National Academies Press: OpenBook

Monoclonal Antibody Production (1999)

Chapter: Introduction

« Previous: Executive Summary
Suggested Citation:"Introduction." National Research Council. 1999. Monoclonal Antibody Production. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9450.
×

Introduction

Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) are important reagents used in biomedical research, in diagnosis of diseases, and in treatment of such diseases as infections and cancer. These antibodies are produced by cell lines or clones obtained from animals that have been immunized with the substance that is the subject of study. The cell lines are produced by fusing B cells from the immunized animal with myeloma cells (Köler and Milstein 1975). To produce the desired mAb, the cells must be grown in either of two ways: by injection into the peritoneal cavity of a suitably prepared mouse (the in vivo, or mouse ascites, method) or by in vitro tissue culture. Further processing of the mouse ascitic fluid and of the tissue culture supernatant might be required to obtain mAb with the required purity and concentration. The mouse ascites method is generally familiar, well understood, and widely available in many laboratories; but the mice require careful watching to minimize the pain or distress induced by excessive accumulation of fluid in the abdomen or by invasion of the viscera. The in vitro tissue-culture method would be widely adopted if it were as familiar and well understood as the mouse ascites method and if it produced the required amount of antibody with every cell line; but in vitro methods have been expensive and time-consuming relative to the costs and time required by the mouse ascites method and often failed to produce the required amount of antibody even with skilled manipulation. Modern in vitro methods have increased the success rate to over 90% and have reduced costs.

The anticipated use of the mAb will determine the amount required (Marx and others 1997). Only small amounts of mAb (less than 0.1 g) are required for most research projects and many analytic purposes. Medium-scale quantities (0.1–1g) are used for production of diagnostic kits and reagents and for efficacy

Suggested Citation:"Introduction." National Research Council. 1999. Monoclonal Antibody Production. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9450.
×

testing of new mAb in animals. Large-scale production of mAb is defined, in this context, as over 1 g. These larger quantities are used for routine diagnostic procedures and for therapeutic purposes.

The use of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) in biomedical research has been and will continue to be important for the identification of proteins, carbohydrates, and nucleic acids. Their use has led to the elucidation of many molecules that control cell replication and differentiation, advancing our knowledge of the relationship between molecular structure and function. These advances is basic biologic sciences have improved our understanding of the host response to infectious-disease agents and toxins produced by these agents, to transplanted organs and tissues, to spontaneously transformed cells (tumors), and to endogenous antigens (involved in autoimmunity). In addition, the exquisite specificity of mAb allows them to be used in humans and animals for disease diagnosis and treatment. Under the appropriate conditions, mAb-producing hybridomas survive indefinitely, so continued production of mAb is associated with the use of fewer animals, especially when production involves the use of in vitro methods. Despite all those benefits associated with production of mAb with the mouse ascites method, it can be distressful to the host animal.

The U.S. Government Principles for the Utilization and Care of Vertebrate Animals Used in Testing, Research and Training (IRAC 1983) states that "animals selected for the procedure should be of appropriate species and quality and the minimum number required to obtain valid results. Methods such as mathematical models, computer simulation, and in vitro biological systems should be considered. Proper use of animals, including the avoidance or minimization of discomfort, distress, and pain when consistent with sound scientific practices, is imperative." The Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NRC 1996, page 10) specifically addresses excessive tumor burden in animals and states, "occasionally, protocols include procedures that have not been previously encountered or that have the potential to cause pain or distress that cannot be reliably controlled.... Relevant objective information regarding the procedures and the purpose of the study should be sought from the literature, veterinarians, investigators and others knowledgeable about the effects in animals." The Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH 1996, page 7) requires IACUCs to ensure that approved protocols conform with the PHS requirement that "procedures with animals ... avoid or minimize discomfort, distress and pain to animals (in a way that is) consistent with sound research design.” It is therefore incumbent on the scientist to consider first the use of in vitro methods for the production of mAb. If in vitro production of mAb is not reasonable or practical, the scientist may request permission to use the mouse ascites method. However, "prior to approval of proposals which include the mouse ascites method, IACUCs must determine that (i) the proposed use is scientifically justified, (ii) methods that avoid or minimize discomfort, distress

Suggested Citation:"Introduction." National Research Council. 1999. Monoclonal Antibody Production. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9450.
×

and pain (including in vitro methods) have been considered, and (iii) the latter [refers to in vitro methods] have been found unsuitable" (NIH 1997). The charge to the present committee excluded evaluation of steps needed to produce an antibody secreting cell line.

Suggested Citation:"Introduction." National Research Council. 1999. Monoclonal Antibody Production. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9450.
×
Page 5
Suggested Citation:"Introduction." National Research Council. 1999. Monoclonal Antibody Production. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9450.
×
Page 6
Suggested Citation:"Introduction." National Research Council. 1999. Monoclonal Antibody Production. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9450.
×
Page 7
Next: Generation of Hybridomas: Permanent Cell Lines Secreting Monoclonal Antibodies »
Monoclonal Antibody Production Get This Book
×
 Monoclonal Antibody Production
Buy Paperback | $47.00 Buy Ebook | $37.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The American Anti-Vivisection Society (AAVS) petitioned the National Institutes of Health (NIH) on April 23, 1997, to prohibit the use of animals in the production of mAb. On September 18, 1997, NIH declined to prohibit the use of mice in mAb production, stating that "the ascites method of mAb production is scientifically appropriate for some research projects and cannot be replaced." On March 26, 1998, AAVS submitted a second petition, stating that "NIH failed to provide valid scientific reasons for not supporting a proposed ban." The office of the NIH director asked the National Research Council to conduct a study of methods of producing mAb.

In response to that request, the Research Council appointed the Committee on Methods of Producing Monoclonal Antibodies, to act on behalf of the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research of the Commission on Life Sciences, to conduct the study. The 11 expert members of the committee had extensive experience in biomedical research, laboratory animal medicine, animal welfare, pain research, and patient advocacy (Appendix B). The committee was asked to determine whether there was a scientific necessity for the mouse ascites method; if so, whether the method caused pain or distress; and, if so, what could be done to minimize the pain or distress. The committee was also asked to comment on available in vitro methods; to suggest what acceptable scientific rationale, if any, there was for using the mouse ascites method; and to identify regulatory requirements for the continued use of the mouse ascites method.

The committee held an open data-gathering meeting during which its members summarized data bearing on those questions. A 1-day workshop (Appendix A) was attended by 34 participants, 14 of whom made formal presentations. A second meeting was held to finalize the report. The present report was written on the basis of information in the literature and information presented at the meeting and the workshop.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!