Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
APPENDIX 80 Appendix Offensive Versus Defensive Use of Human- Toxicity Estimates for CW Agents Perhaps the single most important factor to consider about many of the existing human estimates is that they appear to have been developed primarily for offensive purposes. This is summarized in the following paragraphs excerpted from Silver's (1953) report on GB (CDEPAT 1994): While it is possible to calculate, on a fairly logical basis, an LCt50 for resting man, it is not possible to give a single figure for the LCt50 which would apply to all other states of activity. The actions of soldiers in combat are so varied and unpredictable that the respiratory minute volume at the moment of chemical attack would be quite impossible to determine. At the risk of over-simplification, this problem can be solved for all practical purposes. Offensive tactics, to be successful, must be designed to produce the highest Cts necessary to cause casualties in all possible combat situations. In the case of toxic gas warfare, the highest LCt50 is required for resting men since their minute volume is the least. For all offensive calculations, therefore, the LCt50 for resting man should be used. Any extra casualties caused by increased respiration due to activity should merely be considered as bonus effects. On the other hand, for defensive uses, protective equipment should function under the most adverse conditions. For example,
