National Academies Press: OpenBook

Reporting District-Level NAEP Data: Summary of a Workshop (2000)

Chapter: Appendix A: Workshop on District-Level Reporting for NAEP Agenda and Participants

« Previous: References
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Workshop on District-Level Reporting for NAEP Agenda and Participants." National Research Council. 2000. Reporting District-Level NAEP Data: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9768.
×

APPENDIX A

Workshop on District-Level Reporting for NAEP Agenda and Participants

Thursday – September 16 Georgetown Suites Hotel

 

10:00 - 10:15

Welcome and Introductions

Pat DeVito, Chair

10:15 - 12:15

Panel 1: What purposes would be served by district-level reporting of NAEP?

Facilitators: LeAnn Gamache and Doug Herrmann

 

Topics:

  1. What information needs might be served?

  2. Who would use the results?

  3. How would they be used?

  4. What are the issues that should be considered?

  5. What are the advantages and disadvantages?

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Workshop on District-Level Reporting for NAEP Agenda and Participants." National Research Council. 2000. Reporting District-Level NAEP Data: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9768.
×
 

SPEAKERS

Wayne Martin, Council of Chief State School Officers

Sharon Lewis, Council of Greater City Schools

Ed Roeber, Advanced Systems in Measurement and Evaluationa

Albert Beaton, Boston Collegea

REACTORS

Susan Agruso, South Carolinab

Judy Costa, Clark County, Nevada

12:15- 1:15

Lunch

1:15 - 3:15

Panel 2: What are the implications of district-level reporting for state/local policy, instruction, and assessment?

Facilitators: Melody Carswell and Lou Fabriziob

 

Topics:

  1. What lessons did states learn from the introduction of state NAEP that help us think about the likely impact of district-level NAEP?

  2. What have been the impacts on:

    • - state testing/education policies,

    • - state testing programs,

    • - school curricula,

    • - schools, teachers, children

  3. What types of comparisons are being made?

  4. How do the comparisons affect interpretations of state/ local testing results?

  5. What happens when NAEP results and state/local assessment results differ?

SPEAKERS

Don Watson, Colorado

Bob Silverman, Washingtona

Peter Behuniak, Connecticut

Susan Agruso, South Carolinab

REACTOR

Steve Dunbar, University of Iowa

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Workshop on District-Level Reporting for NAEP Agenda and Participants." National Research Council. 2000. Reporting District-Level NAEP Data: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9768.
×

3:15 – 3:30

Break

3:30

Closed meeting for committee members

Friday – September 17, NAS, Foundry, Room 2004

 

8:30 - 9:00

Continental breakfast

9:00 – 2:00

Welcome and Introductions

Pat DeVito, Chair

Panel 3: To what extent are states and districts interested in district-level reporting? What factors influence their interest?

 

Topics:

  1. What information might district-level reporting provide to you? What information might it provide that is not available from other sources?

  2. How might district-level reports be used? What, if any, decisions might be based on reported results?

  3. What are the implications of district-level reporting for your state and/or local assessment programs?

  4. What lessons from past forays/experiences, if any, with district level reporting of NAEP apply to current context?

  5. What factors would influence your interest in future participation in district-level NAEP? (costs, testing burden, reporting schedule, type of reports, possible score uses)

  6. Should states and/or districts make decisions about participation in district NAEP?

  7. Who should receive the scores? Who should make decisions about score release?

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Workshop on District-Level Reporting for NAEP Agenda and Participants." National Research Council. 2000. Reporting District-Level NAEP Data: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9768.
×

9:00 – 10:45

Naturally Occurring Districts

Facilitators: Pat DeVito, Maryellen Donahue

PANEL 3A: SPEAKERS

Carol Perlman, Chicago

Carmen Chapman, Illinoisa

PANEL 3B: SPEAKERS

Judy Costa, Clark County, Nevada

Tom McIntosh, Nevada

PANEL 3C: SPEAKERS

Robert Tobias, New York Cityb

Gerald DeMauro, New Yorka

10:45 - 11:00

Break

11:00 – 12:00

Other Interested Districts

Facilitators: Linda Bryant and Lou Fabriziob

PANEL 3D: SPEAKERS

Paul Cieslak, Milwaukeec

Nancy Amuleru-Marshall, Atlantaa

Harry Selig, Houston Independent School District

Paula Mosley, Los Angeles Unified School District

Mitchell Chester, Philadelphia

12:00 - 1:00

Lunch

1:00 – 2:00

PANEL 3D, CONTINUED

2:00 - 3:30

Panel 4: Technical and Policy Issues

Facilitators: Audrey Qualls and Duane Steffey

 

Topics:

Issues related to sampling and administration

Issues related to reporting of scores and conditioning

Issues related to policy

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Workshop on District-Level Reporting for NAEP Agenda and Participants." National Research Council. 2000. Reporting District-Level NAEP Data: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9768.
×

    - What constitutes a district?

      - Who makes participation decisions?

        - Who “owns” the data?

          - Who gets to see and use the data?

          PANELISTS

          Rick Vallient, Westat

          Nancy Allen, ETSa

          Peggy Carr, NCES

          Roy Truby, NAGB

          REACTOR

          Lauress Wise, HumRRO

          3:30

          Adjourn

          PARTICIPANTS

          Nancy Allen,a Director, NAEP Analysis and Research, Educational Testing Service

          Nancy Amuleru-Marshall,a Executive Director, Research and Assessment, Atlanta Public Schools

          Al Beaton,a Professor, Educational Evaluation, School of Education, Boston College

          Peter Behuniak, Director of Student Assessment and Testing, Connecticut State Department of Education

          Peggy Carr, Associate Commissioner, Assessment Division, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education

          Carmen Chapman,a Administrator, Division of Assessment, Illinois State Department of Education

          Mitchell Chester, Executive Director, Office of Accountability and Assessment, School District of Philadelphia

          Paul Cieslak,c Research Specialist, Milwaukee Public Schools

          Judy Costa, Testing Director, Clark County School District, Las Vegas, NV

          Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Workshop on District-Level Reporting for NAEP Agenda and Participants." National Research Council. 2000. Reporting District-Level NAEP Data: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9768.
          ×

          Gerald DeMauro,a Coordinator of Assessment, Office of State Assessment, Albany, NY

          Steve Dunbar, Professor of Educational Measurement and Statistics, College of Education, The University of Iowa

          Sharon Lewis, Director of Research, Council of the Great City Schools

          Wayne Martin, Director, State Education Assessment Center, Council of Chief State School Officers

          Thomas McIntosh, Team Leader, Nevada Department of Education

          Paula Mosley, Coordinator, Student Testing and Evaluation, Office of Instruction, Los Angeles, CA

          Carole L. Perlman, Director of Student Assessment, Chicago Public Schools

          Edward Roeber,a Vice President of External Relations, Advanced Systems in Measurement and Evaluation, Dover, NH

          Harry Selig, Research Manager, Research and Accountability Department, Houston Independent School District, Houston, TX

          Robert Silverman,a Senior Analyst for Assessment, Olympia, WA

          Roy Truby, Executive Director, National Assessment Governing Board

          Richard Valliant, Associate Director, Statistical Group, WESTAT

          Don Watson, Acting Director, Student Assessment, Colorado Department of Education

          Lauress L. Wise, President, Human Resources Research Organization

          Hurricane Floyd interfered with participants’ travel plans:

          aParticipated via speaker phone for a portion of the meeting

          bUnable to attend

          cProvided written comments but did not participate

          Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Workshop on District-Level Reporting for NAEP Agenda and Participants." National Research Council. 2000. Reporting District-Level NAEP Data: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9768.
          ×
          Page 45
          Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Workshop on District-Level Reporting for NAEP Agenda and Participants." National Research Council. 2000. Reporting District-Level NAEP Data: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9768.
          ×
          Page 46
          Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Workshop on District-Level Reporting for NAEP Agenda and Participants." National Research Council. 2000. Reporting District-Level NAEP Data: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9768.
          ×
          Page 47
          Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Workshop on District-Level Reporting for NAEP Agenda and Participants." National Research Council. 2000. Reporting District-Level NAEP Data: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9768.
          ×
          Page 48
          Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Workshop on District-Level Reporting for NAEP Agenda and Participants." National Research Council. 2000. Reporting District-Level NAEP Data: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9768.
          ×
          Page 49
          Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Workshop on District-Level Reporting for NAEP Agenda and Participants." National Research Council. 2000. Reporting District-Level NAEP Data: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9768.
          ×
          Page 50
          Next: Appendix B: Background Information on NAEP »
          1. ×

            Welcome to OpenBook!

            You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

            Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

            No Thanks Take a Tour »
          2. ×

            Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

            « Back Next »
          3. ×

            ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

            « Back Next »
          4. ×

            Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

            « Back Next »
          5. ×

            Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

            « Back Next »
          6. ×

            To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

            « Back Next »
          7. ×

            Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

            « Back Next »
          8. ×

            View our suggested citation for this chapter.

            « Back Next »
          9. ×

            Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

            « Back Next »
          Stay Connected!