National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: IV Congressional Oversight and Regulatory Initiatives
Suggested Citation:"V Postscript." Institute of Medicine. 1996. Blood Banking and Regulation: Procedures, Problems, and Alternatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5310.
×

V
Postscript

Suggested Citation:"V Postscript." Institute of Medicine. 1996. Blood Banking and Regulation: Procedures, Problems, and Alternatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5310.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"V Postscript." Institute of Medicine. 1996. Blood Banking and Regulation: Procedures, Problems, and Alternatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5310.
×

Investing in Regulatory Quality

Edward A. Dauer

What we have been exploring in our analysis of blood services regulation and its alternatives may be nothing less than good manufacturing practices for the law itself. What are the specifications of a good process for creating regulation and the procedures for ensuring compliance?

REQUISITES OF REGULATORY PROCEDURES

Predictability is certainly one of the requisites. There is also the challenge of matching the process to the problem in each of two dimensions. One is the dimension of effectiveness; the other is the dimension of efficiency. The procedure itself not only must work but it also must work better than any alternative in terms of its benefits and its costs.

On the one hand it has been argued that any good process must maintain science-based decision-making. On the other hand, it is stubbornly true that some of the necessary science will always be missing. It is not always possible to determine causation unambiguously, to ''prove" that something is or is not in fact transmissible by blood. Under those circumstances, a good process may be one that is not frozen in place by the uncertainties and that does not allow uncertainty always to play the trump suit over other values such as public perception, morality, ethics, and economic welfare and the fact that every cost incurred in one endeavor inflicts additional risks somewhere else.

In addition, a good process would be one that minimizes disincentives and other adverse effects. It would not, for example, discourage innovation. It would not require that attention be paid to the method of compliance, as much as to the objectives of compliance.

Suggested Citation:"V Postscript." Institute of Medicine. 1996. Blood Banking and Regulation: Procedures, Problems, and Alternatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5310.
×

PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS

A good process would be politically acceptable. It would have appropriate accountability and would achieve legislative goals in obvious ways.

In addition, leadership must listen and hear the articulated needs of the constituency. The constituency for many of these problems is the public. One of the needs of the public is their concern about the safety of the blood supply, and so a good process must in an irreducible way respond to that as well.

Could there be, however, a regulatory process that not only responds to the public's concerns about safety but that itself promotes the public's appreciation of the safety of the blood supply? People respond to risks in ways different from the ways in which medical science responds to risk; it is a challenge for us to take that into account. How can the public be brought to recognize the realities of safety so that in fact the decisions that are partly science-based, partly value-based, and partly economics-based can be the right decisions to be reached at the end of the day, not distorted by the politics of misperception and misinformation? This is the regulatory challenge.

What combination of private and public systems will accomplish these things? That is as difficult a question for those who dwell in the law side of the house as the medical issues about antigen testing and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease are for those who live in the medical side. We do not have unambiguous answers either. Our knowledge about alternative procedures is itself indeterminate. For that reason, among others, the notion of a pilot project makes good sense.

It seems clear that some investment of time, energy, and thoughtfulness about these regulatory issues will pay a considerable dividend. After all, the regulatory process is the infrastructure within which all of these other problems come to rest. Government is art, and if the metaphor may be expanded, it is difficult to create a free sculpture with a mean tool. Without an investment in the quality of the decision-making process itself, the odds of sculpting good decisions are not nearly as good as they might be.

Suggested Citation:"V Postscript." Institute of Medicine. 1996. Blood Banking and Regulation: Procedures, Problems, and Alternatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5310.
×
Page 103
Suggested Citation:"V Postscript." Institute of Medicine. 1996. Blood Banking and Regulation: Procedures, Problems, and Alternatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5310.
×
Page 104
Suggested Citation:"V Postscript." Institute of Medicine. 1996. Blood Banking and Regulation: Procedures, Problems, and Alternatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5310.
×
Page 105
Suggested Citation:"V Postscript." Institute of Medicine. 1996. Blood Banking and Regulation: Procedures, Problems, and Alternatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5310.
×
Page 106
Next: Appendixes »
Blood Banking and Regulation: Procedures, Problems, and Alternatives Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $46.00 Buy Ebook | $36.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

This volume examines regulatory and policymaking procedures in blood banking, regulatory enforcement and compliance, innovations and alternatives in regulation, congressional oversight and regulatory initiatives, and investment in regulatory quality.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!