Questions? Call 888-624-8373

HARDBACK + PDF
your price: $50.50
add to cart

HARDBACK
list:$42.95
Web:$38.66
add to cart

PDF BOOK
your price: $33.00
add to cart

PDF CHAPTERS
your price: $3.90
select

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Marijuana and Medicine: Assessing the Science Base (1999)
Institute of Medicine (IOM)

Page
220
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Page 220

11. Bouaboula M, Perrachon S, Milligan L, Canat X, Rinaldi-Carmona M, Portier MB, Calandra B, Pecceu F, Lupker J, Maffrand JP, Le Fur G, Casellas P. 1997. A selective inverse agonist for central cannabinoid receptor inhibits mitogen-activated protein kinase activation stimulated by insulin or insulin-like growth factor 1. Evidence for a new model of receptor/ligand interactions. Journal of Biological Chemistry 272:2233022339.

12. Calhoun, SR, Galloway GP, Smith DE. 1998. Abuse potential of dronabinol (Marinol). Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 30:187-196.

13. Cooper RM. 1980. Therapeutic use of marijuana and heroin: The legal framework. Food Drug Cosmetic Law Journal 35:68-82.

14. DEA (Drug Enforcement Administration). 1992. Marijuana scheduling petition; denial of petition; remand. Federal Register 57:10499-10508.

15. DEA. 1998. Drugs of abuse [WWW document].URL http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/ pubs/abuse/contents.htm (accessed September 1998).

16. DEA. 1996. The National Narcotics Intelligence Consumers Committee (NNICC) report [WWW document].URL www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/intel/nnicc97.htm  (accessed September 1998).

17. DEA. 1998b. Rescheduling of synthetic dronabinol from Schedule II to Schedule III. Federal Register 63:59751-59753.

18. DiMasi JA, Brown JS, Lasagna L. 1996. An analysis of regulatory review times of supplemental indications for already-approved drugs: 1989-1994. Drug Information Journal 30:315-337.

19. DiMasi JA, Hanson RW, Grabowski HG, Lasagna L. 1995. Research and development costs for new drugs by therapeutic category: A study of the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Pharmaco Economics 7:152-169.

20. FDA (Food and Drug Administration). 1990. From Test Tube to Patient: New Drug Development in the United States. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

21. FDA. 1997b. Draft Guidelines for Research Involving the Abuse Liability Assessment of New Drugs. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Division of Anesthetic, Critical Care and Addiction Drug Products.

22. FDA. 1997a. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Fact Book [WWW document]. URL http://www.fda.gov/cder/homepage (accessed September 1998).

23. FDA. 1998a. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Handbook [WWW document]. URL http://www.fda/cder/handbook.htm  (accessed September 1998).

24a. FDA. 1998b. FDA proposes rules for dissemination information on off label uses (press release, June 5). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

24. FDA. 1998c. Guidance for industry: Providing clinical evidence of effectiveness for human drugs and biological products. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. May 1998 [WWW document].URL http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/1397fnl.pdf (accessed September 1998).

25. FDA. 1998d. Office of Orphan Products Development Program Overview [WWW document].URL http://www.fda.gov/orphan/DESIGNAT/recent.htm  (accessed October 14, 1998).

26. Felder CC, Glass M. 1998. Cannabinoid receptors and their endogenous agonists. Annual Reviews of Pharmacology and Toxicology 38:179-200.

27. Glain SJ. 1998. 1. Wall Street Journal.

28. Gollin MA. 1994. Patenting recipes from nature's kitchen: How can a naturally occurring chemical like taxol be patented? Biotechnology (NY) 12:406-407.

Page
220