Practices for Selecting Pedestrian and Bicycle Projects (2021)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

40 Advocacy Advance. State Revenue Sources that Fund Bicycling and Walking Projects. Washington, D.C., 2014. Biton, A., Daddio, D., and Andrew, J. Statewide Pedestrian and Bicycle Planning Handbook. Report FHWA- HEP-14-035. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2014. Dill, J., Smith, O., and Howe, D. Promotion of Active Transportation Among State Departments of Transpor- tation in the US. Journal of Transport and Health, Vol. 5, 2017, pp. 163–171. FHWA. 2015 Status of the Nation’s Highways, Bridges, and Transit: Conditions and Performance. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2016. FHWA. Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning, Program, and Project Development. U.S. Department of Trans- portation, 2019. FHWA. Bicycle and Pedestrian Obligations: FY 1992 Through 2019. U.S. Department of Transportation. https:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bicycle_pedestrian/funding/obligations.pdf. Accessed Aug. 7, 2020. Gelinne, D., Thomas, L., Lang, K., Zegeer, C., and Goughnour, E. How to Develop a Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Action Plan. Report FHWA-SA-17-050. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2017. Giles-Corti, B., Foster, S., Shilton, T., and Falconer, R. The Co-Benefits for Health of Investing in Active Trans- portation. NSW Public Health Bulletin, Vol. 21, 2010, pp. 122–127. Lagerwey, P., Hintze, M., Elliott, J., Toole, J., and Schneider, R. NCHRP Report 803: Pedestrian and Bicycle Trans- portation Along Existing Roads—ActiveTrans Priority Tool Guidebook. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C., 2015. Litman, T. Evaluating Active Transport Benefits and Costs—Guide to Valuing Walking and Cycling Improvements and Encouragement Programs. Victoria Transportation Policy Institute, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 2019a. Litman, T. Towards More Comprehensive and Multi-Modal Transport Evaluation. Victoria Transportation Policy Institute, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 2019b. Luecke, K., Huber, T., Toole, J., Mongelli, E., Schultheiss, B., Deutsch, H., Flusche, D., et al. Incorporating On-Road Bicycle Networks into Resurfacing Projects. Report FHWA-HEP-16-025. FHWA, U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation, 2016. Massachusetts Department of Transportation. MassDOT Municipal Resources Guide for Walkability. Boston, Mass., 2019. Minnesota Department of Transportation. Minnesota Walks. St. Paul, Minn., 2016. Natarajan, S., Demetsky, M., and Lantz, Jr., K. Framework for Selection and Evaluation of Bicycle and Pedes- trian Safety Projects in Virginia. Report FHWA/VTRC 08-R8. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, Va., 2008. New Jersey Department of Transportation, Division of Local Aid and Economic Development. Program Descrip- tion and Procedures for Bikeway Grant Program. Trenton, N.J., 2018a. New Jersey Department of Transportation, Division of Local Aid and Economic Development. Transportation Alternatives Set-Aside Program Handbook 2018. Trenton, N.J., 2018b. Ohio Department of Transportation, Division of Planning. Safe Routes to School Program 2020 Application Guidance. Columbus, Ohio, 2020. Oregon Department of Transportation. State Pedestrian and Bicycle Funding Programs Manual: 2019–2024. Salem, Ore., 2019. Oregon Department of Transportation. Safe Routes to School Construction Program Guidelines, 2021–2022. Salem, Ore., 2020a. Oregon Department of Transportation. Blueprint for Urban Design, Vol. 1. Salem, Ore., 2020b. Oregon Department of Transportation. Blueprint for Urban Design, Vol. 2. Salem, Ore., 2020c. References

References 41   Semler, C., Vest, A., Kingsley, K., Mah, S., Kittelson, W., Sundstrom, C., and Brookshire, K. Guidebook for Developing Pedestrian and Bicycle Performance Measures. Report FHWA-HEP-16-037. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2016. Skov-Petersen, H., Jacobsen, J. B., Vedel, S. E., Nielson, T., and Rask, S. Effects of Upgrading to Cycle Highways: An Analysis of Demand Induction, Use Patterns and Satisfaction Before and After. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 64, 2017, pp. 203–210. South Dakota Department of Transportation. South Dakota Transportation Alternatives Program Summary and Application Guide. Pierre, S.D., 2020. Texas Department of Transportation. Transportation Alternatives Set-Aside Program/Safe Routes to School 2019 Call for Projects Program Guide. Austin, Tex., 2019. Twaddell, H., Rose, E., Broach, J., Dill, J., Clifton, K., Lust, C., Voros, K., et al. Guidebook for Measuring Multi- modal Network Connectivity. Report FHWA- HEP-18-032. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2018. Utah Department of Transportation. New Transportation Capacity Project Prioritization Process. Salt Lake City, Utah, January 2020. Vermont Agency of Transportation. Vermont Bicycle and Pedestrian Program. Montpelier, Vt. https://vtrans. vermont.gov/highway/local-projects/bike-ped. Accessed May 15, 2020.