References
Alexander, L. , and H. James . 1987 The Nation's Report Card. Washington, D.C. : National Academy of Education .
1991 America 2000: Excellence in Education Act.
Forgione, Jr., P.D. 1996Memorandum to Mark Musick on NCES's Review of NAGB Redesign Paper. July 1, 1996 .
Forsyth, R. , R. Hambleton , R. Linn , R. Mislevy , and W. Yen . 1996 Design/Feasibility Team Report to the National Assessment Governing Board. Washington, D.C. : National Assessment Governing Board .
Glaser, R. , R. Linn , and G. Bohrnstedt . 1996 Letter to Roy Truby on the future of NAEP . February 23, 1996 ,
Glaser, R. , K. Raghavan , and G. Baxter . 1992 Cognitive Theory as the Basis for Design of Innovative Assessment: Design Characteristics of Science Assessments.CSE Technical Report No. 349 . Los Angeles : University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing .
Gifford, B. , and M. O'Connor , eds. 1992 Changing Assessments: Alternative Views of Aptitude, Achievement, and Instruction. Boston, Mass. : Kluwer Academic Publishers .
Johnson, S.T. 1996 Letter to Ray Fields on behalf of the Design and Analyses Committee . June 19, 1996 .
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP and Mathtech, Inc. 1996 A Review of the National Assessment of Educational Progress: Management and Methodological Procedures. Washington, D.C. : U.S. Department of Education .
Messick, S. , A. Beaton , and F. Lord . 1983 National Assessment of Educational Progress Reconsidered: A New Design for a New Era. Princeton, N.J. : Educational Testing Service .
National Academy of Education 1993 Setting Performance Standards for Student Assessment. Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University, National Academy of Education .
1996 Quality and Utility: The 1994 Trial State Assessment in Reading. Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University, National Academy of Education .
in press Capstone Report of the National Academy of Education Panel on the Evaluation of NAEP. Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University, National Academy of Education .
National Assessment Governing Board 1996 Redesigning the National Assessment of Educational Progress: Draft for Public Comment (May 1996) . Washington, D.C. : National Assessment Governing Board .
no date The National Assessment of Educational Progress: Demands, Realities and Assumptions.Work Group on Planning . Washington, D.C. : National Assessment Governing Board .
National Center for Education Statistics 1974 NAEP General Information Yearbook. Washington, D.C. : U.S. Department of Education .
no date NAEP Validation Studies for 1996 . Unpublished paper . U.S. Department of Education .
National Commission on Excellence in Education 1983 A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform. Washington, D.C. : U.S. Government Printing Office .
Porter, A. , and S. Kilgore . 1996 Letters to Mr. William Randall on behalf of the Advisory Council on Education Statistics . April 23, 1996 ; June 27, 1996 .
Tyler, R. 1966 The development of instruments for assessing educational progress . Pp. 95-101 in Proceedings of the 1965 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems. Princeton, N.J. : Educational Testing Service .
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment 1992 Testing in American Schools: Asking the Right Questions. Washington D.C. : U.S. Government Printing Office .
U.S. General Accounting Office 1992 National Assessment Technical Quality.GAO/ PEMD-92-22R . Washington, D.C. : U.S. General Accounting Office .
1993 Educational Achievement Standards: NAGB's Approach Yields Misleading Interpretations.GAO/ PEMD-93-12, June 1993 . Washington, D.C. : U.S. General Accounting Office .
Wittrock, M. , and E. Baker , eds. 1991 Testing and Cognition. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. : Prentice Hall .
