National Academies Press: OpenBook

Measuring Poverty: A New Approach (1995)

Chapter: The Engel and Iso-Prop Methods

« Previous: Behavioral Scales
Suggested Citation:"The Engel and Iso-Prop Methods." National Research Council. 1995. Measuring Poverty: A New Approach. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4759.
×
Page 170
Suggested Citation:"The Engel and Iso-Prop Methods." National Research Council. 1995. Measuring Poverty: A New Approach. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4759.
×
Page 171

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

ADJUSTING POVERTY THRESHOLDS 170 calibrate the scales, a result that has been formally demonstrated by Pollak and Wales (1979). Although calculating the cost of a change in family size may appear to be analogous to the problem of calculating the money needed to compensate for a price change—something that is routinely done in applied economics—the two problems are not the same. In the case of a price increase, one can observe how much a family consumes and so get a good idea of how much a price increase will cost it. But when a child is added to a family, one does not know how much the child consumes (or how much the parents alter their own consumption accordingly) and so cannot price out its cost. The situation is not quite hopeless. If one can devise a general rule that indicates when households of different compositions are equally well off, one can use it to calculate the scale. The discussion above showed that such a rule cannot be deduced from the data. In principle, postulating such a rule is not very different from picking a set of arbitrary but plausible values to constitute an equivalence scale, but it is easier to propose and defend a single rule than a whole set of scale values. The use of a single principle guarantees that the scale values for different family types are internally consistent, unlike the scale values implicit in the current official poverty thresholds. In the next two subsections, we discuss two different rules for determining when households are equally well off and the procedures for calculating equivalence scale values that are associated with each. (See Table 3-2 for examples of scales developed by these rules.) The Engel and Iso-Prop Methods The most famous of the procedures for determining equivalence scales dates back to the work of Ernst Engel and uses the share of a family budget devoted to food as an indicator of living standards (E. Engel, 1895). Engel's Law, that the share of food expenditure in the budget declines as people become better off, is one of the earliest and most widely confirmed empirical generalizations in economics. It is also true that, at the same level of income or total expenditure, households with more children spend a larger share of their budget on food. Engel went beyond these two empirical facts to assert that the share of food in the budget correctly indicates the standard of living across families of different types. If one accepts this assertion, one has a simple and easily applied rule for detecting which of two families is better off, even when the families have different compositions. If the food share for two families is the same—that is, if they are on the same food "iso-prop" curve—they are equally well off. Hence, all one needs to do to calculate the cost of an additional family member is to calculate how much must be added to the budget to restore the family's food share to its original value. Figure 3-2, which shows the relationship between the food share and family income for two families, illustrates how Engel's procedure works. Line

ADJUSTING POVERTY THRESHOLDS 171 FIGURE 3-2 Engel method for equivalence scales. (See text for discussion.) A is for a two-adult family, and line B is for that family with the addition of a child. Line B is higher at all levels of income: that is, more is spent on food at all income levels. In the original situation, the small family has income y0 and food share w0, which rises to w1 after the addition of the child. According to Engel, this family is restored to its original standard of living when its food share returns to its original value. This would happen if the family's income was increased to y1, or if the family received some compensation equivalent to y1 – y0. The equivalence scale value for a two-adult/one-child family relative to a two-person family is given by the ratio of y1 to y0. In practice, the Engel method would be implemented, not diagrammatically, but by fitting an Engel curve in which food expenditures—or the share of expenditures on food—is linked to income and family characteristics. The estimated equation can then be used to calculate what increase in income is equivalent to an additional family member (of various types), and the equivalence scale values are calculated exactly as above. The example was cast in terms of two parents having their first child, but so long as one is prepared to accept Engel's basic assertion that food shares indicate welfare, the method can

Next: The Rothbarth and Other Methods »
Measuring Poverty: A New Approach Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $75.00 Buy Ebook | $59.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Each year's poverty figures are anxiously awaited by policymakers, analysts, and the media. Yet questions are increasing about the 30-year-old measure as social and economic conditions change.

In Measuring Poverty a distinguished panel provides policymakers with an up-to-date evaluation of

  • Concepts and procedures for deriving the poverty threshold, including adjustments for different family circumstances.
  • Definitions of family resources.
  • Procedures for annual updates of poverty measures.

The volume explores specific issues underlying the poverty measure, analyzes the likely effects of any changes on poverty rates, and discusses the impact on eligibility for public benefits. In supporting its recommendations the panel provides insightful recognition of the political and social dimensions of this key economic indicator.

Measuring Poverty will be important to government officials, policy analysts, statisticians, economists, researchers, and others involved in virtually all poverty and social welfare issues.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!