Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
155Â Â Findings Short-Term Conditioning The primary concerns with AASHTO T 240 are: (1) binders of different consistencies could be treated differently because the film thickness and its renewal vary with the consistency of the binder, and (2) some heavily modified binders crawl out of the container during conditioning. The evaluation of short-term conditioning procedures identified two options for improving short-term laboratory conditioning of asphalt binders: (1) adopt the container and mixing screw modifications to AASHTO T 240 that were implemented in the UK Ageing Profile Test (Hill etÂ al. 2009), or (2) adopt thin-film conditioning like the USAT (Farrar etÂ al. 2014) but using thicker film to provide more binder for current specification tests. During outreach to industry, a third option was identified: modify AASHTO T 240 to include a heating step where binder in the containers is heated to the conditioning temperature before hand rotating the container to coat it just before loading the container in the RTFO. A short-term conditioning selection experiment was designed to compare conditioning from the candidate approaches to AASHTO T 240 and oven-conditioned loose mix. The loose mix conditioning procedures that were used were those recommended in NCHRP Project 09-52, which were based on a field evaluation of numerous factors affecting the short-term aging characteristics of asphalt mixtures (Newcomb etÂ al. 2015). Eight binders with a wide range of consistency were used in the evaluation, and the evaluation was conducted at temperatures to simulate HMA and WMA production. The major findings from the short-term conditioning selection experiment related to the AASHTO T 240 binder consistency concern were: 1. The ratio of the aging index from the short-term binder conditioning procedures to the aging index from binder recovered from short-term loose mix conditioning was not a function of the viscosity of the binder at the conditioning temperature for any of the laboratory conditioning procedures, including AASHTO T 240. 2. For simulated HMA aging, there was not a significant difference between the aging index from any of the laboratory short-term binder conditioning procedures and the aging index for binder recovered from short-term conditioned loose mix. 3. For simulated WMA aging, there was not a significant difference between the aging index from the mixing screw procedures and the aging index for binder recovered from short-term conditioned loose mix. However, aging indices for AASHTO T 240, AASHTO T 240 with preheated containers, and the static 0.8Â mm film were significantly lower than the aging index for binder recovered from short-term conditioned loose mix. 4. When the binder viscosity at the mixing temperature exceeded about 0.55 Paâ¢s, the mixing screw procedures increased the binder aging relative to AASHTO T 240. Apparently, the mixing screws improve the exposure of viscous binders to air during laboratory conditioning. C H A P T E R Â 3 Findings and Application
156 Asphalt Binder Aging Methods to Accurately Reflect Mixture Aging 5. Heating the binder and the containers before AASHTO T 240 conditioning increased the binder aging index about 6Â percent. 6. There is a rough correlation of mass change measurements between the various short-term laboratory conditioning procedures. The major findings from the short-term conditioning selection experiment related to the AASHTO T 240 binder leakage concern were: 1. Binder leakage did not occur during AASHTO T 240 conditioning for any of the binders conditioned at 163Â°C. Binder leakage did occur during AASHTO T 240 conditioning for the stiffest binder conditioned at 135Â°C. 2. Binder leakage occurred during conditioning with the mixing-screw procedures for several of the binders at 163Â°C and 135Â°C. This was likely the result of the increased binder depth in the container due to the volume occupied by the mixing screws. To better document the extent of the binder leakage issue, the Maine Department of Trans- portation sent a survey on behalf of NCHRP Project 09-61 to the members of the AASHTO Committee on Pavements and Materials. The online survey was directed to technicians performing binder testing and is reproduced in FigureÂ 102. Thirty-three agencies responded to the survey. TableÂ 83 identifies the agencies that responded and summarizes the responses to the questions aimed at determining the extent of the binder flow problem. Agencies estimate between 0 and 50Â percent of the binders that they grade exhibit binder flow. The agencies that responded estimate that they conduct AASHTO T 240 conditioning on 10,693 samples per year and approximately 405 of these samples, or approximately 3.8Â percent, exhibit binder flow. Only four agencies estimate that binder flow occurs in more than 5Â percent of the samples tested: Utah at 50Â percent, Oregon at 30Â percent, Maine at 15Â percent, and Georgia at 10Â percent. The commentary provided by Utah indicates that the binder flow occurs during sample unloading, and since the mass change containers are removed first, flow rarely affects the mass change measurement. The other agencies with high percentages of samples exhibiting binder flow identified the only grades that were susceptible to the flow. An unexpected finding is the number of agencies identifying neat binders as being suscep- tible to binder flow. Seven agencies listed only neat binders as being susceptible to binder flow. Fifteen agencies listed only modified binders as being susceptible to binder flow. Of these, three agencies identified GTR-modified binder, and three agencies identified latex-modified binder as being susceptible to binder flow. Two agencies listed both neat and modified binders as being susceptible to binder flow. The survey included three questions aimed at confirming whether the laboratory routinely checks the levelness of the carriage and rotates the container to generate a film before cooling. The responses to these questions are summarized in TableÂ 84. The higher percentages of flow reported do not appear to be associated with deviation from the test procedure for these items. The last survey question asked the respondents to list other issues with AASHTO T 240 that they thought need to be addressed. The responses are summarized in TableÂ 85. Twelve agencies listed additional areas of concern. The most common, from five agencies, were associated with improvement to temperature measurement and verification. Four agencies listed improving unloading and binder recovery, and two agencies listed tilting the oven with modified binders. Issues identified by only one agency were: (1) stiffer binders tend not to roll, (2) more automa- tion is needed, and (3) correction for laboratory elevation. The survey documented that the AASHTO T 240 binder flow issue affects about 4Â percent of the binders tested, and it occurs when conditioning both modified and unmodified binders. Binders modified with GTR and latex appear to be particularly susceptible to the binder flow issue.
FigureÂ 102. AASHTO T 240 online survey.
158 Asphalt Binder Aging Methods to Accurately Reflect Mixture Aging Agency Tests per Year Binder Flow Susceptible Grades Percent Number 1 600 30 180 64-28, 70-22, 70-28. Both 70 grades are modified. 2 250 1 3 Probably the less viscous virgin binder. 3 100 0 0 We only see flow out of container if it is a proficiency sample at a grade of 58-22. Notmodified. 4 155 15 23 PG 64E-28. 5 150 1 2 PG 52-28. 6 250 5 13 58-28, 70-28, 76-28, yes. 7 300 5 15 PG 70-22, modified grade. 8 200 0 0 9 435 0 0 N/A 10 200 0 0 None. 11 350 1 4 58-22, 64-22, 67-22. No modified binders exhibit the flowing. 12 2800 1 28 Material with latex polymer. 13 50 5 3 Reported as PG 67-22, unmodified from perhaps one specific supplier, and PG 70-22 latex-modified (PG 67-22 with addition of plant-blended latex). 14 100 5 5 PG 76-22, yes. 15 200 0 0 N/A 16 125 5 6 PG 64-22. They are not required by us to be modified. 17 65 3 2 64S-22, unmodified. 18 150 0 0 None. 19 24 0 0 N/A 20 300 1 3 64-28, 76-28, both modified. 21 125 1 1 PG 70-28 (PG 64-28 modified with 2â3% SBR latex added at the HMA production facility). 22 700 1 7 Softer binder grades. PG 52 and 58 23 250 1 3 64-22V with GTR. 24 330 1 3 PG 64V-28 (PG 76-28). Modified. 25 100 50 50 26 350 0 0 27 360 1 4 28 700 5 35 29 250 0 0 30 50 5 3 31 104 10 10 32 350 0 0 33 220 1 180 PG 64-34 and PG 70-28. They are modified. The flow occurs when the carriage is stopped to unload a bottle. Generally, it stays on the lip of the bottle. Fifty percent on lip of at least one bottle after unloading process begins. Mass change bottles are first out and rarely have any outflow. We've only seen it on highly modified 70s or 76s. Even then it's only happened a few times through the years. PG 70-28, but very rarely does it happen. 76-22. Everything we use is modified and no issues with binder flowing out of the container. 76-22 (64V) â GTR-modified binder only. 76-22 and GTR-modify once. Our PMA binder is PG 76-22 (PG 64E-22). We never have a problem with it. On very rare occasions maybe a drop or two would dribble out, and that is not even once a year. We also have, on a few occasions, ran the HPTO asphalt, PG 82-22, or 76-28, and that is well behaved. Over the past 20 years, we have run 1500-2000 PG 76 samples, and binder flowing out of the bottle is a non-issue. PG 88-22, PG 76-22 (SBS). Total 10,638 405 TableÂ 83. Summary of survey results addressing the extent of the binder flow problem.
Findings and Application 159Â Â Agency Percent with Binder Flow Levelness Check Precoat Container Cool Horizontally 1 30 Every 6 months. Yes Yes 2 1 We calibrate it two times per year. Yes Yes 3 0 Every 6 months. Yes Yes 4 15 Annually or as needed. Yes Yes 5 1 Every 6 months. Yes Yes 6 5 Every 12 months. Yes Yes 7 5 Routinely every 6 months; more often if issues noted. Yes Yes 8 0 Once per year. Yes Yes 9 0 Every 6 months. Yes Yes 10 0 Every 12 months or if oven is moved for maintenance. Yes Yes 11 1 Before each test. Yes Yes 12 1 6 months. Yes Yes 13 5 No set frequency - should be every 6 months with bearing check. Yes Yes 14 5 Two times per year. Yes Yes 15 0 Every 12 months. Yes Yes 16 5 Every 6 months as a minimum. Yes Yes 17 3 One to two times per year. Yes Yes 18 0 Every 12 months. Yes Yes 19 0 Every 2 to 3 months. Yes Yes 20 1 Every 6 Months. Yes No 21 1 Six-month intervals. Yes Yes 22 1 Monthly. Yes Yes 23 1 1 time per year Yes Yes 24 1 6-month intervals. We use 3 RTFOTovens. Yes Yes 25 50 Six months. With modified binders, I use my free hand to tip the bottle down beyond horizontal to let it flow towards the opening, then rotate, attempting to coat as evenly as possible. Yes 26 0 Yearly. Yes Yes 27 1 Every 6 months. Yes Yes 28 5 Every 6 months. Yes Yes 29 0 Every 6 months or as needed, for example, if an oven is moved. Yes Yes 30 5 Every 6 months. Yes Yes 31 10 Yearly. Yes Yes 32 0 Annually. Yes Yes 33 1 Bi-annually. Yes Yes TableÂ 84. Summary of the survey results addressing procedural factors affecting binder flow.
160 Asphalt Binder Aging Methods to Accurately Reflect Mixture Aging Agency Percent with Binder Flow Issues with AASHTO T 240 1 30 2 1 Not much to complain. 3 0 We have a thermometer (LIG) hanging in the oven per procedure - is this redundant, because we do not see a temperature drift during the bi-annual temperature verification. Second point - has testing been done to quantify the difference in results if the airflow is off during extraction of the containers from the oven? For the 2 minutes it takes to pull the jars from the oven, it seems like the airflow should not have to be on. That is more of a question. 4 15 N/A 5 1 Rolling issues with highly modified binders. They don't roll. Stiffer materials are more difficult to remove from the containers. 6 5 Another way to calibrate and verify temperature. 7 5 8 0 9 0 None. 10 0 None. 11 1 N/A 12 1 13 5 14 5 Permitting use of K-type thermocouples. 15 0 N/A 16 5 With higher PG grades (PG 76 and 82) there are some samples that we cannot get any binder out of the bottle, or at the least is very tough to get out. 17 3 Unloading the RTFO in <5 minutes is challenging. Two technicians are needed to complete in <5 minutes. Removing >90% of the material from the bottle is also a challenge, especially with modified binders. 18 0 I cannot recall any issues I have encountered with AASHTO T 240. 19 0 No Issues. 20 1 21 1 An easier way to recover aged binder from the bottles. More automation to the equipment (rotating carriage automatically, instead of technician starting the rotation manually). 22 1 None at this time. 23 1 None. 24 1 25 50 We use ductility end pieces under the front of the oven to prevent this as much as possible while keeping the level within tolerance of T 240. 26 0 None. 27 1 N/A 28 5 No other issues that we are concerned about. 29 0 Correction for laboratory elevation - see NCHRP Project 20-07/Task 400. 30 5 Always known to tilt oven back to prevent this from occurring with GTR-modified binders, the rubber swells and crawls out bottle openings. 31 10 Checking the temperature for calibration is always a problem. We need a better way of hanging the thermometer in the oven and also be able to see and read the result. 32 0 Please make the oven temperature sensor and the thermometer in the same location. The current design is just bad engineering. 33 1 TableÂ 85. Summary of other AASHTO T 240 issues.
Findings and Application 161Â Â Long-Term Conditioning The primary improvement to AASHTO R 28 identified by the evaluation of long-term conditioning procedures was to increase the amount of aging simulated by the PAV to better match the properties of binders near the surface of the pavement after approximately 10Â years in service. Feasibility experiments found novel approaches of using acoustic, sonic, and ultra- sonic mixing to accelerate oxidation reactions were not successful; therefore, further devel- opment work investigated changing PAV operating parameters to accelerate aging. The PAV operating parameters experiment evaluated the change in rheological and chemical properties for RTFOT-conditioned binder that was further conditioned using a range of PAV conditioning temperatures, binder masses, and conditioning times. Response surfaces for the change in the crossover frequency, change in the carbonyl absorbance, and change in sulfoxide absorbance were developed for four binders from the ARC validation sections in Arizona and four binders from the ARC validation sections in Minnesota. The response surfaces were used to compare rheological and chemical properties of PAV-conditioned residue to binder extracted from field cores that were aged for 4 to 5Â years and 9 to 11Â years. This comparison provided the range of PAV operating parameters needed to simulate near-surface aging after approximately 10Â years of service in warm and cool climates. The major findings from the PAV operating parameters experiment were: 1. Varying the conditioning temperature, mass of binder, and conditioning time in the PAV produces binder residue with a wide range of rheological and chemical properties. The crossover frequency, which is a measure of the hardness of the conditioned binder, had a range of 7 to 12 orders of magnitude for the binders tested. 2. The rheological and chemical changes produced using various PAV operating conditions were rational and produced smooth trends for the binders tested. The crossover frequency decreased, the rheological index increased, and the carbonyl absorbance increased with increasing severity of conditioning. The sulfoxide absorbance was relatively insensitive to changes in PAV operating conditions. Data from all PAV conditions collapsed onto smooth curves. 3. PAV conditioning 50.0 g of binder for 40Â hours at 100Â°C was approximately equivalent to PAV conditioning of 12.5 g of binder for 20Â hours at 100Â°C. 4. Rheological and chemical properties of field-aged binders generally followed the same trends as PAV-conditioned binders with increasing exposure; however, the data were more variable. The crossover frequency decreased, the rheological index increased, and carbonyl absorbance increased with increasing time in service. The crossover frequency increased, the rheological index decreased, and the carbonyl absorbance decreased with depth in the pavement. Irrational and erratic trends were observed for the field-aged properties for the terpolymer-modified binder. FTIR analysis confirmed that the binder extraction and recovery process was likely not recovering all polymer for this binder. 5. Response surfaces fitted to the change in the crossover frequency and the change in the carbonyl absorbance were most sensitive to changes in conditioning temperature for all binders. Sensitivity to conditioning time and binder mass were binder dependent. 6. The response surfaces were used to determine PAV operating parameters for the Arizona and Minnesota sites that closely matched near-surface aging after 9 to 11Â years in service. The PAV exposure required to approximate the field-aged chemistry was generally greater than that required to match the field-aged rheology. Based on a combined chemical and rheological criterion, PAV conditioning for 20Â hours using a binder mass of 12.5 g and a temperature of 100Â°C reasonably reproduces the aging after about 10Â years in service at a depth of 0.75 in at both sites. To reproduce the aging that occurs at a depth of 0.25 in requires higher temperatures for the same conditioning time and binder massâ108Â°C for the Arizona site and 104Â°C for the Minnesota site.
162 Asphalt Binder Aging Methods to Accurately Reflect Mixture Aging Based on the findings of the PAV operating parameters experiment, the long-term condition- ing calibration experiment was conducted. The objective of this experiment was to determine appropriate conditioning temperatures for 12.5 g, 20-hour, 2.1 MPa PAV conditioning for various climates. The basic approach consisted of comparing rheological and chemical proper- ties of laboratory-conditioned binders to those for binder recovered from cores from in-service pavements. Twenty-six pavements for the LTPP program that had original binder and cores taken after 8 to 16Â years in service stored in the LTPP MRL were included in the experiment. The pavements were in 23 states and two provinces with mean annual air temperatures ranging from 1.7Â°C to 20Â°C. Recovered binder properties were measured for three 0.5 in thick slices: (1) 0 to 0.5Â in, (2) 0.5 in to 1.0Â in, and (3) 1.5 in to 2.0Â in. To determine appropriate PAV conditioning temperatures for each pavement, the original binder samples were first RTFOT conditioned. The RTFOT-conditioned residue was then further conditioned in the PAV using 12.5 g in PAV pans, 20Â hours conditioning time, and 2.1 MPa pressure. Three temperatures were used: 85Â°C, 100Â°C, and 115Â°C. Rheological and chemical properties of the original binder, RTFOT residue, and the residue from the three PAV conditioning temperatures were measured. Equivalent 12.5 g, 20-hr PAV temperatures were determined by equating the properties of the PAV residue to the properties of the recovered binders. The major findings of the long-term calibration experiment were: 1. Residue from 12.5 g, 20-hr PAV conditioning reasonably reproduced the rheological properties and carbonyl absorbance of binder recovered from in-service pavements at conditioning temperatures between 85Â°C and 115Â°C. The temperature where the PAV- conditioned residue most closely approximated the recovered binder properties was called the equivalent PAV conditioning temperature. 2. 12.5 g, 20-hr PAV conditioning did not reasonably reproduce sulfoxide levels for several of the binders, resulting in extremely high or extremely low equivalent PAV conditioning temperatures based on sulfoxide absorbance. 3. There was a fair correlation between the equivalent PAV conditioning temperatures based on changes in carbonyl absorbance and the equivalent PAV conditioning temperature based on changes in rheology. The equivalent PAV conditioning temperatures based on carbonyl absorbance were consistently approximately 10Â degrees higher than those based on rheology. 4. Standard PAV conditioning produced residue with chemical and rheological properties that were similar to 12.5 g, 20-hr PAV conditioning at 85Â°C. 5. A rational statistical model was developed to estimate equivalent PAV conditioning tempera- tures based on rheology. The model showed the equivalent PAV conditioning temperature is sensitive to (1) average pavement temperature, (2) in-place air void content, (3) sensitivity of the binder to changes in aging temperature, (4) age of the pavement, and (5) depth in the pavement. 6. The statistical model was used to calculate equivalent 12.5 g, 20-hr PAV conditioning temperatures for specification testing as a function of climate. These temperatures are based on rheological properties from the top 1 in of the pavement and vary from 85Â°C to 115Â°C. Applications Short-Term Conditioning The findings of the evaluation, laboratory testing and analysis, and survey conducted in NCHRP Project 09-61 support the continued use of AASHTO T 240 for short-term condition- ing of asphalt binders to simulate aging during HMA production. Although the film thickness and its renewal vary with the consistency of the binder, residue from AASHTO T 240 for binders with a wide range of consistencies has rheological properties that are similar to binder recovered from loose mix conditioned following the procedures developed in NCHRP Project 09-52 to
Findings and Application 163Â Â simulate production aging. The survey of highway agency technicians revealed users are generally satisfied with AASHTO T 240, but they would like to see additional improvement, primarily in the areas of temperature measurement, calibration, and binder recovery. The survey docu- mented that binder leakage occurs in approximately 4Â percent of tests, and binder leakage occurs with both modified and neat binders. Some agencies report no binder leakage while neighboring agencies report high instances of binder leakage. This suggests the need for specific equipment and technique evaluation rather than wholesale changes to AASHTO T 240. If agencies want to simulate WMA production at lower temperatures, AASHTO T 240 could be modified to use a temperature greater than 135Â°C or increase the conditioning time. These modifications are preferred over adding mixing screws and maintaining the temperature at 135Â°C and the conditioning time at 85Â minutes because: (1) no new equipment is required, (2) binder recovery from the mixing screws is difficult, and (3) mass change measurements using heated containers as required when using mixing screws are highly variable. Long-Term Conditioning The findings of the evaluation and the laboratory testing and analysis conducted in NCHRP Project 09-61 show PAV conditioning is capable of reasonably simulating the properties of field-aged binders. The time in service simulated by PAV conditioning depends on the operating parameters used in the PAV. Aging is accelerated by increasing the temperature, increasing the conditioning time, decreasing the film thickness, and increasing the pressure. Temperature has the greatest effect. The effect of conditioning time and film thickness are similar. Based on models of the pressure dependency of the asphalt oxidation reactions, doubling the pressure from 2.1 MPa to 4.2 MPa would only change the reaction rate by 8Â percent and 15Â percent. To maintain the current AASHTO R 28 conditioning time, PAV conditioning was calibrated to reproduce the aging that occurs within the top 1 in of the pavement using 12.5 g binder mass, 20-hr conditioning time, and 2.1 MPa pressure. To facilitate specification testing, the PAV conditioning temperatures were expressed as a function of the average of the 98Â percent reliability high and low pavement temperatures at the surface of the pavement from LTPPBind without adjustment for traffic. They range from 85Â°C in areas of Alaska and northern Canada to 115Â°C in areas of Arizona, California, Nevada, and Texas. Condition- ing temperatures between 90Â°C and 110Â°C cover most of the continental United States. The complete listing of 12.5 g, 20-hr, 2.1 MPa PAV conditioning temperatures was provided in TableÂ 77. While encouraging, there are implementation issues associated with film formation and specification criteria that need to be addressed as discussed below. The nominal film thickness for 12.5 g of binder in a standard 140Â mm diameter PAV pan is 0.8Â mm. To form and maintain a uniform film, the pan must be flat and level during condi- tioning. The experimental work in NCHRP Project 09-61 found that commercially available 1.0Â mm thick stainless steel pans that were cleaned with solvents after testing remained flat and did not warp. These pans are thicker than required in AASHTO R 28. Also, the level- ness tolerance specified in AASHTO R 28 of film thickness of 0.5Â mm in a 140Â mm diameter PAV pan is not acceptable. The text of AASHTO R 28 specified 0.5Â mm film thickness, while FigureÂ 1 of AASHTO R 28 specifies 0.05Â mm. Pans leveled with a precision machinist level, having a sensitivity of 0.00042Â mm/mm (0.058Â mm in 140Â mm), resulted in full coverage of the pan. Achieving this degree of levelness was extremely difficult using current PAV equip- ment. Improvements to the PAV equipment are needed to allow rapid leveling to the above tolerance if 12.5 g PAV conditioning is to be adopted. A second issue with film formation was identified during the sensitivity experiment: heavily modified, RTFOT-conditioned binders, when PAV conditioned at the temperatures in TableÂ 77, may not form a film that fully covers the pan. For the sensitivity experiment, a proper film
164 Asphalt Binder Aging Methods to Accurately Reflect Mixture Aging for these binders was formed by heating the pan leveled to 0.00042Â mm/mm under industrial nitrogen for 30Â minutes at 135Â°C before PAV conditioning. If 12.5 g PAV conditioning is to be adopted, PAV equipment should be modified and automated to allow this coating step to be performed automatically. The final issue that must be addressed is developing appropriate grading criteria for the greater amount of aging simulated by 12.5 g, 20-hr, 2.1 MPa PAV conditioning. Based on current criteria, the low-temperature continuous grade of the 10 binders tested in the sensitivity experiment increased an average of 5.9Â°C. The intermediate-temperature continuous grade increased an average of 4.2Â°C. Thus, the adoption of this long-term conditioning without modification of the performance grading criteria will change the low-temperature grade of binders approximately one grade level. Field performance data are needed to establish appropriate grading criteria. One possible application of 12.5 g, 20-hr, 2.1 MPa PAV is in conjunction with the adoption of DTc after 40-hr PAV conditioning as a specification criterion (Asphalt Institute 2019). The testing in this project showed that 12.5 g, 20-hr, 2.1 MPa PAV conditioning yields residue with rheological properties similar to 50.0 g, 40-hr, 2.1 MPa PAV conditioning, allowing residue for intermediate- and low-temperature grading and the 40-hr DTc criterion to be conditioned in 20Â hours using a single run of the PAV. With 10 pans available in the PAV, loading two pans with 50.0 g and eight pans with 12.5 g yields approximately 95 g of binder for low- and intermediate-temperature grading and 85 g to 90 g of binder for DTc determination. This is sufficient residue for testing BBR beams at two different temperatures. The issues discussed above concerning film formation need to be addressed before this approach can be considered for use in practice. Combined Short- and Long-Term Conditioning The laboratory testing and analysis also showed residue from static 0.8Â mm film conditioning for binders with a wide range of consistencies has rheological properties that are similar to binder recovered from loose mix conditioned following the procedures developed in NCHRP Project 09-52. Using the same film thickness and equipment for short- and long-term condition- ing offers the potential to simplify laboratory conditioning. A very reasonable approach is to short-term condition the binder in a low-pressure oven in the standard 140Â mm diameter pans at 163Â°C. Conditioning the thin film under a low pressure above atmospheric would eliminate the laboratory elevation effect that is known to be an issue with AASHTO T 240 (Advanced Asphalt Technologies LLC 2018). Upon completion of the short-term conditioning, one pan would be removed, cooled, weighed for mass change determination, and the residue tested for high pavement temperature rheological properties. The remaining pans would be trans- ferred to the PAV for long-term conditioning under 2.1 MPa air pressure for 20Â hours at the appropriate temperature based on climate temperature. This approach has some advantages: (1) it removes the viscosity-dependent film renewal associated with AASHTO T 240; (2) it removes the laboratory elevation effect associated with AASHTO T 240; (3) it eliminates binder transfer loss between short- and long-term conditioning; and (4) the higher temperature for the short-term conditioning will improve the uniformity of the thin film for the subsequent long-term conditioning. To avoid needing equipment that controls both pressure and vacuum, a standard conditioning pressure somewhat above the maximum atmospheric pressure should be used. Atmospheric pressure varies with elevation and weather. The elevation effect, however, is much larger. Standard atmospheric pressure at sea level is 101.33 kPa (14.70 psi). Based on the relationship for the variation in atmospheric pressure with elevation (U.S. Department of Commerce 1963), the atmospheric pressure at 7,000Â ft elevation, the elevation of the highest labs participating
Findings and Application 165Â Â in the AASHTO re:source proficiency sample testing, is 78.18 kPa (11.34 psi). The historical range of maximum and minimum atmospheric pressures corrected to sea level recorded in the United States is from 93.40 kPa (13.56 psi) to 106.33 kPa (15.42 psi) (Weather Underground n.d.). Therefore, the short-term conditioning pressures should be set to 110.00 kPa (15.95 psi) absolute, which is a small gauge pressure of 8.67 kPa (1.25 psi) at sea level and 16.6 kPa (4.61 psi) at an elevation of 7,000Â ft. Based on work completed in NCHRP Project 20-07/Task 400, a significant difference in AASHTO T 240 residue occurs when the elevation difference between labs exceeds about 1,000Â ft, which corresponds to a pressure difference of about 3.50 kPa (0.51 psi). Therefore, pressure control should be more accurate than this value. Closed-loop electronic air pressure regulators and digital pressure gauges are available with an accuracy of 0.25Â percent of full scale. A 210 kPa (30 psi) device with an accuracy of 0.25Â percent of full scale is accurate to 0.52 kPa (0.075 psi). Based on this analysis, it is feasible to control the pressure in a low-pressure oven to an absolute pressure of 110.00 kPa (15.95 psi) Â± 1.00 kPa (0.14 psi). The primary unanswered question for combined short- and long-term conditioning is how much will the low pressure during short-term conditioning suppress volatile loss? The changes to the binder that occur during AASHTO T 240 conditioning and the construction process include oxidation and volatile loss. The short-term selection experiment documented lower mass loss for the static 0.8Â mm film compared to AASHTO T 240. Applying pressure to the thin film during short-term conditioning may suppress volatile loss. Additional experimental work is needed to determine if volatile loss suppression is significant.