National Academies Press: OpenBook

Bus Use of Shoulders (2006)

Chapter: Appendix B - Survey Respondents

« Previous: Appendix A - Screening Questionnaires
Page 52
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Survey Respondents." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2006. Bus Use of Shoulders. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13950.
×
Page 52
Page 53
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Survey Respondents." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2006. Bus Use of Shoulders. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13950.
×
Page 53

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

52 Arizona Maricopa Association of Governments, Phoenix Pima Association of Governments, Tucson California Caltrans District 11 Central Contra Costa County Transit Authority, Concord Golden Empire Transit, Bakersfield Kern Council of Governments, Bakersfield Metropolitan Transportation Commission, San Francisco Bay Area Monterey—Salinas Transit San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) Santa Barbara Council of Governments South Coast Area Transit, Oxnard Colorado Denver Regional Council of Governments North Front Range Metropolitan Planning Organization, Fort Collins Connecticut Capitol Region Council of Governments, Hartford State Department of Transportation Delaware Delaware Transit Corporation State Department of Transportation Florida Florida Turnpike Enterprise Metroplan, Orlando State Department of Transportation Georgia Georgia Regional Transportation Authority State Department of Transportation Hawaii Oahu Metropolitan Planning Organization Illinois State Department of Transportation Indiana Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation Iowa State Department of Transportation Kansas State Department of Transportation Kentucky Kentuckiana Regional Planning and Development Agency, Louisville Louisiana Capitol Region Planning Commission, Baton Rouge State Department of Transportation Maine State Department of Transportation Maryland State Transit Administration Michigan Tri-County Regional Planning Commission, Lansing Minnesota Metro Transit, Minneapolis Mississippi State Department of Transportation Missouri Mid-America Regional Council, Kansas City State Department of Transportation Montana State Department of Transportation Nebraska Department of Roads Nevada Regional Planning Commission of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas New Hampshire State Department of Transportation New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission New Jersey Transit Corporation State Department of Transportation New York State Department of Transportation APPENDIX B Survey Respondents

53 North Carolina Charlotte Transit Ohio Metro Regional Transit Authority, Akron Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency, Cleveland Oregon State Department of Transportation Pennsylvania Southeastern Pennsylvania Transit Authority (SEPTA) Rhode Island State Department of Transportation South Carolina Central Midlands Council of Governments, Columbia State Department of Transportation Tennessee Knoxville Regional Transportation Planning Organization State Department of Transportation Texas Houston Galveston Area Council State Department of Transportation Utah State Department of Transportation Wasatch Front Region Council, Salt Lake City Virginia Hampton Roads Planning District Commission State Department of Transportation Washington Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, Seattle Pierce Transit, Tacoma Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council, Vancouver State Department of Transportation West Virginia State Department of Transportation Ontario Ottawa GO Transit, Toronto Toronto Transit Commission British Columbia Translink Vancouver Victoria Regional Transit System In addition to the survey respondents that are listed here, a number of other agencies were contacted by phone to follow suggested leads. These telephone inquires included the Massachusetts Highways, Boston Central Transportation Planning Staff, and Miami–Dade Transit.

Next: Appendix C - Supporting Materials from Case Studies »
Bus Use of Shoulders Get This Book
×
 Bus Use of Shoulders
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB's Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Synthesis 64: Bus Use of Shoulders explores transit agencies' experiences with policies and regulations that permit buses to use shoulders on arterial roads or freeways to bypass congestion either as interim or long-term treatments. The report examines the issue from the transit and highway perspectives.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!