**Suggested Citation:**"References." National Research Council. 1999.

*Keeping Score*. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9635.

**References**

Arcavi, A., Kessel, C., Meira, L., & Smith, J. (1998). Teaching mathematical problem solving: A microanalysis of an emergent classroom community. In A. Schoenfeld, E. Dubinsky, & J. Kaput (Eds.), *Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education* *III* (pp. 1-70). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

Beck, P. (1998). Alignment analysis: Assessment to standards. Unpublished manuscript.

Bell, A. (1993). Some experiments in diagnostic teaching. *Educational Studies in Mathematics**,* *24*, 115-137.

Bell, A. W., Swan, M., Onslow, B., Pratt, K., & Purdy, D. (1985). *Diagnostic teaching: Teaching for long term learning. Report of ESRC Project HR* *8491 / 1*, Nottingham, UK: University of Nottingham, Shell Centre for Mathematical Education.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. *Phi Delta Kappan**,* *80*(2), 139-148.

Bond, L. (1995). Unintended consequences of performance assessment: Issues of bias and fairness. *Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice**,* *14*(4), 21-24.

Borasi, R. (1996). *Reconceiving mathematics instruction: A focus on errors*. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Close, G. (1996). *Developing criterion-referenced, open-response, national test items*. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, San Diego, CA.

Cobb, P., & Lampert, M. (1998). *Communication*. White paper prepared for the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Reston, VA.

**Suggested Citation:**"References." National Research Council. 1999.

*Keeping Score*. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9635.

Doyle, W. (1988). Work in mathematics classes: The context of students' thinking during instruction. *Educational Psychologist**,* *23*, 167-180.

Floden, R.E. (1996). *Teachers' choices about content: The Standards in use*. Unpublished paper prepared for November 1996 symposium sponsored by the Board on International Comparative Studies in Education of the National Research Council. Washington, DC.

Graeber, A.O., & Campbell, P.F. (1993). Misconceptions about multiplication and division. *Arithmetic Teacher**,* *39*, 408-411.

Greeno, J., & Hall, R. (1997). Practicing Representation: Learning with and about representational forms. *Phi Delta Kappan**,* *78*, 361-367.

Hartocollis, A. (1999, April 8). In Bronx, Regents coaching is extended to teachers, too . *New York Times*, pp. B1, B3.

Heid, M.K. (1988). Resequencing skills and concepts in applied calculus using the computer as a tool. *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education**,* *19*(1), 3-25.

Henningsen, M. & Stein, M.K. (1996). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning.

Hiebert, J. (1999). Relationships between research and the NCTM *Standards**.* *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education**,* *30*(1), 3-19.

Hiebert, J. & Carpenter, T. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. Grouws (Ed.), *Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning*, (p. 65-97). New York: Macmillan.

Hiebert, J. & Wearne, D. (1996). Instruction, understanding and skill in multidigit addition and subtraction. *Cognition and Instruction**,* *14*(3), 251-283.

Jakwerth, P.R., Stancavage, F.B., & Reed, E.D. (1999). *An investigation of why students do not respond to questions*. Report commissioned by the NAEP Validity Studies (NVS) Panel. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.

Learning First Alliance. (1998). *Every child mathematically proficient: An action plan*. Washington, DC: Author.

Lesh, R., Lamon, S.J., Lester, F., & Behr, M. (1992). Future directions for mathematics assessment. In R. Lesh & S. J. Lamon (Eds.), *Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics* (pp. 379-425). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Linn, R. (1994). Performance assessment: Policy promises and technical measurement standards. *Educational Researcher**,* *23*(9), 4-14.

Massell, D., Kirst, M., & Hoppe, M. (1997). *Persistence and change: Standards-based reform in nine states*. Brunswick, NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.

National Assessment Governing Board. (1995). *Mathematics framework for the 1996 National Assessment of Educational Progress*. Washington, DC: Author.

**Suggested Citation:**"References." National Research Council. 1999.

*Keeping Score*. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9635.

National Center on Education and the Economy. (1998). *Core assignment: Volume*. Washington, DC: Author.

National Center on Education and the Economy & University of Pittsburgh. (1997). *New Standards performance standards*. (Volumes 1-3). Washington, DC: Author.

National Center on Education and the Economy & University of Pittsburgh. (1997-1999). *New Standards mathematics reference examinations*. Washington, DC: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). *Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics*. Reston, VA: Author.

*National Council of Teachers of Mathematics**. (**1991**).* *Professional standards for teaching mathematics*. Reston, VA: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). *Assessment standards for school mathematics*. Reston, VA: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1998). *Principles and standards for school mathematics: Discussion draft*. Reston, VA: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics & National Research Council. (1997). *Improving student learning in mathematics and science: The role of national standards and state policy*. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. (1989). *Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education*. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. (1990). *Reshaping school mathematics: A philosophy and framework for curriculum*. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. (1991). *For good measure: Principles and goals for mathematics assessment* . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. (1993a). *Measuring up: Prototypes for mathematics assessment*. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. (1993b). *Measuring what counts: A conceptual guide for mathematics assessment*. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (1997). *Learning from TIMMS: Results of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study, summary of a symposium*. A. Beatty, (Ed.), Board on International Comparative Studies in Education, Board on Testing and Assessment, Committee on Science Education K-12, and Mathematical Sciences Education Board. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. (1998). *High school mathematics at work: Essays and examples for the education of all students*. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

**Suggested Citation:**"References." National Research Council. 1999.

*Keeping Score*. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9635.

Porter, A.C., Kirst, M.W., Osthoff, E.J., Smithson, J.L., & Schneider, S.A. (1993). *Reform up close: A classroom analysis*. Final report to the NSF on Grant No. SPA-8953446 to the Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.

Resnick, L., & Nolan, K.J. (1995). From aptitude to effort: A new foundation for our schools. *Daedalus*, 124(4), 55-52.

Romberg, T.A., Zarinnia, E.A., & Williams, S.R. (1990). Mandated school mathematics testing in the United States: A survey of state mathematical supervisors. Madison, WI: National Center for Research in Mathematical Sciences Education.

Schmidt, W.H., & Cogan, L.S. (1999). The rest of the story: Putting the U.S. twelfth grade TIMSS mathematics achievement results in perspective. *Focus on Calculus: A Newsletter for the Calculus Consortium Based at Harvard University*, No. 16, 6-8.

Schmidt, W.H., McKnight, C.C., & Raizen, S.A. (1997). *A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education* . Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

Schmidt, W.H., McKnight, C.C., Valverde, G.A., Houang, R.T., & Wiley, D.E. (1997). *Many visions, many aims: A cross-national investigation of curricular intentions in mathematics*. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

Schoen, H.L., & Ziebarth, S.W. (1998). Assessment of students' mathematical performance (A Core-Plus Mathematics Project Field Test Progress Report). Iowa City, IA: Core-Plus Mathematics Project Evaluation Site, University of Iowa.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). *Mathematical problem solving*. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What's all the fuss about metacognition? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), *Cognitive science and mathematics education* (pp. 189-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Schoenfeld, A.H. (1988). When good teaching leads to bad results: The disasters of ''well taught" mathematics classes. *Educational Psychologist**,* *23*, 145-166.

Schoenfeld, A.H. (1989). Explorations of students' mathematical beliefs and behavior. *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education**,* *20*, 338-355.

Schoenfeld, A.H., Burkhardt, H., Daro, P., & Stanley, R. (1993). *A framework for balance*. Unpublished manuscript, Balanced Assessment & New Standards projects.

Schoenfeld, A., Burkhardt, H., Schwartz, J., & Wilcox, S.J. (1999), *Balanced assessment for the mathematics curriculum* (8 packages). Menlo Park, CA: Dale Seymour Publications.

**Suggested Citation:**"References." National Research Council. 1999.

*Keeping Score*. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9635.

Shannon, A., & Zawojewski, J. (1995). Mathematics performance assessment: A new game for students. *Mathematics Teacher**,* *88*(9), 752-757.

Shavelson, R.J., & Baxter, G.P. (1992). What we've learned about assessing hands-on science. *Educational Leadership**,* *49*(8), 21-25.

Shavelson, R.J., Gao, X., & Baxter, G.R. (1993). *Sampling variability of performance assessments* (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 361). Santa Barbara, CA: National Center for Research in Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing.

Shavelson, R.J., Webb, N.M., & Rowley, G. (1989). Generalizability theory. *American Psychologist*, 44, 922-932.

Stein, M.K., & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. *Educational Research and Evaluation**,* *2*(1), 50-80.

Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1997). Understanding and improving classroom mathematics instruction: An overview of the TIMMS Video Study. *Phi Delta Kappan**,* *79*(1), 14-21.

Webb, N. (1997). *Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science*. Madison, WI: National Institute for Science Education and Council of Chief State School Officers.

Wilson, J.W., Fernandez, M.L., & Hadaway, N. (1993). Mathematical problem solving. In Wilson, P.S. (ed.), *Research ideas for the classroom: High school mathematics*. New York: Macmillan.

Zucker, A.A., & Esty, E.T. (1993). Promoting discourse in mathematics classrooms using a new video series for middle schools. Paper presented as part of a symposium entitled "The Potential of Video-Based Materials to Promote Classroom Discourse in Mathematics," at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.