National Academies Press: OpenBook

Proposed AASHTO Guides for Bridge Preservation Actions (2020)

Chapter: References and Other Resources

« Previous: Chapter 5 - Guides to Preservation
Page 38
Suggested Citation:"References and Other Resources." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Proposed AASHTO Guides for Bridge Preservation Actions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26013.
×
Page 38
Page 39
Suggested Citation:"References and Other Resources." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Proposed AASHTO Guides for Bridge Preservation Actions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26013.
×
Page 39
Page 40
Suggested Citation:"References and Other Resources." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Proposed AASHTO Guides for Bridge Preservation Actions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26013.
×
Page 40

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

38 1. AASHTO (n.d.). Guide to Bridge Preservation Actions. Washington, DC, Publication pending. 2. AASHTO (n.d.). Guide Specification for Service Life Design of Highway Bridges. (From NCHRP Project 12-108). Washington, DC. 3. AASHTO (n.d.). Guidelines for Maintaining Small Movement Bridge Expansion Joints. (From NCHRP Project 12-100). Washington, DC. 4. AASHTO (2011). Adoption of an AASHTO Bridge Preservation Definition. Policy Resolution PR-3-11, Washington, DC, 2p. 5. AASHTO (2013). Manual for Bridge Element Inspection. MBEI-1-M, Washington, DC, 406p. 6. Adam, J.F., and Gansen, E. (2001). Performance of Poly-Carb, Inc. Flexogrid Bridge Overlay System. MLR-86-4, Iowa DOT, Ames, 10p. 7. Alger, R., Gruenberg, S., and Wegleitner, J. (2003). Field Performance of Polymer Bridge Deck Overlays in Michigan. 96-5434, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, 46p. 8. Anderson, C. (1990). Performance of Concrete Bridge Deck Overlays. HR-501, Iowa DOT, Ames, 55p. 9. Barnhart, J.E. (2001). Thin Bonded Overlay and Surface Laminates. Ohio Ready Mixed Concrete Associa- tion, Columbus, 37p. 10. Battaglia, I. (2012). An Evaluation of Concrete Bridge Deck Overlays and HMA Bridge Deck Overlays with Waterproof Membranes. WI-02-12, Wisconsin DOT, Madison, 16p. 11. Beck, B.D. (1999). Comparison of Standard and Deep Bridge Deck Overlay Performances. R-1368, Michigan DOT, Lansing, 19p. 12. California DOT (2016). Structure Maintenance and Investigation Database. Excel workbook. Private communication from Paul Cooley. 13. Connecticut DOT (2005). Rental of Bridge Repair Units (RBRU). Contract 05PSX0078, Newington, 373p. 14. Connecticut DOT (2008). Rental of Bridge Repair Units (RBRU). Contract 07PSX0066, Newington, 492p. 15. Connecticut DOT (2010). Rental of Bridge Repair Units (RBRU). Contract 10PSX0004, Newington, 280p. 16. Connecticut DOT (2015). Rental of Bridge Repair Units (RBRU). Contract 12PSX0074, Newington, 228p. 17. Dahlberg, J.M., and Phares, B. (2016). Polymer Concrete Overlay Evaluation. InTrans Project 13-463, Iowa State University, Ames, 242p. 18. FHWA (1995). Recording and Coding Guide for the Structure Inventory and Appraisal of the Nation’s Bridges. FHWA-PD-96-001, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, 124p. 19. FHWA (2016). INFORMATION: Guidance on Highway Preservation and Maintenance (Memorandum). U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, 3p. 20. FHWA (2018). Bridge Preservation Guide. FHWA-HIF-18-022, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, 21p. 21. FHWA (2019). Download NBI ASCII files. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, https:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi/ascii.cfm. 22. Guthrie, W.S., Nelsen, T., and Ross, L.A. (2005). Performance of Concrete Bridge Deck Surface Treatments. UT-05.05, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 85p. 23. Harper, J. (2007). Investigations of Failures of Epoxy Polymer Overlays in Missouri. RI06-020, Missouri DOT, Jefferson City, 20p. 24. Harries, K., McCabe, M., and Sweriduk, M. (2013). Structural Evaluation of Slab Rehabilitation by the Method of Hydrodemolition and Latex Modified Overlay. FHWA-PA-2013-006-PIT WO 01, Pennsylvania DOT, Harrisburg, 119p. 25. Hopwood T., Fairchild, J., Meade, B.W., Palle, S. (2015). Preventative Maintenance Program for Bridges. KTC-15-07/SPR11-424-1F, Kentucky Transportation Center, Lexington, 80p. References and Other Resources

References and Other Resources 39 26. Illinois DOT (2016). ILDOT District 1 Database of Decks & Treatments. Private communication from Sarah Wilson. Excel workbook. 27. Johnson, D.R., and Stephens, J.E. (1997). Monitoring and Evaluation of Thin Bonded Overlays and Surface Laminates for Bridge Decks. MSU G+C 290367, Montana State University, Bozeman, 89p. 28. Laaninen, K.H. (1978). Low Slump Portland Cement Concrete Bridge Deck Overlays. R-1077, Michigan DOT, Lansing, 19p. 29. Laylor, H.M., and Petrak, A. (1990). Long Term Deck Deterioration. OR 82-02 through OR 82-08, Oregon DOT, Salem, 10p. 30. Martinelli, P. (1996). Bridge Deck Waterproof Membrane Evaluation. AK-RD-96-04, Alaska DOT, Juneau, 69p. 31. Meggers, D., and Hobson, C. (2007). Investigation of Materials for Thin Bonded Overlays on Bridge Decks. FHWA-KS-05-2, Kansas DOT, Topeka, 115p. 32. Michigan DOT (2016). Bridge Scoping Cost Estimate Worksheets. Excel workbook. 33. Michigan DOT (2016). List of Bridge Projects. Private communication from Linda Reed, Excel workbook Q8806172016. 34. New York State (2016). Let Maintenance Projects 2005–2016. Private communication from Hawkins, J., Excel workbook. 35. New York State (2016). Unit Costs for AASHTO Bridge Elements. Private communication from Zinni, E., Excel workbook. 36. New York State (2016). Bridge Maintenance Task Codes. Private communication from Hawkins, J., Excel workbook. 37. Ohio DOT (2016). Summary of Contracts Awarded Year 2011 to Year 2015, Item 512 Sealing of Concrete Decks. Columbus, 2p. 38. Ohio DOT (2016). Summary of Contracts Awarded Year 2011 to Year 2015, Item 514 Structural Steel Painting. Columbus, 4p. 39. Ohio DOT (2016). Summary of Contracts Awarded Year 2011 to Year 2015, Item 516 Expansion Joint Systems. Columbus, 4p. 40. Ohio DOT (2016). Summary of Contracts Awarded Year 2011 to Year 2015, Item 516 or SS 846 Polymer Modified Expansion Joint System. Columbus, 1p. 41. Ohio DOT (2016). Summary of Contracts Awarded Year 2011 to Year 2015, Item 519 Deck Patching. Columbus, 2p. 42. Ohio DOT (2016). Summary of Contracts Awarded Year 2011 to Year 2015, Item 601 Slope and Channel Protection. Columbus, 4p. 43. Ohio DOT (2016). Summary of Contracts Awarded Year 2011 to Year 2015, Item 847/848 Concrete Deck Overlays. Columbus, 4p. 44. Ohio DOT (2016). Summary of Contracts Awarded Year 2014 to Year 2015, Item 856 Asphalt Deck Waterproofing. Columbus, 1p. 45. Oregon DOT (2016). ODOT Bridge Projects from 2011 to Present. Private communication from Kinney, T., Excel workbook. 46. Ozyildirim, C. (1996). Field Investigation of Concrete Overlays Containing Latex, Silica Fume, or Pyrament Cement. VTRC 96-R23, Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 24p. 47. Pennsylvania DOT (2016). Maintenance Work Data Pull corrected. Private communication from Macioce, T., Excel workbook. 48. Pfeifer, B.A. (1999). Concrete Bridge Deck Overlays in Illinois: Mix Design Experimentation and Investiga- tion of Construction Methods. PR 133, Illinois DOT, Springfield, 41p. 49. Pfeifer, B.A., and Kowlaski, G. (1999). Evaluation of Thin Lift Polymer Bridge Deck Overlays on I-57 Bridges at Clifton, IL. PR 132, Illinois DOT, Springfield, 29p. 50. Ramey, G.E., Oliver, R.S. (1998). Rapid Rehabilitation/Replacement of Bridge Decks. Report 930-376, Auburn University, AL, 349p. 51. Rasoulian, M., Rabalais, N. (1991). Evaluation of Thin Epoxy System Overlays for Concrete Bridge Decks. FHWA/LA-91/243, Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Baton Rouge, 243p. 52. Roper, T.H., Henley, E.H., Jr. (1991). Thin Overlay Custer Way Undercrossing 5/316. WA-RD 244.1, Washington DOT, Olympia, 27p. 53. Sharp, S.R., Brown, M.C. (2007). Survey of Cathodic Protection Systems on Virginia Bridges. VTRC 07-R35, Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 40p. 54. Simonsen, J.E. (1988). Low-Slump High-Density Concrete Bridge Deck Overlay. R-1294, Michigan DOT, Lansing, 9p. 55. Sprinkel, M.M. (1986). Polymer Concrete Overlay on The Big Swan Creek Bridge. VHTRC 86-R37, Virginia Highway Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 64p. 56. Sprinkel, M.M. (1987). Comparative Evaluation of Concrete Sealers and Multiple Layer Polymer Concrete Overlays. VTRC 88-R2, Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 72p.

40 Proposed AASHTO Guides for Bridge Preservation Actions 57. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (2018). Civil Works Construction Cost Index System (CWCCIS). EM 1110- 2-1304, Washington, DC, 55p. 58. U.S. Government (2017). Code of Federal Regulations. 23 CFR 490. 59. U.S. Government (2018). United States Code. 23 USC 116. 60. U.S. Government (2018). United States Code. 23 USC 101. 61. Virginia DOT (2016). Loaded Cost Calculation for Bridge Preservation Work. Structure and Bridge Division Excel workbook. 62. Washington DOT (2016). WSDOT Bridge Deck Data. Private communication from Wilson, D., Excel workbook. 63. Wilson, D.L., Henley, E.H., Jr. (1995). Thin Polymer Bridge Deck Overlays. WA-RD 374.1, Washington DOT, Olympia, 100p. 64. Wisconsin DOT (2016). Bridge Projects from Wisconsin DOT Highway Structures Information System (HSI). Private communication from Ryan Bowers, Excel spreadsheet.

Next: Acronyms, Abbreviations, Notations, and Symbols »
Proposed AASHTO Guides for Bridge Preservation Actions Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Many transportation departments have significant practical experience with bridge preservation and have developed conclusions regarding the effectiveness of bridge preservation actions based on those experiences. However, limited efforts have been made to identify, measure, evaluate, and document the short- and long-term performance of specific bridge preservation actions.

The TRB National Cooperative Highway Research Program's NCHRP Research Report 950: Proposed AASHTO Guides for Bridge Preservation Actions presents the development of two AASHTO guides for bridge preservation, including a general guide to preservation of highway bridges and a guide to preservation of highway bridge decks.

Supplementary to the report is Appendix B: Summaries of Information from State DOTs.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!