National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Lethal Effects (LCt50)
Suggested Citation:"ECt50 for Mild Effects." National Research Council. 1997. Review of Acute Human-Toxicity Estimates for Selected Chemical-Warfare Agents. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5825.
×
Page 23

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

REVIEW OF ACUTE HUMAN-TOXICITY ESTIMATES FOR GA (TABUN) 23 CDEPAT based its proposed LCt50 estimate for humans primarily on the assumption that GA is probably about 0.5 times as potent as GB (HEC 1960). The subcommittee accepts CDEPAT's approach of assuming that GA is 0.5 times as toxic as GB in deriving its LCt50 estimate for this route. The subcommittee recommends that the LCt50 estimate for GA be lowered, as was done for GB by the subcommittee. The subcommittee also recommends that further research be conducted to establish the LCt50 estimate with a greater degree of confidence. ECt50 for Severe Effects CDEPAT's proposed ECt50 estimate for severe effects following inhalation exposure to GA is 50 mg-min/m3, assuming exposure durations of 2 to 10 min and minute volumes of 15 liters. CDEPAT's degree of confidence in this estimate is moderate. There is no existing toxicity estimate for ECt50 for severe effects following inhalation of GA vapors (CDEPAT 1994). CDEPAT's proposed ECt50 estimate of 50 mg-min/m3 was derived on the basis of the study by Cresthull et al. (1957), which indicated that the ratio of the incapacitation vapor dose (ICt50) to the LCt50 is about 0.75. The reported ICt50s for 2-min and 10-min exposures were 102 and < 180 mg-min/m3, respectively. The subcommittee believes that CDEPAT's approach of estimating the ECt50 for severe effects is reasonable in its assumption that the ratio of ICt50 to LCt50 is 0.75. The subcommittee recommends that CDEPAT's estimate of 50 mg-min/m3 be lowered to correspond to the lowered estimate for LCt50 until further research is conducted to establish the ECt50 for severe effects with a greater degree of confidence. ECt50 for Mild Effects CDEPAT's proposed ECt50 estimate for mild effects (miosis or rhinorrhea) following exposure to GA vapor is 0.5 mg-min/m3, assuming a 2-min to 10-min exposure period. The Army's existing ECt 50 estimate for mild effects is 0.9 mg- min/m3; the duration of exposure was 5 min (Mumford 1950). Human data are available that indicate that the proposed ECt50 esti

Next: ED50 for Severe Effects »
Review of Acute Human-Toxicity Estimates for Selected Chemical-Warfare Agents Get This Book
×
 Review of Acute Human-Toxicity Estimates for Selected Chemical-Warfare Agents
Buy Paperback | $50.00 Buy Ebook | $39.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

No reliable acute-exposure1 standards have been established for the particular purpose of protecting soldiers from toxic exposures to chemical warfare (CW) agents. Some human-toxicity estimates are available for the most common CW agents—organophosphorus nerve agents and vesicants; however, most of those estimates were developed for offensive purposes (that is, to kill or incapacitate the enemy) and were intended to be interim values only. Because of the possibility of a chemical attack by a foreign power, the Army's Office of the Surgeon General asked the Army's Chemical Defense Equipment Process Action Team (CDEPAT) to review the toxicity data for the nerve agents GA (tabun), GB(sarin), GD (soman), GF, and VX, and the vesicant agent sulfur mustard (HD) and to establish a set of exposure limits that would be useful in protecting soldiers from toxic exposures to those agents. This report is an independent review of the CDEPAT report to determine the scientific validity of the proposed estimates.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!