National Academies Press: OpenBook

Communication Mediums for Signal, ITS, and Freeway Surveillance Systems: Final Report (1996)

Chapter: A.2.2 Theoretical and In Practice Capacity of Digital Communication Mediums

« Previous: A.2.1 Analog versus Digital Communication System
Page 348
Suggested Citation:"A.2.2 Theoretical and In Practice Capacity of Digital Communication Mediums." Transportation Research Board. 1996. Communication Mediums for Signal, ITS, and Freeway Surveillance Systems: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6338.
×
Page 348
Page 349
Suggested Citation:"A.2.2 Theoretical and In Practice Capacity of Digital Communication Mediums." Transportation Research Board. 1996. Communication Mediums for Signal, ITS, and Freeway Surveillance Systems: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6338.
×
Page 349
Page 350
Suggested Citation:"A.2.2 Theoretical and In Practice Capacity of Digital Communication Mediums." Transportation Research Board. 1996. Communication Mediums for Signal, ITS, and Freeway Surveillance Systems: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6338.
×
Page 350
Page 351
Suggested Citation:"A.2.2 Theoretical and In Practice Capacity of Digital Communication Mediums." Transportation Research Board. 1996. Communication Mediums for Signal, ITS, and Freeway Surveillance Systems: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6338.
×
Page 351
Page 352
Suggested Citation:"A.2.2 Theoretical and In Practice Capacity of Digital Communication Mediums." Transportation Research Board. 1996. Communication Mediums for Signal, ITS, and Freeway Surveillance Systems: Final Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6338.
×
Page 352

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Once digitized, a signal can be communicated 100 meters or internationally, typically web no additional degradation as long as Me signal on each intermediate link is maintained above threshold. For example, We current predominantly aB digital public telephone network permits local, national, and international cans usually of equal quality while the old analog network often degraded badly on national and international calls. Similarly, Me evolving commercial digital television win provide exceptional quality TV to most of Me public; however, viewers on the fringe of the signal coverage area may no longer get a chewable picture (without cable or over source) because the weaker RF signal win create a badly detenoratM (unusable) video signal when below Ashore. Fringe area viewers of cunTent analog TV simply get a noisy, snowy picture. ITS will undoubtedly evolve to digital TV to permit sharing of high quality full motion video images among jurisdictions regardless of location. Our focus win be on digital communication networks as this is He modern trend Cat industry is increasingly evolving toward. Digital networks are support by He most cost-effective components, equipment, systems, and services. Additionally, designers for digital communication are more readily available. A.2.2 Theoretical and "In Practice" Capacity of Digital Communication Mediums In 194S, C. E. Shannon published a seminal paper on "A Mathematical Theory of Communication" In He Bell System Technical journal. It established the ~eoredcal bit rate of a digital communication channel. It also established a relationship between: BR = BW*Iog2 ~ ~ + STIR ); where (eq. A.2.2-~) I. BR is He ~eoredcal maximum digital bit rate possible on a communication channel. 2. BW is He available communication channel band in Hertz. c:`NCHR~\ NCHRP3-51 · Pnase2F'nalReport A2 -

3. SNR is Me signal-to-noise ratio of We desired source digital signal to corrupting "white" noise ("white noise" for statistical analysis is uncorrelated gaussian samples). 4. Note: SNR = lO^(SNRDJ1O) as most SNR are specified in dB. [Also note Me inverse: SNRDB = JO*IOgIO (SNR)~[Note: X^Y = XY] The proof of this relationship is based on very sophisticated mathematics and is beyond Me scope of this work. It should be noted Mat Shannon, in his derivation of this limit, used very clever statistical and mathematical techniques Hat did not require him to develop the actual techniques to achieve He predicted limidng performance. Thus, communication practitioners continually strive in R&D for the theoretical performance limim for various mediums. They have yet to achieve Hem in practice; however, it is He measure by which communications engineers judge He efficiency of utilization of Heir con~mun~cadon channels. As an example, a 25 kHz Bandwidth (BOO) RF channel at 10 and 15 dB SNR, can support bit rates of: BR = 25 kHz * logic ~ ~ + 10~5~°~/ log~0~2) = 125.7 kbps Typical RF Channels BR = 25 kHz * logic ~ ~ + 10~°~°~/ log~0~2) = 25.0 kbps In practice, bit rates of 4.8 to 19.2 kbps are being obtained over 25 kHz radio channels. RF bit rates in practice are usually substantially less Han Be theoretical limits due primarily to extensive portable transceivers dial cannot employ specially efficient modulation techniques due to battery drain requirements, small equipment size and weight requirements, and cost constraints. Fixed RF transceivers without these constraints can be more speck y efficient and therefore more closely approach these theoretical limits. In fact, microwave radio does employ specmally efficient modulation techniques. Similarly, an SMFO fiber typically has a bandy ink over 10 GHz and a SNR of over 40 DB and can support a BR over: BR= 10 GHz * logic ~ ~ + 104°~°~/log~0~2) = 132.9 Gbps L:wa~P ~NCHRP3-51 · Phase2FmalReport A2-5

In practice, He current long distance fiber network is 2.488 Gbps (OC48) and is evolving to 10 GHz (OC-192). The limiting factors in SMFO are the electronics and optical components with speed to support the potential of the optical channel. In realibr, the available bandwidth and bit rate of fiber is adequate without near tenn concern for efficiency. The modem industry appears to have most closely approached He attainable limits predicted by Shannon's theory, thus it is instructive to review modem performances achieved in practice and to note that the recent ITU V.34, 28.8 kbps starboard, over a 3500 Hz public circuit, is operating close to the limit. Figure A.2~2-1 plots bandwidth required versus required signal-to-noise (SNR) for popular modem bit rates. Also, depicted on He graph is He actual range of operation in practice for He following modems: 1. Bell 202 (Model 400), 1200 bps modem (1970 origins) 2. ITU V.32' 9600 bps modem (1984 origins) 3. ITU V.34, 28,800 bps modem (1994 ongins) The range of operation must be above and to the right of the appropriate bit rate curve. As can be observed, the modem industry, through extensive R&D activities, has improved (or moved) the range of operation closer to the theoretical bit rate limit for bandwidth and SNR. The V.34 will, in fact, only work over higher quality dial-up circuits and must fall back to lower speeds on lower quality circuits (e.g., bandwidth constraints or inadequate SNR). Shannon's theory predicts this requirement. Table A.2.~! presents a matrix of popular ITS comn~un~cation mediums and He ~eoredcal maximum bit rate. It should be noted Hat fiber does not achieve comparable spectral efficiency In terms of bits/Hertz Hat is achieved with wireline modems. With the exception of microwave, wireless is also usually less specify efficient ~:~\ N~3-51 · IF A2-6

By: 'I m o lo lo 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 g $ g m 0 0 0 0 0 ~c ~0 0 cn ~ oo LLJ ~c ~cs, . _ c ~c~ 1 m + + ~ 1 + + + ~ ~ L~T ° 1 <- u) ~ c =m Q- Y O _ <1: a,=c a o L1J ~ o c z LL ~ I o Q: ' ~ _ O_ <: 0,~ L~ hJ ~ <: L \ O O O O O O O LO r ~s (MEN) HlOlN\ONVE - r ~ m - 0 C~ _ C~ _ ~ C~ . _ C~ _ CN C~ m _0 C~ _ 0 C~ - 00 ~D ~ Ln z u) -m ~ r) 1 . ~ z Be o ~ ~ ~n ~- ~s c, ~ - O ~ ~ l- == .~ ,,o, ~z oo ' z oz o

~ - :E o ~- ~ - o o - o · - 3 - ._ _ a, Cot Cot o ~2 ~ s I ~ 10O 1smm1,:. 1! 1~ 1~=c 1m==1~ W i 5; ! At j1 m m ~ ~ ca _ ~ 0 i_ ~ ~ D S S | S | ~ | Q S ~ :: i~ - a) .cn ~ s O e _ Cot ~ Cd In .~ '_ ~ C- C ._ ~ ._ ~ ~ tn N cn n cn y UD C~ m ~5 - I y C~ - o ._ Ct ~cn Ct = a a) ._ C' ~ . CO a, CtS ~ ._ o C~ T C, - CO ._ ~ CtS .i? -

Next: A.2.3 Repeaterless Link Distances: Link Budgets »
Communication Mediums for Signal, ITS, and Freeway Surveillance Systems: Final Report Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!