Questions? Call 800-624-6242 About | Ordering | New Menu | Items in cart [0] SEARCH

PAPERBACK price:$37.00 add to cart Rights & Permissions Free PDF Access Sign in to download PDF book and chapters Free Resources PDF SUMMARY Display this book on your site! Related Titles Improving Metrics for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program Countering Biological Threats:Challenges for the Department of Defense's Nonproliferation Program Beyond the Former Soviet Union Other Related Titles Global Security Engagement: A New Model for Cooperative Threat Reduction (2009) Committee on International Security and Arms Control (CISAC) Citation Manager Export the bibliographic data for this book in your chosen format Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web. Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book. Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic. Citation Manager . "Appendix H: A Comparison of the Characteristics of Six Weapons Systems from the Perspective of a State or Terrorist Organization." Global Security Engagement: A New Model for Cooperative Threat Reduction. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009. Please select a format: Page 155   E-mail Share on facebook Facebook Share on delicious Delicious Share on stumbleupon Stumble Share on twitter Twitter More Sharing ServicesMore The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. Appendix H A Comparison of the Characteristics of Six Weapons Systems from the Perspective of a State or Terrorist Organization1 Legend Detectable signature? No, Maybe, Yes Barriers to development Very High, High, Moderate, Low Technical experts Many, Some, Few, Very Few Casualty potential Very High, High, Moderate, Low, Low (High Economic), Very Low Is technical capability a limitation? Yes, No Availability of materials Few, Some, Many Access to materials Very Poor, Poor, Good, Very Good, Universal Intelligence target Very Hard, Hard, Moderately Hard, Moderately Easy Dual use Yes, No Trackable/detectable? Yes, Maybe Attribution possibility? High, Moderate, Low, Very low 1 Table developed by Dr. David Franz. Page 155 Front Matter (R1-R14) Executive Summary (1-4) Overview (5-16) Introduction (17-20) 1 The Evolution of Cooperative Threat Reduction (21-38) 2 Cooperative Threat Reduction in the 21st Century: Objectives, Opportunities, and Lessons (39-68) 3 The Form and Function of Cooperative Threat Reduction 2.0: Engaging Partners to Enhance Global Security (69-98) 4 The Role of the Department of Defense in Cooperative Threat Reduction 2.0 (99-116) 5 Cooperative Threat Reduction 2.0: Implementation Checklist (117-122) List of Acronyms (123-126) Appendixes (127-128) Appendix A: H.R. 1585: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (129-132) Appendix B: Biographical Sketches of Committee Members (133-138) Appendix C: Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program History: References (139-140) Appendix D: List of Committee Meetings and Speakers (141-142) Appendix E: The Evolution of U.S. Government Threat Reduction Programs (143-148) Appendix F: Nunn-Lugar Scorecard (149-150) Appendix G: The G8 Global Partnership: Guidelines for New or Expanded Cooperation Projects (151-154) Appendix H: A Comparison of the Characteristics of Six Weapons Systems from the Perspective of a State or Terrorist Organization (155-158) Appendix I: Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Programs (159-162) Appendix J: Congressional Guidelines and Corresponding Findings and Recommendations (163-166)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 155
Global Security Engagement: A New Model for Cooperative Threat Reduction Appendix H A Comparison of the Characteristics of Six Weapons Systems from the Perspective of a State or Terrorist Organization1 Legend Detectable signature? No, Maybe, Yes Barriers to development Very High, High, Moderate, Low Technical experts Many, Some, Few, Very Few Casualty potential Very High, High, Moderate, Low, Low (High Economic), Very Low Is technical capability a limitation? Yes, No Availability of materials Few, Some, Many Access to materials Very Poor, Poor, Good, Very Good, Universal Intelligence target Very Hard, Hard, Moderately Hard, Moderately Easy Dual use Yes, No Trackable/detectable? Yes, Maybe Attribution possibility? High, Moderate, Low, Very low 1 Table developed by Dr. David Franz.

OCR for page 156
Global Security Engagement: A New Model for Cooperative Threat Reduction   Nuclear Biological Chemical   State Substate State Substate State Substate Detectable signature? Yes Maybe Maybe Maybe Yes Maybe Barriers to development High Very High Moderate Moderate Low Moderate Technical experts Few Very Few Many Very Few Many Few Casualty potential Very High Very High Very High to Very Low High to Very Low Moderate to Low Low Is technical capability a limitation? Yes Yes No Yes No No Availability of materials Few Many Many Some Some Few Access to materials Poor Very Poor Good Poor Very Good Good Intelligence target Moderately Easy Moderately Hard Very Hard Very Hard Moderately Hard Hard Dual use Yes N/A Yes N/A Yes N/A Trackable/detectable? Yes Maybe Maybe Maybe Maybe Maybe Attribution possibility? High to Moderate Moderate Low Very Low Low Very Low

OCR for page 157
Global Security Engagement: A New Model for Cooperative Threat Reduction   Radiological Conventional Explosive Cyber   State Substate State Substate State Substate Detectable signature? Maybe Maybe No No Maybe Maybe Barriers to development Low Moderate Low Low Low Low Technical experts Some Few Many Many Many Some Casualty potential Low (High Economic) Low (High Economic) High to Low High to Low N/A N/A Is technical capability a limitation? No Yes No No No No Availability of materials Some Some Many Many Universal Universal Access to materials Good Poor Very Good Good Universal Universal Intelligence target Very Hard Hard Very Hard Very Hard Hard Hard Dual Use Yes N/A Yes N/A No N/A Trackable/detectable? Maybe Maybe Maybe Maybe Maybe Maybe Attribution possibility? Low Very Low Low Very Low Moderate Moderate

OCR for page 158
Global Security Engagement: A New Model for Cooperative Threat Reduction This page intentionally left blank.