Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
35 APTA. Public Transportation Ridership Report: Fourth Quarter 2018. Washington, DC, 2018. https://www.apta. com/wp-content/uploads/2018-Q4-Ridership-APTA-3.pdf. APTA. Public Transportation Factbook. 70th edition. Washington, DC, 2019a. https://www.apta.com/wp-content/ uploads/APTA_Fact-Book-2019_FINAL.pdf. APTA. Public Transportation Ridership Report: Fourth Quarter 2019. Washington, DC, 2019b. https://www.apta. com/wp-content/uploads/2019-Q4-Ridership-APTA.pdf. Bin Osman, M. H., S. Kaewunruen, and A. Jack. Optimisation of Schedules for the Inspection of Railway Tracks. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol. 232, No. 6, July 2018, pp. 1577â1587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409717721634. FRA. Inspection of Rail. Final rule. 49 CFR, Part 213, 2019. Liu, X., A. Lovett, T. Dick, M. Saat, and C. Barkan. Optimization of Ultrasonic Rail-Defect Inspection for Improving Railway Transportation Safety and Efficiency. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 140, No. 10, Oct. 2014. Orringer, O. Control of Rail Integrity by Self-Adaptive Scheduling of Rail Tests. Report DOT/FRA/ORD-90/05. FRA, Washington, DC, June 1990. Palese, J. W., and T. W. Wright. Risk Based Ultrasonic Rail Test Scheduling on Burlington Northern Santa Fe. Presented at the American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association Annual Technical Conference, Dallas, TX, Sept. 10â13, 2000. Podofillini, L., E. Zio, and J. Vatn. Risk-Informed Optimisation of Railway Tracks Inspection and Maintenance Procedures. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 91, No. 1, 2006, pp. 20â35. Vatn, J., and H. Svee. A Risk Based Approach to Determine Ultrasonic Inspection Frequencies in Railway Appli- cations. 6th Proceedings of the 22nd ESReDA Seminar, Vol. 9, Madrid, Spain, May 27â28, 2002. https:// www.ndt.net/article/v09n01/vatn/vatn.htm. Zarembski, A. M. Rail Defect Type vs. Derailment Risk. Railway Track & Structures, July 1988. Zarembski, A. M., and J. W. Palese. Risk Based Ultrasonic Rail Test Scheduling: Practical Applications in Europe and North America. Presented at the Conference on Contact Mechanics and Wear of Rail/Wheel Systems (CM2003), Gothenburg, Sweden, June 10â13, 2003. Zarembski, A. M., and J. W. Palese. Characterization of Broken Rail Risk for Freight and Passenger Railway Operations. Presented at the 2005 AREMA Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, Sept. 25â28, 2005a. Zarembski, A. M., and J. W. Palese. Assessing and Managing Risk on the Railway Track. International Railway Journal, May 2005b. Zarembski, A.M., and J. W. Palese. Management of Broken Rail Risk. LeRail, January 2006. Zarembski, A. M., and J. W. Palese. Use of Risk Management in Improving Track Safety. Presented at the 2007 AREMA Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, Sept. 9â12, 2007. Zhang, R., and H. Wu. The Concept of âRisk RankingâPrioritisation Matrixâ Method and Its Application for Prioritisation of the Non-Compliance Rail Ultrasonic Testing Tracks. In Computers in Railways XVI, WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, Vol. 181, WIT Press, 2019 [Online]. https://www.witpress.com/ elibrary/wit-transactions-on-the-built-environment/181/36883. References