. "5 Guiding Principles for Selecting Reference Values for Nutrition Labeling." Dietary Reference Intakes: Guiding Principles for Nutrition Labeling and Fortification. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2003.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Dietary Reference Intakes: Guiding Principles for Nutrition Labeling and Fortification
The committee recommends that the DVs be based on population-weighted values of the EARs for the different life stage and gender groups. This is because the EAR represents the most accurate reflection of the true contribution of a particular food to total nutrient needs in the general population. A fundamental assumption underlying the committee’s recommendation is that the DV (expressed as % DV) is intended not only to help individuals compare different products within a food type, but also to help them understand nutrition information about foods “… in the context of a total daily diet” (NLEA, P.L. 101-535). To fulfill this function, the DV must take into account that nutrient requirements differ not only by life stage and gender group, but also within any single life stage and gender group. The best point of comparison for the nutrient contribution of a particular food to an individual’s total nutrient needs is the individual’s nutrient requirement, which is almost never known, but can be represented by the median of the requirement distribution (EAR). The logic is described in the following paragraphs.
The recommendation that DVs be based on population-weighted EARs arose from the examination of two questions. First, given a distribution of requirements, how should a single numerical characterization be obtained? Second, given a collection of distributions of requirements corresponding to different subpopulations, how should these be combined to produce a single, meaningful DV?
The true requirement of any one individual is almost never known, but it can be estimated from the DRIs. For nutrients for which the distributions of nutrient requirements for particular life stage and gender groups have been characterized, the best estimate of an individual’s requirement is the EAR for the life stage and gender group to which he or she belongs. This is because levels of intake above or below the EAR will have a greater likelihood of systematically over- or underestimating an individual’s needs. Mathematically, the most appropriate single numerical characterization of a distribution of requirements is typically the median. For symmetrical distributions, the median is equal to the mean. By definition the EAR is the median of the estimated distribution of requirements for a particular life stage and gender group (IOM, 1997); therefore the EAR represents the best estimate of the nutrient requirement for individuals within a specific life stage and gender group. The probability that any individual in the group has a nutrient requirement above the EAR is 0.5. This probability declines as requirement levels rise above the EAR, falling to 0.025 at the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA). The RDA overstates the needs for 97.5 percent of the population in terms of a specific