National Academies Press: OpenBook
Suggested Citation:"FRONT MATTER." National Research Council. 1997. A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5519.
×

A REVIEW OF THE RADIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTS CORPORATION'S FERNALD DOSE RECONSTRUCTION REPORT

Committee on an Assessment of CDC Radiation Studies

Board on Radiation Effects Research

Commission on Life Sciences

National Research Council

NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS
Washington, DC
1997

Suggested Citation:"FRONT MATTER." National Research Council. 1997. A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5519.
×

NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS
2101 CONSTITUTION AVENUE, NW, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20418

The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard to appropriate balance.

This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors according to procedures approved by a Report Review Committee consisting of members of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine.

This report was prepared under contract 200-95-0965 between the National Academy of Sciences and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

International Standard Book Number 0-309-05677-2

Additional copies of this report are available from

National Research Council

Board on Radiation Effects Research

Room 342

2101 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20418

202 334-2232

Copyright 1997 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Printed in the United States of America

Suggested Citation:"FRONT MATTER." National Research Council. 1997. A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5519.
×

COMMITTEE ON AN ASSESSMENT OF CDC RADIATION STUDIES

WILLIAM J. SCHULL

(Chairman),

University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas

STEPHAN A. BENJAMIN,

Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

ANDRÉ BOUVILLE,

National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland

PATRICIA A.H. BUFFLER,

University of California, Berkeley, California

GEOFFREY G. EICHHOLZ,

Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia

J. CHARLES JENNETT,

Texas A&M International University, Laredo, Texas

LEEKA I. KHEIFETS,

Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California

JAMES E. MARTIN,

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

CHRISTOPHER B. NELSON,

US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

HENRY D. ROYAL,

Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, Missouri

ROY E. SHORE,

New York University Medical Center, New York, New York

ROBERG G. THOMAS,

Bigfork, Montana

HENRY N. WAGNER JR.,

The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutes, Baltimore, Maryland

JAMES M. WALL,

The Christian Century, Chicago, Illinois

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL STAFF

EVAN B. DOUPLE,

Study Director

JOHN D. ZIMBRICK,

Director,

Board on Radiation Effects Research

DORIS E. TAYLOR,

Staff Assistant

NORMAN GROSSBLATT,

Editor

SPONSOR'S PROJECT OFFICER

JAMES M. SMITH,

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia

Suggested Citation:"FRONT MATTER." National Research Council. 1997. A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5519.
×

BOARD ON RADIATION EFFECTS RESEARCH

JOHN B. LITTLE

(Chairman),

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

MERRIL EISENBUD,

New York University Medical Center, New York, New York (emeritus)

MAURICE S. FOX,

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts

R.J. MICHAEL FRY,

Radiation Research, Oak Ridge, Tennessee

PHILIP HANAWALT,

Stanford University, Stanford, California

MAUREEN M. HENDERSON,

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

JONATHAN M. SAMET,

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

WILLIAM J. SCHULL,

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas

SUSAN W. WALLACE,

University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont

H. RODNEY WITHERS,

UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL

JOHN D. ZIMBRICK,

Director

EVAN B. DOUPLE,

Senior Program Officer

LARRY H. TOBUREN,

Senior Program Officer

(Department of Physics, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina)

CATHERINE S. BERKLEY,

Administrative Associate

DORIS E. TAYLOR,

Staff Assistant

Suggested Citation:"FRONT MATTER." National Research Council. 1997. A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5519.
×

COMMISSION ON LIFE SCIENCES

THOMAS D. POLLARD

(Chairman),

Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California

FREDERICK R. ANDERSON,

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, Washington, DC

JOHN C. BAILAR III,

University of Chicago, Illinois

PAUL BERG,

Stanford University, Stanford, California

JOHN E. BURRIS,

Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts

SHARON L. DUNWOODY,

University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin California, Riverside, California

GLENN A. CROSBY,

Washington State University, Pullman, Washington

URSULA W. GOODENOUGH,

Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri

HENRY W. HEIKKINEN,

University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, Colorado

HANS J. KENDE,

Michican State University, East Lansing, Michigan

SUSAN E. LEEMAN,

Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts

THOMAS E. LOVEJOY,

Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC

DONALD R. MATTISON,

Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

JOSEPH E. MURRAY,

Wellesley Hills, Massachusetts

EDWARD E. PENHOET,

Chiron Corporation, Emeryville, California

EMIL A. PFITZER,

Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc., Hackensack, New Jersey

MALCOLM C. PIKE,

Norris/USC Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California

HENRY C. PITOT III,

McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin

JONATHAN M. SAMET,

The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

CHARLES F. STEVENS,

The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California

JOHN L. VANDEBERG,

Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research, San Antonio, Texas

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL STAFF

PAUL GILMAN,

Executive Director

ALVIN L. LAZEN,

Associate Executive Director

SOLVEIG M. PADILLA,

Administrative Assistant

Suggested Citation:"FRONT MATTER." National Research Council. 1997. A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5519.
×

The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts is president of the National Academy of Sciences.

The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. William A. Wulf is interim president of the National Academy of Engineering.

The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Kenneth I. Shine is president of the Institute.

The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy's purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts and Dr. William A. Wulf are chairman and interim vice chairman, respectively, of the National Research Council.

Suggested Citation:"FRONT MATTER." National Research Council. 1997. A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5519.
×

PREFACE

The first specific task requested by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of the National Research Council's Committee on an Assessment of CDC Radiation Studies was a review of draft reports prepared by the Radiological Assessments Corporation (RAC) pertaining to its efforts to reconstruct environmental doses of radionuclides in the vicinity of the Fernald, Ohio, nuclear facility, the Feed Materials Production Center (FMPC). The facility, some 15 miles northwest of Cincinnati, began operation in 1951 and continued production activities through 1988. (It is now called the Fernald Environmental Management Project, or FEMP.) FMPC converted uranium feed materials (uranium concentrates, uranium compounds recycled from various stages of nuclear-weapons production, and some uranium ores) to uranium metal ingots for machining or extrusion in tubular form. Although uranium processing was the primary activity at FMPC, smaller amounts of thorium were processed intermittently during the middle 1950s and in 1964-1980, and some recycled uranium feed materials were processed beginning in late 1963. These activities and the storage of waste production materials containing radionuclides in silos at the facility led to the release of substantial amounts of uranium dust and radon gas into the environment. The releases raised the possibility of detrimental health effects in people living in the vicinity of the facility.

The primary purpose of RAC's Fernald Dose-Reconstruction Project was to estimate the radiation doses received by members of the public who lived near FMPC between 1950 and 1989. RAC approached its charge through a series of 6 tasks: (1) identifying the release points on the Fernald site; (2) developing the source terms, that is, the quantity, chemical and physical form, and time course of contaminants released to the environment from the facility; (3) identifying the uncertainties or level of confidence in the assessment of the source term; (4) developing environmental transport and dose calculations; (5) identifying and compiling environmental and other data to verify the transport and dose calculations; and (6) presenting the final doses and health risks with their attending uncertainties. Each task culminated in an interim report that was reviewed by the committee. The first interim reports to be reviewed were on radionuclide source terms (task 2) and uncertainties (task 3) for 1960-1962; the committee's review, Dose

Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"FRONT MATTER." National Research Council. 1997. A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5519.
×

Reconstruction for the Fernald Nuclear Facility, was published in 1992. Next, the committee was asked to review the report of task 4, to develop methods that could be used to translate the release estimates into concentrations of radioactive materials in the residential environment. The committee's review of those methods, Dose Reconstruction for the Fernald Nuclear Facility: A Review of Task 4, was published in 1994. In 1995, the committee submitted a letter report to CDC in response to a request for advice on the methods and future directions of the Fernald project and on their appropriateness and scientific soundness. In that letter, the committee reported its findings and commented on 6 issues for which CDC requested further clarification. The committee endorsed the overall approach being used by RAC in the dose-reconstruction project, judged that the project was generally headed in the right direction, and commended RAC for its thoroughness in addressing all issues carefully, soundly, and persuasively.

RAC's draft report, Task 6: Radiation Doses and Risk to Residents from FMPC Operations from 1951-1988, was released in 2 volumes on August 22, 1996. Volume I summarizes the major releases of radionuclides, including releases to the atmosphere, surface water, and groundwater; discusses transport of radionuclides in air and in water; compares environmental measurements with predictions; and estimates the doses received by the public from FMPC releases, the health effects of the estimated doses, and the lifetime risks of cancer associated with each of 9 exposure scenarios. Volume II sets forth in technical detail the methods used in assessing doses and includes 20 appendixes that provide information on the data that were used, the analytic models and methods, and the assumptions inherent in the computations. The present report consists of the committee's review and assessment of those volumes.

The committee members wish to thank the members of the RAC team who briefed the committee on the contents of the reports and answered questions regarding the approaches and methods used in the study. Specifically, RAC president John E. Till and contributing authors Susan K. Rope, Duane W. Schmidt, and Warren K. Sinclair made presentations to the committee. The committee members also wish to express thanks to Doris E. Taylor for her assistance in the preparation of this report and for her administrative assistance.

William J. Schull

Chairman

Suggested Citation:"FRONT MATTER." National Research Council. 1997. A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5519.
×
Suggested Citation:"FRONT MATTER." National Research Council. 1997. A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5519.
×

There was a problem loading page R10.

Suggested Citation:"FRONT MATTER." National Research Council. 1997. A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5519.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"FRONT MATTER." National Research Council. 1997. A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5519.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"FRONT MATTER." National Research Council. 1997. A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5519.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"FRONT MATTER." National Research Council. 1997. A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5519.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"FRONT MATTER." National Research Council. 1997. A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5519.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"FRONT MATTER." National Research Council. 1997. A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5519.
×
Page R6
Suggested Citation:"FRONT MATTER." National Research Council. 1997. A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5519.
×
Page R7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"FRONT MATTER." National Research Council. 1997. A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5519.
×
Page R8
Suggested Citation:"FRONT MATTER." National Research Council. 1997. A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5519.
×
Page R9
Suggested Citation:"FRONT MATTER." National Research Council. 1997. A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5519.
×
Page R10
Next: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY »
A Review of the Radiological Assessments Corporation's Fernald Dose Reconstruction Report Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $47.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!