A new book from the National Research Council recommends changes in how the federal government evaluates the efficiency of research at EPA and other agencies. Assessing efficiency should be considered only one part of gauging a program's quality, relevance, and effectiveness. The efficiency of research processes and that of investments should be evaluated using different approaches. Investment efficiency should examine whether an agency's R&D portfolio, including the budget, is relevant, of high quality, matches the agency's strategic plan. These evaluations require panels of experts. In contrast, process efficiency should focus on "inputs" (the people, funds, and facilities dedicated to research) and "outputs" (the services, grants, publications, monitoring, and new techniques produced by research), as well as their timelines and should be evaluated using quantitative measures. The committee recommends that the efficiency of EPA's research programs be evaluated according to the same standards used at other agencies. To ensure this, OMB should train and oversee its budget examiners so that the PART questionnaire is implemented consistently and equitably across agencies.
Table of Contents
|Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency||1-2|
|1 Introduction: The Government Performance and Results Act, the Program Assessment Rating Tool, and the Environmental Protection Agency||11-20|
|2 Efficiency Metrics Used by the Environmental Protection Agency and Other Federal Research and Development Programs||21-37|
|3 Are the Efficiency Metrics Used by Federal Research and Development Programs Sufficient and Outcome-Based?||38-51|
|4 A Model for Evaluating Research and Development Programs||52-57|
|5 Findings, Principles, and Recommendations||58-68|
|Appendix A: Biographic Information on the Committee on Evaluating the Efficiency of Research and Development Programs at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency||69-74|
|Appendix B: Evaluating the Efficiency of Research and Development Programs at the Environmental Protection Agency: Workshop Summary||75-85|
|Appendix C: Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) Questions||86-89|
|Appendix D: The Environmental Protection Agency's Strategic and Multi-year Planning Process||90-94|
|Appendix E: Agency and Industry Efficiency Measures||95-108|
|Appendix F: Draft Board of Scientific Counselors Handbook for Subcommittee Chairs: Draft Proposed Charge Questions for BOSC Reviews||109-112|
|Appendix G: OMB's Research and Development Program Investment Criteria||113-118|
|Appendix H: Charge to the BOSC Subcommittee on Safe Pesticides/Safe Products Research||119-127|
|Appendix I: PART Guidance on Efficiency Measures||128-132|
The National Academies Press (NAP) has partnered with Copyright Clearance Center's Rightslink service to offer you a variety of options for reusing NAP content. Through Rightslink, you may request permission to reprint NAP content in another publication, course pack, secure website, or other media. Rightslink allows you to instantly obtain permission, pay related fees, and print a license directly from the NAP website. The complete terms and conditions of your reuse license can be found in the license agreement that will be made available to you during the online order process. To request permission through Rightslink you are required to create an account by filling out a simple online form. The following list describes license reuses offered by the National Academies Press (NAP) through Rightslink:
Click here to obtain permission for the above reuses. If you have questions or comments concerning the Rightslink service, please contact:
Rightslink Customer Care
Tel (toll free): 877/622-5543
To request permission to distribute a PDF, please contact our Customer Service Department at 800-624-6242 for pricing.
To request permission to translate a book published by the National Academies Press or its imprint, the Joseph Henry Press, please click here to view more information.