National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Section 2 - Resources
Page 138
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Redesigning Transit Networks for the New Mobility Future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26028.
×
Page 138
Page 139
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Redesigning Transit Networks for the New Mobility Future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26028.
×
Page 139
Page 140
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Redesigning Transit Networks for the New Mobility Future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26028.
×
Page 140

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

138 Accuardi, Z. 2018. Inclusive Transit: Advancing Equity Through Improved Access and Opportunity. TransitCenter, p. 39, New York, NY. APTA. 2019. Being Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) Ready: APTA International Study Mission. Washington, DC. Arlington County, Virginia. 2012. Capital Bikeshare Transit Development Plan. Arlington, VA. Badia, H., E. Miquel, and F. Robuste. 2014. Competitive Transit Network Design in Cities with Radial Street Patterns. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, pp. 161−181. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2013.11.006. Bhattacharya, T., J. Brown, M. Jaroszynski, and T. Batuhan. 2014. The Effects of Perception versus “Reality” on Travel Behavior after a Major Transit Service Change: The Case of Tallahassee, Florida. Journal of Public Transportation, 17 ed. Boyle, D.K., and J. Rey. 2012. Redesigning an Existing Transit Network from Scratch. Presented at the 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Byala, L., K. Filardo, O. Hirsch, M. Walk, J. Cardenas, and J. Hwang. 2019. TCRP Synthesis 140: Comprehensive Bus Network Redesigns. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Central Ohio Transit Authority. 2016. Long Range Transit Plan. Columbus. City of Santa Monica. 2019. Shared Mobility Pilot Program Summary Report. Santa Monica, CA. Cohen, S., and C. Cabansagan. 2017. A Framework for Equity in New Mobility. TransForm, Oakland, CA, p. 8. Curtis, T., M. Merritt, C. Chen, D. Perlmutter, D. Berez, and B. Ellis. 2019. TCRP Research Report 204: Partner- ships Between Transit Agencies and Transportation Network Companies (TNCs). Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Dallas Area Rapid Transit. 2016. Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA): Draft Bus Service Plan Recom- mendations. Dallas, TX. Eno Center for Transportation. 2019. A Fast-Changing Mobility Landscape: An Analysis of Public Transit Agency Survey Results. Washington, DC. Feigon, S., and C. Murphy. 2018. TCRP Research Report 195: Broadening Understanding of the Inter- play Among Public Transit, Shared Mobility, and Personal Automobiles. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. FTA. 2016. Shared Mobility FAQs: Americans with Disabilities Act. U.S. Department of Transportation, Wash- ington, DC. https://www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-and-guidance/shared-mobility-faqs-americans- disabilities-act-ada (Accessed May 1, 2020). FTA. 2018. MOD Sandbox Demonstrations Independent Evaluation: DART—The First and Last Mile Solution Evaluation Plan. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. FTA Office of Budget and Policy. 2019. National Transit Summaries and Trends: Appendix. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Goodall, W., T.D. Fishman, J. Bornstein, and B. Bonthron. 2017. The Rise of Mobility as a Service: Reshaping How Urbanites get Around. Deloitte Review. Graves, B. 2019. Shared Mobility and TNCs: Legal Considerations for Public Transit. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, Washington, DC. Grossman, A., and P. Lewis. 2019. Contracting for Mobility: A Case Study in the Los Angeles and Puget Sound Regions. Eno Center for Transportation, Washington, DC. Grossman, A., and P. Lewis. 2020. Data on Demand: A Case Study in the Los Angeles and Puget Sound Regions. Eno Center for Transportation, Washington, DC, p.12. Halifax Transit. 2016. Moving Forward Together Plan. Dartmouth, Canada. Houston METRO. 2014. Reimagined 5-Year Transit Service Plan. Houston, TX. References

References 139 Houston METRO. 2016. Houston METRO New Bus Network (NBN) Planning & Implementation, Lessons Learned Volumes 1 & 2. Houston, TX. Houston METRO. n.d. Houston Metro New Bus Network (NBN) Planning & Implementation. Metro politan Transit Authority of Harris County, Houston, TX, pp. 1−3. Indy Connect. 2016. The Central Indiana Transit Plan. Indianapolis, IN. Indy Connect. n.d. The Marion County Transit Plan. Indianapolis, IN. IndyGo. 2015. IndyGo Forward. Indianapolis, IN. IndyGo. 2019. Fare Capping and 2-Hour Transfer: Fare Policy Proposal and Equity Analysis. IndyGo, Indianapolis, IN, p. 9. Jacksonville Transportation Authority. n.d. Route Optimization Initiative: Case Study. Jacksonville, FL. Kalantari, N.Z., M.H. Zamanian, and S.M.M. Amiripour. 2014. Bus Network Modification Problem: A New Approach to Bus Network Design. Presented at the 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. King, I., and E. Newcomer. 2018. Uber Spent $10.7 Billion in Nine Years. Does it Have Enough to Show for it? Bloomberg, March 6. LA Metro. 2018. Transfers Design Guide: Improving Connections for a Seamless Trip. Los Angeles, CA. LA Metro. 2019a. Board Report: NextGen Regional Service Concept. Los Angeles, CA, July 18. http:// media.metro.net/projects_studies/nextgen/images/Ops_Committee_NG_Regional_Service_Concept_ 2019-0718.pdf (Accessed May 22, 2020). LA Metro. 2019b. MicroTransit Pilot. Los Angeles, CA. LA Metro. 2020a. LA Metro Board of Directors Approves Creation of Innovative New MicroTransit Pilot Project. Los Angeles, CA, February 27. https://www.metro.net/news/simple_pr/la-metro-board-directors-approves- creation-innovat/ (Accessed May 22, 2020). LA Metro. 2020b. LA Metro Transit Service Policy. Los Angeles, CA. LA Metro. 2020c. NextGen Bus Plan. Los Angeles, CA. LA Metro. n.d. Office of Extraordinary Innovation. Los Angeles, CA. https://www.metro.net/projects/oei/ (Accessed May 20, 2020). Lotshaw, S., P. Lewis, D. Bragdon, and Z. Accuardi. 2017. A Bid for Better Transit: Improving Service with Contracted Operations. TransitCenter and Eno Center for Transportation, Washington, DC. Madej, P. 2020. Leslie Richards Has Taken over as SEPTA’s General Manager. She’s All Ears. The Philadelphia Inquirer, January 24. Martin, E., and S. Shaheen. 2016. Impacts of car2go on Vehicle Ownership, Modal Shift, Vehicle Miles Traveled, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: An Analysis of Five North American Cities. Innovative Mobility Research and Transportation Sustainability Research Center, Berkeley, CA. MDOT MTA. 2017. Launching the Network Redesign. Maryland Transit Administration, Baltimore, MD. MDOT MTA. 2018a. BaltimoreLink Final Report (Draft). Maryland Transit Administration, Baltimore, MD. MDOT MTA. 2018b. Project Overview: North Avenue Rising. Open House Meeting Slides. Maryland Transit Administration, Baltimore, MD. https://northavenuerising.com/ (Accessed July 21, 2020). Meese, A. 2019. Overview of Recent COG/TPB Dockless Shared Mobility Device (SMD) Activities. Commuter Connections Subcommittee Item #4. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Washington, DC. Narula-Woods, R. 2018. Three Contracts Awarded to Firms to Design Microtransit Service. LA Metro, Los Angeles, CA. National Association of City Transportation Officials. 2018. Guidelines for the Regulation and Management of Shared Active Transportation. New York, NY, pp. 7−8. National Association of City Transportation Officials. 2019. Shared Micromobility in the U.S. New York, NY. New York City Transit Authority. 2017. Staten Island Bus Study: Reimagining Express Buses. New York, NY. New York Public Transit Association. n.d. NYPTA White Pater on Transportation Network Company (TNC) Issues. New York, NY, p. 10. Peterson, S.J., B. Holland, E. Evenhouse, and P. Lauer. 2019. Equity and Shared Mobility Services: Working with the Private Sector to Meet Equity Objectives. Shared-Use Mobility Center, Chicago, IL, pp. 2, 10. Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority. 2020. Catch a Ride Before You Ride. https://www.psta.net/riding-psta/ direct-connect/ (Accessed May 22, 2020). Reich, S.L., and J.L. Davis. 2011. Analysis of Contracting for Fixed Route Bus Service. National Center for Transit Research, Tampa, FL, p. 58. Rosenberg, E. 2020. Can California Rein in Tech’s Gig Platforms? A Primer on the Bold State Law that Will Try. The Washington Post, January 14. San Francisco Transportation Authority. 2017. The TNC Regulatory Landscape: An Overview of Current TNC Regulation in California and Across the Country. San Francisco, CA, p. 4. Schmitt, A. 2018. The Columbus Bus Network Redesign Boosted Ridership. Streetsblog USA, August 14.

140 Redesigning Transit Networks for the New Mobility Future Shaheen, S., and N.D. Chan. 2012. Ridesharing in North America: Past, Present, and Future. Transport Reviews. Shaheen, S., and A. Cohen. 2020. Innovative Mobility: Carsharing Outlook Carsharing Market Overview, Analysis, And Trends. Transportation Sustainability Research Center, Berkeley, CA. Shared-Use Mobility Center. 2016a. Shared Mobility and the Transformation of Public Transit. Chicago, IL. Shared-Use Mobility Center. 2016b. Shared-Use Mobility Toolkit for Cities. Chicago, IL. Shared-Use Mobility Center. 2020. Mobility on Demand Learning Center. https://learn.sharedusemobility center.org/ (Accessed March 22, 2020). Shared-Use Mobility Center. n.d. Learning Module: Microtransit. https://learn.sharedusemobilitycenter.org/ learning_module/microtransit/ (Accessed May 22, 2020). Short, A. 2017. Driver Shortages Causing Transit Delays Nationwide. Streetsblog USA, August 27. https://usa. streetsblog.org/2019/08/27/driver-shortages-causing-transit-delays-nationwide/ (Accessed May 22, 2020). Touhy, J. 2016. Supporters declare victory for mass transit tax hike in Marion County. IndyStar, November 9. Transportation for America. 2020. Shared Micromobility Playbook. https://playbook.t4america.org/ (Accessed May 22, 2020). Tsay, S., Z. Accuardi, and B. Schaller. 2016. Private Mobility, Public Interest: How Public Agencies Can Work with Emerging Mobility Providers. TransitCenter, New York, NY. Union of Concerned Scientists. 2020. Ride-Hailing’s Climate Risks Steering a Growing Industry toward a Clean Transportation Future. Cambridge, MA. Vock, D.C. 2017. Bus Network Redesigns are the ‘Hottest Trend in Transit.’ Government Technology. September 19. Volinski, J. 2019. TCRP Synthesis 141: Microtransit or General Public Demand−Response Transit Services: State of the Practice. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Waite, J. 2018. TCRP Legal Research Digest 53: Legal Considerations in Evaluating Relationships Between Transit Agencies and Ridesourcing Service Providers. Transportation Research Board of the National Acad- emies, Washington, DC. Watkins, K., S. Berrebi, C. Diffee, B. Kiriazes, and D. Ederer. 2020. TCRP Research Report 209: Analysis of Recent Public Transit Ridership Trends. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Westervelt, M., J. Schank, and E. Huang. 2017. Partnerships with Technology-Enabled Companies: Lessons Learned. Transportation Research Record Vol. 2649, Is. 1, pp. 106−112. Wilson, K. 2020. Why Do Micromobility Companies Keep Losing Money? Streetsblog, January 14.

Next: Abbreviations and Acronyms »
Redesigning Transit Networks for the New Mobility Future Get This Book
×
 Redesigning Transit Networks for the New Mobility Future
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Urban travel patterns are affected by many factors including changes in demography, land use, economics, technology, and mobility options. Public transportation must evolve to remain responsive.

The TRB Transit Cooperative Research Program's TCRP Research Report 221: Redesigning Transit Networks for the New Mobility Future presents case studies and toolkits to plan and implement the redesign of bus networks in the United States.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!