Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
4 Dynamic Evolution of Plant Mitochondrial Genomes: Mobile Genes and Introns and Highly Variable Mutation Rates JEFFREY D. PALMER, KEITH L. ADAMS, YANGRAE CHOâ , CHRISTOPHER L. PARKINSONâ¡, YIN-LONG QIUÂ§, AND KEMING SONGÂ¶ We summarize our recent studies showing that angiosperm mito- chondrial (mt) genomes have experienced remarkably high rates of gene loss and concomitant transfer to the nucleus and of in- tron acquisition by horizontal transfer. Moreover, we find sub- stantial lineage-specific variation in rates of these structural mu- tations and also point mutations. These findings mostly arise from a Southern blot survey of gene and intron distribution in 281 diverse angiosperms. These blots reveal numerous losses of mt ribosomal protein genes but, with one exception, only rare loss of respiratory genes. Some lineages of angiosperms have kept all of their mt ribosomal protein genes whereas others have lost Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405 This paper was presented at the National Academy of Sciences colloquium âVariation and Evolution in Plants and Microorganisms: Toward a New Synthesis 50 Years After Stebbins,â held January 27â29, 2000, at the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Center in Irvine, CA. Abbreviation: mt, mitochondrial. â Present address: Stanford Genome Center, 855 California Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94304. â¡Present address: Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816-2368. Â§Present address: Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003-5810. Â¶Present Address: Sigma Chemical Company, 3300 South Second Street, St. Louis, MO 63118. 35
36 / Jeffrey D. Palmer, et al. most of them. These many losses appear to reflect remarkably high (and variable) rates of functional transfer of mt ribosomal protein genes to the nucleus in angiosperms. The recent transfer of cox2 to the nucleus in legumes provides both an example of interorganellar gene transfer in action and a starting point for discussion of the roles of mechanistic and selective forces in determining the distribution of genetic labor between organellar and nuclear genomes. Plant mt genomes also acquire sequences by horizontal transfer. A striking example of this is a homing group I intron in the mt cox1 gene. This extraordinarily invasive mobile element has probably been acquired over 1,000 times separately during angiosperm evolution via a recent wave of cross-species horizontal transfers. Finally, whereas all previously examined an- giosperm mtDNAs have low rates of synonymous substitutions, mtDNAs of two distantly related angiosperms have highly accel- erated substitution rates. T he evolutionary dynamics of plant mitochondrial (mt) genomes have long been known to be unusual compared with those of ani- mals and most other eukaryotes at both the sequence level (excep- tionally low rate of point mutations) and structural level (high rates of rearrangement, duplication, genome growth and shrinkage, and incorpo- ration of foreign DNA). The rate of synonymous substitutions (a useful approximation of the neutral point mutation rate) was shown in the 1980s to be lower in angiosperm mitochondria than in any other characterized genome, and fully 50â100 times lower than in vertebrate mitochondria (Wolfe et al., 1987; Palmer and Herbon, 1988). This gulf largely persists despite the more recent discovery of modest substitutional rate heteroge- neity within angiosperms (Eyre-Walker and Gaut, 1997; Laroche et al., 1997) and vertebrates (Martin et al., 1992; Waddell et al., 1999). Angiosperms have by far the largest mtDNAs, at least 200 kb to over 2,000 kb in size (larger than some bacterial genomes) (Palmer 1990, 1992). These genomes grow and shrink relatively rapidly; for example, within the cucumber family, mt genome size varies by more than six-fold (Ward et al., 1981). Plant mitochondria rival the eukaryotic nucleus (especially the plant nucleus) in terms of the C-value paradox they present: i.e., larger plant mt genomes do not appear to contain more genes than smaller ones, but simply have more spacer DNA (intron content and size also do not vary significantly across angiosperms). This paradox extends to plant/ animal comparisons. For example, the one sequenced angiosperm mt ge- nome (from Arabidopsis; Unseld et al., 1997; Marienfeld et al., 1999) is 367 kb in size yet contains only one more RNA gene and twice the number of protein genes (27 vs. 13) than our own mt genome, which is over 20 times smaller (16.6 kb). Angiosperm mtDNAs are large in part because of fre-
Dynamic Evolution of Plant Mitochondrial Genomes / 37 quent duplications. These most commonly result in small (2â10 members) repeat families whose elements range up to a few hundred base pairs in size, although large duplications and triplications of up to 20 kb are al- most always found at least once and sometimes several times within a genome. Angiosperm mtDNAs also grow promiscuously via the rela- tively frequent capture of sequences from the chloroplast and nucleus (Palmer, 1992; Unseld et al., 1997; Marienfeld et al., 1999). The functional significance of this foreign DNA seems entirely limited to chloroplast- derived tRNA genes, which provide many of the tRNAs used in plant mt protein synthesis (Miyata et al., 1998). Recombination between the small and large repeats scattered through- out angiosperm mtDNAs creates a very dynamic genome structure, both evolutionarily and in real time. Recombination between repeats of about 2 kb and larger is so frequent as to create a dynamic equilibrium in which an individual plantâs mtDNA exists as a nearly equimolar mixture of recombinational isomers differing only in the relative orientation of the single copy sequences flanking the rapidly recombining repeats (Palmer, 1990; Mackenzie et al., 1994). Plants such as maize, with many different sets of these large, usually direct ârecombination repeatsâ somehow man- age to perpetuate their mt genomes despite their dissolution into a bewil- dering complexity of subgenomic molecules via repeat-mediated deletion events (Mackenzie et al., 1994; Fauron et al., 1995). Recombination be- tween smaller repeats appears to occur less frequently, although perhaps frequently enough to help maintain a reservoir of low-level, rearranged forms of the genome (termed âsublimonsâ) that persist together with the main mt genome. On an evolutionary time-scale, recombination between short dispersed inverted repeats generates large inversions frequently enough to scramble gene order almost completely, even among relatively close members of the same genus (Palmer and Herbon, 1988; Fauron et al., 1995). The combined forces of frequent duplication and inversion have led to the fairly common creation of novel, chimeric genes in plant mito- chondria. A number of these chimeric genes lead to cytoplasmic-nuclear incompatibilities manifest as cytoplasmic male sterility (Hanson, 1991; Mackenzie et al., 1994). The above picture, encapsulated as the title of a 1988 paper (Palmer and Herbon, 1988)ââPlant mitochondrial DNA evolves rapidly in struc- ture, but slowly in sequenceââwith its corollary that animal mtDNA evolves oppositely in all respects, was largely complete by the late 1980s (Palmer, 1990). This picture was derived from comparison, at both fine- and broad-scale taxonomic levels, of a relatively small number of angiosperms, belonging primarily to but five economically important families [the crucifers (Brassicaceae), the cucurbits (Cucurbitaceae), the legumes (Fabaceae), the grasses (Poaceae), and the nightshades (Solana-
38 / Jeffrey D. Palmer, et al. ceae)], and with two genera (Brassica and Zea) serving as exemplars (Palmer and Herbon, 1988; Fauron et al., 1995). The completion of the Arabidopsis mt genome sequence in 1997 (Unseld et al., 1997; Marienfeld et al., 1999) gave a more fine-grained and comprehensive picture of the extent to which foreign DNA uptake and internal duplication have in- fluenced the size, structure, and evolutionary potential of a particular mt genome, but without significantly changing prior notions of the struc- tural dynamics of plant mt genomes. A few years ago, we set up a large-scale Southern blot survey, of 281 diverse angiosperms, to better elucidate the evolution of two fundamen- tal classes of mt featuresâtheir content of genes and of intronsâthat were poorly characterized relative to the traits whose evolution is de- scribed above. Our hope was that by surveying hundreds of diverse plants, we could discern the basic tempo and pattern of gene and intron loss and gain and, furthermore, identify especially attractive candidates for follow-up study to learn about the processes and mechanisms under- lying these kinds of structural changes. An additional, utilitarian goal, whose achievements (see, e.g., Qiu et al., 1998) will not be described in this report, was to use these presence/absence characters to help unravel the phylogeny of angiosperms and other land plants. This paper will summa- rize our results, both recently published and unpublished, on gene con- tent and intron content evolution in angiosperm evolution. We show that rates of gene loss, of accompanying gene transfer to the nucleus, and of intron acquisition by cross-species horizontal transfer can be remarkably high for particular classes of these genetic elements, and that these rates also vary substantially across lineages of flowering plants. As a com- pletely unexpected bonus, these surveys have also led to the discovery of two exceptional groups of plants with vastly elevated rates of synony- mous substitutions. SOUTHERN BLOT SURVEY FOR CHANGES IN MT GENE AND INTRON CONTENT We went to some lengths to sample angiosperm diversity, extracting total DNAs from 281 species that represent 278 genera and 169 families of angiosperms (species listed at www.bio.indiana.edu/~palmerlab). Twelve sets of pseudoreplicate filter-blots were made, each set containing one di- gest (with either BamHI or HindIII) of each of the 281 DNAs. The digested DNAs were arranged according to the presumptive phylogenetic relation- ships of their cognate plants as understood about 5 years ago. To date, the sets of blots have been sequentially hybridized with nearly 100 different probes, mostly for segments of various mt genes and introns, but also for several chloroplast genes and introns.
Dynamic Evolution of Plant Mitochondrial Genomes / 39 Virtually all mt genes and introns tested hybridized well across the full spectrum of angiosperms examined, and some even hybridized well across additional blots containing the full diversity of land plants, a roughly 450- million-year time span (see, e.g., Qiu et al., 1998). The success of these hybridizations, carried out at moderate stringencies [washes at 60Â°C in 2x standard saline citrate (SSC)/0.1% SDS], across such large timespans testi- fies to the very low substitution rates of the great majority of plant mtDNAs. A probe sequence was inferred to be absent from the mt genome of a particular filter-bound preparation of total DNA if there was no detectable hybridization on an overexposed autoradiograph against two layers of con- trols: good hybridization to the DNA in question using other mt probes and good hybridization to other DNAs with the probe in question. Fig. 1 shows examples of the three general categories of results ob- tained with the various mt probes used. Many probes, such as rRNA probes and the cox1 exon probe used in the middle panel of Fig. 1, hybrid- ized strongly to essentially all DNAs tested; i.e., the lane-to-lane varia- tions in hybridization intensity were reproducible across all probes in this category. We interpret these variations as primarily reflecting differences in amount of mtDNA loaded per lane, and conclude that each mtDNA probably contains an intact copy of the sequence probed (see the pen- ultimate section for an explanation of the weak cox1 hybridization in lane 4 of the middle panel). Many other probes, such as the rps7 gene probe used in the top panel of Fig. 1, while hybridizing strongly to many lanes FIGURE 1. Southern blot survey illustrating three distinct presence/absence pat- terns of mitochondrial genes and introns. BamHI-cut total DNAs from 51 of 281 angiosperms surveyed were arranged according to presumptive phylogenetic re- lationships, were electrophoresed, and were blotted and hybridized with probes internal to the rps7 gene (Upper; gene mostly present, with several losses evi- dent), the cox1 coding sequence (Middle; gene universally present), and the cox1 intron (Lower; intron rarely present, each presence thought to reflect an indepen- dent acquisition by horizontal transfer).
40 / Jeffrey D. Palmer, et al. (normalizing intensities to the category 1 results described above), hy- bridized at best only very weakly (again normalizing) and often not at all to many other lanes (i.e., lanes 3â4, 13â17, 19â21, 29â30, 32â34, 37, 44, 48). We conclude that most or all of the rps7 probe region is probably missing from these mt genomes. The third category of results was obtained with but a single probe, the cox1 intron shown in Fig. 1 Bottom. This probe gave a singularly patchy, sporadic hybridization pattern, whose molecular ba- sis will be explained in a later section. RIBOSOMAL PROTEIN GENES ARE LOST FREQUENTLY, RESPIRATORY GENES ONLY RARELY The survey blots were hybridized with probes for each of the 14 ribo- somal protein genes known from angiosperm mt genomes, and with probes for 11 of the 21 known respiratory genes. The cases of inferred gene absences were plotted onto a multigene phylogeny of the surveyed angiosperms (Soltis et al., 1999) to estimate the number of phylogeneti- cally separate gene losses. A total of only two losses were inferred among 10 of the respiratory genes; these include the previously described loss of mt cox2 in the legume Vigna (Nugent and Palmer, 1991, 1993; Covello and Gray, 1992; Adams et al., 1999) and the loss of nad3 in the Piperaceae. The small respiratory gene sdh4 was an exception, with about 10 separate losses inferred (K.A., Y.-L.Q., and J.D.P., unpublished data). In striking contrast to the respiratory genes as a group, probes for all 14 ribosomal protein gene probes failed to hybridize to mtDNAs of many, disparately related angiosperms (see, e.g., Fig. 1 Upper), suggesting numerous gene losses (at least 10 losses for most genes, over 200 losses in total). The losses vary in phylogenetic depth, with most being limited to one or two related families, whereas several encompass many related families or even or- ders (K.A., Y.-L.Q., and J.D.P., unpublished data). Probes for rps2 and rps11 did not hybridize to the lanes of most higher eudicots (a group comprising 182 of the 281 angiosperms in our survey), suggesting rela- tively ancient losses early in the evolution of eudicots. Both rps2 and rps11 have been isolated from the nucleus of Arabidopsis (Perrotta et al., 1998; rps11 expressed sequence tags from the GenBank database), suggesting that gene loss followed functional transfer to the nucleus. The relatively few losses of these two genes (4 and 6, respectively) reflect the re- duced potential for many (âsubsequentâ) losses when such an ancient loss occurs. Our blot surveys will not detect mt pseudogenes unless much or all of the probe region is missing, and thus our survey probably underestimates the number of gene losses. Several ribosomal protein pseudogenes have been reported in angiosperm mt genomes, for example, of rps14 and rps19
Dynamic Evolution of Plant Mitochondrial Genomes / 41 in Arabidopsis (Sanchez et al., 1996; Unseld et al., 1997; Marienfeld et al., 1999). In some cases, weak hybridization by a probe was observed to DNA from a species known to contain only a fragment of a gene in the mitochondrion (e.g., rps12 in Oenothera). The hybridization results show that ribosomal protein gene content in angiosperm mitochondrial genomes varies considerably, as suggested previously (Nugent and Palmer, 1993; Unseld et al., 1997), although the magnitude of the variation and frequency of gene loss are unexpectedly high. The high number of ribosomal protein gene losses compared with the low number of respiratory gene losses is also striking. In some an- giosperm lineages, the rate of ribosomal protein gene loss appears to be comparable to, or even higher than, the silent substitution rate (K.A., Y.-L.Q., and J.D.P., unpublished work), whereas in many other lineages, including the most ancient ones, there has been no loss at all. These latter lineages have retained all 14 ribosomal proteins that were present in the common ancestor of angiosperms, whereas several fairly recently arisen angiosperm lineages have lost 10 or more of the 14 genes (in one case, apparently all 14). The rate of ribosomal protein gene loss thus varies enormously across angiosperms lineages; some factor(s) must have trig- gered a rapid rate of loss in certain recent lineages. The mt gene losses detected by our survey could be explained by functional transfer of the gene to the nucleus, by functional substitution by another protein (see, e.g., Sanchez et al., 1996), or by the protein being dispensable in certain plants. Six ribosomal protein genes (Grohmann et al., 1992; Wischmann and Schuster, 1995; Kadowaki et al., 1996; Sanchez et al., 1996; Perrotta et al., 1998; Figueroa et al., 1999a; Kubo et al., 1999) that are present in the mitochondrion of many flowering plants, along with the respiratory gene cox2 (Nugent and Palmer, 1991, 1993; Covello and Gray, 1992; Adams et al., 1999), have been reported to have been trans- ferred to the nucleus. Thus, the most likely explanation for loss of a gene from the mitochondrion is transfer to the nucleus. DO MULTIPLE GENE LOSSES REFLECT MULTIPLE GENE TRANSFERS? Assuming that most of the genes lost from the mitochondrion have been transferred to the nucleus, then the many separate losses of each mt ribosomal protein gene and of sdh4 could reflect either an equivalent number of separate transfers, each more or less coincident in time with the loss, or a smaller number of earlier transfers (as few as one for each gene), with several or all losses stemming from the same ancestral trans- fer of a particular gene. The latter, early-transfer/multiple-dependent- loss model predicts a prolonged period of retention of dual intact and
42 / Jeffrey D. Palmer, et al. expressed genes in both compartments after gene transfer. This model seems inconsistent with both theory (Marshall et al., 1994; Herrman, 1997) and with empirical results (see the next section) indicating fairly rapid loss of one compartmentâs gene or the other after gene transfer/duplica- tion. On the other hand, the one-loss = one-transfer model and other multiple transfer models seem unlikely considering the complex series of events required for each successful functional transfer (i.e., reverse tran- scription, movement to the nucleus, chromosomal integration, and func- tional activation, which in almost all cases requires acquisition of se- quences conferring both proper expression and also targeting of the now cytoplasmically synthesized protein to the mitochondrion). Nuclear sequences for each of three mitochondrially derived ribosomal protein genes have been reported from two separate lineages of mt gene loss as defined by our blot survey, while we have been studying the trans- ferred rps10 gene in a number of angiosperms. These genes provide a use- ful starting point for investigating the number and timing of gene transfers during angiosperm evolution. In the rps14 loss lineage that includes maize and rice, the transferred gene is located within an intron of the sdh2 gene, and the sdh2 targeting sequence is alternatively spliced to rps14 transcripts (Figueroa et al., 1999a; Kubo et al., 1999), whereas nuclear rps14 in Arabidopsis shares none of these features (Figueroa et al., 1999b). Rice rps11 was dupli- cated in the nucleus after transfer but before targeting sequence acquisition (Kadowaki et al., 1996), with the two rps11 genes having acquired their targeting sequences from two different nuclear genes for mt proteins (atpB and coxVb), whereas the targeting sequence of pea rps11 (Kubo et al., 1998) has no similarity to any sequences currently in the databases. Finally, nuclear rps19 genes of Arabidopsis (Sanchez et al., 1996) and soybean (ex- pressed sequence tags in the GenBank database), both rosids, also have unrelated targeting sequences and structures. The dissimilar structural fea- tures of members of each pair of these three genes strongly suggests that each was derived from a separate activation event. Because activation prob- ably occurs relatively soon after transfer, before the nuclear gene is perma- nently disabled by mutation (Thorsness and Weber, 1996; Adams et al., 1999; see next section), we think that these ribosomal protein genes were not only independently activated but also independently transferred to the nucleus. Considering that rps14, rps11, and rps19 have been lost from the mt genomes of many different angiosperm lineages, as revealed by our South- ern blot survey, it is possible that each gene has been independently trans- ferred many times, not just twice. Indeed, we have recently obtained evi- dence for many, recent independent transfers of rps10, which has been lost from the mt genome over 20 times among the 281 angiosperms surveyed by blots (K.A., D. Daley, Y.-L.Q., J. Whelan, and J.D.P., unpublished work). It is increasingly evident, therefore, that functional transfer of mt genes to the
Dynamic Evolution of Plant Mitochondrial Genomes / 43 nucleus occurs at a surprisingly high frequency in angiosperm evolution, especially, it would appear, in some groups of flowering plants (see preced- ing section). MITOCHONDRIAL GENE TRANSFER IN ACTION: RECENT TRANSFER OF COX2 TO THE NUCLEUS IN LEGUMES The most extensively studied example of recent mt gene transfer in flowering plants (or any group of eukaryotes) is the cytochrome oxidase subunit 2 gene (cox2) in legumes (Nugent and Palmer, 1991, 1993; Covello and Gray, 1992; Adams et al., 1999). Cox2, present in the mitochondrion of virtually all plants, was transferred to the nucleus during recent legume evolution (Adams et al., 1999). Examination of nuclear and mt cox2 presence and expression in over 25 legume genera has revealed a wide range of intermediate stages in the process of mt gene transfer, providing a por- trayal of the gene transfer process in action (Fig. 2; Adams et al., 1999). Cox2 was transferred to the nucleus via an edited RNA intermediate (Nugent and Palmer, 1991; Covello and Gray, 1992). Once nuclear cox2 was acti- vated, a state of dual intact and expressed genesâof transcompartmental functional redundancyâwas established; this transition stage persists most fully (i.e., with both compartmentsâ cox2 genes highly expressed in terms of steady-stated, properly processed RNAs; COX2 protein levels have not been assayed) only in Dumasia among the many studied legumes. Four other, phylogenetically disparate legumes also retain intact and expressed copies of cox2 in both compartments, but with only one of the two genes expressed at a high enough level, in the one tissue type examined thus far, to presumably support respiration (Fig. 2). Silencing of either nuclear or mt cox2 has occurred multiple times and in a variety of ways, including disrup- tive insertions or deletions, cessation of transcription or RNA editing, and partial to complete gene loss (Adams et al., 1999). Based on phylogenetic evidence, we infer that mt cox2 and nuclear cox2 have been silenced ap- proximately three to five times each during the evolution of the studied legumes (Fig. 2). Although cox2 in legumes is the only known example of gene inactivation after recent transfer and activation in the nucleus, a com- parative phylogenetic approach might reveal that the nuclear copy of other recently transferred organelle genes has become inactivated in one or more species related to the single plant studied so far. ROLES OF SELECTION AND CHANCE IN MITOCHONDRIAL GENE TRANSFERS DURING ANGIOSPERM EVOLUTION All but the last step (gene loss) in the complicated and evolutionarily unidirectional process by which mt genes move to the nucleus and disap-
44 / Jeffrey D. Palmer, et al. FIGURE 2. Summary of legume cox2 gene distribution and expression data in a phylogenetic context. The left two columns indicate the presence (+) or absence (â) of an intact cox2 gene in the mitochondrion (mt) or nucleus (nuc) of the indi- cated species. Bullets indicate genes containing small insertions or deletions that disrupt the reading frame or intron splicing. The right two columns indicate the presence (+) or absence (â) of detectable mitochondrial and nuclear cox2 tran- scripts in young leaves. Parentheses indicate transcripts present at low levels; the asterisk indicates transcripts that are not properly edited. Boxing highlights dual intact genes and/or dual transcription and proper processing (of dual cox2 genes, intact or not) in a given plant. Light rectangles and dark circles indicate loss or silencing of mt and nuclear cox2, respectively. The phylogenetic tree is one of three equally parsimonious trees obtained from parsimony analysis of a data set consisting of 2,154 bp of two chloroplast gene sequences (rbcL and ndhF) and 557 chloroplast restriction sites. Bootstrap values above 40% are shown. The figure is modified from Adams et al. (1999). pear from the mitochondrion may be driven largely by mechanistic forces and chance mutations. These prior steps include reverse transcription (which could also occur after either of the next two steps), exit from the mitochondrion, entry into the nucleus, integration into the nuclear ge- nome, gain of a nuclear promoter and other elements conferring properly
Dynamic Evolution of Plant Mitochondrial Genomes / 45 regulated expression, and gain of a mt targeting sequence. Nucleic acids could escape from the mitochondrion by several mechanisms, as thor- oughly discussed by Thorsness and Weber (1996). The rate of mtDNA escape and uptake by the nucleus has been estimated to be relatively high (Thorsness and Fox, 1990; Thorsness and Weber, 1996). Once inside the nucleus, nucleic acids can integrate into the nuclear genome by double- strand break repair, as shown recently for yeast (Ricchetti et al., 1999), and perhaps by other mechanisms. Clues have been revealed as to the mecha- nisms of gene activation and targeting sequence acquisition, including gain of a targeting sequence (and perhaps upstream promoter and other regulatory elements) from a preexisting gene for a mt protein by a shuf- fling process (Kadowaki et al., 1996; our unpublished data) and by inte- gration into a preexisting gene for a mt protein (Figueroa et al., 1999; Kubo et al., 1999). After the nuclear copy of a transferred gene is activated and gains a mt targeting sequence, both genes must be expressed at least transiently, as described above for cox2 in legumes (Fig. 2; Adams et al., 1999). It is possible that the genes in both genomes could become fixed. Both nuclear and mt atp9 genes have been retained in Neurospora crassa (van den Boo- gaart et al., 1982) and Aspergillus nidulans (Brown et al., 1984; Ward and Turner, 1986), and both are functional at certain times during the life cycle of Neurospora (Bittner-Eddy et al., 1994). However, the most commonly observed outcome is that one gene (usually the mt gene, although this is influenced by sampling biases) becomes silenced and lost. Inactivation of the nuclear copy of a transferred gene results in a failed transfer, but the opportunity for repeated âattemptsâ at transfer can create a gene transfer ratchet (Doolittle, 1998). Both selection and chance factors may play a role in determining which gene is retained and which gene is inactivated. Our finding of approximately equal numbers of cox2 silencings in legume mt and nuclear genomes raises the possibility that it is largely random as to which gene became silenced in a given species, with disabling mutations inactivating either cox2 gene at comparable frequencies. Alternatively, if the rate of production of disabling mutations is higher in one genome or the other, then the equal numbers of silencings would reflect selection favoring the geneâs retention in the high-rate genome. This is difficult to assess because, although we know that substitution rates are much higher in legume nuclear than mt genes (Wolfe et al., 1987), we do not know what the overall rate of disabling mutations is in either genome. Several hypotheses have been proposed for selection favoring reten- tion of the nuclear copy of a transferred and activated organelle gene and loss of the organellar copy. Presence of a gene in the nucleus allows for crossing over during meiosis, perhaps enabling beneficial mutations to be fixed more rapidly than in asexual organelle genomes (Blanchard and
46 / Jeffrey D. Palmer, et al. Lynch, 2000). Alternatively, the progressive accumulation of detrimental mutations in asexual mt genomes by Mullerâs ratchet may favor transfer of genes to the nucleus. Evidence for Mullerâs ratchet has been found in tRNA genes of animal mitochondria (Lynch, 1996) and in the genomes of endosymbiotic bacteria (Moran, 1996). However, the rate of nucleotide substitutions is very low in plant mitochondria (about 10-fold lower than in the nucleus), which should counterbalance the effects of Mullerâs ratchet (Martin and Herrman, 1998; Race et al., 1999) and negate (for plants) the hypothesis (Allen and Raven, 1996) that a nuclear location is favored because it provides relief from the effects of oxygen free radical damage incurred by organellar genes. Selection for a small, compact ge- nome, although perhaps operating in other eukaryotes, is unlikely to be a factor favoring continued gene transfer in plants, because plant mt ge- nomes readily incorporate and retain foreign DNA (Nugent and Palmer, 1988; Palmer, 1992; Unseld et al., 1997; Cho et al., 1998; Marienfeld et al., 1999) and are very large and mostly noncoding (Ward et al., 1981; Palmer, 1990, 1992; Unseld et al., 1997; Marienfeld et al., 1999). Finally, there is the possibility that genes for some organellar proteins may be better regu- lated in the nucleus (Thorsness and Weber, 1996). Although this possibil- ity is intriguing, we are unaware of any evidence to support or refute it. Why are a few protein genes preferentially retained by mt genomes across all or most eukaryotes? One view is that the products of these genes, all of which function in respiration, are highly hydrophobic and difficult to both import into mitochondria and properly insert (post- translationally) into the inner mt membrane (see, e.g., Popot and de Vitry, 1990; Thorsness and Weber, 1996; Palmer, 1997). Evidence for this in- cludes experiments in which cytoplasmically synthesized cytochrome b, a highly hydrophobic protein with eight transmembrane helices, could not be imported in its entirety, with successful import limited to regions com- prising only three to four transmembrane domains (Claros et al., 1995). In general, genes whose products have many hydrophobic transmembrane domains are usually located in the mitochondrion whereas genes whose products have few such domains are more often transferred to the nucleus (Popot and de Vitry, 1990; Gray et al., 1998). Indeed, the only two protein genes contained in all of the many completely sequenced mt genomes encode what are by some criteria (Claros et al., 1995) the two most hydro- phobic proteins present in the mitochondrion, cytochrome b and subunit 1 of cytochrome oxidase (Gray et al., 1998; Gray, 1999). Although the hydrophobicity hypothesis cannot account for the distribution of every mt gene in every eukaryote, it seems likely to be a factor favoring the retention of certain respiratory genes. A second hypothesis for retention of certain genes in organelles is that their products are toxic when present in the cytosol or in some other, inappropriate cellular compartment to
Dynamic Evolution of Plant Mitochondrial Genomes / 47 which they might be misrouted after cytosolic synthesis (Martin and Schnarrenberger, 1997). Although this toxicity hypothesis is eminently testable, we are unaware of any empirical evidence for it. A third hypoth- esis for organellar gene retention is to allow their expression to be directly and quickly regulated by the redox state of the organelle (Allen, 1993; reviewed in Race et al., 1999). Evidence for redox regulation of organellar gene expression has been reported for chloroplasts (Pfannschmidt et al., 1999) but not, to our knowledge, for mitochondria. Although selective factors may be responsible for the transfer of some genes to the nucleus and the retention of others in the mitochondrion, chance factors may also be at work. At the stage of dual expression, whether the nuclear or mt copy of a transferred gene is retained may in some cases depend solely on the roll of the evolutionary diceâon which gene first sustains a gene-inactivating mutation, or a mutation that is either deleterious or beneficial to the gene productâs function. In the latter two cases, selection would be involved in the sense that it would act to either fix the gene with the beneficial mutation or eliminate the gene with the deleterious mutation. We are left with a picture of organelle gene transfer as a complex, historically contingent process whose outcome undoubtedly depends on a combination of mechanistically driven factors and chance mutations, together with selective forces. The process seems to be driven by the high rate of physical duplication of organelle genes into the nucleus (which appears to be true for all eukaryotes, regardless of whether functional gene transfer is still occurring), and proceeds seemingly exclusively in one direction: from organelles to nucleus. Indeed, with one disputed ex- ception, a mutS homolog in coral mt DNA (Pont-Kingdon et al., 1995, 1998), there are no examples known of the reverse process, of functional genes moving from the nucleus to the mitochondrion or chloroplast. Why has gene transfer been so pervasively unidirectional? Flowering plant mitochondria are certainly able to accept foreign sequences: Nu- merous examples are known of the uptake of chloroplast DNA (Nugent and Palmer, 1988; Palmer, 1992; Unseld et al., 1997; Marienfeld et al., 1999), nuclear DNA (Knoop et al., 1996; Unseld et al., 1997; Marienfeld et al., 1999), and sequences from other organisms (Vaughn et al., 1995; Cho et al., 1998; see below), and a few chloroplast-derived genes are expressed in the mitochondrion (Joyce and Gray, 1989; Kanno et al., 1997; Miyata et al., 1998). Nonetheless, the initial driving force (the rate of physical transfer/ duplication of sequences from one genome into the other) may be much stronger toward the nucleus than in the reverse direction; certainly this seems to be the case for yeast by several orders of magnitude (Thorsness and Fox, 1990; Thorsness and Weber, 1996). Compounding this, each mt gene physically transferred to the nucleus can potentially result in func-
48 / Jeffrey D. Palmer, et al. tional transfer whereas only a small fraction of nuclear genes could play a useful role if transferred to the mitochondrion. The pervasively unidirec- tional flow of mt genes to the nucleus may, therefore, be driven largely, perhaps even entirely, by a huge imbalance in the relative likelihood of gene movement and potential functionality in one direction versus the other. EXPLOSIVE INVASION OF PLANT MITOCHONDRIA BY A GROUP I INTRON Thus far, we have discussed intracellular horizontal evolution en- tirely as a means of relocating plant mt genes to the nucleus. As men- tioned in the introduction, plant mt genomes are also well known to acquire foreign sequences by intracellular gene transfer, from both the chloroplast and nucleus. We have recently described (Cho et al., 1998; Cho and Palmer, 1999), and will briefly review here, a case of horizontal evolu- tion that stands out in three respects: (i) It is the first case of cross-species acquisition of DNA by plant mt genomes; (ii) it is unparalleled with re- spect to how frequently the same piece of DNA has been acquired, over and over again, during angiosperm evolution; and (iii) all of these many invasions have occurred very recently, as an explosive wave within the last 10 million years or so. The piece of DNA in question here is a homing group I intron. These introns encode site-specific endonucleases with relatively long target sites that catalyze their efficient spread from intron-containing to intron- lacking alleles of the same gene in genetic crosses. A few cases of the evolutionary spread of these introns by horizontal homing between spe- cies were known when, in 1995, we in collaboration with Jack Vaughnâs group reported (Vaughn et al., 1995) that the angiosperm Peperomia had acquired, quite recently (Adams et al., 1998), a group I intron in its mt cox1 gene by long-distance horizontal transfer, most likely from a fungus. We subsequently discovered a closely related form of this intron, located at the same position in cox1, in a very distantly related angiosperm, Veronica. This stimulated us to use the Veronica intron as a probe against our survey blots of 281 angiosperm DNAs. As shown in Fig. 1 Lower, the intron probe hybridized strongly to relatively few DNAs, in an unusually patchy man- ner phylogenetically [and always to the same band as a cox1 exon probe (Fig. 1 Middle), indicating that the hybridizing region is always located in the same gene]. All told, 48 of the 281 angiosperm DNAs on the blots, scattered across most of the major groups represented, hybridized well to the intron (Cho et al., 1998). The exceptionally patchy phylogenetic distribution of the intron (see Fig. 2 of Cho et al., 1998) caused us to sequence the intron from 30 diverse
Dynamic Evolution of Plant Mitochondrial Genomes / 49 intron-containing taxa. We then compared the congruence of intron (Fig. 3A) and âorganismalâ (Fig. 3B) phylogenies to assess the relative contri- butions of vertical and horizontal transmission to the intronâs evolution- ary history in angiosperms. These phylogenies are highly incongruent. From this, we concluded that the intron had been independently acquired, by cross-species horizontal transfer, many times separately among the examined plants. For example, consider the closely related rosids Bursera and Melia, whose intron-hybridizing DNAs are in adjacent lanes in Fig. 1 (lanes 46 and 47; recall that DNAs are arranged according to presumptive phylogenetic order in these blots) and which group with 100% bootstrap support in the organismal tree of Fig. 3B. Their cox1 intron sequences do not, however, group together (Fig. 3A), suggesting that Bursera and Melia acquired their introns independently of one another. Three, more con- vincing pairs of examples of phylogenetic evidence for independent ac- quisition consist of Ilex/Hydrocotyle, Symplocus/Diospyros, and Maranta/ Hedychium. Each pair again receives 100% bootstrap support in Fig. 3B, and in each case the two members of the pair are now separated by multiple, well supported nodes in the intron tree (Fig. 3A). All told, we inferred at least 32 separate cases of intron gain to ac- count for the intronâs presence in the 48 angiosperms revealed to contain the intron by the 281-taxa Southern blot survey (Cho et al., 1998). Some 25 of these cases are marked on Fig. 3A by plus signs, while 7 additional gains were inferred by criterion ii, as we shall now describe. Overall, the inferences of independent intron gain were based on four criteria: (i) the many incongruencies, some strongly supported, some less so, between intron and organismal phylogenies (Fig. 3); (ii) the highly disjunct phylo- genetic distribution of intron-containing plants; (iii) different lengths of co-conversion tracts among otherwise related introns (Fig. 3); and (iv) the existence of ancestrally intron-lacking taxa within families containing the intron. This last form of evidence also relates to co-conversion, the pro- cess by which donor exonic sequences flanking the intron replace recipi- ent exonic sequences when the intron is inserted into the cox1 gene. Space limitations preclude any meaningful discussion of the complicated logic behind the two criteria that are largely or entirely based on co-conversion tract evidence; the interested reader is instead referred to Cho et al. (1998) and Cho and Palmer (1999). More extensive sampling within the monocot family Araceae showed that 6 of the 14 Araceae sampled contain the intron and that these 6 taxa probably acquired their introns by at least 3 and quite possibly 5 separate horizontal transfers (Cho et al., 1998; Cho and Palmer, 1999). In addition, unpublished studies from our lab and that of Claude dePamphilis reveal many more cases of independent gain of this promiscuous group I intron. Given that we have still sampled only a tiny fraction of the >300,000
50 / Jeffrey D. Palmer, et al. FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic evidence for horizontal transfer of cox1 introns. (A) Maximum-likelihood tree of 30 angiosperm cox1 introns. Numbers on the tree are bootstrap values. Plus signs on the tree mark 25 inferred gains of the intron among these taxa. Symbols to the immediate right of names are as in Fig. 3B. Numbers at far right indicate number of 3â-flanking nucleotides changed by co- conversion (see text). Bold branches mark four small clades of introns thought to have originated from the same intron gain event. (B) Organismal tree from a maximum-likelihood analysis of a combined data set of chloroplast rbcL and mt cox1 coding sequences. Numbers are bootstrap values. Symbols mark the nine major groups of angiosperms represented in this analysis. The figure is modified from Cho et al. (1998). species of angiosperms, we are confident that the intron has been hori- zontally acquired at least hundreds of times during angiosperm evolution and probably over 1,000 times. Equally remarkably, all of these transfers seem to have occurred very recently, in the last 10 million years or so of angiosperm evolution. Many fascinating questions can be asked about the evolution of this wildly invasive group I intron. What does the inevitably complex histori- cal network of horizontal transfers look like; i.e., who is the donor and who is the recipient in each specific instance of intron transfer? Phyloge- netic evidence suggests at least one, perhaps initiating long-distance trans- fer of the intron from a fungus to a flowering plant (Cho et al., 1998). Have many or most of the transfers occurred via this long-distance route, in
Dynamic Evolution of Plant Mitochondrial Genomes / 51 which case all of the fungi must themselves be closely related [because all of the plant introns are (Cho et al., 1998)]? Or have most transfers, perhaps all but the first, occurred via âshortâ-distance transfer, i.e., from an- giosperm to angiosperm? These two alternative models make contrasting phylogenetic predictions as elaborated elsewhere (Cho et al., 1998). Has transfer, especially if largely plant-to-plant, been mediated by vectoring agents, and if so which ones (e.g., viruses, bacteria, aphids, mycorrhizal fungi, etc.)? Or has it occurred by transformation-like uptake of DNA from the environment or by the occasional direct fusion (perhaps pollen- mediated) of two unrelated plants? To some extent, the answers are prob- ably yes, yes, and yes; considering the large number of independent trans- fers, each a unique and rare (except on the evolutionary timescale) historical event, almost any imaginable kind of vector and method of intron transfer could have been used at least once. Why has the intron burst on the angiosperm scene in such a rampant manner only so re- cently? Has this recent wave of lateral transfers been triggered by some key shift in the intronâs invasiveness within angiosperms, and if so, what has changed? We hope to provide at least partial answers to some of these fascinating but challenging questions over the coming years. In passing, we note that the overwhelmingly horizontal evolution of this remarkable group I intron is in striking contrast to the vertical pattern of evolution of the 23 other introns in angiosperm mt genomes, all of which are group II introns (Unseld et al., 1997). We have used probes for 11 of these introns in our Southern blots surveys (Qiu et al., 1998; Y.-L.Q. and J.D.P., unpublished data). All 11 are present in most or all major groups of angiosperms, and in many other groups of vascular plants, and thus were clearly present in the common ancestor of all angiosperms. These group II introns appear to have been transmitted in a strictly verti- cal manner, including occasional to frequent losses. HIGHLY ACCELERATED SUBSTITUTION RATES IN TWO LINEAGES OF PLANTS As already emphasized, our wide-scale Southern blot survey for pres- ence or absence of mt genes and introns is predicated entirely on the uncommonly low rates of nucleotide substitutions observed to date in plant mitochondria. If a lineage of plants were to sustain for very long a radically higher substitution rate (say at the 50- to 100-fold higher level characteristic of mammalian mitochondria), then all of its mt genes might hybridize poorly or not at all, as if the genome no longer existed. Poor hybridization with all mt probes tested was observed for two of the 281 angiosperms on our blots, Pelargonium hortorum (the common garden ge- ranium) (Fig. 1, lane 4) and Plantago rugelii (plantain, a common lawn
52 / Jeffrey D. Palmer, et al. weed); this was despite normal loadings of total DNA in these two lanes and strong hybridization with all chloroplast probes used. To explore this, portions of several mt protein and rRNA genes were PCR-amplified from both taxa and sequenced (Y.C., C.L.P., Y.-L.Q., and J.D.P., unpub- lished work). In all cases, the genes are exceptionally divergent. Most critically, in the case of the protein genes, most of the enhanced diver- gence is confined to synonymous sites. This indicates that the neutral point mutation rate, the rate of occurrence of nucleotide substitutions irrespective of selection, is markedly enhanced in both genera. To illus- trate this effect for cob and cox2, Fig. 4 shows phylogenetic trees con- structed with third codon positions only. Most third position changes are silent, and therefore the extremely long branch lengths leading to the Pelargonium and Plantago sequences in each tree graphically illustrate the high point mutation rate in these two distantly unrelated angiosperms. Analysis of chloroplast and nuclear gene sequences from both plants indicates that these two genomes are not undergoing accelerated evolu- tion (consistent with the strong hybridization of chloroplast probes men- tioned above). Thus, the mutation rate increases in these two plants are restricted to their mitochondrial genomes. This distinguishes these cases of rate variation from those reported by Eyre-Walker and Gaut (1997), in which all three genomes of grasses were shown to exhibit higher rates of synonymous substitution than in palms. Another distinction is the mag- nitude of the rate variation: Grasses and palms differ only several-fold in their (plant-wide) substitution rates, whereas Pelargonium and Plantago FIGURE 4. Accelerated evolution of mitochondrial cob (left tree) and cox2 (right tree) genes in P. hortorum and P. rugelii. Trees are from a maximum likelihood analysis of third codon positions only (344 positions for cob and 116 for cox2). Tree topologies were constrained to match current views of phylogenetic rela- tionships for the organisms whose genes are analyzed. Trees are shown at the same scale; scale bar indicates 0.1 substitution/nucleotide. Pelargonium and Plan- tago sequences are from our unpublished data, and the rest are from the Gen- Bank database.
Dynamic Evolution of Plant Mitochondrial Genomes / 53 show elevated (mt-specific) rates some 50â100 times higher than normal, putting them on a par with the very rapidly evolving mt genomes of mammals. Furthermore, analysis of several other species from the Pelar- gonium (Geraniaceae) and Plantago (Plantaginaceae) families shows a range of enhanced mt divergences in both families, as if sequential in- creases in the mt mutation rate had occurred during their evolution (Y.C., C.L.P., and J.D.P., unpublished work). The magnitude and recency of these mutation rate shifts appear to be unprecedented for evolutionary lineages of species (as opposed to the well known but ephemeral mutator strains of laboratory mutant cultures, of wild strains of bacteria, or of human colon cancers). It remains to be seen whether the same sorts of underlying mechanisms are involved, such as changes in the fidelity and efficacy of DNA replication and mis- match repair (Modrich and Lahue, 1996). POSTSCRIPT Plant mt genomes continue to spring marvelous evolutionary sur- prises. The discovery that certain angiosperm groups are rapidly moving a large set of mt ribosomal proteins to the nucleus seems remarkable in two contexts: first, that they still have these so âeasily transferredâ genes left to transfer after a roughly 2-billion-year period of mt existence; sec- ond, that animals lost all of these ribosomal protein genes at least 0.6 billion years ago (i.e., before they became animals) and that there has been absolutely no functional gene transfer within the long period of metazoan evolution (plants still do it, animals donât!). For reasons as yet unfathom- able, rates of functional gene transfer appear to vary hugely across lin- eages and over time. The very recent and explosive burst of cox1 intron invasions into angiosperm mt genomes and the discovery of unprece- dentedly large increases in the mt point mutation rate in two groups of angiosperms also speak to the surprising fluidity of the forces that control the rates of all manner of classes of mutations. These discoveries pave the way for more reductionist studies aimed at elucidating molecular mecha- nisms underlying these striking evolutionary patterns and rate changes. They also point to the opportunity afforded by microarray technology to mine new veins of molecular evolutionary gold by scaling up by orders of magnitude the Southern blot approach so successfully used thus far. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Jeff Doyle, Jane Doyle, Peter Kuhlman, Jackie Nugent, Phil Roessler, and Andy Shirk for various contributions and Jeff Blanchard, Dan Daley, Will Fischer, Patrick Keeling, and Jim Whelan for helpful
54 / Jeffrey D. Palmer, et al. discussions. This study was supported by National Institutes of Health Research Grant GM-35087 to J.D.P., U.S. Department of Agriculture Plant Biotechnology Fellowship 95-38420-2214 to K.L.A., and National Insti- tutes of Health Postdoctoral Fellowships GM-17923 and GM-19225 to Y.L.Q. and C.L.P., respectively. REFERENCES Adams, K. L., Clements, M. J. & Vaughn, J. C. (1998) The Peperomia mitochondrial coxI group I intron: Timing of horizontal transfer and subsequent evolution of the intron. J. Mol. Evol. 46, 689â696. Adams, K. L., Song, K., Roessler, P.G., Nugent, J. M., Doyle, J. L., Doyle, J. J. & Palmer, J. D. (1999) Intracellular gene transfer in action: Dual transcription and multiple silencings of nuclear and mitochondrial cox2 genes in legumes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 13863â13868. Allen, J. F. (1993) Control of gene expression by redox potential and the requirement for chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes. J. Theor. Biol. 165, 609â631. Allen, J. F. & Raven, J. A. (1996) Free-radical-induced mutation vs redox regulation: Costs and benefits of genes in organelles. J. Mol. Evol. 42, 482â492. Bittner-Eddy, P., Monroy, A. F. & Brambl, R. (1994) Expression of mitochondrial genes in the germinating conidia of Neurospora crassa. J. Mol. Biol. 235, 881â897. Blanchard, J. & Lynch, M. (2000) Organellar genes. Why do they end up in the nucleus? Trends Genet. 16, 315â320. Brown, T. A., Ray, J. A., Waring, R. B., Scazzocchio, C. & Davies, R. W. (1984) A mitochon- drial reading frame which may code for a second form of ATPase subunit 9 in As- pergillus nidulans. Curr. Genet. 8, 489â492. Cho, Y., Qiu, Y.-L., Kuhlman, P. & Palmer, J. D. (1998) Explosive invasion of plant mito- chondria by a group I intron. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 14244â14249. Cho, Y. & Palmer, J. D. (1999) Multiple acquisitions via horizontal transfer of a group I intron in the mitochondrial cox1 gene during evolution of the Araceae family. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1155â1165. Claros, M. G., Perea, J., Shu, Y., Samatey, F. A., Popot, J.-L. & Jacq, C. (1995) Limitations to in vivo import of hydrophobic proteins into yeast mitochondria. The case of a cyto- plasmically synthesized apocytochrome b. Eur. J. Biochem. 228, 762â771. Covello, P. S. & Gray, M. W. (1992) Silent mitochondrial and active nuclear genes for sub- unit 2 of cytochorme c oxidase (cox2) in soybean: evidence for RNA-mediated gene transfer. EMBO J. 22, 3815â3820. Doolittle, W. F. (1998) You are what you eat: a gene transfer ratchet could account for bacterial genes in eukaryotic nuclear genomes. Trends Genet. 14, 307â311. Eyre-Walker, A. & Gaut, B. S. (1997) Correlated rates of synonymous site evolution across plant genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14, 455â460. Fauron, C. M.-R., Moore, B. & Casper M. (1995) Maize as a model of higher plant mitochon- drial genome plasticity. Plant Science 112, 11â32. Figueroa, P., Gomez, I., Holuigue, L., Araya, A. & Jordana, X. (1999a) Transfer of rps14 from the mitochondrion to the nucleus in maize implied integration within a gene encoding the iron-sulphur subunit of succinate dehydrogenase and expression by alternative splicing. Plant J. 18, 601â609. Figueroa, P., Gomez, I., Carmona, R., Holuigue, L., Araya, A. & Jordana, X. (1999b) The gene for mitochondrial ribosomal protein S14 has been transferred to the nucleus in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Gen. Genet. 262, 139â144. Gray, M. W. (1999) Evolution of organellar genomes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9, 678â687.
Dynamic Evolution of Plant Mitochondrial Genomes / 55 Gray, M. W., Lang, B. F., Cedergren, R., Golding, G. B., Lemieux, C., Sankoff, D., Turmel, M., Brossard, N., Delage, E., Littlejohn, T. G., Plante, I., Rious, P., Saint-Louis, D., Zhu, T. & Burger, G. (1998) Genome structure and gene content in protist mitochondrial DNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 865â878. Grohmann, L., Brennicke, A. & Schuster, W. (1992) The mitochondrial gene encoding ribo- somal protein S12 has been translocated to the nuclear genome in Oenothera. Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 5641â5646. Hanson, M. R. (1991) Plant mitochondrial mutations and male sterility. Annu. Rev. Genet. 25, 461â486. Herrmann, R. G. (1997) Eukaryotism, towards a new interpretation. In Eukaryotism and Symbiosis, ed. Schenk, H. E. A., Herrmann, R. G., Jeon, K. W., MÃ¼ller, N. E. & Sch- wemmler, W. (Springer-Verlag, Vienna), pp. 73â118. Joyce, P. B. & Gray, M. W. (1989) Chloroplast-like transfer RNA genes expressed in wheat mitochondria. Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 5461â5476. Kadowaki, K., Kubo, N., Ozawa, K. & Hirai, A. (1996) Targeting presequence acquisition after mitochondrial gene transfer to the nucleus occurs by duplication of existing tar- geting signals. EMBO J. 15, 6652â6661. Kanno, A., Nakazono, M., Hirai, A. & Kameya, T. (1997) A chloroplast derived trnH gene is expressed in the mitochondrial genome of gramineous plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 34, 353â 356. Knoop, V., Unseld, M., Marienfeld, J., Brandt, P., Sunkel, S., Ullrich, H. & Brennicke, A. (1996) copia-, gypsy- and LINE-like retrotransposon fragments in the mitochondrial genome of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 142, 579â585. Kubo, N., Harada, K. & Kadowaki, K. (1998) Transfer of an rps11 gene from mitochondrion to the nucleus in pea. In Plant Mitochondria: From Gene to Function, eds. Moller, I. M., Gardestrom, P., Glimelius, K. & Glaser, E. (Backhuys, Leiden), pp. 25â27. Kubo, N., Harada, K., Hirai, A. & Kadowaki, K. (1999) A single nuclear transcript encoding mitochondrial RPS14 and SDHB of rice is processed by alternative splicing: Common use of the same mitochondrial targeting signal for different proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 9207â9211. Laroche, J., Li, P., Maggia, L. & Bousquet, J. (1997) Molecular evolution of angiosperm mitochondrial introns and exons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 5722â5727. Lynch, M. (1996) Mutation accumulation in transfer RNAs: molecular evidence for Mullerâs ratchet in mitochondrial genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13, 209â220. Mackenzie, S., He, S. & Lyznik, A. (1994) The elusive plant mitochondrion as a genetic system. Plant Physiol. 105, 775â780. Marienfeld, J., Unseld, M. & Brennicke, A. (1999) The mitochondrial genome of Arabidopsis is composed of both native and immigrant information. Trends Plant Sci. 4, 495â502. Marshall, C. R., Raff, E. C. & Raff, R. A. (1994) Dolloâs law and the death and resurrection of genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 12283â12287. Martin, A. P., Naylor, G. J. P. & Palumbi, S. R. (1992) Rates of mitochondrial DNA evolution in sharks are slow compared with mammals. Nature 357, 153â155. Martin, W. & Schnarrenberger, C. (1997) The evolution of the Calvin cycle from prokaryotic to eukaryotic chromosomes: a case study of functional redundancy in ancient path- ways through endosymbiosis. Curr. Genet. 32, 1â18. Martin, W. & Herrmann, R. G. (1998) Gene transfer from organelles to the nucleus: How much, what happens, and why? Plant Physiol. 118, 9â17. Miyata, S., Nakazono, M. & Hirai, A. (1998) Transcription of plastid-derived tRNA genes in rice mitochondria. Curr. Genet. 34, 216â220. Modrich, P. & Lahue, R. (1996) Mismatch repair in replication fidelity, genetic recombina- tion, and cancer biology. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65, 101â133.
56 / Jeffrey D. Palmer, et al. Moran, N. (1996) Accelerated evolution and Mullerâs rachet in endosymbiotic bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 2873â2878. Nugent, J. M. & Palmer, J. D. (1988) Location, identity, amount and serial entry of chloro- plast DNA sequences in crucifer mitochondrial DNAs. Curr. Genet. 14, 501â509. Nugent, J. M. & Palmer, J. D. (1991) RNA-mediated transfer of the gene coxII from the mitochondrion to the nucleus during flowering plant evolution. Cell 66, 473â481. Nugent, J. M. & Palmer, J. D. (1993) Evolution of gene content and gene organization in flowering plant mitochondrial DNA: A general survey and further studies on coxII gene transfer to the nucleus. In Plant Mitochondria, eds. Brennicke, A. & Kuck, U. (VCH Publishers, New York), pp. 163â170. Palmer, J. D. (1990) Contrasting modes and tempos of genome evolution in land plant organelles. Trends. Genet. 6, 115â120. Palmer, J. D. (1992) Chloroplast and mitochondrial genome evolution in land plants. In Plant Gene Research: Cell Organelles, ed. Herrmann, R. G. (Springer-Verlag, Vienna), pp. 99â133. Palmer, J. D. (1997) Organelle genomes: going, going, gone! Science 275, 790â791. Palmer, J. D. & Herbon, L. A. (1988) Plant mitochondrial DNA evolves rapidly in structure, but slowly in sequence. J. Mol. Evol. 28, 87â97. Perrotta, G., Grienenberger, J. M. & Gualberto, J. M. (1998) Plant mitochondrial rps2 genes code for proteins with a C-terminal extension that apparently is processed. In Plant Mitochondria: From Gene to Function, eds. Moller, I. M., Gardestrom, P., Glimelius, K. & Glaser, E. (Backhuys, Leiden), pp. 37â41. Pfannschmidt, T., Nilsson, A. & Allen, J. F. (1999) Photosynthetic control of chloroplast gene expression. Nature 397, 625â628. Pont-Kingdon, G. A., Okada, N. A., Macfarlane, J. L., Beagley, C. T., Wolstenholme, D. R., Cavalier-Smith, T., & Clark-Walker, G. D. (1995) A coral mitochondrial mutS gene. Nature 375, 109â111. Pont-Kingdon, G., Okada, N. A., Macfarlane, J. L., Beagley, C. T, Watkins-Sims, C. D., Cavalier-Smith, T., Clark-Walker, G. D. & Wolstenholme, D. R. (1998) Mitochondrial DNA of the coral Sarcophyton glaucum contains a gene for a homologue of bacterial mutS: A possible case of gene transfer from the nucleus to the mitochondrion. J. Mol. Evol. 46, 419â431. Popot, J.-L. & de Vitry, C. (1990) On the microassembly of integral membrane proteins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 19, 369â403. Qiu, Y.-L., Cho, Y., Cox, J. C. & Palmer, J. D. (1998) The gain of three mitochondrial introns identifies liverworts as the earliest land plants. Nature 394, 671â674. Race, H. L., Herrmann, R. G. & Martin, W. (1999) Why have organelles retained genomes? Trends Genet. 15, 364â370. Ricchetti, M., Fairhead, C. & Dujon, B. (1999) Mitochondrial DNA repairs double-strand breaks in yeast chromosomes. Nature 402, 96â100. Sanchez, H., Fester, T., Kloska, S., Schroder, W. & Schuster, W. (1996) Transfer of rps19 to the nucleus involves the gain of an RNP-binding motif which may functionally replace RPS13 in Arabidopsis mitochondria. EMBO J. 15, 2138â2149. Soltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E. & Chase, M. W. (1999) Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from mul- tiple genes as a tool for comparative biology. Nature 402, 402â404. Thorsness, P. E. & Fox, T. D. (1990) Escape of DNA from mitochondria to the nucleus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 346, 376â379. Thorsness, P. E. & Weber, E. R. (1996) Escape and migration of nucleic acids between chlo- roplasts, mitochondria, and the nucleus. Intl. Rev. Cytol. 165, 207â233.
Dynamic Evolution of Plant Mitochondrial Genomes / 57 Unseld, M., Marienfeld, J. R., Brandt, P. & Brennicke, A. (1997) The mitochondrial genome of Arabidopsis thaliana contains 57 genes in 366, 924 nucleotides. Nature Genet. 15, 57â 61. van den Boogaart, P., Samallo, J. & Agsteribbe, E. (1982) Similar genes for a mitochondrial ATPase subunit in the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes of Neurospora crassa. Na- ture 298, 187â189. Vaughn, J. C., Mason, M. T., Sper-Whitis, G. L., Kuhlman, P. & Palmer, J. D. (1995) Fungal origin by horizontal transfer of a plant mitochondrial group I intron in the chimeric coxI gene of Peperomia. J. Mol. Evol. 41, 563â572. Waddell, P. J., Cao, Y., Hasegawa, M. & Mindell, D. P. (1999) Assessing the cretaceous superordinal divergence times within birds and placental mammals by using whole mitochondrial protein sequences and an extended statistical framework. Syst. Biol. 48, 119â137. Ward, B. L., Anderson, R. S. & Bendich, A. J. (1981) The mitochondrial genome is large and variable in a family of plants (Cucurbitaceae). Cell 25, 793â803. Ward, M. & Turner, G. (1986) The ATP synthase subunit 9 gene of Aspergillus nidulans: sequence and transcription. Mol. Gen. Genet. 205, 331â338. Wischmann, C. & Schuster, W. (1995) Transfer of rps10 from the mitochondrion to the nucleus in Arabidopsis thaliana: evidence for RNA-mediated transfer and exon shuf- fling at the integration site. FEBS Letters 375, 152â156. Wolfe, K. H., Li, W.-H. & Sharp, P. M. (1987) Rates of nucleotide substitution vary greatly among plant mitochondrial, chloroplast, and nuclear DNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 9054â9058.