National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 3 Committee Reactions
Suggested Citation:"4 Concluding Comments." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 1999. Review of the Disability Evaluation Study Design: Third Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9706.
×

4
Concluding Comments

The Disability Evaluation Study (DES), if well designed could be the cornerstone for long-term disability research. It will be of fundamental importance to future analyses by the Social Security Administration (SSA) and other researchers. It will provide information that would guide SSA in making decisions about its disability programs and will play a key role in projecting and understanding disability rolls in the future. Moreover, it will lay the groundwork for future surveys. The committee is gratified to note that SSA decisionmakers have given high priority to research and to policy development based on that research. The DES is key to how SSA will deal with the population with disabilities in the future. Until now, SSA has mainly focused on streamlining the claims process by making it more efficient and less time consuming. To ensure effective planning, SSA must explore the fundamental characteristics of who is disabled, how many more people might become disabled, and what can be done to assist people to remain in the workforce. The SSA has not collected such basic information for nearly 20 years and it is long overdue.

The committee, however, has serious reservations about the timeframe for the conduct of the survey. The current plan provides little flexibility in terms of the amount of time available to make deliberate and rigorous decisions on issues of design, procedures, and questionnaire if problems are uncovered during the pilot study. The 3 months allowed between the end of the pilot study and the start of the national survey is clearly inadequate for the kind of analysis and further testing that will be needed to resolve any issues that may arise. The committee understands that the documents reviewed in preparing this report are "works in progress" and that Westat and SSA are already addressing many of the issues raised in this report. Nevertheless, the committee believes that unless the period for testing, analysis, and development is extended, SSA could encounter serious problems during the national survey.

Suggested Citation:"4 Concluding Comments." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 1999. Review of the Disability Evaluation Study Design: Third Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9706.
×
Page 22
Next: References »
Review of the Disability Evaluation Study Design: Third Interim Report Get This Book
×
 Review of the Disability Evaluation Study Design: Third Interim Report
Buy Paperback | $21.00 Buy Ebook | $16.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Social Security Administration (SSA) has been engaged in a major effort to redesign the process for determining disability for cash benefits and medical assistance under its Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), Title II of the Social Security Act and the Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Because of the complexity and far-reaching impact of its efforts, SSA concluded that the redesign effort requires extensive research, testing, and validation, as well as further development of some of its components before national implementation. The effect of the new determination process on the number and characteristics of future beneficiaries also needs further study. The agency asked the National Academies to provide ongoing independent and unbiased review of, and recommendations on, its current and proposed research as it relates to the development of a revised disability decision process including the approach, survey design, and content of the complex multiyear Disability Evaluation Study (DES).

The present report is the third in a series of short interim reports of the National Academies' Committee to Review the SSA's Disability Decision Process. This third interim report relates directly to one of the contract tasks—review of the design, approach, and content of the DES, as proposed by SSA's contractor for the survey, Westat, Inc. This report is limited to a brief review of the sample design (including that of the pilot study), instruments and procedures, and response rates goals developed by Westat and provided by SSA in June 1999 to the committee for its review and recommendations. It also comments on the proposed timeline for initiation of each phase of the survey.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!