National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Lethal Effects (LCt50)
Suggested Citation:"ECt50 for Threshold Effects." National Research Council. 1997. Review of Acute Human-Toxicity Estimates for Selected Chemical-Warfare Agents. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5825.
×
Page 36

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

REVIEW OF ACUTE HUMAN-TOXICITY ESTIMATES FOR GD (SOMAN) 36 min. There is no existing LCt50 estimate for exposures to percutaneous vapor (CDEPAT 1994). No human data on GD are available for this effect. LCt50 values derived from studies in monkeys range from 1,750 to 28,000 mg-min/m3 (Cresthull 1957). Because data on the effects of percutaneous exposure to GD vapor are extremely limited and are insufficient for developing human-toxicity estimates, CDEPAT recommended that estimates for GD be based on toxicity information on GB, assuming that GD is 4 times more potent than GB. This assumption is supported by empirical evidence in dogs and rabbits, showing that the percutaneous potency of GD vapor is at least 2 times and maybe 5 times that of GB (Van de Wal and Zeffert 1970). The subcommittee concludes that the approach used by CDEPAT to estimate the LCt50 of GD is scientifically valid and defensible, because (1) GD and GB belong to the same class of chemicals (organophosphates) and are structurally similar, and (2) animal data support the assumption that GD is 4 times more potent than GB. On the basis of the available data, the subcommittee concludes that the CDEPAT's LCt50 estimate of 2,500 mg-min/m3 is scientifically valid. ECt50 for Threshold Effects CDEPAT's proposed estimate for the ECt50 for threshold (minimal) effects after percutaneous exposure to GD vapor is 300 mg-min/m3, assuming light clothing, exposure durations of 30 to 50 min, and moderate temperatures. There is no existing toxicity estimate for threshold effects from exposure to percutaneous vapor (CDEPAT 1994). No human data are available to estimate this effect level. In deriving the ECt50 for threshold effects, CDEPAT assumed that GD vapor is 4 times more potent than GB vapor (CDEPAT 1994). This assumption was based on a report (Cullumbine et al. 1954) showing that the LCt 50 for GD was 4 times lower than GB. However, CDEPAT has a low degree of confidence in this estimate because of insufficient data. The subcommittee agrees with CDEPAT's approach of basing the ECt50 estimate for GD on toxicity data from GB and assuming that GD is 4 times more potent than GB. The subcommittee also agrees with CDEPAT that the confidence in the ECt50 estimate is low to moderate because of sparse data on both compounds. The subcommittee recommends that CDEPAT's proposed estimate of 300 mg-min/m3 serve as an interim value

Next: ECt50 for Severe Effects »
Review of Acute Human-Toxicity Estimates for Selected Chemical-Warfare Agents Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $50.00 Buy Ebook | $39.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

No reliable acute-exposure1 standards have been established for the particular purpose of protecting soldiers from toxic exposures to chemical warfare (CW) agents. Some human-toxicity estimates are available for the most common CW agents--organophosphorus nerve agents and vesicants; however, most of those estimates were developed for offensive purposes (that is, to kill or incapacitate the enemy) and were intended to be interim values only. Because of the possibility of a chemical attack by a foreign power, the Army's Office of the Surgeon General asked the Army's Chemical Defense Equipment Process Action Team (CDEPAT) to review the toxicity data for the nerve agents GA (tabun), GB(sarin), GD (soman), GF, and VX, and the vesicant agent sulfur mustard (HD) and to establish a set of exposure limits that would be useful in protecting soldiers from toxic exposures to those agents. This report is an independent review of the CDEPAT report to determine the scientific validity of the proposed estimates.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!