National Academies Press: OpenBook

Review of the U.S. Navy's Exposure Standard for Manufactured Vitreous Fibers (2000)

Chapter: 8 Information Gaps and Recommendations for Future Research

« Previous: 7 Evaluation of the Navy's Exposure Standard
Suggested Citation:"8 Information Gaps and Recommendations for Future Research." National Research Council. 2000. Review of the U.S. Navy's Exposure Standard for Manufactured Vitreous Fibers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9867.
×

8

INFORMATION GAPS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH

AS is evident from the number of recent studies cited in this report, a considerable amount of research has been and is being conducted in North America and Europe to elucidate the health effects of exposure to manufactured vitreous fibers (MVF). Although much of the research might address the information gaps discussed below, the need for and direction of future research must nonetheless be emphasized.

A recent agreement between the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and manufacturers and users of MVF to monitor exposures of production workers and users, might provide important data for future epidemiological studies (NAIMA 1999). Results of recent life-cycle studies on refractory ceramic fibers (RCF) as used in consumer products (Venturin et al. 1997) are an excellent starting point for this type of study. Monitoring information will be particularly valuable in light of the sparse epidemiological data on special-purpose fibers and other MVF, especially fibers that have been thermally aged. Ideally, monitoring will yield much-needed data on exposures of women and members of racial and other ethnic minorities to MVF. Nested case-control studies that obtain information on potential confounders, such as smoking, could be the best means of addressing questions on the effects of exposures to MVF.

The extrapolation of risks of lung tumors in rats after chronic inhalation of fibers is based on the assumption that the sensitivity of rats to fiber-induced carcinogenesis is similar to that of humans. Potential differences in target-cell sensitivity between rats and humans and the impact of these differences on risk models need to be addressed in future research. The research should focus on elucidating the mechanisms of

Suggested Citation:"8 Information Gaps and Recommendations for Future Research." National Research Council. 2000. Review of the U.S. Navy's Exposure Standard for Manufactured Vitreous Fibers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9867.
×

fiber carcinogenesis, including the reasons why hamsters are prone to developing pleural mesotheliomas but not lung tumors after chronic inhalation but rats are more likely to develop lung tumors and have a lower incidence of mesotheliomas. These studies should provide data to help determine the rodent species that are most appropriate for use in human-health risk assessment after exposures to fibers.

Bioassays for lung tumors after inhalation of fibers are based on expensive and time-consuming 2-year carcinogenicity studies. Although the intracavitary-exposure tests might cost less and produce a high incidence of mesotheliomas, they have substantial shortcomings, as discussed in Chapter 5. Consequently, the subcommittee notes that results of intracavitary exposure studies should not be used for purposes of risk assessment. Thus, there is a need for the development and validation of short-term assays to predict long-term effects. These predictive short-term tests could include inhalation and possibly in vitro studies once the mechanisms of fiber carcinogenicity are more fully understood. For any short-term test to be accepted, it must be properly validated against the results of chronic-inhalation studies.

Animal studies of the effects of chronic inhalation of MVF have used mainly particular animal species and fiber types. However, variation in sensitivity among species and dependence of response on fiber type and dimensions are evident. More systematic testing would clarify the patterns of species and fiber-type dependence and aid in the generalization of effects and application to human risk assessment. One such assessment has already been conducted to determine whether a glass-fiber insulation product required a cancer warning label under California proposition 65 (Fayerweather et al. 1997).

Dosimetry studies in animals are needed to clarify the nature and degree of deposition of fibers of various dimensions in different parts of the respiratory tract. Dosimetry studies should also examine the rates of translocation of deposited fibers and the rates at which fibers are dissolved or otherwise cleared; dissolution and cleaving change the magnitude and size distribution of local tissue burdens over time. Studies are needed to clarify how differences in those morphological processes result in variations in sensitivity among species. Methods for defining toxicologically equivalent exposures and tissue burdens across species are needed, and the application of these methods in extrapolating from animal results to humans should be assessed.

The biological mechanisms by which fibers induce tumors and nonma

Suggested Citation:"8 Information Gaps and Recommendations for Future Research." National Research Council. 2000. Review of the U.S. Navy's Exposure Standard for Manufactured Vitreous Fibers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9867.
×

lignant pulmonary dysfunction need to be further investigated. In particular, factors that can influence the shape of the dose-response relationship and could help to identify exposures below which key biological responses are not to be expected, need to be identified. The effects of continuous versus intermittent exposures should also be examined.

In general, methods and data appropriate for pursuing quantitative analysis of potential risks of chronic disease from MVF inhalation are needed. Quantitative risk analysis based on epidemiological data is hampered by the limited quantitative information on dosimetry. Epidemiology studies that incorporate measurements of fiber exposures or that reconstruct estimates of worker exposures to fibers, over the last several decades would aid in this endeavor.

The use of MVF as insulation material means that they are subjected to variations in temperature. Heat stress can result in changes in fibers' chemical and physical structure. However, there is a lack of information on the effect of heat stress on fiber structure and fiber breakdown. Such information could be important for assessing the exposures of Navy personnel and other workers to MVF. The toxicity of heat-stressed MVF—particularly those produced to withstand high temperature, such as RCF—has yet to be fully explored.

Pursuit of a research agenda as suggested above poses formidable challenges. It will need to be a continuing process that is not the province solely of the Navy, but rather of the fiber research community in general. Although monitoring data might always be difficult to come by, it is imperative that the Navy determine the concentrations and characteristics (such as, fiber length, diameter, and composition) of the MVF, particularly RCF, to which its personnel are exposed. That could be accomplished by air monitoring or by an inventory of the fiber content of the MVF-containing equipment and materials used by the Navy.

The subcommittee believes that when the Navy adopts another organization 's standard, as it has adopted the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists threshold limit value, it must evaluate the rationale used by the other organization to develop the standard so that it can assess how appropriate the standard is for its own purposes. It is important that typical fiber concentrations and exposure ranges be measured in the workplace air so that actual worker exposure can be compared with established or proposed occupational exposure standards. Such data and comparisons are necessary for any quantitative risk assess

Suggested Citation:"8 Information Gaps and Recommendations for Future Research." National Research Council. 2000. Review of the U.S. Navy's Exposure Standard for Manufactured Vitreous Fibers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9867.
×

ment and its accompanying uncertainty analysis. The Navy might also want to consider asking its suppliers to provide, where possible, materials that use low-biopersistence MVF.

The Navy should regard its current occupational standard as only one point on an ever-changing mosaic of exposure standards that will require periodic adjustments as new toxicological data become available, new monitoring studies are conducted, and new MVF are introduced into the workplace.

Suggested Citation:"8 Information Gaps and Recommendations for Future Research." National Research Council. 2000. Review of the U.S. Navy's Exposure Standard for Manufactured Vitreous Fibers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9867.
×
Page 59
Suggested Citation:"8 Information Gaps and Recommendations for Future Research." National Research Council. 2000. Review of the U.S. Navy's Exposure Standard for Manufactured Vitreous Fibers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9867.
×
Page 60
Suggested Citation:"8 Information Gaps and Recommendations for Future Research." National Research Council. 2000. Review of the U.S. Navy's Exposure Standard for Manufactured Vitreous Fibers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9867.
×
Page 61
Suggested Citation:"8 Information Gaps and Recommendations for Future Research." National Research Council. 2000. Review of the U.S. Navy's Exposure Standard for Manufactured Vitreous Fibers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9867.
×
Page 62
Next: References »
Review of the U.S. Navy's Exposure Standard for Manufactured Vitreous Fibers Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $47.00 Buy Ebook | $37.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Manufactured vitreous fibers (MVF), also known as synthetic vitreous fibers, are considered to be less hazardous than asbestos to human health. They are used in many thermal- and acoustical-insulation applications as an asbestos substitute or as a filtration medium. The Navy uses MVF in shipboard and onshore applications. To protect Navy personnel from harmful exposures to MVF, the U.S. Navy Environmental Health Center (NEHC) developed occupational exposure standards. The documentation assists industrial hygienists, occupational medicine physicians, and other Navy health professionals in assessing and controlling the health hazards linked with exposure to MVF.

In 1997, the National Research Council (NRC) was asked to conduct an independent review of the Navy's toxicological assessment of MVF and to evaluate the scientific validity of its exposure standard of 2 fibers per cubic centimeter of air (f/cm3). The NRC assigned the task to the Committee on Toxicology, which established the Subcommittee on Manufactured Vitreous Fibers, a multidisciplinary group of experts, to determine whether all relevant toxicological and epidemiological data were correctly considered in developing the exposure standard; and to examine the uncertainty, variability, and quality of data and the appropriateness of assumptions used in the derivation of the exposure standard. The subcommittee was also asked to identify deficiencies in the MVF database and, where appropriate, to make recommendations for future research and data development.

Review of the U.S. Navy's exposure Standard for Manufactured Vitreous Fibers represents the subcommittee's final report. The committee had expanded its review when in January 1999, the Navy revised its Occupational Safety and Health Program Manual (CNO 1999), changing the occupational exposure limit for MVF to the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) threshold limit value (TLV) of 1 f/cm3. The report features recommendations by the subcommittee as well as information gaps found throughout investigation. Overall, the subcommittee found that the Navy made a good start in assessing the health effects of MVF, but needed further research.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!