Click for next page ( 96


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 95
APPENDIX A References The papers, books, reports, and websites referred to in the guidebook and its appendices are listed here. An annotated bibliography is also developed in this research which can be found in TCRP Web-Only Document 41, available at http://trb.org/news/blurb_detail.asp?id=9886. (2000). "CM/GC White Paper, Public Contracting Coalition." OR. (2002). "Design-Build White Paper, Public Contracting Coalition." OR. 3D/International, Inc. (2005). CM at Risk. Available at http://www.3di.com/toolbox/cmatrisk.pdf (accessed April 1, 2005). AIA Minnesota (2006). "Understanding Project Delivery for the Design and Construction of Public Buildings." AIA Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. Allen, L. N., D. D. Gransberg, and K. R. Molenaar (2002). "Partnering Successful Design-Build Contracts in the Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest Division." The Military Engineer, Vol. 94 (616), 4748. American Institute of Architects (AIA) (2005). Construction Manager at-Risk State Statute Com- pendium. AIA Government Affairs, American Institute of Architects, Washington, DC, 125129. American Institute of Architects, California Council (1996). Handbook on Project Delivery. Sacra- mento. American Institute of Architects, California Council, Sacramento, CA. Associated General Contractors (2004). Project Delivery Systems for Construction. Associated Gen- eral Contractors of America, Arlington, VA. Beard, J., Loulakis, M., and Wundram, E. (2001). Design-Build: Planning Through Development. RR Donnelley, Chicago, IL. Bearup, W., Kenig, M., and O'Donnell, J. (2007). "Alternative Delivery Methods, A Primer." Pro- ceedings, ACI-NA Project Delivery Summit II, Airport Board Members and Commissioners Annual Conference. Airports Council International-North America, Chicago, IL. Chan, A., Yung, K., Lam, P., Tam, C., Cheung, S. (2001). "Application of Delphi Method in Selection of Procurement Systems for Construction Projects." Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 19, 699718. Chang, K. (2004). "Multiattribute Weighting Models for Best-Value Selection in Public Sector Design-Build Projects." Ph.D. dissertation, University of Colorado. Construction Industry Institute (CII) (1997). "Project Delivery Systems: CM at Risk, Design- Build, Design-Bid-Build." Research Summary RS 133-1, CII, Austin, TX. Construction Industry Institute (CII) (2003). "Owner's Tool for Project Delivery and Contract Strategy Selection." Research Summary RS 165-1, CII, Austin, TX. Debella, D. C., and Ries, R. (2006). "Construction Delivery Systems: A Comparative Analysis of Their Performance within School Districts." Journal of Construction Engineering and Man- agement, Vol. 132, No. 11, 11311138. El Wardani, M., Messner, J., Horman, M. (2006). "Comparing Procurement Methods for Design- Build Projects." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 132, No. 3, 230238. 95

OCR for page 95
96 A Guidebook for the Evaluation of Project Delivery Methods FTA (2003). Third Party Contracting Requirements--Circular 4220.1E. FTA, U.S. DOT, Washington, D.C. FTA (2006). Annual Report on New Starts: Proposed Allocation of Funds for Fiscal Year 2007-- Report of the Secretary of Transportation to the United States Congress Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 5309(k)(1). FTA, U.S. DOT, Washington, DC. FTA (2007). "PMO Operating Procedures No. 40, Risk Management Products and Procedures" (internal document). FTA, U.S. DOT. Garvin, M. (2003). "Role of Project Delivery Systems in Infrastructure Improvement," in Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation in Construction--Proceedings of Construction Research Congress, March 1921, 2003, Honolulu, HI. Eds. Keith R. Molenaar and Paul S. Chinowsky (CD-ROM). ASCE, Reston, VA. Ghavamifar, K., and Touran, A. (2008). "Alternative Project Delivery Systems: Applications and Legal Limits in Transportation Projects." Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Educa- tion and Practice, Vol. 134, No. 1, 106111. Gordon, C. M. (1994). "Choosing Appropriate Construction Contracting Method," Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 120, No. 1, 196210. Gordon & Rees LLP (2005). "The Basics of Design Build," Construction Group Newsletter, Gor- don & Rees LLP, San Francisco, CA. Graham, P. (2001). "Evaluation of Design-Build Practice in Colorado IR IM(CX) 025-3(113)." Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, CO. Gransberg, D. D., and Barton, R. F. (2007a). "Analysis of Federal Design-Build Request for Pro- posal Evaluation Criteria," Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 23 (2), April 2007, pp. 105111. Gransberg, D. D., Badillo-Kwiatkowski, G. M., and Molenaar, K. R. (2003). "Project Delivery Comparison Using Performance Metrics." Presentation at 2003 Transactions, AACE Inter- national, Orlando, FL, pp. DRM 02.0102.06. Gransberg, D. D., and Molenaar, K. R. (2004). Analysis of Owner's Design and Construction Qual- ity Management Approaches in Design/Build Projects, Journal of Management in Engineering, 20(4). Gransberg, D. D. and Molenaar, K. R. (2007b). The Impacts of Design-Build on the Public Work- force, Research Paper 07-01, USC Keston Institute for Public Finance and Infrastructure Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. Halpin, D. W. (2006). Construction Management, 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, New York. Harrington-Hughes, K. (2002). TCRP Research Results Digest 53: International Transit Studies Program Report on the Spring 2001 Mission--Design-Build Transit Infrastructure Projects in Asia and Australia. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC. Ibbs, C. W., Kwak, Y., Odabasi, A. (2003). "Project Delivery System and Project Change: A Quan- titative Analysis." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 129, No. 4, 382387. Irwin, D. (2003). "Developing the Design and Construction Contracting Plan for a Major Light Rail Extension Project." Transportation Research Circular E-C058: The 9th Annual National Light Rail Conference--Experience, Economics, and Evolution--From Starter Lines to Growing Systems. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 557575. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/circulars/ec058/ec058.pdf. Kessler, F. (2005). "Managing Your Money: Project Delivery Methods." MassTransit, April 2005, 2639. http://www.nossaman.com/showarticle.aspx?show=913 (accessed March 20, 2007). Kumaraswamy, M. M., and Dissanayaka, S. M. (1998). "Linking Procurement Systems to Proj- ect Priorities," Building Research and Information, Vol. 26, No. 4, 223238. Konchar, M., and V. Sanvido (1998). "Comparison of U.S. Project Delivery Systems." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 124, No. 6, 435444.

OCR for page 95
Appendix A 97 Loulakis, M. (2000). Project Delivery Systems: Evaluating Owner's Alternatives. A/E/C Training Technologies, Reston, VA. Loulakis, M. (2005). Construction Project Delivery Systems: Evaluating the Owner's Alternatives. (CD-ROM). A/E/C Training Technologies, Reston, VA. Mahdi, I. M., and Al-Reshaid, K. (2005). "Decision Support System for Selecting the Proper Project Delivery Method Using Analytical Hierarchy Process." International Journal of Proj- ect Management, 23, 564572. Minchin, E., Thakkar, K., Ellis, R. (2007). "Miami Intermodal Center--Introducing `CM-At-Risk' to Transportation Construction." In Molenaar, K. R., and Yakowenko, G., Eds., Alternative Project Delivery, Procurement, and Contracting Methods for Highways, 4659. ASCE Press, Reston, VA. Mitchell, B. P. (1999). "The Applicability of the Spearin Doctrine: Do Owners Warrant Plans and Specifications?" FindLaw for Legal Professionals. http://library.findlaw.com/1999/Aug/1/ 128038.html (accessed March 24, 2007). Molenaar, K. R. (2005). "Programmatic Cost Risk Analysis for Highway Megaprojects." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 131, No. 3, 343353. Molenaar, K. R., and Scott, S. (2003). "Examining the Performance of Design-Build in the Pub- lic Sector." In Loulakis, M., Ed., Design-Build for the Public Sector, 71112. Aspen Business and Law, Aspen Publishers, New York, NY. Molenaar, K. R., Gransberg, D. D., Scott, S., Downs, D., and Ellis, R. (2005). "Recommended AASHTO Design-Build Procurement Guide." Final Report for NCHRP Project 20-7(172). Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC. North Carolina State Construction Office (2005). "Construction Management-At-Risk Selection Procedures." http://interscope2.doa.state.nc.us/Guidelines/CM@RISK%20SELECTION% 20PROCEDURES.pdf (accessed January 31, 2005). Oyetunji, A. A, Anderson, S. D., (2006). "Relative Effectiveness of Project Delivery and Contract Strategies." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 132, No. 1, 313. Parsons, Inc., Touran, A., and Golder Associates. (2004). "Risk Analysis Methodologies and Pro- cedures." Prepared for the FTA. Riley, D. R., Diller, B. E., Kerr, D. (2005). "Effects of Delivery Systems on Change Order Size and Frequency in Mechanical Construction." Journal of Construction Engineering and Manage- ment, Vol. 131, No. 9, 953962. Saaty, T. L. (1990). Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytical Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA. Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), AECOM Consult, and the University of Colorado at Boulder (2006). Design-Build Effectiveness Study--As Required by TEA-21 Sec- tion 1307(f). FHWA, U.S. DOT, Washington, DC. www.fhwa.dot.gov/reports/designbuild/ designbuild0.htm (accessed August 30, 2006). Scott, S. Molenaar, K. R., Gransberg, D. D., Smith, N. C. (2006). NCHRP Report 561: Best Value Procurement Methods for Highway Construction Projects. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC. Skitmore, R. M., and Marsden, D. E. (1988). "Which Procurement System? Towards a Universal Procurement Selection Technique." Construction Management and Economics, 6, 7189. Smith, N. and Davis, B. J. (2006). "50-State Survey of Transportation Agency Design-Build Authority." Nossaman, Guthner, Knox & Elliot LLP. www.nossaman.com/showArticle. aspx?show=925 (accessed December 12, 2006). Temesi, J. (2006). "Consistency of Decision Maker in Pairwise Comparisons." International Jour- nal of Management and Decision Making, Vol. 7, No. 2/3, 267274. Touran, A., Bolster, P. J., and Thayer, S. W. (1994). Risk Assessment in Fixed Guideway Construction. DOT-T-95-01, FTA, U.S. DOT, Washington, D.C.

OCR for page 95
98 A Guidebook for the Evaluation of Project Delivery Methods Walewski, J. Gibson, Jr., G. E., Jasper, J. (2001). Project Delivery Methods and Contracting Approaches Available for Implementation by the Texas Department of Transportation. FHWA/TX-0-2129-1. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX. Weber, M., and Borcherding, K. (1993). "Behavioral Influences on Weight Judgments in Multi- attribute Decision Making," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 67, 112. Wiss, R. A., Roberts, R. T., Phraner, S. D. (2000). "Beyond Design-Build-Operate-Maintain: New Partnership Approach Toward Fixed Guideway Transit Projects." In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1704, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1318. Woodman, G. K., Starke, J. S., and Schwartz, L. D. (1995). TCRP Legal Research Digest 4: Transit Labor Protection-A Guide to Section 13(c) Federal Transit Act. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.