SCANNING FOR NEW EVIDENCE ON
RIBOFLAVIN TO SUPPORT A DIETARY
REFERENCE INTAKE REVIEW
Barbara O. Schneeman, Ann L. Yaktine, and Alice Vorosmarti, Editors
Committee on Scanning for New Evidence on Riboflavin to Support a Dietary
Reference Intake Review
Food and Nutrition Board
Health and Medicine Division
A Consensus Study Report of
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
Washington, DC
www.nap.edu
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001
This activity was supported by a contract between the National Academy of Sciences and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (Contract # 59-0204-0-001) and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (Contract # 75F40120P00440). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization or agency that provided support for the project.
International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-67545-1
International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-67545-6
Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.17226/26188
Additional copies of this publication are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu.
Copyright 2021 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America
Suggested citation: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Scanning for new evidence on riboflavin to support a Dietary Reference Intake review. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26188.
The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, nongovernmental institution to advise the nation on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Marcia McNutt is president.
The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineering to advising the nation. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. John L. Anderson is president.
The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on medical and health issues. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished contributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president.
The three Academies work together as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions. The National Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding contributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engineering, and medicine.
Learn more about the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at www.nationalacademies.org.
Consensus Study Articles published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Articles typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each article has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
For information about other products and activities of the National Academies, please visit www.nationalacademies.org/about/whatwedo.
COMMITTEE ON SCANNING FOR NEW EVIDENCE ON RIBOFLAVIN TO SUPPORT A DIETARY REFERENCE INTAKE REVIEW
BARBARA O. SCHNEEMAN (Chair), University of California, Davis
REGAN L. BAILEY, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
PATSY M. BRANNON, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
MARTHA S. FIELD, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
JESSE GREGORY, University of Florida, Gainesville
ALICE H. LICHTENSTEIN, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts
IAN J. SALDANHA, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
Health and Medicine Division Staff
ANN L. YAKTINE, Director, Food and Nutrition Board
ALICE VOROSMARTI, Associate Program Officer
ZARIA FYFFE, Senior Program Assistant
This page intentionally left blank.
REVIEWERS
This Consensus Study Report was reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in making each published report as sound as possible and to ensure that it meets the institutional standards for quality, objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process.
We thank the following individuals for their review of this report:
YVONNE LAMERS, The University of British Columbia
HELENE MCNULTY, Ulster University
JOSHUA W. MILLER, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
PATRICK J. STOVER, Texas A&M University
Although the reviewers listed above provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations of this report nor did they see the final draft before its release. The review of this report was overseen by CATHERINE E. WOTEKI, Iowa State University. She was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with the standards of the National Academies and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content rests entirely with the authoring committee and the National Academies.
This page intentionally left blank.
Contents
2 METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO EVIDENCE SCANNING
4 DISCUSSION AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Approach to the Evidence Scanning Process
D COMMITTEE MEMBER BIOGRAPHIES
___________________
1Appendix E is not printed in this report but is available at https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26188.
This page intentionally left blank.
