National Academies Press: OpenBook

Effects of Past Global Change on Life (1995)

Chapter: Biological Reasons for Linkage

« Previous: Paleontological Evidence for Evolutionary Innovation
Suggested Citation:"Biological Reasons for Linkage." National Research Council. 1995. Effects of Past Global Change on Life. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4762.
Page 25
Suggested Citation:"Biological Reasons for Linkage." National Research Council. 1995. Effects of Past Global Change on Life. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4762.
Page 26
Suggested Citation:"Biological Reasons for Linkage." National Research Council. 1995. Effects of Past Global Change on Life. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/4762.
Page 27

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

OXYGEN AND PROTEROZOIC EVOLUTION: AN UPDATE 25 in 2100 Ma shales from Michigan (Han and Runnegar, 1992). Microfossils of probable eukaryotic origin first become widespread in rocks 1800 to 1600 Ma (Figure 1.4A-D), and molecular biomarkers for eukaryotes are similarly known from rocks ≤1760 Ma (Summons and Walter, 1990). Unfortunately, paleobiological documentation of Paleoproterozoic evolutionary change is hampered by a serious problem. At about 1800 Ma the fossil record improves markedly (e.g., Schopf, 1983), so it is not clear that paleontological first appearances necessarily record evolutionary innovations. Paleontological evidence is certainly consistent with a model of linked early Proterozoic environmental and biological evolution, but at the present time, fossils do not provide strong, independent confirmation of such a linkage. Documentation of microfossil assemblages from a number of pre-2100 Ma localities representing diverse paleoenvironments is needed to strengthen or reject the conclusion that fossilizable protists radiated about the time the deposition of iron formations ceased. Biological Reasons for Linkage Bearing in mind the unsatisfactory state of paleontological evidence, let us ask why evolutionary change might have attended the atmospheric transitions of the Paleoproterozoic Era. At oxygen levels less than about 1% PAL (a relatively poorly defined number; see Schopf, 1983), Figure 1.4 A: Probable eukaryotic microfossils from the Mesoproterozoic Roper Group, northern Australia (bar = 50 µm); B: a weakly ornamented protistan cyst from the Neoproterozoic Visingsö Beds, Sweden (bar = 25 µm); C: a vase-shaped protistan microfossil from the Neoproterozoic Elbobreen Formation, Spitsbergen (bar = 50 µm); D: large process-bearing protistan microfossils from the Neoproterozoic Draken Conglomerate Formation, Spitsbergen (bar = 200 µm);, E: Ediacaran metazoan from the White Sea, USSR (bar = 1.5 mm).

OXYGEN AND PROTEROZOIC EVOLUTION: AN UPDATE 26 aerobic metabolism is impossible, and there is limited atmospheric protection against ultraviolet (UV) radiation that destroys DNA (Kasting, 1987). The rate of nitrate production in the atmosphere by lightning may well have been an order of magnitude lower than today (Yung and McElroy, 1979; Levine et al., 1982); however, the difference between the present-day rate of nitrate production (Borucki and Chameides, 1984) and the rate 2500 to 2000 Ma depends on the CO2 pressure in the Paleoproterozoic atmosphere. Kasting (1990) proposed that at a PCO2 of 0.2 atmosphere (atm), the NO production rate in the absence of O2 is only about a factor of two lower than at present. At a CO 2 pressure of 0.02 atm (i.e., 60 PAL), the NO fixation rate would probably be only one-tenth of the present rate. Denitrification was probably more widespread and intense in a low-O2 ocean than in the present ocean. Therefore, NO3- was almost certainly in very short supply prior to 2100 Ma, and biological N2 fixation must have been the principal source of usable nitrogen for primary producers. H2O 2 may have been an important oxidant on the early anoxic Earth (Kasting et al., 1987); it is possible that biochemical defenses against molecules generally regarded as reactive intermediates in oxygen biochemistry evolved before O2 itself became a significant constituent of the atmosphere (McKay and Hartman, 1991). The conditions described in the previous paragraph certainly apply to the biota that existed before the evolution of cyanobacterial photosynthesis. How long such conditions persisted after the advent of oxygenic photosynthesis is unclear. As noted above, the antiquity of oxygenic cyanobacteria is poorly constrained, although it could easily be as great as 3500 Ma, the age of the oldest negligibly metamorphosed sedimentary rocks (Knoll, 1979; Schopf and Packer, 1987). As noted previously, a PO2 of approximately 1 to 2% PAL appears likely for an extended period prior to 2100 Ma (see also Towe, 1990). This is an oxygen level of both biological and environmental significance. At about 1% PAL, aerobic metabolism by single-celled organisms becomes possible, while an effective ozone screen expands the ecological possibilities of life. When PO2 rose to 1 to 2% PAL, aerobic metabolism probably followed quickly in organisms already protected against oxygen toxicity. In particular, bacteria capable of aerobic respiration, with its tremendous energetic advantage over fermentation, probably radiated rapidly (and polyphyletically) from photosynthetic ancestors. Flavin-based oxygen-utilizing pathways evolved in archaebacteria and in amitochondrial eukaryotes. At this O2 level, nitrate production levels in the atmosphere may well have been significantly lower than today's (see above). Nitrogen fixers, therefore, could have retained a considerable advantage in primary production. Ancestral eukaryotes formed endosymbiotic associations with purple bacterial aerobes, gaining the benefits of aerobic respiration. Symbioses with photosynthetic prokaryotes may not have formed concurrently, however. Nitrogen fixation is unknown in plastids and appears to be prohibited (Postgate and Eady, 1988); the reasons for this are not clear, but may involve oxygen toxicity. Although some early algae might have obtained nitrogen heterotrophically, obligately photosynthetic eukaryotes (including all extant megascopic algae) are unlikely to have occurred in the absence of significant quantities of nitrate in the environment. These considerations suggest a different biological focus for the 2100 Ma oxygen event. It is not that fundamentally new metabolisms were made possible, but rather that as oxygen increased to levels above 10% PAL, nitrate availability may well have increased dramatically (see above). Obligately photosynthetic eukaryotes would then have become feasible. With their ability to avoid formation of nutrient-depleted boundary layers adjacent to cells, eukaryotic primary producers would soon have become ecologically important as primary producers. Thus, it is not surprising that 2100 Ma shales contain megascopic algae or that slightly younger rocks contain abundant acritarchs whose morphology and distribution are similar to those of younger eukaryotic phytoplankton. How does this environmental scenario compare with the known phylogeny of eukaryotes? Figure 1.5 shows evolutionary relationships among living eukaryotes as determined by Sogin et al. (1989). At the base of the tree is Giardia, a common pathogen in the digestive system of vertebrates. Biochemically, Giardia shares more features with prokaryotes than any other known eukaryote. Ultrastructurally, however, it is clearly a true eukaryote; it contains a membrane-bounded nucleus, undulipodia (9+2 flagella), and a cytoskeleton (albeit a biochemically very simple one). On the other hand, Giardia has no mitochondria and no well-developed ER or Golgi apparatus. These organisms are heterotrophic, engulfing particulate food (phagocytosis) and absorbing dissolved organic molecules. Food is metabolized by the classic Embden-Meyerhoff pathway of glycolysis. Giardia cells are not capable of classical aerobiosis, but can use oxygen as a terminal acceptor of reducing equivalents. This system uses flavins and iron-sulfur proteins, and does not include cytochromes; it appears that the cells derive little energetic benefit from this reaction (Müller, 1988). The next branches in Figure 1.5 are occupied by the microsporidia, trichomonads, and related protists. Both groups have clearly become specialized as obligate parasites (microsporidians are apparently dependent on an external source of ATP), but they retain features that complement the picture of early eukaryotes developed from Giardia.

OXYGEN AND PROTEROZOIC EVOLUTION: AN UPDATE 27 Figure 1.5 Summary of eukaryotic phylogeny as determined by comparisons of small subunit ribosomal RNA sequences (redrawn as a Hennigian comb from Sogin et al., 1989). Microsporidians have prokaryote-like features of ribosomal organization and lack mitochondria; unlike Giardia they have a well-developed endomembrane system. Trichomonads also lack mitochondria, and free-living species live as aerotolerant anaerobic heterotrophs (Margulis et al., 1989). Some contain small organelles called hydrogenosomes, which are thought to be anaerobic equivalents of mitochondria. Others harbor intracellular bacterial symbionts that confer specific metabolic capabilities such as cellulose catabolism (Müller, 1988). To date, RNA sequence data are available for relatively few protists, and it is entirely possible that organisms will be recognized that branch even earlier than Giardia. Nonetheless, the significant features shared by Giardia, microsporidians, and trichomonads suggest that these organisms can provide important clues to the nature of the earliest eukaryotes. They appear to have been anaerobic but aerotolerant heterotrophs, motile (using typically eukaryotic undulipodia), and endowed with a cytoskeleton and membrane system capable of endocytosis. Whether or not the first eukaryotes could have lived in the essentially O2-free environments in which life began is uncertain. Giardia is unable to synthesize most of its lipids and so must incorporate lipids from its environment (Jarroll et al., 1989). The growth environment of modern Giardia is the small intestine of vertebrate hosts, and the lipids taken up from this environment include sterols. This raises an important issue, because sterol synthesis requires molecular oxygen at concentrations of ca. ≥0.2% PAL (Chapman and Schopf, 1983). If sterol synthesis is a primitive feature of eukaryotes subsequently lost by Giardia, the eukaryotic cell could not have arisen until at least low levels of oxygen had accumulated in the atmosphere. This requires that the origin of cyanobacteria predate the divergence of eukaryotes, a scenario of rapid early diversification consistent with recent phylogenies that root the universal tree between the eubacteria and an archaebacterial/eukaryote clade (Iwabe et al., 1989; Woese et al., 1990), but not with those in which all three kingdoms are viewed as diverging from a simple common ancestor (Woese, 1987). Alternatively, sterol synthesis could be a later innovation of eukaryotes, with sterol incorporation by Giardia being a relatively recent phenomenon, perhaps related to its specialized habitat. The important point is that regardless of the phylogeny preferred, organisms such as Giardia and trichomonads could have existed in Archean environments containing significantly less than 1 to 2% PAL PO2. As PO2 rose to the 1 to 2% PAL level, their aerotolerance and ability to phagocytize and maintain intracellular symbionts would have positioned them well for continued evolution. All branches above the level of trichomonads are occupied principally by mitochondria-containing organisms. The kinetoplastids include both free-living bacteriophagous forms and obligate parasites (the notorious trypanosomes).

Next: Paleontological Data »
Effects of Past Global Change on Life Get This Book
Buy Hardback | $65.00 Buy Ebook | $49.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

What can we expect as global change progresses? Will there be thresholds that trigger sudden shifts in environmental conditions—or that cause catastrophic destruction of life?

Effects of Past Global Change on Life explores what earth scientists are learning about the impact of large-scale environmental changes on ancient life—and how these findings may help us resolve today's environmental controversies.

Leading authorities discuss historical climate trends and what can be learned from the mass extinctions and other critical periods about the rise and fall of plant and animal species in response to global change. The volume develops a picture of how environmental change has closed some evolutionary doors while opening others—including profound effects on the early members of the human family.

An expert panel offers specific recommendations on expanding research and improving investigative tools—and targets historical periods and geological and biological patterns with the most promise of shedding light on future developments.

This readable and informative book will be of special interest to professionals in the earth sciences and the environmental community as well as concerned policymakers.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook,'s online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!