National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 4 - Conclusions and Suggested Research
Page 102
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. AASHTO Load Rating Provisions for Implements of Husbandry. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26001.
×
Page 102
Page 103
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. AASHTO Load Rating Provisions for Implements of Husbandry. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26001.
×
Page 103
Page 104
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. AASHTO Load Rating Provisions for Implements of Husbandry. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26001.
×
Page 104
Page 105
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. AASHTO Load Rating Provisions for Implements of Husbandry. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26001.
×
Page 105
Page 106
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. AASHTO Load Rating Provisions for Implements of Husbandry. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26001.
×
Page 106

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

102 Bibliography AASHTO. LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 8th ed. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2017. AASHTO. Manual for Bridge Evaluation, 3rd ed. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2018. Abu-Hawash, A., and B. M. Phares. Pooled Fund Study of the Impacts of Implements of Husbandry on Bridges, Presented at Long-Term Bridge Performance Program meeting, 2016. Azizinamini, A., T. E. Boothby, Y. Shekar, and G. Barnhill. Old Concrete Slab Bridges. I: Experimental Investiga- tions. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 120, No. 11, 1994, pp. 3284–3304. Baker, D. J., G. D. Manolis, and S. Mohan. HIBIC: Expert System for Highway Bridge Dynamics. ASCE Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1989, pp. 348–366. Bowman, M., G. Fu, E. Zhou, R. Connor, and A. Godbole. NCHRP Report 721: Fatigue Evaluation of Steel Bridges. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.17226/22774. Brena, S. F., A. E. Jeffrey, and S. A. Civjan. Evaluation of a Noncomposite Steel Girder Bridge Through Live-Load Field Testing. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 7, 2013, pp. 690–699. Brigham, E. O. The Fast Fourier Transform, Prentice Hall, Englewood, N.J., 1974. Catbas, F. N., H. B. Gokce, and M. Gul. Practical Approach for Estimating Distribution Factor for Load Rating: Demonstration on Reinforced Concrete T-Beam Bridges. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2012, pp. 652–661. Catbas, F. N., S. K. Ciloglu, O. Hasancebi, J. S. Popovics, and A. E. Aktan. Re-Qualification of Aged Reinforced Concrete T-Beam Bridges in Pennsylvania. Report to Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Drexel University, 2003. Chan, T. H. T., and C. O’Connor. Vehicle Model for Highway Bridge Impact. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineer- ing, Vol. 116, No. 7, 1990a, pp. 1772–1793. Chan, T. H. T., and C. O’Connor. Wheel Loads from Highway Bridge Strains: Field Studies. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 116, No. 7, 1990b, pp. 1751–1771. Chen, S. R. and J. Wu. Dynamic Performance Simulation of Long-Span Bridge Under Combined Loads of Stochastic Traffic and Wind. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2010, pp. 219–230. Conte, J. P., X. He, B. Moaveni, S. F. Masri, J. P. Caffrey, M. Wahbeh, F. Tasbihgoo, D. Whang, and A. Elgamal. Dynamic Testing of Alfred Zampa Memorial Bridge. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 134, No. 6, 2008, pp. 1006–1015. Corotis, R., A. Dougherty, and W. Xu. Extreme Value Index and Tail Probability Estimates for Mixed Distributions. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2008, pp. 385–392. Cross, B., B. Vaughn, N. Panahshahi, D. Petermeier, Y. S. Siow, and T. Domagalski. Analytical and Experimental Investigation of Bridge Girder Shear Distribution Factors. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2009, pp. 154–163. Dahlberg, J. A Study of the Effects on Bridge Behavior from Implements of Husbandry on Farm-to-Market Roads During Harvest Season. Presented at Midwest Transportation Research Symposium, Iowa State University Bridge Engineering Center, August 19, 2015. http://intrans.iastate.edu/events/midcon2015/ documents/presentation-submissions/1-B/Dahlberg.pdf. Dahlberg, J., P. Lu, K. Freeseman, and B. M. Phares. Development of Rural Road Bridge Weigh-in-Motion System to Assess Weight and Configuration of Farm-to-Market Vehicles. Final Report, Bridge Engineering Center, Iowa State University, Ames, 2018. Deng, L., C. S. Cai, and M. Barbato. Reliability-Based Dynamic Load Allowance for Capacity Rating of Prestressed Concrete Girder Bridges. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 6, 2011, pp. 872–880.

Bibliography 103 Deng, L., W. He, and Y. Shao. Dynamic Impact Factors for Shear and Bending Moment of Simply Supported and Continuous Concrete Girder Bridges. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 11, 2015. https:// doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000744. Deng, L., Y. Yu, Q. Zou, and C. S. Cai. State-of-the-Art Review of Dynamic Impact Factors of Highway Bridges. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 5, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000672. Dietsche, J. S., and W. L. Oliva. Extreme Vehicle Loads on Bridges: Evaluating and Regulating Farm Equipment in Wisconsin. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2592, 2016, pp. 76–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2592-09. Freeseman, K., B. Phares, L. Greimann, and C. T. Kilaru. Study of the Impacts of Implements of Husbandry on Bridges—Volume III: Appendices. Bridge Engineering Center, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 2017. Fu, G. Modeling of Lifetime Structural System Reliability. Ph.D. Dissertation, Report No. 87-9, Department of Civil Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, 1987. UMI, Ann Arbor, MI, Order Number 8802461. Fu, G. Variance Reduction by Truncated Multimodal Importance Sampling. International Journal of Structural Safety, Vol. 13, 1994, p. 267. Fu, G. Response Statistics of SDOF System to Exponentially Decaying Seismic Input: An Explicit Solution. International Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 24, No. 10, 1995, p. 1355. Fu, G. Reliability-Based Evaluation of Loading Configurations for Long-Span Bridges. Final Report to Michigan Department of Transportation, August 2010. Fu, G. Bridge Design and Evaluation: LRFD and LRFR, 1st ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, N.J., 2013. Fu, G., and D. Devaraj. Methodology of Markov Chains for Modeling Bridge Element Deterioration. Interim Report to Michigan Department of Transportation, Center for Advanced Bridge Engineering, Wayne State University, 2007. Fu, G., and D. M. Frangopol. System Reliability and Redundancy in a Multiobjective Optimization Framework. In New Directions in Structural System Reliability: Proceedings of the U.S. National Science Foundation Workshop on Research Needs of Structural System Reliability (D. M. Frangopol, ed.), Sept. 12–14, 1988, pp. 147. Fu, G., and C. Fu. NCHRP Synthesis 359: Bridge Rating Practices and Policies for Overweight Vehicles. Transporta- tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006. Fu, G., and O. Hag-Elsafi. Safety-Based Bridge Overstress Criteria for Non-Divisible Loads. Final Report on R212 to FHWA, New York State Department of Transportation, 1997. Fu, G., and O. Hag-Elsafi. Vehicular Overloads: Load Model, Bridge Safety, and Permit Checking. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2000, p. 49. Fu, G., and F. Moses. Lifetime System Reliability Models with Application to Highway Bridges. In Reliability and Risk Analysis in Civil Engineering: Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Soil and Structural Engineering (N. C. Lind, ed.), Vancouver, Canada, May 25–29, Vol. 1, 1987, p. 71. Fu, G., and F. Moses. Overload Permit Checking Based on Structural Reliability. Transportation Research Record, No. 1290, 1991, pp. 279–289. Fu, G., and J. W. van de Lindt. LRFD Load Calibration for State of Michigan Trunkline Bridges. Research Report RC-1466. Michigan Department of Transportation, 2006. Fu, G., and J. You. Truck Loads and Bridge Safe Capacity Evaluation in China. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 5, 2009, pp. 327–336. Fu, G., and J. You. Extrapolation for Future Maximum Load Statistics. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2011, pp. 527–535. Fu, G., J. Chi, and Q. Wang. Illinois-Specific Live-Load Factors Based on Truck Data. Civil Engineering Studies, Illinois Center for Transportation Series, Report No. FHWA-ICT-19-002 UILU-ENG-2019-2002, Illinois Institute of Technology, 2019. Fu, G., L. Liu, and M. Bowman. Multiple Presence Factor for Truck Load on Highway Bridges. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2013, pp. 240–249. Fu, G., J. Feng, J. Dimaria, and Y. Zhuang. Bridge Deck Corner Cracking on Skewed Structures. Report RC-1490. Final Report to Michigan Department of Transportation, Wayne State University, 2007. Fu, G., J. Feng, W. Dekelbab, F. Moses, H. Cohen, D. Mertz, and P. Thompson. NCHRP Report 495: Effect of Truck Weight on Bridge Network Costs, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003. Galdos, N. H., D. R. Schelling, and M. A. Sahin. Methodology for Impact Factor of Horizontally Curved Box Bridges. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 119, No. 6, 1990, pp. 1917–1934. Ghosn, M., B. Sivakumar, and F. Miao. Load and Resistance Factor Rating (LRFR) in NYS, Volumes I and II. Final Report, Department of Civil Engineering, City College of the City University of New York, Project No. C-06-13, 2011.

104 Proposed AASHTO Load Rating Provisions for Implements of Husbandry Greimann, L., B. Phares, P. Lu, and K. Freeseman. Study of the Impacts of Implements of Husbandry on Bridges— Volume II: Rating and Posting Recommendations. Bridge Engineering Center, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 2017. Han, W., J. Wu, C. S. Cai, and S. Chen. Characteristics and Dynamic Impact of Overloaded Extra Heavy Trucks on Typical Highway Bridges. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2015. Harris, D. K., J. M. Civitillo, and A. Gheitasi. Performance and Behavior of Hybrid Composite Beam Bridge in Virginia: Live Load Testing. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 6, 2016. HNTB. LA Design and Rating Vehicles Based on WIM (Weigh-in-Motion) Study, Executive Summary. December 29, 2016. Hodson, D. J., P. J. Barr, and L. Pockels. Live-Load Test Comparison and Load Ratings of a Posttensioned Box Girder Bridge. ASCE Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 27, No. 5, 2013, pp. 585–593. Holden, K., C. Pantelides, and L. Reaveley. Maximum Dynamic-Load Allowance of Bridge with GFRP-Reinforced Concrete Deck. ASCE Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2015. Huang, D. Dynamic and Impact Behavior of Half-Through Arch Bridges. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2005, pp. 133–141. Hwang, E. S., and A. S. Nowak. Simulation of Dynamic Load for Bridge. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 117, No. 5, 1991, pp. 1413–1434. Iatsko, O., and A. S. Nowak. “WIM-Based Live Load for Alabama Bridges” Report No. ALDOT 930-870, Highway Research Center, Department of Civil Engineering, 238 Harbert Engineering Center, Auburn, AL, 36849, March 2017. Jiang, X., Z. J. Ma, and J. Song. Effect of Shear Stud Connections on Dynamic Response of an FRP Deck Bridge Under Moving Loads. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 7, 2013, pp. 644–652. Khazanovich, L. Effects of Implements of Husbandry (Farm Equipment) on Pavement Performance. Final Report to Minnesota Department of Transportation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, 2012. Kim, S., and A. S. Nowak. Load Distribution and Impact Factors for I-Girder Bridges. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1997, pp. 97–104. Kozikowski, M., and A. S. Nowak. Live Load Models Based on Weigh-in-Motion Data. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety, and Management: Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization (D. Frangopol, R. Sause, and C. Kusko, eds.), Routledge, 2010, p. 2874. Kulicki, J. M., and D. R. Mertz. Evolution of Vehicular Live Load Models During the Interstate Design Era and Beyond. Transportation Research E-Circular E-C104: 50 Years of Interstate Structures: Past, Present, and Future. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006. Kulicki, J. M., W. G. Wassef, D. D. Kleinhans, C. H. Yoo, A. S. Nowak, and M. Grubb. NCHRP Report 563: Devel- opment of LRFD Specifications for Horizontally Curved Steel Girder Bridges. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006. Kwon, O.-S., E. Kim, and S. Orton. Calibration of Live-Load Factor in LRFD Bridge Design Specifications Based on State-Specific Traffic Environments. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 6, 2011, pp. 812–819. Kwon, O.-S., E. Kim, S. Orton, H. Salim, and T. Hazlett. Calibration of the Live Load Factor in LRFD Design Guide- lines. Missouri Department of Transportation, Missouri University of Science and Technology, University of Missouri, Columbia, 2011. Laman, J. A., J. S. Pechar, and T. E. Boothby. Dynamic Load Allowance for Through-Truss Bridges. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 4, 1999, pp. 231–241. Li, H., J. Wekezer, and L. Kwasniewski. Dynamic Response of a Highway Bridge Subjected to Moving Vehicles. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 5, 2008, pp. 439–448. Mertz, D. R. Gerald Desmond Bridge Replacement Project Site-Specific Vehicular Live Load Study, Draft Report to Port of Long Beach, 2008. Minnesota Department of Transportation. MnDOT Bridge Load Rating and Evaluation Manual. State of Minnesota, Saint Paul, 2018. Mlynarski, M., W. G. Wassef, and A. S. Nowak. NCHRP Report 700: A Comparison of AASHTO Bridge Load Rating Methods. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011. Moses, F. NCHRP Report 454: Calibration of Load Factors for LRFR Bridge Evaluation, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001. Nadarajah, S. Exact Distribution of the Linear Combination of p Gumbel Random Variables. International Journal of Computer Mathematics, Vol. 85, No. 9, 2008, pp. 1355–1362. Nassif, H., M. Gindy, and J. Davis. Live Load Calibration for the Schuyler Heim Bridge Replacement and State Route 47 Extension. Final Report to the Alameda Corridor Engineering Team and the California Department of Transportation, 2008.

Bibliography 105 Nassif, H. H., M. Liu, and O. Ertekin. Model Validation for Bridge-Road-Vehicle Dynamic Interaction System. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2003, pp. 112–120. Nowak, A. S. NCHRP Report 368: Calibration of LRFD Bridge Design Code. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999. O’Connor, C., and W. Pritchard. Impact Studies on Small Composite Girder Bridge. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 111, No. 3, 1985, pp. 641–653. Paultre, P., J. Proulx, and M. Talbot. Dynamic Testing Procedures for Highway Bridges Using Traffic Loads. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 121, No. 2, 2011, pp. 362–376. Pelphrey, J., C. Higgins, B. Sivakumar, R. L. Groff, B. H. Hartman, J. P. Charbonneau, J. W. Rooper, and B. V. Johnson. State-Specific LRFR Live Load Factors Using Weigh-in-Motion Data. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2008, pp. 339–350. Phares, B. M. Impacts of Implements of Husbandry on Road Bridges. Slide presentation, 2010. Phares, B. M. Pooled Fund Study of the Impacts of Implements of Husbandry on Bridges: Rating of Bridges for Husbandry Vehicles. Slide presentation, 2015. Phares, B. M. Study of the Impacts of Implements of Husbandry on Bridges. Slide presentation, 2016. Phares, B. M., and L. Greimann. Study of the Impacts of Implements of Husbandry on Bridges, Volume I: Live Load Distribution Factors and Dynamic Load Allowances. Draft Report for FHWA Pooled Fund Study, Department of Civil Engineering, Iowa State University, 2015. Phares, B. M., T. Wipf, and H. Ceylan. Impacts of Overweight Implements of Husbandry on Minnesota Roads and Bridges. Report to Minnesota Department of Transportation, Center for Transportation Research and Education, Iowa State University, 2004. Robinson, M. J., and J. B. Kosmatka. Experimental Dynamic Response of a Short-Span Composite Bridge to Military Vehicle. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2011, pp. 166–170. Samaan, M., J. B. Kennedy, and K. Sennah. Impact Factors for Curved Continuous Composite Multiple-Box Girder Bridges. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2007, pp. 80–88. Sanayei, M., A. J. Reiff, B. R. Brenner, and G. R. Imbaro. Load Rating of a Fully Instrumented Bridge: Comparison of LRFR Approaches. ASCE Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2016. Sennah, K. M., X. Zhang, and J. B. Kennedy. Impact Factors for Horizontally Curved Composite Box Girder Bridges. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 6, 2004, pp. 512–520. Seo, J., and J. W. Hu. Influence of Atypical Vehicle Types on Girder Distribution Factors of Secondary Road Steel-Concrete Composite Bridges. ASCE Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2015 pp. 04014064-1–04014064-8. Seo, J., B. M. Phares, and T. J. Wipf. Lateral Live-Load Distribution Characteristics of Simply Supported Steel Girder Bridges Loaded with Implements of Husbandry. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2014. Seo, J., C. Kilaru, B. M. Phares, and P. Lu. Live Load Distribution Factors for a Short Span Timber Bridge Under Heavy Agricultural Vehicles. Proceedings of the Structures Conference 2015 (N. Ingraffea and M. Libby, eds.), ASCE Structural Engineering Institute, 2015, pp. 2164–2173. Sivakumar, B. Study of Multiple Presence Probabilities for Trucks Using Recent Weigh-in-Motion Data. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety, and Management: Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization (D. Frangopol, R. Sause, and C. Kusko, eds.), Routledge, 2010, p. 2882. Sivakumar, B. Weigh-in-Motion Measurements and Truck Models for the State of Oklahoma. Final report to the Oklahoma Department of Transportation, 2011. Sivakumar, B., and M. Ghosn. Recalibration of LRFR Live Load Factors in the AASHTO Manual for Bridge Evaluation. Prepared for NCHRP, May 2011. Sivakumar, B., M. Ghosn, and F. Moses. NCHRP Web-Only Document 135: Protocols for Collecting and Using Traffic Data in Bridge Design. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008. Sivakumar, B., M. Ghosn, F. Moses, and TranSystems Corporation. NCHRP Report 683: Protocols for Collecting and Using Traffic Data in Bridge Design. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011. Sivakumar, B., F. Moses, G. Fu, and M. Ghosn. NCHRP Report 575: Legal Truck Loads and AASHTO Legal Loads for Posting. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007. Stallings, J. M., and C. H. Yoo. Tests and Ratings of Short-Span Steel Bridge. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineer- ing, Vol. 119, No. 7, 1993, pp. 2150–2168. Szurgott, P., J. Wekezer, L. Kwasniewski, J. Siervogel, and M. Ansley. Experimental Assessment of Dynamic Responses Induced in Concrete Bridge by Permit Vehicles. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2011, pp. 108–116. Uddin, N., H. Zhao, C. Waldron, L. Dong, and S. Greer. Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) Data for Site Specific LRFR Bridge Load Rating. Report to Alabama Department of Transportation, Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 2011.

106 Proposed AASHTO Load Rating Provisions for Implements of Husbandry U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cash Receipts by Commodity, https://data.ers.usda.gov/reports.aspx?ID=17844, 2016. Wang, T. L., D. Huang, and M. Shahaway. Dynamic Behavior of Continuous and Cantilever Thin-Walled Box Girder Bridge. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1996, pp. 67–75. Wang, T. L., D. Huang, and M. Shahaway. Dynamic Response of Multigirder Bridge. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 118, No. 8, 1992, pp. 2222–2238. Wang, W., L. Deng, and X. Shao. Fatigue Design of Steel Bridges Considering the Effect of Dynamic Vehicle Loading and Overloaded Trucks. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2016. Wassef, W. G., J. M. Kulicki, H. Nassif, D. Mertz, and A. S. Nowak. NCHRP Web-Only Document 201: Calibration of AASHTO LRFD Concrete Bridge Design Specifications for Serviceability. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2014 Wisconsin Department of Transportation. Implements of Husbandry Study: Phase I Report to the Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, State of Wisconsin, Madison, 2013a. Wisconsin Department of Transportation. Implements of Husbandry Study: Phase II Report to the Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, State of Wisconsin, Madison, 2013b. Yu, Z., and G. Fu. Dynamic Analysis of Soil-Pile-Highrise Wall Frame Structure Interaction. Journal of Tongji University, No. 1, 1984, p. 66. Yu, Z., R. Chen, and G. Fu. Seismic Analysis of Fixed Offshore Platforms. Journal of Tongji University, No. 4, 1984, p. 1.

Next: Appendix A - Protocols for Load Rating Bridges for Implements of Husbandry »
AASHTO Load Rating Provisions for Implements of Husbandry Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Farm equipment, generally referred to as “implements of husbandry” (IoH), has been considered to be local vehicles on farms that do not use public roads often, if at all. As a result, state and local jurisdictions vary widely in managing IoH. Apparently, the growth of IoH has far outpaced that of other legal highway vehicles, warranting concern with bridge safety.

The TRB National Cooperative Highway Research Program's NCHRP Research Report 951: AASHTO Load Rating Provisions for Implements of Husbandry (1) proposes new IoH load-rating provisions for the AASHTO Manual for Bridge Evaluation in load factor rating and load and resistance factor rating (LRFR), along with related revisions to the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications; and (2) develops protocols to evaluate IoH with various configurations for load rating and overload permits.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!