National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Read this book online, free! Click here to proceed to linked table of contents

Preserving Public Trust:

Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs

Book Cover

Status: Available Now

Size: 232 pages, 6 x 9

Publication Year:2001


E-mail this page
Print List Price    
Order online and save 10%
PAPERBACK
ISBN-10: 0-309-07328-6
ISBN-13: 978-0-309-07328-8
$44.00   Add to Cart
PDF     About PDF

Authors:
Committee on Assessing the System for Protecting Human Research Subjects, Board on Health Sciences Policy, Institute of Medicine
Authoring Organizations

Description:
Amid increasing concern for patient safety and the shutdown of prominent research operations, the need to improve protections for individuals who volunteer to participate in research has become critical. Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs considers ...
Read More


Paste into your Web page:

Preview
Free Resources
Read

Full Text
Jump to this book's table of contents to begin reading online for free.

Research Tools
Download Free

PDF Summary
Download the summary in PDF.

Report In Brief
Download report in brief in PDF.

Rights & Permissions

Reprint Permission
Request permission to license or reprint the book's content through Copyright Clearance Center's Rightslink.

Request Permission to Distribute a PDF

Request Translation Rights

Questions About Rights and Permissions?

Description

Amid increasing concern for patient safety and the shutdown of prominent research operations, the need to improve protections for individuals who volunteer to participate in research has become critical. Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs considers the possible impact of creating an accreditation system to raise the performance of local protection mechanisms. In the United States, the system for human research participant protections has centered on the Institutional Review Board (IRB); however, this report envisions a broader system with multiple functional elements.

In this context, two draft sets of accreditation standards are reviewed (authored by Public Responsibility in Medicine & Research and the National Committee for Quality Assurance) for their specific content in core areas, as well as their objectivity and validity as measurement tools. The recommendations in the report support the concept of accreditation as a quality improvement strategy, suggesting that the model should be initially pursued through pilot testing of the proposed accreditation programs.

Search This Book

»Find more like this book

SIGN UP FOR...

New Title Emails
Read about the newest releases and receive special offers.