National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: ACADEMIC EMPLOYMENT OF HUMANISTS
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIXES." National Research Council. 1994. Humanities Doctorates in the United States: 1991 Profile. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9118.
×

APPENDIX A

1991 SURVEY CHANGES

In 1991, a number of methodological changes were made to the Survey of Humanities Doctorates. These changes distinguish 1991 data from those collected in earlier years. The changes are described below.

  1. Sampling Frame. The 1991 sampling frame was redefined to include only doctorates who were 75 years of age or younger in September 1991. In prior surveys, the frame had excluded individuals on the basis of years since the award of their degree, not on the basis of age. Under that definition, individuals who had earned their degrees more than 42 years prior to the survey year were excluded (or at about age 72). This change was made to accommodate growing interest in retirement issues.

  2. Sample Design and Sample Size. Because of budgetary constraints, the initial 1991 sample was cut in half--from 17,716 to 8,894 sample cases. At the same time, it was restratified into fewer sampling cells and greater homogeneity in sampling rates across strata was introduced. These changes were made to reflect current analytic interests.

  3. Response Rates. The resources saved as a result of the sample size reduction were redirected toward increasing the response rate, which had fallen to about 55 percent in 1989. The approach was two-pronged. First, the mail survey was made more productive through (a) extensive efforts to locate and update addresses for individuals in the sample, (b) reformatting of the survey questionnaire (the content did not change), and (c) the use of personalized mailing techniques. Second, a sample of about 60 percent of the nonrespondents was followed up by telephone. As a result of these efforts, the overall response rate to the 1991 survey increased to 78 percent (unweighted). Most likely, this reduced the effects of nonresponse bias in the 1991 survey estimates.7

  4. Reference Period. Due to the Change in the schedule for fielding the survey (traditionally, mailing had commenced in March or April of the survey year), the reference date for survey items was moved from February to September. Thus, 31 months elapsed between the 1989 and 1991 surveys, compared with 24 months between previous surveys.

    7  

    A study conducted on a sample of science and engineering doctorates who were nonrespondents to the 1989 SDR showed bias due to the low response rate in several variables, including location, type of employer, primary work activity, and tenure status. The findings were that the size of the U.S. population of doctorates was being overestimated, as were the numbers of those employed in the academic sector and the numbers of those teaching. To the extent that these biases existed in estimates of the humanities population, they should be minimized by the higher response rate in 1991. For additional information, see S. Mitchell and D. Pasquini, Nonresponse Bias in the 1989 Survey of Doctorate Recipients: An Exploratory Study, Office of Scientific and Engineering Personnel, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991.

Suggested Citation:"APPENDIXES." National Research Council. 1994. Humanities Doctorates in the United States: 1991 Profile. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9118.
×

TABLE 22 Publications of Humanities Ph.D.s Employed in Academe, by Field of Doctorate and Tenure Status, 1991 (in percent)

   

Number of Publications

Field of Doctorate and Tenure Status

Total* (No.)

None

1-2

3-5

More Than 5

Mean

Total

60,000

31.2

21.7

22.7

24.4

4.2

Field of Doctorate

American History

3,800

20.4

20.1

25.4

34.1

6.1

Other History

9,200

26.3

19.5

24.7

29.4

5.0

Art History

1,900

15.4

32.2

29.0

23.4

4.0

Music

5,000

61.0

16.4

10.5

12.1

2.1

Speech/Theater

3,100

43.3

20.1

18.1

18.5

3.6

Philosophy

4,900

26.6

22.7

23.6

27.1

4.2

English and Amer Lang/Lit

17,000

33.2

24.9

21.8

20.1

3.8

Classical Lang/Lit

1,300

29.7

20.5

28.1

21.8

3.5

Modern Lang/Lit

9,900

26.8

20.3

24.8

28.1

4.6

Other Humanities

3,900

21.5

19.9

27.6

30.9

4.9

Tenure Status

Tenured

37,300

28.7

21.0

23.4

26.9

4.6

Not Tenured

20,700

35.3

22.7

21.7

20.2

3.6

Tenure Track

9,600

21.0

23.4

29.6

26.0

4.3

Nontenure Track

4,200

40.3

24.8

20.4

14.5

3.3

Tenure Not Applicable

6,900

52.3

20.4

11.6

15.7

2.7

*Totals in this table are equal to the number answering the question on publications, not the total sample, and may therefore disagree with totals shown elsewhere in the report.

†Subcategories do not add to total because no reports are not shown.

Suggested Citation:"APPENDIXES." National Research Council. 1994. Humanities Doctorates in the United States: 1991 Profile. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9118.
×
Page 39
Suggested Citation:"APPENDIXES." National Research Council. 1994. Humanities Doctorates in the United States: 1991 Profile. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9118.
×
Page 38
Next: APPENDIX A: 1991 SURVEY CHANGES »
Humanities Doctorates in the United States: 1991 Profile Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!