National Academies Press: OpenBook

Performance Metrics for Public–Private Partnerships (2021)

Chapter: Appendix A - Literature Review

« Previous: Glossary
Page 57
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Literature Review." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Performance Metrics for Public–Private Partnerships. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26171.
×
Page 57
Page 58
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Literature Review." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Performance Metrics for Public–Private Partnerships. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26171.
×
Page 58
Page 59
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Literature Review." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Performance Metrics for Public–Private Partnerships. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26171.
×
Page 59

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

57   Abdel Aziz, A. M. Successful Delivery of Public–Private Partnerships for Infrastructure Development. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(12), 2007, 918–931. Ajei, O., and Adeniyi, O. Performance Indicators for Public–Private Partnership (Ppp) in Infrastructure. Joint CIB W070, W092 & TG72 International Conference: Delivering Value to the Community, 2012. Australia Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development. National Public–Private Partnership Guide- lines: Volume I - Procurement Options Analysis, Canberra, Australia, 2008. Ball, R., Heafey, M., and King, D. Risk Transfer and Value for Money in PFI Projects. Public Management Review, 5(2), 2003, 279–290. Barutha, P., Karaca, I., Pinto-Nunez, M., and Gransberg, D. D. Project Risk Perception on Public–Private Partner- ship Projects. Compendium, 2019 Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Paper #19-04767, January 2019. Bing, L., Akintoye, A., Edwards, P. J., and Hardcastle, C. The allocation of risk in PPP/PFI construction projects in the UK. International Journal of Project Management, 23(1), 2005, 25–35. Brinkerhoff, D. W., and Brinkerhoff, J. M. Public–private partnerships: Perspectives on purposes, publicness, and good governance. Public Administration and Development, 31(1), 2011, 2–14. Chan, A. P. C., Lam, P. T. I., Chan, D. W. M., Cheung, E., and Ke, Y. Critical success factors or PPPs in infra- structure developments: Chinese perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(5), 2010a, 484–494. Chan, A. P. C., Yeung, J. F. Y., Yu, C. C. P., Wang, S. Q., and Ke, Y. Empirical study of risk assessment and alloca- tion of public–private partnership projects in China. Journal of Management in Engineering, 27(3), 2010b, 136–148. Chiara, N., Garvin, M. J., and Vecer, J. Valuing simple multiple-exercise real options in infrastructure projects. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 13(2), 2007, 97–104. Chou, J. S., and Leatemia, G. T. Critical process and factors for ex-post evaluation of public–private partnership infrastructure projects in Indonesia. Journal of Management in Engineering, 32(5), 2016, 05016011. Chou, J., and Pramudawardhani, D. Cross-country comparisons of key drivers, critical success factors and risk allocation for public–private partnership projects. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 2015, 1–12. Chung, D., and Hensher, D. Risk Management 695 in Public–Private Partnerships. Australian Accounting Review, 25(1), 2015, 13–27. Chung, D., Hensher, D. A., and Rose, J. M. Toward the betterment of risk allocation: Investigating risk per- ceptions of Australian stakeholder groups to public–private-partnership tollroad projects. Research in Transportation Economics, 30(1), 2010, 43–58. Dewulf, G., Garvin, M. J., and Duffield, C. “Multinational comparison of the tension between standards and con- text in PPP.” Public–Private Partnerships in Transport: Trends and theory (Roumboutsos, A., ed.), Routledge Studies in Transport Analysis, 2015, 267–291. El Asmar, M., Ramsey, D. W., and Cho, N. Quantifying and Benchmarking the Project Delivery Performance of Public–Private-Partnership (PPP) Transportation Projects in the U.S. No. Project ID: NTC2014-SU-R-18, 2017, College Park, MD. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). “Public–private partnerships for highway infrastructure: Capital- izing on international experience.” International Technology Scanning Program, 2009. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). P3 Hand-Back Experience white paper. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ ipd/pdfs/p3/p3_handback_experience_010318.pdf, 2018. A P P E N D I X A Literature Review

58 Performance Metrics for Public–Private Partnerships Gad, G. M., Loulakis, M. C., and Gransberg, D. D. Confidentiality Issues with Alternative Technical Concepts during Design-Build Project Procurement. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 12(1), 2020, 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000345. Garvin, M. J. Enabling development of the transportation public–private partnership market in the United States. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(4), 2009, 402–411. Garvin, M. J., and Bosso, D. Assessing the effectiveness of infrastructure public–private partnership programs and projects. Public Works Management & Policy, 13(2), 2008, 162–178. Gransberg, D. D., and Windel, E. Communicating Design Quality Requirements for Public Sector Design/Build Projects, Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, 24(2), 2008, 105–110. Gransberg, D. D., and Molenaar, K. R.. A Synthesis of Public Design-Build Source Selection Methods Journal of Construction Procurement, 9(2), 2003, 40–51. Gransberg, D. D., and Molenaar, K. R. Life Cycle Cost Award Algorithms for Design-Build Highway Pavement Projects. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, ASCE, 10(4), 2004, 167–175. Gransberg, D. D. “A Framework for Performance Based Contractor Prequalification,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.2151, National Academies, 2010, pp.46–54. Gransberg, D. D., and Scheepbouwer, E. U. S. Partnering Programs and International Partnering Contracts and Alliances. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2504, 2015, pp. 73–77. Gransberg, D. D., Scheepbouwer, E., and Lopez del Puerto, C. A Framework for Objectively Determining Alter- native Contracting Method Best Practices. Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2630, 2017, 10.3141/2630-07. Gransberg, D. D., Karaca, I., and Buss, A. Life Cycle Cost Adjustment Factors in Alternate Design/Alternative Bid Pavement Bids: Added Value or Added Controversy? Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2672, 2018, pp. 21–27. Gransberg, D. D., Scheepbouwer, E., and Lopez del Puerto, C. Making the Business Case for Alliance Contract- ing on US Megaprojects. Paper No. 26, Proceedings of the Construction Research Congress, ASCE, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 2016. Gransberg D. D., and Touran, A. Value, Benefits, and Limitations of Qualifications Based Selection (QBS) for Airport Project Delivery, ACRP Synthesis 102, Transportation Research Board, National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2018, p. 111. Gransberg D. D., Loulakis, M. C., and Gad, G. M. Alternative Technical Concepts for Contract Delivery Methods, NCHRP Synthesis 455, Transportation Research Board, National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014, p. 119. Gordon, C. M. Choosing Appropriate Construction Contracting Method. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 120(1), 1994, 196–210. Hasanzadeh, S., Esmaili, B., Gad, G.M, and Gransberg, D. D. Impact of Owners’ Early Decisions on Project Per- formance and Dispute Occurrence in Public Highway Projects. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolu- tion in Engineering and Construction, 10(28), 2018. Hodge, G. A. The risky business of public–private partnerships. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63(4), 2004, 37–49. Kwak, Y. H., Chih, Y., and Ibbs, C. W. Towards a comprehensive understanding of public–private partnerships for infrastructure development. California Management Review, 51(2), 2009, 51–78. Li, B., Akintoye, A., Edwards, P. J., and Hardcastle, C. “Critical success factors for PPP/PFI projects in the UK construction industry.” Construction Management and Economics, 23(5), 2005, 459–471. Liu, J., Love, P. E., Smith, J., Regan, M., and Palaneeswaran, E. Review of performance measurement: implica- tions for public–private partnerships. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 5(1), 2015, 35–51. Lopez del Puerto, C., Gransberg, D. D., and Loulakis, M. C. Contractual Approaches to Address Geotechnical Uncertainty in Design-Build Projects. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000202, 04516010, 2016. Lopez del Puerto, C., Gransberg, D. D., and Shane, J. S. Comparative Analysis of Owner Goals for Design/Build Projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, 24(1), 2008, 22–29. Loulakis, M. C., Smith, N. C., Brady, D. L., Rayl, R. E., and Gransberg, D. D. Liability of Design-Builders for Design, Construction, and Acquisition Claims, NCHRP Legal Digest 68, Transportation Research Board, National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2015, pp. 127. Miller, J. B., Garvin, M. J., Ibbs, C. W., and Mahoney, S. E. Toward a new paradigm: simultaneous use of multiple project delivery methods. Journal of Management in Engineering, 16(3), 2000, 58–67. Molenaar, K., Harper, C., and Yugar-Arias, I. Guidebook for Selecting Alternative Contracting Methods for Roadway Projects: Project Delivery Methods, Procurement Procedures, and Payment Provisions. University of Colorado, Boulder, Colo., 2014.

Literature Review 59   Neely, A., Gregory, M., and Platts, K. Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 25(12), 2005, 1228–1263. Partnerships Victoria. Partnerships Victoria Requirements. Dept. of Treasury and Finance, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 2016. Touran, A., Gransberg, D. D., Molenaar, K. R., Ghavamifar, K., Mason, D. J., and Fithian, L. A. TCRP Report 131: A Guidebook for the Evaluation of Project Delivery Methods, 2009. Touran, A., Gransberg, D. D., Molenaar, K. R., and Ghavamifar, K. Selection of Project Delivery Method in Transit: Drivers and Objectives. Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, 26(4), 2010. Touran, A., Gransberg, D. D., Molenaar, K. R., and Ghavamifar, K. A Decision Support System for Project Delivery Method Selection in Transit. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2111, 2009, pp. 148–157. Touran, A., Gransberg, D. D., and Molenaar, K. R. A System for Selecting Project Delivery Methods in US Airports. Journal of Airport Management. Airports Council International, 4(4), 2010, 305–314. Wu, J., Liu, J., Jin, X., and Sing, M. C. Government accountability within infrastructure public–private partner- ships. International Journal of Project Management, 34(8), 2016, 1471–1478. Yuan, J., Skibniewski, J., Li, Q., and Zheng, L. “Performance objectives selection model in public–private partner- ship projects based on the perspective of stakeholders.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 26(2), 2009, 89–104. Yuan, J., Wang, C., Skibniewski, M. J., and Li, Q. Developing key performance indicators for public–private partnership projects: questionnaire survey and analysis. Journal of Management in Engineering, 28(3), 2011, 252–264.

Next: Appendix B - Survey Questionnaire »
Performance Metrics for Public–Private Partnerships Get This Book
×
 Performance Metrics for Public–Private Partnerships
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Public–private partnerships (P3) allow public transportation agencies to attract private financing to deliver needed highway infrastructure and not have to wait until the required funding is fully in place via traditional state and federal sources.

The TRB National Cooperative Highway Research Program'sNCHRP Synthesis 563: Performance Metrics for Public–Private Partnerships documents key performance metrics used in various long-term P3 contracts for the delivery of highway projects, including services by Departments of Transportation (DOTs).

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!