studies 49(10):1266–1276. Speroni, K. G., T. Fitch, E. Dawson, L. Dugan, and M. Atherton. 2014. Incidence and cost of nurse workplace violence perpetrated by hospital patients or patient visitors. Journal of Emergency Nursing 40(3):218–228. Squires, A., M. Clark-Cutaia, M. Henderson, G. Arneson, and P. Resnik. 2020. Working paper: Working the frontlines of the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives of US nurses. New York: Rory Meyers College of Nursing. Stacey, G., G. Cook, A. Aubeeluck, B. Stranks, L. Long, M. Krepa, and K. Lucre. 2020. The im- plementation of resilience based clinical supervision to support transition to practice in newly qualified healthcare professionals. Nurse Education Today 94:104564. Stanulewicz, N., E. Knox, M. Narayanasamy, N. Shivji, K. Khunti, and H. Blake. 2020. Effective- ness of lifestyle health promotion interventions for nurses: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(1):17. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010017. Stephens, T. M. 2013. Nursing student resilience: A concept clarification. Nursing Forum 48(2): 125–133. Stimpfel, A. W., D. Sloane, and L. Aiken. 2012. The longer the shifts for hospital nurses, the higher the levels of burnout and patient dissatisfaction. Health Affairs (Millwood) 31(11):2501–2509. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1377. Stimpfel, A. W., C. S. Brewer, and C. T. Kovner. 2015. Scheduling and shift work characteristics as- sociated with risk for occupational injury in newly licensed registered nurses: An observational study. International Journal of Nursing Studies 52(11):1686–1693. Stokes-Parish, J., R. Elliott, K. Rolls, and D. Massey. 2020. Angels and heroes: The unintended con- sequence of the hero narrative. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 52(5):462–466. PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

352 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 Strobbe, S., and M. Crowley. 2017. Substance use among nurses and nursing students: A joint posi- tion statement of the Emergency Nurses Association and the International Nurses Society on Addictions. Journal of Addictions Nursing 28(2):104–106. Subhi, Y., S. H. Bube, S. Rolskov Bojsen, A. S. Skou Thomsen, and L. Konge. 2015. Expert involve- ment and adherence to medical evidence in medical mobile phone apps: A systematic review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 3(3):e79. Sue, D. W., C. M. Capodilupo, G. C. Torino, J. M. Bucceri, A. M. B. Holder, K. L. Nadal, and M. Esquilin. 2007. Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist 62(4):271–286. Szanton, S. L., L. K. Mihaly, J. Alhusen, and K. L. Becker. 2010. Taking charge of the challenge: Factors to consider in taking your first nurse practitioner job. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners 22(7):356–360. Tai-seale, M., C. Olson, J. Li, A. Chan, C. Morikawa, M. Durbin, W. Wang, and H. Luft. 2017. Elec- tronic health record logs indicate that physicians split time evenly between seeing patients and desktop medicine. Health Affairs 36(4):655–662. Tarcan M., N. Hikmet, B. Schooley, M. Top, and G. Y. Tarcan. 2017. An analysis of the relationship between burnout, socio-demographic and workplace factors and job satisfaction among emer- gency department health professionals. Applied Nursing Research 34:40–47. doi: 10.1016/j. apnr.2017.02.011. Taylor, R. A. 2019. Contemporary issues: Resilience training alone is an incomplete intervention. Nurse Education Today 78:10–13. Terry, D., Q. Le, U. Nguyen, and H. Hoang. 2015. Workplace health and safety issues among com- munity nurses: A study regarding the impact on providing care to rural consumers. BMJ Open 5(8):08306. PMID: PMC4538262. Thomas, L. J., and S. H. Revell. 2016. Resilience in nursing students: An integrative review. Nurse Education Today 36:457–462. Thompson, L. J. 2018. Moral dimensions of wellbeing. Paper presented at the Society for Business Ethics Annual Conference, Chicago IL, August 10–12, 2018. Traudt, T., J. Liaschenko, and C. Peden-McAlpine. 2016. Moral agency, moral imagination, and moral community: Antidotes to moral distress. Journal of Clinical Ethics 27(3):201–213. Trinkoff, A. M., J. M. Geiger-Brown, C. C. Caruso, J. A. Lipscomb, M. Johantgen, A. L. Nelson, B. A. Sattler, and V. L. Selby. 2008. Personal Safety for Nurses. In Patient safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook for nurses. Advances in Patient Safety. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Trotochaud, K., H. Fitzgerald, and A. D. Knackstedt. 2018. Ethics champion programs. American Journal of Nursing 118(7):46–54. Ulrich, B., C. Barden, L. Cassidy, and N. Varn-Davis. 2019. Critical care nurse work environments 2018: Findings and implications. Critical Care Nurse 39(2):67–84. Ulrich, C. M. 2020. The moral distress of patients and families. American Journal of Bioethics 20(6):68–70. Ulrich, C. M., and C. Grady (eds.). 2018. Moral distress in the health professions. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. Ulrich, C. M., C. H. Rushton, and C. Grady. 2020. Nurses confronting the coronavirus: Challenges met and lessons learned to date. Nursing Outlook 68(6):838–844. Ünal, A., and S. Seren. 2016. Medical error reporting attitudes of healthcare personnel, barriers and solutions: A literature review. The Journal of Nursing Care 5:1–8. Vaismoradi, M., S. Tella, A. L. P, J. Khakurel, and F. Vizcaya-Moreno. 2020. Nurses’ adherence to patient safety principles: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(6). Van Hoek, G., M. Portzky, and E. Franck. 2019. The influence of socio-demographic factors, resil- ience and stress reducing activities on academic outcomes of undergraduate nursing students: A cross-sectional research study. Nurse Education Today 72:90–96. PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

HEALTH AND PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING OF NURSES 353 Waite, R., and D. Nardi. 2019. Nursing colonialism in America: Implications for nursing leadership. Journal of Professional Nursing 35(1):18–25. Walsh, E. S., and D. Freshwater 2009. The mental well-being of prison nurses in England and Wales. Journal of Researching in Nursing 14(6):553–564. Wang, K., D. S. Varma, and M. Prosperi. 2018. A systematic review of the effectiveness of mobile apps for monitoring and management of mental health symptoms or disorders. Journal of Psy- chiatric Research 107:73–78. Wasson, R. S., C. Barratt, and W. H. O’Brien. 2020. Effects of mindfulness-based interventions on self-compassion in health care professionals: A meta-analysis. Mindfulness 11(8):1914–1934. Weaver, K. B. 2013. The effects of horizontal violence and bullying on new nurse retention. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development 29(3):138–142. PMID: 23703273. Wech, B. A., J. Howard, and P. Autrey. 2020. Workplace bullying model: A qualitative study on bul- lying in hospitals. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 32(73):73–96. Wei, H., K. A. Sewell, G. Woody, and M. A. Rose. 2018. The state of the science of nurse work envi- ronments in the United States: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Sciences 5(3):287–300. Welker-Hood, K. 2014. Underfunding and undervaluing the public health infrastructure: Reinforcing the haves and the have-nots in health. Public Health Nursing 31(6):481–483. WHO (World Health Organization). 2004. Promoting mental health—Concepts, emerging evidence, practice: Summary report. World Health Organization, Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, in collaboration with the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation and the University of Melbourne. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. WHO. 2011. mHealth: New horizons for health through mobile technologies. Global Observatory for eHealth Series 3. https://www.who.int/goe/publications/goe_mhealth_web.pdf (accessed April 9, 2021). Williams, D. R., and L. Cooper. 2019. Reducing racial inequities in health: Using what we already know to take action. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16040606. Williams, D. R., J. A. Lawrence, and B. A. Davis. 2019. Racism and health: Evidence and needed research. Annual Review of Public Health 40:105–125. Williams, R. D., J. A. Brundage, and E. B. Williams. 2020. Moral injury in times of COVID-19. Jour- nal of Health Service Psychology 46:65–69. doi: 10.1007/s42843-020-00011-4. Wocial, L. D., M. Hancock, P. D. Bledsoe, A. R. Chamness, and P. R. Helft. 2010. An evaluation of unit-based ethics conversations. JONA’s Healthcare Law, Ethics and Regulation 12(2):48–54. Wojciechowski, M. 2020 (July 2). Racism: Beginning the conversation. Minority Nurse Blog, Nurs- ing Diversity. https://minoritynurse.com/racism-beginning-the-conversation (accessed April 9, 2021). Wolf, L. A., C. Perhats, A. M. Delao, M. D. Moon, P. R. Clark, and K. E. Zavotsky. 2016. It’s a bur- den you carry: Describing moral distress in emergency nursing. Journal of Emergency Nursing 42(1):37–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2015.08.008. Wolf, A. T., K. R. White, E. G. Epstein, and K. B. Enfield. 2019. Palliative care and moral distress: An institutional survey of critical care nurses. Critical Care Nurse 39(5):38–49. Wood, A. E., P. Prins, N. E. Bush, J. F. Hsia, L. E. Bourn, M. D. Earley, R. D. Walser, and J. Ruzek. 2017. Reduction of Burnout in mental health care providers using the provider resil- ience mobile application. Community Mental Health Journal 53(4):452–459. doi: 10.1007/ s10597-016-0076-5. Woodward, E. L., L. Northrop, and B. Edelstein. 2016. Stress, social support, and burnout among long-term care nursing staff. Journal of Applied Gerontology 35(1):84–105. Worley, J. 2017. Nurses with substance use disorders: Where we are and what needs to be done. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services 55(12):11–14. Yau, Y. H., and M. N. Potenza. 2013. Stress and eating behaviors. Minerva Endocrinology 38(3):255–267. PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

354 THE FUTURE OF NURSING 2020–2030 Yu, F., D. Raphael, L. Mackay, M. Smith, and A. King. 2019. Personal and work-related factors associated with nurse resilience: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies 93:129–140. Yue, L., V. Plummer, and W. Cross. 2016. The effectiveness of nurse education and training for clinical alarm response and management: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Nursing 26:2511–2526. PREPUBLICATION COPY—Uncorrected Proofs

Next: 11 The Future of Nursing: Recommendations and Research Priorities »
The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity Get This Book
×
Buy Prepub | $84.00 Buy Paperback | $75.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The decade ahead will test the nation’s nearly 4 million nurses in new and complex ways. Nurses live and work at the intersection of health, education, and communities. Nurses work in a wide array of settings and practice at a range of professional levels. They are often the first and most frequent line of contact with people of all backgrounds and experiences seeking care and they represent the largest of the health care professions.

A nation cannot fully thrive until everyone - no matter who they are, where they live, or how much money they make - can live their healthiest possible life, and helping people live their healthiest life is and has always been the essential role of nurses. Nurses have a critical role to play in achieving the goal of health equity, but they need robust education, supportive work environments, and autonomy. Accordingly, at the request of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, on behalf of the National Academy of Medicine, an ad hoc committee under the auspices of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine conducted a study aimed at envisioning and charting a path forward for the nursing profession to help reduce inequities in people's ability to achieve their full health potential. The ultimate goal is the achievement of health equity in the United States built on strengthened nursing capacity and expertise. By leveraging these attributes, nursing will help to create and contribute comprehensively to equitable public health and health care systems that are designed to work for everyone.

The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity explores how nurses can work to reduce health disparities and promote equity, while keeping costs at bay, utilizing technology, and maintaining patient and family-focused care into 2030. This work builds on the foundation set out by The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health (2011) report.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!