National Academies Press: OpenBook

Measuring Poverty: A New Approach (1995)

Chapter: Recommendation

« Previous: Summary
Suggested Citation:"Recommendation." National Research Council. 1995. Measuring Poverty: A New Approach. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4759.
×
Page 352

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

THE POVERTY MEASURE AND AFDC 352 assistance, and these preferences should be given weight in any national policy making. On the other hand, there are equity problems in providing needy families with very different levels of public support on the basis of where they happen to live when their economic problems arise. From this perspective, while the proposed poverty measure (or any standard of need) cannot be used by itself to determine benefit levels, it does have a role to play in the policy debate. DETERMINING STATE AFDC STANDARDS OF NEED In most government assistance programs, the benefit standard (i.e., the maximum amount of benefits provided to people with no other income) and the need standard are one and the same: people who are eligible because their countable income falls below the benefit standard are in turn entitled to receive benefits up to the amount of the standard.10 As noted above, the standard for a particular program reflects judgements about a variety of factors, including appropriate levels of need, constraints on available funds, and the desire to provide positive incentives to recipients. AFDC is unique in that federal legislation requires each state to establish a standard of need for families with children who have no other means of support, and, in a separate process, to determine a payment standard, which may be lower than the need standard.11 Both the need standard and the payment standard restrict eligibility for benefits (see below). Furthermore, states may set a maximum benefit amount that is below both the standard of need and the payment standard. Recommendation One might surmise that the need standard, as distinct from the payment standard or maximum benefit, is supposed to represent a type of poverty concept. In this case, one might want to consider the use of the proposed poverty measure as the standard.12 The use of the proposed measure would reduce the current wide disparity in need standards among the states, while recognizing geographic cost-of-living differences. However, it is not clear that the states have typically interpreted the need standard as a poverty concept. Indeed, the role of the need standard in the AFDC program seems 10 Strictly speaking, this statement applies to cash benefit programs (e.g., SSI, veterans' pensions, etc.). Near-cash programs (e.g., food stamps and assisted housing) have a benefit standard that falls below the eligibility standard because the benefit pertains to a single commodity. 11 See Appendix D for details of the AFDC program. 12 As discussed below, 14 states link their need standard to the current poverty guidelines.

Next: Program Regulations »
Measuring Poverty: A New Approach Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $75.00 Buy Ebook | $59.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Each year's poverty figures are anxiously awaited by policymakers, analysts, and the media. Yet questions are increasing about the 30-year-old measure as social and economic conditions change.

In Measuring Poverty a distinguished panel provides policymakers with an up-to-date evaluation of:

  • Concepts and procedures for deriving the poverty threshold, including adjustments for different family circumstances.
  • Definitions of family resources.
  • Procedures for annual updates of poverty measures.

The volume explores specific issues underlying the poverty measure, analyzes the likely effects of any changes on poverty rates, and discusses the impact on eligibility for public benefits. In supporting its recommendations the panel provides insightful recognition of the political and social dimensions of this key economic indicator.

Measuring Poverty will be important to government officials, policy analysts, statisticians, economists, researchers, and others involved in virtually all poverty and social welfare issues.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!