National Academies Press: OpenBook

Global Health in Transition: A Synthesis: Perspectives from International Organizations (1996)

Chapter: I: The Documents Reviewed: An Analysis--Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries

« Previous: Introduction
Suggested Citation:"I: The Documents Reviewed: An Analysis--Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries." Institute of Medicine. 1996. Global Health in Transition: A Synthesis: Perspectives from International Organizations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5513.
×

I

The Documents Reviewed: An Analysis

Suggested Citation:"I: The Documents Reviewed: An Analysis--Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries." Institute of Medicine. 1996. Global Health in Transition: A Synthesis: Perspectives from International Organizations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5513.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"I: The Documents Reviewed: An Analysis--Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries." Institute of Medicine. 1996. Global Health in Transition: A Synthesis: Perspectives from International Organizations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5513.
×

Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries

Jamison, DT, WH Mosley, AR Measham, and JL Bobadilla, eds. 1993. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. New York: Oxford University Press. The core of this collection is a set of analyses undertaken for the World Bank's Health Sector Priorities Review. Its impetus was recognition of the lack of analytic approaches developing countries might take in dealing with the implications of the health transition and the emergence of behavioral risk factors and noncommunicable diseases as significant problems. Each chapter assesses the current and probable future public health significance of over 100 individual diseases or related clusters of diseases in the developing world. It then assesses the cost and effectiveness of alternative interventions for preventing each condition and managing it clinically in different contexts by using the Disability-Adjusted Life Year as a measure. Each chapter also includes an extensive bibliography. The authorship of the collection reflects a balance among economists, epidemiologists, clinicians, and biomedical scientistsover 80 in alldrawn from the international academic and technical communities.

OBJECTIVES
  • To assess the current and probable future public health significance of the burden of disease in developing countries as those countries experience demographic and epidemiologic transitions.

  • To take stock, in a systematic disease-by-disease manner, of the cost-effectiveness of alternative responses to those conditions in various socioeconomic, demographic, and epidemiologic contexts.

CONCLUSIONS
  • The net effects of demographic and epidemiologic transition and

Suggested Citation:"I: The Documents Reviewed: An Analysis--Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries." Institute of Medicine. 1996. Global Health in Transition: A Synthesis: Perspectives from International Organizations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5513.
×

socioeconomic change will be unprecedented increases in the volume, diversity, range, and complexity of problems developing country health systems will face in the next decades. The “unfinished agenda” of communicable disease, malnutrition, and unwanted fertility among the most vulnerable groups will persist, along with an “emerging agenda” of new health risks, noncommunicable diseases, injury, and disability in an ever-greater proportion of the population.

  • The total burden of disease, measured by days lost to acute disease episodes, chronic disabilities, and premature death (Disability-Adjusted Life Years), will grow. Demand for health services, especially by more urbanized, educated, affluent, and vocal populations, will also grow, at the same time that access to health resources for the most vulnerable populations will need to be strengthened and preserved.

  • This means that the range of health services will have to expand correspondingly, since new provider skills, technologies, and organizational arrangements will be required for even minimum standards of care. The needs of these new sectors, as well as the higher health maintenance costs for older cohorts, will require rising percentages of gross national product, at the same time that austerity will continue to dominate the economies of most countries. Health systems will be challenged to mount a broader range of preventive measures and to develop very low cost protocols for managing increasing numbers of cases.

  • Though marginal cost-effectiveness varies widely, many interventions are attractive by any reasonable economic standard. A major challenge will be to use them, optimally grouped into efficient basic packages of prevention and essential clinical services. Although core sets of preventive and clinical interventions would seem appropriate to the needs of most countries, they will have to be defined and targeted to account for local epidemiologic variability and financial capacities.

  • Primary prevention or public health interventions are not inherently more cost-effective than the clinical strategies that are suggested, none of which requires more specialized facilities than those available at a reasonably well-equipped, well-organized district hospital. Although some components of an individual package are simple technologies, their recombination, reassignment to different delivery levels, and proper functioning will require new standards of care and provider skills. This will be especially crucial for those diseases that carry particularly large burdens of death and disability.

  • The full range of policy tools available to governmentsfor example, regulatory interventions or taxes to promote public health and

Suggested Citation:"I: The Documents Reviewed: An Analysis--Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries." Institute of Medicine. 1996. Global Health in Transition: A Synthesis: Perspectives from International Organizations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5513.
×

raise revenue;is underused. The economics of investment in research, its transportability, and the existence of substantial research capacity in donor countries make research a most viable domain for foreign aid, yet the current volume of resources going into research is quite limited and virtually ignores issues that will dominate the policy agenda in years to come. Vaccine development, which offers the means of preventing a broader range of conditions with greater cost-effectiveness and less logistical complexity than many other preventive interventions, receives relatively little support.

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POLICY AND ACTION
  • As their central task, national governments should explore, develop, and apply the following:

    1. A full range of policy instruments;legislation, regulation, taxes, subsidies, investment research;

    2. Goal-oriented, comprehensive, integrated strategies mixing preventive and clinical interventions, continuing education for providers, and technology assessment and control; and

    3. Analytic skills in demographic and economic analysis, epidemiologic surveillance, health technology assessment, and input-output-outcome interactions.

  • The central tasks for countries providing development assistance are to help do the following:

    1. Improve health services delivery by

      • continuing emphasis on immunization and family planning and increasing selectivity in delivery of oral rehydration therapy and tuberculosis vaccine (BCG) in low-risk environments;

      • enhancing emphasis on measles immunization, case management of acute respiratory infection, control of vitamin A deficiency, tuberculosis chemotherapy, anti-helminthic prophylaxis, control of sexually transmitted diseases, and control of cancer pain;

      • strengthening capacity for drug logistics to support system priorities, provider training to manage priority procedures, and delivery of inexpensive rehabilitative services; and

      • reducing support for hospital facilities and shifting emphasis away from general institutional development and toward strengthening specific capacities.

Suggested Citation:"I: The Documents Reviewed: An Analysis--Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries." Institute of Medicine. 1996. Global Health in Transition: A Synthesis: Perspectives from International Organizations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5513.
×
  1. Improve the policy environment by

    • applying a full range of mechanisms to limit tobacco use;

    • tracking and reducing use of procedures that are of low cost-effectiveness;

    • reducing occupational and transport injuries, including control of alcohol use;

    • strengthening the capacity to develop policy instruments for sustainable allocations to the health sector; and

    • formulating and implementing policies involving taxation, regulation, and communication.

  2. Increase allocation of resources to research for

    • exemplary programs of essential national health research;

    • epidemiologic and operational research on cardiovascular and other noncommunicable diseases, sexually transmitted diseases, mental and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorders, and injury;

    • assessment of intervention cost-effectiveness in different environments;

    • vaccine development;

    • strengthening national and international capacities to address these research emphases; and

    • monitoring epidemiologic trends and the efficacy of intervention in well-documented populations.

COMMENTARY

This comprehensive collection of concepts, methods, and strategies for addressing the major health problems of the developing world advances the global capacity for management or control of those problems in two crucial ways. Its methods for measuring disease burdens and intervention cost-effectiveness provide a basis for priority setting, and thereby support policy formulation and resource allocation, as well as epidemiologic and health care guidance for managing these diseases. A major question remains: how to facilitate the absorption and application of these important findings and strategies into developing country settings.

Stated somewhat differently, although each disease problem is well analyzed, with appropriate advice for disease control and case management, there is still the substantial challenge of how to develop health systems that can encompass interventions for large clusters of such problems. In the 1960s and 1970s, the search was on for models

Suggested Citation:"I: The Documents Reviewed: An Analysis--Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries." Institute of Medicine. 1996. Global Health in Transition: A Synthesis: Perspectives from International Organizations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5513.
×

of primary health care that were effective and affordable in settings of poverty and remoteness in developing countries. Some were found and served as the basis for strengthening health systems in a variety of settings. Now, new models are needed that, first, go beyond primary health care, to more comprehensive approaches in which primary and secondary care are effectively and efficiently joined to address emerging epidemiologic diversity, and, second, can act as policy generators for system development and change.

In material that follows, we will call attention to the usefulness of models and their limitations as universal solutions on the basis of the fact that each country is unique. Modeling remains important, but in a context in which each country is helped to build capacity to assess its own needs, reform its own policies, and adapt models to its own situation.

Thus, the new capacities required to advance health would build on the methods and strategies presented in this volume and would include construction of health care prototypes at the district level to handle changing epidemiology, relevant health research, human resources development, and related policy making and implementation. The metric described here and in the World Development Report for determining burdens of disease and the cost-effectiveness of interventions provides a basis for priority setting and related policy formulation, assuming that capacities exist at the country level for their adaptation and application.

Suggested Citation:"I: The Documents Reviewed: An Analysis--Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries." Institute of Medicine. 1996. Global Health in Transition: A Synthesis: Perspectives from International Organizations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5513.
×
Page 7
Suggested Citation:"I: The Documents Reviewed: An Analysis--Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries." Institute of Medicine. 1996. Global Health in Transition: A Synthesis: Perspectives from International Organizations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5513.
×
Page 8
Suggested Citation:"I: The Documents Reviewed: An Analysis--Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries." Institute of Medicine. 1996. Global Health in Transition: A Synthesis: Perspectives from International Organizations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5513.
×
Page 9
Suggested Citation:"I: The Documents Reviewed: An Analysis--Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries." Institute of Medicine. 1996. Global Health in Transition: A Synthesis: Perspectives from International Organizations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5513.
×
Page 10
Suggested Citation:"I: The Documents Reviewed: An Analysis--Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries." Institute of Medicine. 1996. Global Health in Transition: A Synthesis: Perspectives from International Organizations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5513.
×
Page 11
Suggested Citation:"I: The Documents Reviewed: An Analysis--Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries." Institute of Medicine. 1996. Global Health in Transition: A Synthesis: Perspectives from International Organizations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5513.
×
Page 12
Suggested Citation:"I: The Documents Reviewed: An Analysis--Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries." Institute of Medicine. 1996. Global Health in Transition: A Synthesis: Perspectives from International Organizations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5513.
×
Page 13
Next: World Development Report 1993: Investing in Health »
Global Health in Transition: A Synthesis: Perspectives from International Organizations Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $49.00 Buy Ebook | $39.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

For many reasons, this decade is a time of rethinking many things. There is the impending turn of the millenium, an event packed with meaning. There is recent political history, which has changed the global structure of power in ways few could foresee, and there is an economic fluidity worldwide that makes every day unpredictable and the future uncertain. There are movements of people and surges of violence that seem unparalleled, and well may be. We are awash in change, and people everywhere are trying to understand that and read its implications. It is a time that provokes soul-searching: backward, into the lessons and achievements of the past, and forward, into ways for the future to be better.

The fields of health and social development are no exception. More specifically, events and conditions in the health sector point to the need to rethink some large issues. Nations everywhere are grappling with the economic and ethical dilemmas of achieving and maintaining healthy populations, since these are both cause and consequence of true development. Increasingly, the thinking is global, because there are comparisons to be learned from, connections that have implications, obligations to fulfill, and costs that are somehow shared.

As part of this dynamic, there has been an explosion of analytic documents, published since the start of this decade, that deal mainly, though not exclusively, with health in developing countries. The purpose of Global Health in Transition is to distill the essential elements from those efforts, discuss the major ideas they share and the thoughts they prompt, ask what those might mean for a next agenda in global health, and comment on the shifting context in which our current concepts of the ideal will proveor not provetheir adequacy for the future.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!